Jump to content

Bills rushing - yards before contact


Recommended Posts

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/rushing_advanced.htm

 

Rushing yards before contact is generally considered a good measure of how effective a team’s OL is in run blocking.  While the Bills OL seems to be built to pass block well, they do not seem to be doing a good job at all of run blocking.  The exception would be if RBs aren’t doing a good job of finding/hitting the holes opened for them.

 

The link above shows Singletary 3rd worst in the league with 1.5 yards before contact/attempt and Moss 9th worst at 1.8 ybc/a.  I think it is unlikely that both are that bad at finding and hitting holes so it looks like it on the OL.

 

Both backs seem to be excellent at getting yards after contact though.  Link  Singletary is 2nd with 2.9 and Moss is 13th with 2.4.  Looking at those numbers I can certainly see why the Bills didn’t draft a RB, but it makes me wonder why they didn’t try to upgrade the OL, especially the interior. 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought, you also should  consider scheme, the Bills run more 10 and 11 personnel than any other team in the league so they have less big guys blocking.  Also the defense counters with 5-6 DB's so smaller guys might explain the run after contact being high.

Edited by mattynh
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think the blocking scheme needs to be looked at, this team is built for a Zone Scheme and try’s to play road grader, which just doesn’t cut it.  Morse is crazy athletic, and the Guards aren’t big enough to run over real interior players, they need to quit pretending they have the personnel for a smash mouth style run game.  More pulls etc would be great, instead the RBs are primarily trying to get back to the LoS at this point.  They are pretty good pass blockers, but I was pretty disappointed to see them not try to upgrade the O-line this offseason.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of speed in a small RB is a killer in the NFL.  I think much of the problem with Devins  very low yards before contact/attempt is his lack of speed.   And Zach Moss is no speed demon either.  I dont think the Bills current regime has done a good job at drafting RBs.  I think that is why they signed Matt Breida, we finally have some speed in the backfield.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I heard this on a segment/podcast not too long ago but didn't know where to look it up.  

I think they're going to change their run blocking philosophy since we are essentially going with the same everything.

imo, this is the fallout from a designed team concept of everybody being able to play every position along both lines. In the ‘daze of yore’, a team was either Zone Blocking or man on man Road Graders. We would get screwed with new coaches every couple years as each of them wanted the opposite of what we were trying to build and adding specific skill sets for on the OL. Couple this with Allen being an uncommon running entity and the rush game as a whole being an afterthought, I don’t see anything of note changing any time soon. 

Look at our OL. Feliciano and Ford are road graders who can be a liability in Passpro, while Morse and D. Williams are great at Passpro, not so much at run blocking. We don’t know who we are -and we don’t give a damn. We’ve got Josh Allen.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/rushing_advanced.htm

 

Rushing yards before contact is generally considered a good measure of how effective a team’s OL is in run blocking.  While the Bills OL seems to be built to pass block well, they do not seem to be doing a good job at all of run blocking.  The exception would be if RBs aren’t doing a good job of finding/hitting the holes opened for them.

 

The link above shows Singletary 3rd worst in the league with 1.5 yards before contact/attempt and Moss 9th worst at 1.8 ybc/a.  I think it is unlikely that both are that bad at finding and hitting holes so it looks like it on the OL.

 

Both backs seem to be excellent at getting yards after contact though.  Link  Singletary is 2nd with 2.9 and Moss is 13th with 2.4.  Looking at those numbers I can certainly see why the Bills didn’t draft a RB, but it makes me wonder why they didn’t try to upgrade the OL, especially the interior. 

 

These differences (1.8, 1.3 or 2.4, 2.9) is +/- a foot.  This pretty much renders differences between the values are pretty tiny when it's 10 yards for a 1st down. The vast majority of the RBs in the league have YBC/A between 1.5 and 2.7 yards.

 

These stats have little value, I think.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this was all common knowledge, but with all the hate that Singletary gets, I guess not. We do not need a running back. We need better run blocking.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Lack of speed in a small RB is a killer in the NFL.  I think much of the problem with Devins  very low yards before contact/attempt is his lack of speed.   And Zach Moss is no speed demon either.  I dont think the Bills current regime has done a good job at drafting RBs.  I think that is why they signed Matt Breida, we finally have some speed in the backfield.

And that's his biggest flaw, besides stone hands. Without a reasonable burst, it won't matter if there was a hole/seam there or not. Personally I think this is Devin's last season in Buffalo. And then our eyes will focus on whether Moss pans out. It's imperative we improve our run game to win a SB. JA17 can't be expected to do it all.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the hate for Singletary.  He's an excellent pass-protector, and more than adequate receiver and rusher for the pass-heavy schemes that we run.  These are the most critical elements of his role on this team, and as noted, we have had a lot of turnover on the OL and again, the heavy emphasis on pass-blocking skills vs run-blocking.

 

He's just fine, and also comes cheap without a lot of tread on the tires.  Let's not be so hasty to run him out of town yet

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Cover1 did a great video analysis of the running game and covered all this.

 

The offense switched up their blocking scheme to better merge with the pass blocking scheme and the switch to more 3-4 WRs and no full back.  This switch also moved the primary TE off the LOS more and into an H-Back role.  The final piece was this was designed with the original starting 5 OL last year (Dawkins, Spain, Morse, Feliciano, Ford/Williams) and those guys never played a snap together.  
 

Compounding the switch was the decrease in practice and preseason to get the timing working together - especially on double teams and combo blocks.  The blocking scheme adjustment also was very new for Singletary - who admitted he was more comfortable in a straight ahead man scheme rather than the combo blocking double team/zone style and he mis-read some holes and totally missed some runs.

 

I believe from listening to the coaches and the Cover1 guys that they felt the run game had some potential, but they needed to focus on it and last year the big focus was on Josh Allen and the passing attack.  They gave a much higher percentage of their practice time to getting timing and passing calls meshed together than putting in a running attack and that showed in the stats.

 

In the end - I believe they realize scoring comes from the passing game and they just need to do a little better in the running game when forcing teams into coverage - nickel and dime sets.  I think they will take a lesser running game if they can keep the explosive passing game, but I expect with increased preseason and practice - they will mesh a bit better than last year - I don’t expect them to lead the league or even run significantly more times than last year, but I think they will be more efficient and effective.

 

 

Edited by Rochesterfan
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another overlooked issue is how well wide receivers run block downfield.  I recently re-watched last season's game vs. LA Rams and it struck me how well LAR's wide receivers are designed to and actually block downfield on run plays.  Robert Woods especially is a good downfield run blocker who stays with his blocks.  I noticed how our WR's do not stay with blocks and DB's are immediately able to provide run support.  That must have an effect on yards after initial contact if a DB can just fly up and make a hit because they have not been engaged at all.  By the way, Bills had 101 rushing yards in that game and LAR had 167. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

Cover1 did a great video analysis of the running game and covered all this.

 

The offense switched up their blocking scheme to better merge with the pass blocking scheme and the switch to more 3-4 WRs and no full back.  This switch also moved the primary TE off the LOS more and into an H-Back role.  The final piece was this was designed with the original starting 5 OL last year (Dawkins, Spain, Morse, Feliciano, Ford/Williams) and those guys never played a snap together.  
 

Compounding the switch was the decrease in practice and preseason to get the timing working together - especially on double teams and combo blocks.  The blocking scheme adjustment also was very new for Singletary - who admitted he was more comfortable in a straight ahead man scheme rather than the combo blocking double team/zone style and he mis-read some holes and totally missed some runs.

 

I believe from listening to the coaches and the Cover1 guys that they felt the run game had some potential, but they needed to focus on it and last year the big focus was on Josh Allen and the passing attack.  They gave a much higher percentage of their practice time to getting timing and passing calls meshed together than putting in a running attack and that showed in the stats.

 

In the end - I believe they realize scoring comes from the passing game and they just need to do a little better in the running game when forcing teams into coverage - nickel and dime sets.  I think they will take a lesser running game if they can keep the explosive passing game, but I expect with increased preseason and practice - they will mesh a bit better than last year - I don’t expect them to lead the league or even run significantly more times than last year, but I think they will be more efficient and effective.

 

 

 

All makes sense to me.  Tons of negative runs too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

These differences (1.8, 1.3 or 2.4, 2.9) is +/- a foot.  This pretty much renders differences between the values are pretty tiny when it's 10 yards for a 1st down. The vast majority of the RBs in the league have YBC/A between 1.5 and 2.7 yards.

 

These stats have little value, I think.

 

His Yards after contact number is in pretty good company.  It's the yards before contact there that need the most improvement.  Be it oline, his ability to find holes, or playcalling (probably all 3).  

 

image.thumb.png.47dab20b7dff82cdb886e0a9c75ef7c9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

I really think the blocking scheme needs to be looked at, this team is built for a Zone Scheme and try’s to play road grader, which just doesn’t cut it.  Morse is crazy athletic, and the Guards aren’t big enough to run over real interior players, they need to quit pretending they have the personnel for a smash mouth style run game.  More pulls etc would be great, instead the RBs are primarily trying to get back to the LoS at this point.  They are pretty good pass blockers, but I was pretty disappointed to see them not try to upgrade the O-line this offseason.

 

Absolutely concur. And thankfully as Cover 1 explained, the running game on the back half of the season went to a more zone scheme and moved away from power. Moss thrives in zone and Singletary struggled. Whereas in power Devin was more productive and Moss struggled. 

 

We need to go with zone and run with Moss. 

Edited by DJB
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

These differences (1.8, 1.3 or 2.4, 2.9) is +/- a foot.  This pretty much renders differences between the values are pretty tiny when it's 10 yards for a 1st down. The vast majority of the RBs in the league have YBC/A between 1.5 and 2.7 yards.

 

These stats have little value, I think.

 

When things move that fast, every inch, every foot counts.  A foot is the difference on whether or not you need to continue on that path or immediately changing direction.  It doesn't just apply to football, pretty much any fast moving sport.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

These differences (1.8, 1.3 or 2.4, 2.9) is +/- a foot.  This pretty much renders differences between the values are pretty tiny when it's 10 yards for a 1st down. The vast majority of the RBs in the league have YBC/A between 1.5 and 2.7 yards.

 

These stats have little value, I think.

That the numbers for our two main RBs are close was part of my point.  It supports the issue being with the blocking and not with them.  Also both have very good yards after contact which supports them being good RBs. 

Edited by BarleyNY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DJB said:

 

Absolutely concur. And thankfully as Cover 1 explained, the running game on the back half of the season went to a more zone scheme and moved away from power. Moss thrives in zone and Singletary struggled. Whereas in power Devin was more productive and Moss struggled. 

 

We need to go with zone and run with Moss. 

I think DS would be able to adapt to a zone scheme, Moss pretty much is the perfect back for Zone, he’s very North/South and will break arm tackles all day.   DS is used to hiding behind his block and then bursting out, he’s just got to understand how that works in Zone, you ride the shoulder, not the rear and blast into the seam, not the open field.  It’s a different thing, but I don’t see why he couldn’t, he’s not really a dancer, he’s just got crazy quick moves, which could work.   Shady would never work because he had no discipline to hit the right hole and trust it to open, he ALWAYS looked outside and for the open field.  He sucked between the tackles for good reason, he wanted home runs not doubles, but when it was goal line, he could find the seam and slip through, that’s the whole zone scheme.  DS can do that and with his low center of gravity and suddenness, combined with the fact he’s a little bowling ball, I see no reason he couldn’t be VERY good at it.  Will he? That’s another question all together.

Edited by DCofNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

imo, this is the fallout from a designed team concept of everybody being able to play every position along both lines. In the ‘daze of yore’, a team was either Zone Blocking or man on man Road Graders. We would get screwed with new coaches every couple years as each of them wanted the opposite of what we were trying to build and adding specific skill sets for on the OL. Couple this with Allen being an uncommon running entity and the rush game as a whole being an afterthought, I don’t see anything of note changing any time soon. 

Look at our OL. Feliciano and Ford are road graders who can be a liability in Passpro, while Morse and D. Williams are great at Passpro, not so much at run blocking. We don’t know who we are -and we don’t give a damn. We’ve got Josh Allen.

I think there's some truth to this.  McBeane do want a lot of flexibility among their players.   However, I think their philosophy makes a little more sense when you think it all the way through.

 

Yes, they want position flexibility, which means that a lot of the players are tweeners.   The benefit they're shooting for, however, is to be able to play any style.  They want to be able to do what the Patriots did to teams for many seasons, which was to change how they attack from week to week.  Teams don't know what to prepare for, and the Bills have the opportunity, even within games, to change their style of play.  

 

Now, I don't know if they can achieve that goal, but that's the objective.  As for the run game, I think their plan is that they just need a little better execution to create just a little more room so the Bills running backs can get into the hole and then use their ability to break tackles to get better yardage than last season.  I don't know if they can achieve that, either, but I think that's the goal.  

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I heard this on a segment/podcast not too long ago but didn't know where to look it up.  

I think they're going to change their run blocking philosophy since we are essentially going with the same everything.

Run blocking schemes via the O line and it’s related coaches were a target of Beane in his 2019/2020 season end PC, so yes, the run blocking concepts/schemes will have already been addressed this preseason by the GM, offensive coaching staff, and relevant players.  We will see a substantial improvement in both the Online and the RBs outcomes this upcoming season, otherwise the heads of some coaches and players will roll, as the saying goes…, 

 

Go Bills!!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DJB said:

 

Absolutely concur. And thankfully as Cover 1 explained, the running game on the back half of the season went to a more zone scheme and moved away from power. Moss thrives in zone and Singletary struggled. Whereas in power Devin was more productive and Moss struggled. 

 

We need to go with zone and run with Moss Breida. 

 

FIFY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be interested if Breida changes this, because it could be blocking or it could be that both running backs we run with are similar styles. I do also wonder if the numbers changed much from week 1-4, when no one believes Josh was MVP player, to later in year when they had to be more honest defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I will be interested if Breida changes this, because it could be blocking or it could be that both running backs we run with are similar styles. I do also wonder if the numbers changed much from week 1-4, when no one believes Josh was MVP player, to later in year when they had to be more honest defensively.

 

Breida's speed and catching ability (87.3% catch percentage after his rookie season) should add a lot to the offense.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

That the numbers for our two main RBs are close was part of my point.  It supports the issue being with the blocking and not with them.  Also both have very good yards after contact which supports them being good RBs. 

 

 

I'm not swayed by a stat that "ranks" a ton of players within a small variance.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

I'm not swayed by a stat that "ranks" a ton of players within a small variance.

It’s actually a very sizable variance relative to yards per carry and across all 51 ranked players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

It’s actually a very sizable variance relative to yards per carry and across all 51 ranked players. 

 

4 of the 51 (and 4 off the top 12) are QBs, who can't count in this conversation.

 

After the top 12, the next 34 RBs are within 1 yard of each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched an analysis of the RBs in pass blocking, particularly blitz pickups.  Moss excels while Motor struggles.  I think this goes back to excellent coaching at Utah, which prepared Moss for the life of an NFL RB on a passing team.  I think this is also why Moss was drafted.

 

As long as Allen is the QB, the Bills will be a passing team that runs from time to time.  The O line was built for pass blocking.  The entire offense is built around making the passing game work.  And why not?  With our QB and WRs, of course that's just playing to our strengths.

 

If Singletary doesn't make it past this year with the Bills, it will be because he hasn't improved enough on blitz pickups.  I have no idea whether Brieda is any good at pass blocking, but I anticipate that given Brieda's superior speed and quickness over Motor, that Brieda is here now to be ready for Motor leaving next year.  I hope things don't go this way. I like Singletary and I hope he grows into the role the team wants him to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/rushing_advanced.htm

 

Rushing yards before contact is generally considered a good measure of how effective a team’s OL is in run blocking.  While the Bills OL seems to be built to pass block well, they do not seem to be doing a good job at all of run blocking.  The exception would be if RBs aren’t doing a good job of finding/hitting the holes opened for them.

 

The link above shows Singletary 3rd worst in the league with 1.5 yards before contact/attempt and Moss 9th worst at 1.8 ybc/a.  I think it is unlikely that both are that bad at finding and hitting holes so it looks like it on the OL.

 

Both backs seem to be excellent at getting yards after contact though.  Link  Singletary is 2nd with 2.9 and Moss is 13th with 2.4.  Looking at those numbers I can certainly see why the Bills didn’t draft a RB, but it makes me wonder why they didn’t try to upgrade the OL, especially the interior. 

Good post. I remember Thurman comparing favorably to Emmet in yards after contact while Dallas had arguably the better line.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/rushing_advanced.htm

 

Rushing yards before contact is generally considered a good measure of how effective a team’s OL is in run blocking.  While the Bills OL seems to be built to pass block well, they do not seem to be doing a good job at all of run blocking.  The exception would be if RBs aren’t doing a good job of finding/hitting the holes opened for them.

 

The link above shows Singletary 3rd worst in the league with 1.5 yards before contact/attempt and Moss 9th worst at 1.8 ybc/a.  I think it is unlikely that both are that bad at finding and hitting holes so it looks like it on the OL.

 

Both backs seem to be excellent at getting yards after contact though.  Link  Singletary is 2nd with 2.9 and Moss is 13th with 2.4.  Looking at those numbers I can certainly see why the Bills didn’t draft a RB, but it makes me wonder why they didn’t try to upgrade the OL, especially the interior. 

 

9 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I heard this on a segment/podcast not too long ago but didn't know where to look it up.  

I think they're going to change their run blocking philosophy since we are essentially going with the same everything.

 

This is like Deja Vu all over again as this was also just discussed in an article in today's Athletic.  Basically stating the same thing that the issue wasn't all on the RB's.

 

As far as upgrading the interior, wonder how much of season was Mongo not back to full strength, Morse and Ford were both out some too.  They did draft a guard and signed a fairly highly thought of FA backup guard so maybe they are expecting more.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

4 of the 51 (and 4 off the top 12) are QBs, who can't count in this conversation.

 

After the top 12, the next 34 RBs are within 1 yard of each other.

The range of yards per rush by RBs is 5.6-3.2.  The range of yards before contact among RBs is 3.3-1.4.  There is a fat middle to that bell curve, but the Bills have two RBs on the lower tail of it at 1.8 and 1.5.  On one hand getting to average or a little above in run blocking would not add that much to total yards in a season.  On the other, that kind of improvement might help us close out games on the ground and balance the offense a little.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, In Summary said:

Good post. I remember Thurman comparing favorably to Emmet in yards after contact while Dallas had arguably the better line.

 

Not arguable.  Smith gained 2/3 of his yards before he was ever touched by a defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

The range of yards per rush by RBs is 5.6-3.2.  The range of yards before contact among RBs is 3.3-1.4.  There is a fat middle to that bell curve, but the Bills have two RBs on the lower tail of it at 1.8 and 1.5.  On one hand getting to average or a little above in run blocking would not add that much to total yards in a season.  On the other, that kind of improvement might help us close out games on the ground and balance the offense a little.  


As I said, the variation is miniscule as 34 of 47 RBs are within a yard.  Not significant.

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big improvement in the running stats in the last 9 vs. the first 7.  Unsettled OL, Moss with turf toe and pass heavy play calls contributed to a slow start.  I'd suspect these yards before contact numbers were really bad in the first 7 games.

 

Edited by JESSEFEFFER
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/rushing_advanced.htm

 

Rushing yards before contact is generally considered a good measure of how effective a team’s OL is in run blocking.  While the Bills OL seems to be built to pass block well, they do not seem to be doing a good job at all of run blocking.  The exception would be if RBs aren’t doing a good job of finding/hitting the holes opened for them.

 

The link above shows Singletary 3rd worst in the league with 1.5 yards before contact/attempt and Moss 9th worst at 1.8 ybc/a.  I think it is unlikely that both are that bad at finding and hitting holes so it looks like it on the OL.

 

Both backs seem to be excellent at getting yards after contact though.  Link  Singletary is 2nd with 2.9 and Moss is 13th with 2.4.  Looking at those numbers I can certainly see why the Bills didn’t draft a RB, but it makes me wonder why they didn’t try to upgrade the OL, especially the interior

The presumed starting 5 OL did not play a single snap as a unit last year.  A healthy Ford can be a big upgrade at LG.  They spent money bringing back Williams and Feliciano and draft capital on the pass rush.  I have no issues with that approach.  I have my well documented concerns about Morse.  At least they got him to take a pay cut.  I would have drafted C instead of an OT.  Taking two OT's still makes no sense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

The presumed starting 5 OL did not play a single snap as a unit last year.  A healthy Ford can be a big upgrade at LG.  They spent money bringing back Williams and Feliciano and draft capital on the pass rush.  I have no issues with that approach.  I have my well documented concerns about Morse.  At least they got him to take a pay cut.  I would have drafted C instead of an OT.  Taking two OT's still makes no sense.  

 

Yeah I think they're banking on continuity and cohesion.  They pretty much know the 5 starting positions so it's now a matter of keeping them together during training camp and pre-season.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Lack of speed in a small RB is a killer in the NFL.  I think much of the problem with Devins  very low yards before contact/attempt is his lack of speed.   And Zach Moss is no speed demon either.  I dont think the Bills current regime has done a good job at drafting RBs.  I think that is why they signed Matt Breida, we finally have some speed in the backfield.

 

 

YBC isn't really about speed, it's about blocking.

 

When you look at the top ten at the YBC stat link in the OP, it's clear that there are a mix of RB styles there. Derrick Henry is #1, and while he's got really good top speed, he's anything but a fast starter. Zeke is #5. There are breakaway guys and mashers, big and small, all styles.

 

YBC is about how big and how good the hole is.

 

Oh, and saying "Devin's very low yards before contact/attempt" is conflating two completely different things. You're right that Singletary's YBC is not good. But again, that's primarily an OL stat, and the fact that Moss's is similarly bad makes the same point. Singletary's Yards Per Attempt, though, are excellent over the course of his career and very solid indeed last year.

 

If on the other hand you're not talking about Yards Per Attempt and are instead talking about the other figure shown on this chart, YAC/Att (Yards AFTER Contact per Attempt), um, you need to take another look at the chart. Singletary managed 2.9 YAC/Att. How many guys can you find who managed higher than that with 50 or more attempts? I only see two. Two others who tied him. That puts him in the top five, in a three-way tie for 3rd. That's pretty good any way you look at it.

 

The top two RBs on this team have been effective after the hit, and effective overall, at 4.4 YPC last year. Singletary was terrific in 2019. All this without going over round three. Their ability to draft RBs hasn't shown great yet or anything but it certainly looks good so far.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:


As I said, the variation is miniscule as 34 of 47 RBs are within a yard.  Not significant.

 

 

On the contrary.

 

When you say "within a yard" you're missing the point. You could say they're all within a yard if some got 0.0001 yard and others got 0.9999 yards. Still a huge variance, though. Same with the figure here.

 

Within a yard is a very significant difference when the percentage of difference is so large.

 

If everyone was within a yard between, say 12 and 13 yards, yeah, it's insignificant. Now, that would be minisiscule variation, where the figures only vary around 8%.

 

If on the other hand you're looking at a list (as you are here) where the variation is between 2.0 and 3.0 yards, that's a 50% variation in productivity in that area. That's very significant difference indeed.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I will be interested if Breida changes this, because it could be blocking or it could be that both running backs we run with are similar styles. I do also wonder if the numbers changed much from week 1-4, when no one believes Josh was MVP player, to later in year when they had to be more honest defensively.

Tim, that was my interest in what style does both Breida and/or Moss Singletary gel.  They need to settle in on one style and master it.  Shaw makes a good point in flexibility, but a good running team like the Browns or Titans does one thing very well.

 

I don’t expect a heavy running game as our strength obviously is in pass pro and 10/11 personnel with an exceptional passing scheme.  We were 14th in rushing in 2020 partially because of Allen’s yards.  I don’t expect that to go away so if we could just increase our ypc bringing us up to 10th, that will be significant progress.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...