Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 1 minute ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: Still doesn't make sense Makes plenty of sense for me, here you go since it's upsetting for you... https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/regardless I was using as an adverb as you can see scrolling down just a bit....meaning despite what has been said or done. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 If Carolina will take a 2nd. Fine. Nothing more 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 10 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said: Makes plenty of sense for me, here you go since it's upsetting for you... https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/regardless I was using as an adverb as you can see scrolling down just a bit....meaning despite what has been said or done. Obviously we would take him on a veteran min. or similar contract. Beane would, every GM in the league would Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 I'm pretty confident Carolina would do a straight up trade, Singletary for McCaffery. Get er done Beane. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 1 minute ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: Obviously we would take him on a veteran min. or similar contract. Beane would, every GM in the league would Lol, so you think he Mcaffrey is could be had for vet min? Even with the injury issue he wouldn't be that low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 1 minute ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said: Lol, so you think he Mcaffrey is could be had for vet min? Even with the injury issue he wouldn't be that low Gotcha so you didn't really mean regardless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Just now, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: Gotcha so you didn't really mean regardless Yeah, as responding to original post I quoted which read, "we could rework his contract". So I take it you assumed that means vet min to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Just now, Sheneneh Jenkins said: Yeah, as responding to original post I quoted which read, "we could rework his contract". So I take it you assumed that means vet min to you? I mean regardless means regardless. There are numbers where he makes sense and there are numbers where he doesn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 No. Rookie contract RB's only please. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Just now, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: I mean regardless means regardless. There are numbers where he makes sense and there are numbers where he doesn't Maybe , but "regardless" of what numbers you think make since it likely would not be vet min. Which imo wouldn't be worth the risk. You following me here now? We on same page yet? We good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Just now, Sheneneh Jenkins said: Maybe , but "regardless" of what numbers you think make since it likely would not be vet min. Which imo wouldn't be worth the risk. You following me here now? We on same page yet? We good? I think so. You didn't actually mean "regardless of contract" A lot of times when really good players come available, people say things like "hard pass" that just make no sense. Obviously if you could hypothetically get a top talent easily and cheaply, you do it. Beane has said he's always trying to make the team better and he's always interested when top players come available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 40 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: Those Apricot pits were delicious You probably need to have a second and third helping. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Sure, let's scrap our high-octane passing offense, take the ball out of JA17's hands, and re-build our offensive philosophy around an injury-prone running back who by the way is paid at the top end of the market. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 “Package some picks and Addison” 😂 why on earth would Houston want Addison? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: I think so. You didn't actually mean "regardless of contract" A lot of times when really good players come available, people say things like "hard pass" that just make no sense. Obviously if you could hypothetically get a top talent easily and cheaply, you do it. Beane has said he's always trying to make the team better and he's always interested when top players come available. I meant "regardless "of the possibility if it could be reworked (which we done know if it could, even if by chance it could, which we also don't know by how much). So I kinda went out on a limb and assumed it wouldn't be vet min or less enough if it were to be reworked to be worth the risk, imo Got it this time? Edited October 30, 2021 by Sheneneh Jenkins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 I'd love to have McCaffrey, but I don't think that's a good long-term move. You don't need an elite RB to win a SB. You need to prioritize QB, receivers, and defense. Running game just needs to be respectable. 4 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said: Sure, let's scrap our high-octane passing offense, take the ball out of JA17's hands, and re-build our offensive philosophy around an injury-prone running back who by the way is paid at the top end of the market. McCaffrey is one of the best pass-catching RBs. He can run in the Bills scheme. I'm not for taking on that contract, but it's not like they would need to adjust much. He would be used the same way as their current duo, but solo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 He is probably the best non QB in the league. Hopefully our 1st is going to be “super” late anyway….I’d be in for it borderline regardless of price. We are a loaded, deep roster. Draft picks aren’t anywhere near as valuable to the Bills right now as they are to most teams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshAllin Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 Take more snaps out of josh's hands? no thanks. Maybe a couple years down the road when josh gets slower 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Malazan said: No one was ever trading for a QB that can't play this year. except maybe Miami. But really, can't understand anyone trading for him with 20+ sexual assault accusations hanging over his head, I mean, it's not like he's thinking of running for president in 2024. 24 minutes ago, NewEra said: “Package some picks and Addison” 😂 why on earth would Houston want Addison? I agree, but they did trade Hopkins for David Johnson. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 26 minutes ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said: I think so. You didn't actually mean "regardless of contract" A lot of times when really good players come available, people say things like "hard pass" that just make no sense. Obviously if you could hypothetically get a top talent easily and cheaply, you do it. Beane has said he's always trying to make the team better and he's always interested when top players come available. 17 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said: I meant "regardless "of the possibility if it could be reworked (which we done know if it could, even if by chance it could, which we also don't know by how much). So I kinda went out on a limb and assumed it wouldn't be vet min or less enough if it were to be reworked to be worth the risk, imo Got it this time? Nah bro, I seriously want to know if you understand now? You made a huge thing out of it so I want to make sure you're all good now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.