Jump to content

Panthers willing to trade McCaffrey, should Bills go all in?


Sherlock Holmes

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said:

Yeah I'm good, you didn't mean regardless of contract.

Yeah you're getting it..(I think)...was meant for regardless of the possibility of contract being reworked it wouldn't be worth the risk. So technically it's about the contract but more about whether if reworked or not.

 

I seriously can't understand why you're having trouble getting something so simple as this...it's like you just want to argue just to argue no matter if I clearly showed you were mistaken.

 

It's OKAY to admit you were mistaken. I do it quite a bit. In fact everyone does. It's going to be alright bro...no big deal

Edited by Sheneneh Jenkins
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Yeah you're getting it..(I think)...was meant for regardless of the possibility of contract being reworked it wouldn't be worth the risk. So technically it's about the contract but more about whether if reworked or not.

 

I seriously can't understand why you're having trouble getting something so simple as this...it's like you just want to argue just to argue no matter if I clearly showed you were mistaken.

 

It's OKAY to admit you were mistaken. I do it quite a bit. In fact everyone does. It's going to be alright bro...no big deal

 

It's pretty much a consensus that you didn't mean what you wrote.

 

we get it. It was a grammar mistake. If you do it all the time then it should be easy to admit now. Especially since you've already gone the "technically this is what I really meant" excuse route.

Edited by unbillievable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

 

It's pretty much a consensus that you didn't mean what you wrote.

 

we get it. It was a grammar mistake. If you do it all the time then it should be easy to admit now. Especially since you've already gone the "technically this is what I really meant" excuse route.

Dude, how you gona tell me what I meant on something I wrote....I have explained this multiple times and made it clear. Maybe read up thread and reconsider non sense statements like that making you look silly. 

 

LOL, you whip out the X-men card and can see inside my mind and tell me what I meant when I make a statement. Damn, some of you guys here are really something else..

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, klos63 said:

except maybe Miami.  But really, can't understand anyone trading for him with 20+ sexual assault accusations hanging over his head, I mean, it's not like he's thinking of running for president in 2024.

I agree, but they did trade Hopkins for David Johnson.

BoB did…..but I feel ya!

1 hour ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

No pass rush to mediocre pass rush

No pass rush to still no pass rush 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

I mean can't we technically rework his contract?

I originally quoted this post, so what I "meant" is regardless of if they could rework his contract or not, it still wouldn't be reworked enough to be worth the risk imo.

 

Can't believe I'm explaining something so simple

25 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

 

It's pretty much a consensus that you didn't mean what you wrote.

 

we get it. It was a grammar mistake. If you do it all the time then it should be easy to admit now. Especially since you've already gone the "technically this is what I really meant" excuse route.

I have no problem at all admitting when I'm mistaken. I have many times here. Looks like you also have a hard time also

Edited by Sheneneh Jenkins
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Dude, how you gona tell me what I meant on something I wrote....I have explained this multiple times and made it clear. Maybe read up thread and reconsider non sense statements like that making you look silly. 

 

LOL, you whip out the X-men card and can see inside my mind and tell me what I meant when I make a statement. Damn, some of you guys here are really something else..

Honestly to me not a big deal. Don't let it bother you. Don't really know why everyone making this big thing. Sheneneh you're cool. Glad to have you posting as well as Bills fans rooting for the Bills.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

Honestly to me not a big deal. Don't let it bother you. Don't really know why everyone making this big thing. Sheneneh you're cool. Glad to have you posting as well as Bills fans rooting for the Bills.

yeah I'mall good bro, it's not really the bothering that's the issue. It's the amazement that it needed to be explained in the 1st place. But yeah moving on

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

Why do people still see the RB as an issue…. It’s the blocking… it sucks…

I totally agree with you on this, it’s somewhat stunning that folk don’t grasp this, 

 

Go Bills!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sure would be fun seeing McCaffrey in a Bills jersey working with Allen. I like our backs until I compare them to a Fred ajackson or someone like that. Imagine if Allen had Beast Mode Lynch and Fred Jackson in the backfield. Running, blocking and passing to.... It would be so much fun to watch. And our offense would be so physically tough.

 

In other news, when Allen starts to see and release a hair faster we will be very tough to play against as is.

Our defense hopefully can play like it did vs. KC throughout the playoffs or even better than that. I want to see our edge rushers take a couple steps forward. Maybe look like how we did vs. Miami but against Tampa or someone like that.....

AJ has a lot of potential I think. Groot And Boogie of course do too....

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unbillievable said:

 

How many RBs in the league are worth legit #1 contracts? Maybe 3?

 

 

 

I'm not even advocating trading for him, I just don't agree Singletary and Moss are solely held back by the o-line. They miss some opportunities that are there and contribute almost nothing as pass catchers. If we had a RB anywhere near the level of McCaffrey we would be unstoppable.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Since I have no faith in him being healthy for the playoffs I don't want him with that contract. He is a supreme talent but unreliable.

 

In other words, the offensive equivalent of JJ Watt.

Edited by Special K
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

All in?  What does that mean?  Trading a high pick for a guy who has played just 6 games the last 2 years?  Is this serious?

 

This is a bit of hyperbole 6 games in two years? He has played 22 out of 40 games. In 2020 he had some unfortunate injuries, and may have come back later in the season but the Panthers were 4-8 ish and why bother? In 2021 he came back strong as ever with 364 yards of offense in two games. Yes he injured his hamstring this year. That can happen to anyone. In fact it has happened to both of our running backs.

 

I don't know anything about a potential trade but bottom line is McCaffrey puts us over the top if he is healthy at the cost of a high draft pick. If he somehow stays injured, it was worth the gamble for a super bowl. Its not like the guy is going to fall apart and never play again, its a damn hamstring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In most cases I would say no way at all. But then I think of our offense the way it is with McCaffery added to it at RB and I'd be willing to give up at least next year's 1st for him to get to a SB. He's the only RB outside of  Derrick Henry that I would do that for

Edited by Buffalo03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Dude, how you gona tell me what I meant on something I wrote....I have explained this multiple times and made it clear. Maybe read up thread and reconsider non sense statements like that making you look silly. 

 

LOL, you whip out the X-men card and can see inside my mind and tell me what I meant when I make a statement. Damn, some of you guys here are really something else..

 

We can't read your mind, which is why we read what you wrote. We responded to that.

We also understand that your mistake was that you didn't write what you really meant to say.

 

"...but regardless (or irregardless) of contract it still not worth it imo."

 

The above statement is so blatantly wrong, that an explanation was required from you to explain your reasoning. It boggled the mind that in response, your only caveat was to change "regardless" to "irregardless"; A grammar correction.

 

To make matters worse, when pressed further, you try to clarify what you really meant, got butthurt over it, then acted snarky by demanding an apology because we were "wrong" in correctly interpreting what you incorrectly wrote down the first time.

 

"...you didn't really mean regardless" (or irregardless)

 

Basically, your excuse is that you know what you meant to say, and that you were correct in your own head, so we have to admit we were wrong, because we can't read your mind. That is insane.

 

All because you refuse to admit you are wrong, despite insisting it is something you routinely admit to.

 

Is my re-up of the thread silly?

Edited by unbillievable
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

I'm not even advocating trading for him, I just don't agree Singletary and Moss are solely held back by the o-line. They miss some opportunities that are there and contribute almost nothing as pass catchers. If we had a RB anywhere near the level of McCaffrey we would be unstoppable.

 

 

They contribute as pass catchers.

 

And the fact that they don't contribute more mostly comes down to Josh wanting to go longer.

 

If we had an RB anywhere near the level of McCaffrey we still wouldn't use him enough to make it worthwhile paying him what McCaffrey gets. We'd probably trade him in his third year and bring in another 3rd rounder.

 

A healthy McCaffrey really is a weapon, though. He'd take gadget plays too.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


This all Makes sense.

 

 

Yeah, totally. If I were the Fins I'd demand pick protections. Not sure I'd give them if I was the Texans, but I'd strongly consider it. They need to put this mess behind them.

 

4 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

McCaffrey doesn't need blocking

 

 

They all do.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...