Jump to content

Was The Tyrod Taylor Era a Success?


Was The Tyrod Taylor Era A Success?  

139 members have voted

  1. 1. Was The Tyrod Taylor Era A Success?

    • Yes
      98
    • No
      41


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Putin said:

I still can't believe we got a 3rd round pick for him , 

 

 

he can play

 

the Eagles won with two nobodies that ran a perfect system, so anything can happen if you try to adapt to reality

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

 

he can play

 

the Eagles won with two nobodies that ran a perfect system, so anything can happen if you try to adapt to reality

 

That nobody was going for the league MVP before he got hurt 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

8-8

7-9

9-7 (backing into playoffs)

 

We (generally speaking) only consider this "success," because we're Bills fans.

 

That is a crappy three seasons and I, personally, do not consider it a successful run.  That's not all on Tyrod.  It's a team game.

 

And this team stunk the entire time he was here.

right. it's all a matter of perspective. we were a .500 team before he arrived and we were a .500 team during his tenure. the poster who said we backed into the playoffs is correct, if not for Andy Dalton, it wouldn't have happened.  now, if your Cleveland and he plays .500 ball you will view him as an overwhelming success.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Putin said:

That nobody was going for the league MVP before he got hurt 

 

that was a SYSTEM victory, plain and simple, any decent QB could have filled in for the Eagles, didn't even need a decent QB

 

now the opposition will be ready for it in the season coming up.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

that was a SYSTEM victory, plain and simple, any decent QB could have filled in for the Eagles, didn't even need a decent QB

 

now the opposition will be ready for it in the season coming up.

 

 

Really? Your telling me Tyrod would have come in and would have done what Foles win the SB ?

There's no way in hell Tyrod could have made half of the throws that Foles made system or not

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wouldn't say it was an overwhelming success. i would say it was a moderate one. they took another teams unproven backup and then....

 

he won slightly more than he lost

we never broke the bank for him

made the playoffs

and then turned said backup into the 1st pick of the 3rd round. which could potentially be ammo for the future franchise guy.

 

i'm cool with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How could they not be considered a success.  He was signed as a backup with upside to compete.  He competed and won the starting job, and led us to the playoffs... he doesn’t have to be the long term solution for me to consider his time here a success.... I think for what he was, his time was about the best that we could have hoped for....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a success. not a complete failure either. success would of been developing in to the franchise guy this team has lacked for far too many years to count.

 

the playoffs may of never happened if not for the defense playing as they did early on in the season or they could very well finished 5-11/6-10 and not sniffed the playoffs.

 

that said, he was part of the team that won enough to have an opportunity for a wild card and ended the drought and I am grateful for that.

 

you have to also credit andy dalton and the bengals for their help in getting the bills in to the post season, made for some real excitement at the end of the season.

 

the first year gave me hope, the second season I started to question and last season I lost all hope he would be the future.

 

I would not really rate him as successful yet I wish him well as the browns stop gap where maybe there when their future (likely drafted rookie) is ready to take over he can accept a back up role?

 

 

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A success. Won more than he lost ( I think), got the drought off the franchise's back. Although that took some fortuitous happenings: the Bills were 9-7 under Orton in 2014 as well but missed the posteseason. For what Taylor is, it's a ( modest ) success. The new FO realized his ceiling  had been reached and moved on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't exactly call scoring 3 points in the Playoffs, then being traded to the worst team in the NFL a success.   I wouldn't call it a complete failure either. Tyrod instead of still being a backup, got to start for a borderline playoff team. Then on his last year with that team, the cards played out to actually favor the Bills and they crawled into the Playoffs making him look interesting to a few teams so he could continue on. 

 

The Bills pulled a 3rd rounder and snuck into the Playoffs and that was a win. It wasn't being successful because we are now in transition from it. If Tyrod had a successful year with Bills they wouldn't of traded him. 

 

Tyrod can have flashes of being good. I think he actually can win some games for you. I also think he can manage a stalled out offensive games and do nothing to win it for you. I seen that at least a few times last season. 

 

I think Tyrod can win some games for the Browns. I also think if other teams defensive plans get in his head he will run some stalled out games. 

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to define "success" for the conversation to have any meaning.

 

If measured by whether or not we had a chance to win the Superbowl, no, Tyrod was never successful.

 

We never even had a chance to win a playoff game with him, let alone a Superbowl.  Some of us were saying that for the entirety of his stay in Buffalo.  His ceiling is what it is and lucking backwards into a wildcard berth for a playoff loss is about as far as Tyrod is going to take you.

 

No way that can be considered "successful".

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

This stat includes playoffs which means after 17 years without a QB that could say this, it WAS a success IMHO.

 

Not success   

 

 

Looked worse than Tj Yates, Brock Osweiler, and Tim Tebow did. 

 

Edited by Teddy KGB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wins and losses are a function of the team, so I'll leave that out of the discussion.  I voted for failure for one simple reason that everyone keeps beating around the bush about.  Taylor was incapable of carrying the team on his back when the team needed him to do exactly that.  There were many games where the Bills defense and special teams absolutely stymied opposing teams offenses and Taylor did nothing.  When teams schemed to make him beat them as a passer, he couldn't do it.  Some QB's aren't good at the two minute drill.  Tyrod looks inept whether under the constraint of the clock or not.  At his position, I can't rate him as anything other than failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, no.  It was not a success.  We were no better than we were during any of the years in the drought.  We were just as mediocre as before:  not bad enough to get a good draft pick but not good to have a realistic shot at the superbowl.  The definition of mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it was a success. The Bills broke the drought and he left the team in much better shape than when he got here. There is a process in sports that teams go through (sorry to use that word). You usually don’t go from out of the playoffs to champion (I realize that just happened). You usually have to be tested some. The Bills are AT LEAST a step ahead of where they were when he joined the team. I don’t know how that can be considered anything but successful?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...