Jump to content

Bills offense compared to 2020 by the numbers, and they may shock you.


FireChans

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Your solution to one set of data being incomplete is to make both incomplete? 
Incredible statistic work.

 

I understand that you're being sarcastic here, but it may well be appropriate to do this, from a statistical standpoint.  At best, you can't say a priori it's more appropriate to compare a full and a partial data set.  And by the way, if I'm remembering correctly, @billsfan1959 has some good statistical background and actually knows more about this than the Average Bear, maybe more than I do since for much of my professional life I had the support of professional statisticians.

 

There are a number of factors that go into sound statistical practice.

One of them is comparable size data sets.

One of them is comparable data collection conditions

 

You can compare data sets of unequal sizes, but then you have to use special statistical tools and tests to ask "are these truly different, or are the differences I'm seeing the result of a smaller sample size in one set?"

 

If you have reason to believe that conditions varied during the course of the data collection (as occurs during a football season) it may be statistically appropriate to limit the size of the larger set to correspond to the smaller set.  Is there reason to believe that conditions vary during the season?  Yes, on the one hand weather may worsen, injuries may mount up.  On the other hand, the team may "click" and bond more as the season goes on, or find what they're best at and focus there, or just "practice makes perfect".

 

McDermott has openly said on many occasions that it's his goal for the team to play their best football in Nov and Dec, indicating he is trying to skew the full-season data set towards improvement at the end.

 

So it may well be the best "apples to apples" strategy to compare first 11 games last season to first 11 games this season.  It would probably be inappropriate or cherry picking to perform other comparisons, such as picking the best or worst 11 games from last season to to compare to this season.  It might be less cherry-picking to make a random selection of 11 games, but only if you believe there are no systematic factors that enter into the course of the season (which is probably true - see above).

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Virgil said:

2F5A07A3-BDD0-4537-B2CC-EDFD7625B484.jpeg

Amazingly similar season for Josh. He's slightly better in a few key areas which is extremely impressive considering the drop-off in OL play. A little improvement every game and every season is what you're looking for. We're getting that, it appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, FireChans said:

How can I be ignoring those games when I included every game he’s played? 

Your solution to one set of data being incomplete is to make both incomplete? 
 

Incredible statistic work.

 

We are comparing Josh’s numbers here. Last season compared to this season so far. Sorry I’m not cherry picking his first 11 games last year, you’re welcome to do so but that’s stupid.

 

The only one “manipulating data” is you. I have posted the numbers from every game our QB has played in the regular season in the last two years. Sorry it doesn’t fit your agenda.

 

Dude you are just being foolish now.  So one data set INCLUDES 6 more games that IMPROVED Josh season end numbers...and the other does NOT.  So you want to compare 11 games to 16 games instead of comparing where Josh was at the SAME time last year?  

 

You clearly do not understand statistical analysis to even the slightest.  Or you do, and just want to cherry pick things that don't make sense because doing a FAIR and ACCURATE analysis doesn't prove your biased.  

 

You are literally the definition of confirmation bias.  Where you search for data to support your biased view...and when its not there, you search for different data until you find something you hang your hat on.  

 

Bottom line, Josh is on par with last year through 11 games.  Nothing you can say can change those FACTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Dude you are just being foolish now.  So one data set INCLUDES 6 more games that IMPROVED Josh season end numbers...and the other does NOT.  So you want to compare 11 games to 16 games instead of comparing where Josh was at the SAME time last year?  

 

You clearly do not understand statistical analysis to even the slightest.  Or you do, and just want to cherry pick things that don't make sense because doing a FAIR and ACCURATE analysis doesn't prove your biased.  

 

You are literally the definition of confirmation bias.  Where you search for data to support your biased view...and when its not there, you search for different data until you find something you hang your hat on.  

 

Bottom line, Josh is on par with last year through 11 games.  Nothing you can say can change those FACTS.

And Josh this year is worse than Josh last year when including all of the games. Fact.

 

Sorry Charlie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

And Josh this year is worse than Josh last year when including all of the games. Fact.

 

Sorry Charlie.

 

You have had some pretty knowledgeable posters in this thread point out the flaws in your conclusions based on "statistics." You haven't bothered to respond to most of those points because it is apparent you are unable to do so.

 

At this point, it is clear you are interested in nothing more than manipulating numbers to pass off your opinions as "facts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

You have had some pretty knowledgeable posters in this thread point out the flaws in your conclusions based on "statistics." You haven't bothered to respond to most of those points because it is apparent you are unable to do so.

 

At this point, it is clear you are interested in nothing more than manipulating numbers to pass off your opinions as "facts."

I didn’t even intend this topic to discuss Allen as much as how the offense is still really good, despite the eye test indicating that our offense is worse than last year.

 

You and your cabal tried to make it an “Allen sucks” topic because that’s all you have interest in discussing. No one worth responding to thinks Allen sucks. I refuse to discuss anything with you or Alpha further because that’s all your interested in talking about. I won’t defend a strawman I never stated or implied. Good day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

I didn’t even intend this topic to discuss Allen as much as how the offense is still really good, despite the eye test indicating that our offense is worse than last year.

 

You and your cabal tried to make it an “Allen sucks” topic because that’s all you have interest in discussing. No one worth responding to thinks Allen sucks. I refuse to discuss anything with you or Alpha further because that’s all your interested in talking about. I won’t defend a strawman I never stated or implied. Good day.

 

Actually, I never once even implied that you said "Allen sucks." I even stated that I had no problems saying the offensive efficiency numbers or statistics from this year might not be as good as last year at this point. My issues were simply with how you went about your statistical analyses and your conclusions that you tried to pass off as facts based on "statistics." Your reaction was to simply dig your heels in and double down on your flawed analyses.

 

And you have made it about Allen, from your first post to your last. Your quotes: "Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year."  "Josh this year is worse than Josh last year when including all of the games. Fact."

 

Those are your own words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

Actually, I never once even implied that you said "Allen sucks." I even stated that I had no problems saying the offensive efficiency numbers or statistics from this year might not be as good as last year at this point. My issues were simply with how you went about your statistical analyses and your conclusions that you tried to pass off as facts based on "statistics." Your reaction was to simply dig your heels in and double down on your flawed analyses.

 

And you have made it about Allen, from your first post to your last. Your quotes: "Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year."  "Josh this year is worse than Josh last year when including all of the games. Fact."

 

Those are your own words.

 

1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:


Not fact.  I’m convinced you don’t know what the word “fact” actually means

I’m really not interested anymore guys. You’re pathological. Move along. 

Edited by FireChans
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, FireChans said:

So 2020 was a great offensive season by the Bills. Wonderful, exciting, electric, whatever you want to call it.

 

We can all agree the 2021 offense has its moments where it feels like a continuation of 2020 and moments where it feels like we are back in 2019. But what do the numbers say?

 

1. We are actually better at running the ball this year.

 

Last year, the Bills were 17th in attempts, 20th in yards, 15th in TD's and 20th in YPA.

 

This year, we are 17th in attempts, 11th in yards, 9th in TD's and 9th in YPA.

 

Some of this may be explained by Josh running a bit more (he's averaging 34 YPG compared to 28 last season, but on a similar number of attempts per game 6.4 to 6.3), but the fact remains, we are better at running.

 

2. We are worse through the air this year.

 

Last year, 11th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 3rd in yards, 9th in INT's and 4th in NY/A

 

This year, 8th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 7th in yards, 24th in INT's, and 10th in NY/A.

 

A lot of this is Josh, statistically. He is across the board less efficient and more TO prone compared to last season. Still playing great, still one of the best young QB's in the NFL, but not 2020 Josh.

 

3. On the whole, we are not much different than last year.

 

I have long held the belief that the best statistic to judge a unit to their peers is their "per drive" stats. Not as prone to confabulation due to the defense creating opportunities for the offense etc. 

 

Last year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 15th in TO percentage, 5th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 3rd in points per drive.

 

This year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 12th in TO percentage, 14th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 2nd in points per drive.

 

Outside of the huge difference in time per drive (which may be related to sheer number of possessions due to a great defense), we are still a very similar offense per drive. We score often, we are efficient, we get a lot of yards and we get a lot of points. Our TO% is actually better despite our INT number climbing, likely due to less fumbling overall.

 

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year.

 

The variance we are seeing from Josh is not really uncommon, even among the historically great. Last year, Aaron Rodgers threw for 48 TDs. This year, through 11 games, he has thrown for only 23, which will likely place him in the mid 30's as a season total trendwise. His passer rating is a full 17 points less this year compared to last year.

 

The great QB's have good years, and great years, and insane years. We aren't in an insane year for Josh. We are in a great year. And our offense continues to remain great.

I still swear we are in an insane year for josh and everything will go more smoothly with Feliciano and brown back but maybe I’ll have to eat my words haha we’ll find out soon.  every game he plays his oline is getting whooped like in the afc championship last year. Not to mention all our wins have been blowouts and most of which he has missed time in the 4th quarter…there haven’t been nearly as many shootouts where a late score puts the game away. Our pass blocking was outstanding at times last season 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not shocked, the Bills offense in the first 11 games of 2020 produced three stinkers (Titans, Chiefs and the second Jets game) the defense bailed out the field goal kicking offense against the Jets but the other two games were losses. In 2021 the Bills offense has had three stinkers the Steelers, Jags and Colts games. The rest of the games in 2021 the Bills have scored 26 or more points with all but one (the second Fins game) being a 30 or more point affair. 

 

The Bills in 2020 offensively turned in six good to great performances to end the season they scored 27, 34, 26, 48, 38 and 56 points in the last six games of the season in 2020. Hopefully the Bills in 2021 can find more consistency.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s how I would summarize it:

First, the Bills blowout wins came in the final six games of last season, not in the first eleven. Second, the 2021 Bills have been feast and famine, piling up stats in a number of blowout wins against bad opponents. Let the season play itself out. NE, TB, and NE all on tap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I wonder @FireChans if you have looked at consistency game to game? My perception is that the offense has been more boom or bust in 2021 than in 2020.... but that is perception I haven't crunched the numbers on it. 

 

Football Outsiders measures variance. This year our offense has by far the most variance in the league so we are extremely inconsistent. Last year we were the 13th most consistent. Definitely a big difference. Your perception is accurate.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I understand that you're being sarcastic here, but it may well be appropriate to do this, from a statistical standpoint.  At best, you can't say a priori it's more appropriate to compare a full and a partial data set.  And by the way, if I'm remembering correctly, @billsfan1959 has some good statistical background and actually knows more about this than the Average Bear, maybe more than I do since for much of my professional life I had the support of professional statisticians.

 

There are a number of factors that go into sound statistical practice.

One of them is comparable size data sets.

One of them is comparable data collection conditions

 

You can compare data sets of unequal sizes, but then you have to use special statistical tools and tests to ask "are these truly different, or are the differences I'm seeing the result of a smaller sample size in one set?"

 

If you have reason to believe that conditions varied during the course of the data collection (as occurs during a football season) it may be statistically appropriate to limit the size of the larger set to correspond to the smaller set.  Is there reason to believe that conditions vary during the season?  Yes, on the one hand weather may worsen, injuries may mount up.  On the other hand, the team may "click" and bond more as the season goes on, or find what they're best at and focus there, or just "practice makes perfect".

 

McDermott has openly said on many occasions that it's his goal for the team to play their best football in Nov and Dec, indicating he is trying to skew the full-season data set towards improvement at the end.

 

So it may well be the best "apples to apples" strategy to compare first 11 games last season to first 11 games this season.  It would probably be inappropriate or cherry picking to perform other comparisons, such as picking the best or worst 11 games from last season to to compare to this season.  It might be less cherry-picking to make a random selection of 11 games, but only if you believe there are no systematic factors that enter into the course of the season (which is probably true - see above).

Exactly 

 

The goal is to be the best team in December and January... When it's high stakes football 

 

Lots of teams have been amazing in September and fluttered 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

Exactly 

 

The goal is to be the best team in December and January... When it's high stakes football 

 

Lots of teams have been amazing in September and fluttered 

Well now it is December, let's see what happens..  BTW let's hope they are playing their very best February 13th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2021 at 6:25 PM, FireChans said:

So 2020 was a great offensive season by the Bills. Wonderful, exciting, electric, whatever you want to call it.

 

We can all agree the 2021 offense has its moments where it feels like a continuation of 2020 and moments where it feels like we are back in 2019. But what do the numbers say?

 

1. We are actually better at running the ball this year.

 

Last year, the Bills were 17th in attempts, 20th in yards, 15th in TD's and 20th in YPA.

 

This year, we are 17th in attempts, 11th in yards, 9th in TD's and 9th in YPA.

 

Some of this may be explained by Josh running a bit more (he's averaging 34 YPG compared to 28 last season, but on a similar number of attempts per game 6.4 to 6.3), but the fact remains, we are better at running.

 

2. We are worse through the air this year.

 

Last year, 11th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 3rd in yards, 9th in INT's and 4th in NY/A

 

This year, 8th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 7th in yards, 24th in INT's, and 10th in NY/A.

 

A lot of this is Josh, statistically. He is across the board less efficient and more TO prone compared to last season. Still playing great, still one of the best young QB's in the NFL, but not 2020 Josh.

 

3. On the whole, we are not much different than last year.

 

I have long held the belief that the best statistic to judge a unit to their peers is their "per drive" stats. Not as prone to confabulation due to the defense creating opportunities for the offense etc. 

 

Last year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 15th in TO percentage, 5th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 3rd in points per drive.

 

This year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 12th in TO percentage, 14th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 2nd in points per drive.

 

Outside of the huge difference in time per drive (which may be related to sheer number of possessions due to a great defense), we are still a very similar offense per drive. We score often, we are efficient, we get a lot of yards and we get a lot of points. Our TO% is actually better despite our INT number climbing, likely due to less fumbling overall.

 

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year.

 

The variance we are seeing from Josh is not really uncommon, even among the historically great. Last year, Aaron Rodgers threw for 48 TDs. This year, through 11 games, he has thrown for only 23, which will likely place him in the mid 30's as a season total trendwise. His passer rating is a full 17 points less this year compared to last year.

 

The great QB's have good years, and great years, and insane years. We aren't in an insane year for Josh. We are in a great year. And our offense continues to remain great.

One other big difference is Josh can’t tackle Derrick Henry or Jonathan Taylor or we’d have basically the same record as last year with one egg against the jags 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 11/30/2021 at 6:25 PM, FireChans said:

So 2020 was a great offensive season by the Bills. Wonderful, exciting, electric, whatever you want to call it.

 

We can all agree the 2021 offense has its moments where it feels like a continuation of 2020 and moments where it feels like we are back in 2019. But what do the numbers say?

 

1. We are actually better at running the ball this year.

 

Last year, the Bills were 17th in attempts, 20th in yards, 15th in TD's and 20th in YPA.

 

This year, we are 17th in attempts, 11th in yards, 9th in TD's and 9th in YPA.

 

Some of this may be explained by Josh running a bit more (he's averaging 34 YPG compared to 28 last season, but on a similar number of attempts per game 6.4 to 6.3), but the fact remains, we are better at running.

 

2. We are worse through the air this year.

 

Last year, 11th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 3rd in yards, 9th in INT's and 4th in NY/A

 

This year, 8th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 7th in yards, 24th in INT's, and 10th in NY/A.

 

A lot of this is Josh, statistically. He is across the board less efficient and more TO prone compared to last season. Still playing great, still one of the best young QB's in the NFL, but not 2020 Josh.

 

3. On the whole, we are not much different than last year.

 

I have long held the belief that the best statistic to judge a unit to their peers is their "per drive" stats. Not as prone to confabulation due to the defense creating opportunities for the offense etc. 

 

Last year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 15th in TO percentage, 5th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 3rd in points per drive.

 

This year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 12th in TO percentage, 14th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 2nd in points per drive.

 

Outside of the huge difference in time per drive (which may be related to sheer number of possessions due to a great defense), we are still a very similar offense per drive. We score often, we are efficient, we get a lot of yards and we get a lot of points. Our TO% is actually better despite our INT number climbing, likely due to less fumbling overall.

 

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year.

 

The variance we are seeing from Josh is not really uncommon, even among the historically great. Last year, Aaron Rodgers threw for 48 TDs. This year, through 11 games, he has thrown for only 23, which will likely place him in the mid 30's as a season total trendwise. His passer rating is a full 17 points less this year compared to last year.

 

The great QB's have good years, and great years, and insane years. We aren't in an insane year for Josh. We are in a great year. And our offense continues to remain great.

@Alphadawg7

 

Is it time to revisit this topic? 

 

Looks like our offense was better at running, worse at throwing, Josh wasn't as sharp on the year as he was in 2020.

 

I will take my flowers now.

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2021 at 5:25 PM, FireChans said:

 

...

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year....

 

 

The numbers say Josh wasn't as sharp but my eyes tell me a different story.   Josh was mostly sharp when he had protection.  He was sometimes sharp even when the protection was poor.  

 

The OL just wasn't as good in passpro in 2021 as it was in 2020.

 

And I think you have to count the playoffs.  Josh played much better in the playoffs in 2021 than he did in 2020.  

 

I don't think Josh had an off year at all.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

The numbers say Josh wasn't as sharp but my eyes tell me a different story.   Josh was mostly sharp when he had protection.  He was sometimes sharp even when the protection was poor.  

 

The OL just wasn't as good in passpro in 2021 as it was in 2020.

 

And I think you have to count the playoffs.  Josh played much better in the playoffs in 2021 than he did in 2020.  

 

I don't think Josh had an off year at all.  

As for the season as a whole, he performed less well in every passing category in 2021 compared to 2020.  His YPA (my best measure of QB play after TD/INT ratio) was down 1.1 YPA.  His INTs were up by 50% and the highest of his career.  He fumbled less - 8 times losing 3 - and I recall at least one that was a RB issue credited to Allen.  

 

All that stated....

 

Josh playoff performance is the best QB play this franchise has ever seen.   

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this post would’ve held up better had Josh not had TWO Herculean games in the postseason, one of which qualified as an all time greatest performance in NFL history. You’re right, he’s not as sharp as last year, he’s sharper

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

The numbers say Josh wasn't as sharp but my eyes tell me a different story.   Josh was mostly sharp when he had protection.  He was sometimes sharp even when the protection was poor.  

 

The OL just wasn't as good in passpro in 2021 as it was in 2020.

 

And I think you have to count the playoffs.  Josh played much better in the playoffs in 2021 than he did in 2020.  

 

I don't think Josh had an off year at all.  

Yeah he had a great playoff. An all time playoff. But he wasn’t as sharp in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2021 at 6:25 PM, FireChans said:

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year.


There are a few factors that account for this.  The biggest is the type of 2 high shell defense the Bills were seeing most of the season.  Typically this treatment for QB’s that defenses respect through the air.  Josh saw a lot of man coverage last year and absolutely destroyed.  This year the coverage took away some of the deep shots we were used to seeing last season.   
 

It took the Bills nearly half a season to figure this out.  What compounded the issue was an underperforming OL - which Josh actually figured how to work around.  The other is a running game which didn’t threaten defenses for most of the season and slowed redzone production.  It was either ineffective or not utilized appropriately.  Once the Bills found their line combo, the run game improved and the overall offense was more efficient toward the end of the season.  
 

Numbers aside, I believe you can make the argument that Josh was actually better in 2021 given how much of the offense he accounted for.  He literally was the Bills entire offense 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FireChans said:

@Alphadawg7

 

Is it time to revisit this topic? 

 

Looks like our offense was better at running, worse at throwing, Josh wasn't as sharp on the year as he was in 2020.

 

I will take my flowers now.


Still disagree.  Our OL was an issue until it was finally healthy and stabilized, especially when Bates entered the starting lineup.  
 

Down the stretch and playoffs this offense was definitely better. 
 

I’ll take the team that entered the playoffs THIS year over LAST years team 100% of the time.  And you know you would too if you’re being honest about it.  
 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really care about the numbers. 

 

What I saw down the stretch was consecutive, historically elite performances logged by #17 when it mattered most. We all watched him, beginning in the 2nd half in Tampa Bay, ascend to a new paradigm. It wasn't linear, this ascension, but it was unmistakable. What we saw in the playoffs was unprecedented. 

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richard Noggin said:

I don't really care about the numbers. 

 

What I saw down the stretch was consecutive, historically elite performances logged by #17 when it mattered most. We all watched him, beginning in the 2nd half in Tampa Bay, ascend to a new paradigm. It wasn't linear, this ascension, but it was unmistakable. What we saw in the playoffs was unprecedented. 

Yeah. Something clicked for him. Something big. 

 

...SSJ2?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I’ll take the team that entered the playoffs THIS year over LAST years team 100% of the time.  And you know you would too if you’re being honest about it.  
 

 

I wouldn't have. Not before the playoffs. In hindsight now the two offensive performances affect that judgment but going into these playoffs I felt like the divisional round was our ceiling and said as much on here. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2021 at 7:01 PM, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

People think of last year and they only think of the glorious games. They expect that every game now.

Josh Allen's last 2 games of the year were spectacular.


And as I write here all the time, this board has a memory @ 1 game long...LOL

 

So yes, people think of our offense as being unstoppable and will expect it to be that way every game.


They have already forgotten that games like Jacksonville, Indy, and Tennessee happened. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The line play was the biggest issue not Josh, and they finally got it straight at the end of the season.  The play calling was inconsistent as well, and the offense was clearly frustrated at times during the season.   The only bell cow on the team was Allen doing amazing things through the air with his legs. I thought that there was stubbornness in coaching that almost cost them the AFC East.  I think Daboll should be given credit for the success in developing Allen and good to great game plans from time to time, but it may be best for the long term health of Allen and the team to be moving on from him and get more balance and physicality to compliment the toughest mofo in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2021 at 6:25 PM, FireChans said:

So 2020 was a great offensive season by the Bills. Wonderful, exciting, electric, whatever you want to call it.

 

We can all agree the 2021 offense has its moments where it feels like a continuation of 2020 and moments where it feels like we are back in 2019. But what do the numbers say?

 

1. We are actually better at running the ball this year.

 

Last year, the Bills were 17th in attempts, 20th in yards, 15th in TD's and 20th in YPA.

 

This year, we are 17th in attempts, 11th in yards, 9th in TD's and 9th in YPA.

 

Some of this may be explained by Josh running a bit more (he's averaging 34 YPG compared to 28 last season, but on a similar number of attempts per game 6.4 to 6.3), but the fact remains, we are better at running.

 

2. We are worse through the air this year.

 

Last year, 11th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 3rd in yards, 9th in INT's and 4th in NY/A

 

This year, 8th in attempts, 3rd in TD's, 7th in yards, 24th in INT's, and 10th in NY/A.

 

A lot of this is Josh, statistically. He is across the board less efficient and more TO prone compared to last season. Still playing great, still one of the best young QB's in the NFL, but not 2020 Josh.

 

3. On the whole, we are not much different than last year.

 

I have long held the belief that the best statistic to judge a unit to their peers is their "per drive" stats. Not as prone to confabulation due to the defense creating opportunities for the offense etc. 

 

Last year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 15th in TO percentage, 5th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 3rd in points per drive.

 

This year, Bills offense 2nd in score percentage, 12th in TO percentage, 14th in time of possession, 10th in plays per drive (an admittedly stat missing in utility due to scoring fast not being particularly bad), 4th in yards per drive, and 2nd in points per drive.

 

Outside of the huge difference in time per drive (which may be related to sheer number of possessions due to a great defense), we are still a very similar offense per drive. We score often, we are efficient, we get a lot of yards and we get a lot of points. Our TO% is actually better despite our INT number climbing, likely due to less fumbling overall.

 

Conclusions? Josh is just not as sharp as he was last year, but overall he is still playing great football and leading a great offense, an offense that by the numbers is just as good as the one last year.

 

The variance we are seeing from Josh is not really uncommon, even among the historically great. Last year, Aaron Rodgers threw for 48 TDs. This year, through 11 games, he has thrown for only 23, which will likely place him in the mid 30's as a season total trendwise. His passer rating is a full 17 points less this year compared to last year.

 

The great QB's have good years, and great years, and insane years. We aren't in an insane year for Josh. We are in a great year. And our offense continues to remain great.

 

The running numbers were likely given a huge boost during the last 5 or 6 games of the year where we were one of the best running teams in the NFL averaging over 165 YPG. The last 3 it was almost 200 YPG. This coincided with Bates coming in at guard and then making Singletary the lead back.

 

Most of the INTs came in the mid season lull and the Falcons game. 

 

Allen just turned it up in the playoffs to another level. Had the best passer rating in NFL playoff history this year posting an almost unheard of 149 combined for both games and now is the all time leader in QB rating in postseason history with a 106.7 passing Mahomes who is now second after the Bengals game.

 

That bodes really well...a player who takes his game up a notch in the playoffs when so many others wilt under the pressure 

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

The running numbers were likely given a huge boost during the last 5 or 6 games of the year where we were one of the best running teams in the NFL averaging over 165 YPG. The last 3 it was almost 200 YPG. This coincided with Bates coming in at guard and then making Singletary the lead back.

 

Most of the INTs came in the mid season lull and the Falcons game. 

 

Allen just turned it up in the playoffs to another level. Had the best passer rating in NFL playoff history this year posting an almost unheard of 149 combined for both games and now is the all time leader in QB rating in postseason history with a 106.7 passing Mahomes who is now second after the Bengals game.

 

That bodes really well...a player who takes his game up a notch in the playoffs when so many others wilt under the pressure 

Mate, the numbers in the OP were from November. Same with the INTs

8 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:


Still disagree.  Our OL was an issue until it was finally healthy and stabilized, especially when Bates entered the starting lineup.  
 

Down the stretch and playoffs this offense was definitely better. 
 

I’ll take the team that entered the playoffs THIS year over LAST years team 100% of the time.  And you know you would too if you’re being honest about it.  
 

2021 offensive playoffs over 2020 offensive playoffs all day every day. But the 2020 offense in the regular season was just a little bit better than the 2021 offense. The numbers bear that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I wouldn't have. Not before the playoffs. In hindsight now the two offensive performances affect that judgment but going into these playoffs I felt like the divisional round was our ceiling and said as much on here. 

Do folks not remember 3 picks vs Atlanta? Letting the Jets and Panthers hang around for 3 quarters? 
 

Josh was unreal in the postseason so I get it. But we were not firing on all cylinders heading into the postseason. Compared to 2020. Which many people IN THIS VERY THREAD brought up over and over again.

 

These jamokes were trying to fire Daboll at week 12 and now trying to pretend the 2021 offense was a powerhouse all year. You won’t memory hole me @Alphadawg7

Edited by FireChans
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

The running numbers were likely given a huge boost during the last 5 or 6 games of the year where we were one of the best running teams in the NFL averaging over 165 YPG. The last 3 it was almost 200 YPG. This coincided with Bates coming in at guard and then making Singletary the lead back.

 

Most of the INTs came in the mid season lull and the Falcons game. 

 

Allen just turned it up in the playoffs to another level. Had the best passer rating in NFL playoff history this year posting an almost unheard of 149 combined for both games and now is the all time leader in QB rating in postseason history with a 106.7 passing Mahomes who is now second after the Bengals game.

 

That bodes really well...a player who takes his game up a notch in the playoffs when so many others wilt under the pressure 

Allen is a clutch player that has been up to the bigger moments.  I know people have mixed feelings about Gabe Davis, but he really steps up his game in the playoffs as well.  The Bills need more players ready for those big moments, especially on D.  I think Spencer Brown is going to be another stud and is going to come into his own in the next year or two as one of the best tackles in the game.  He is athletic, huge, has a nastiness to him and is a perfect compliment to what should be an emerging identity for the Offense to be tough and very talented.  I would love to see them pick up an interior lineman in the draft, and the best defensive player available because they are going to start needing to feed the pipeline as players age out and/or get too expensive (DT, S, LB).  I'd also love to see them pick up a physical back like Dameon Pierce who may not have eye popping stats while at Florida, but is an absolute beast in his lower body, has good vision, and will likely see more success in the NFL.  He's also a good blocker, especially in the passing game and is a decent receiver.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...