Jump to content

Rondale Moore.....trade down and snag this monster.


Recommended Posts

He's only 5'9" but then you have the speed factor.

 

I like big, tall, physical guys who can catch any ball that is anywhere near their huge wingspan, despite being well covered.  

 

But we need a speed burner threat! 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

He's only 5'9" but then you have the speed factor.

 

I like big, tall, physical guys who can catch any ball that is anywhere near their huge wingspan, despite being well covered.  

 

But we need a speed burner threat! 

 

 

 

Slot guy, jet sweep, punt/kickoff returns.  Somebody who can take over for Cole.  But some say he'll start right away.  He's got explosive lower body strength, which is unusual for a guy that short.  Great route runner, so he'll probably be open more often than not.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

He's only 5'9" but then you have the speed factor.

 

I like big, tall, physical guys who can catch any ball that is anywhere near their huge wingspan, despite being well covered.  

 

But we need a speed burner threat! 

 

Yea we have this already

23 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

If he is such a monster then why risk it by trading down? Just take him at 30.

This is a horrible response Turk come on.. lol your better then this lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good thing is, if Beane says Moore, and whoever takes the pick to the officials writes down Elijah, it won't be a mistake.

I still wonder if Buddy meant T-Y instead of T-J in 2012...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TC in St. Louis said:

He's rated mid 2nd to early 3rd.  Just keep an eye on him and make a deal when the time is right.

 

OK but again...if he ends being Terrell Owens will anyone cry about him going 30th in 5 years?

 

The end justification for any draft pick is how they perform after being drafted not where they were graded...that is subjective and different teams have different grades.

 

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team is in win now mode.  Don't draft a WR high when the room is already packed.  CB, RB, DL.  WR is a waste of a pick this year.  Only a team with a win in the next 2-3 years & not win now with the WRs we have would draft a WR.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 3
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

The team is in win now mode.  Don't draft a WR high when the room is already packed.  CB, RB, DL.  WR is a waste of a pick this year.  Only a team with a win in the next 2-3 years & not win now with the WRs we have would draft a WR.  

Draft picks are never a win-now scenario. They're 4-5 year investments. If you're looking for a win-now move, you sign a known commodity in FA to a big contract.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, billybrew1 said:

I'm all for a WR, but I want an outside WR with speed. A #2 WR is what we need. We need more legit weapons on the outside (with speed).


Why does it matter where the speed comes from? Just get a playmaker who makes things hard for opposing defenses.

13 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

The team is in win now mode.  Don't draft a WR high when the room is already packed.  CB, RB, DL.  WR is a waste of a pick this year.  Only a team with a win in the next 2-3 years & not win now with the WRs we have would draft a WR.  


A WR isn’t a wasted pick when 2 of your top 4 WRs are in their 30’s. Sanders is only here for 1 year and Beasley isn’t getting any younger.

Edited by Bangarang
  • Like (+1) 9
  • Agree 7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Why does it matter where the speed comes from? Just get a playmaker who makes things hard for opposing defenses.


A WR isn’t a wasted pick when 2 of your top 4 WRs are in their 30’s and in the last year of their contracts.

 

Is a WR worth an early pick when they've played 7 games in 2 years? 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few wrs who are options at 30.  I dont know where Moore shakes out.  Everyone is running sub 4.4 w/o lazer timing.  I like his explosion.  At 30 I would like edge, Cb, or pass catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Mahomes showed you can blow up defenses with a big arm and fast little receivers who get wide open.  Josh does the same thing and has had no problem throwing to small guys like Beasley Isaiah and brown.  I don’t hate little receivers as much as I used to.  The era of megatron and Julio may have passed.  

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he play his whole  College career like he did his Freshman year he’d be a top 10 pick for sure. Rolling the dice with his injury history. Not just hammies. Toney or the Ole Miss guy are similar. With less red flags. I’d be good with any of them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


A WR isn’t a wasted pick when 2 of your top 4 WRs are in their 30’s. Sanders is only here for 1 year and Beasley isn’t getting any younger.

You want your top pick to play.  Thinking like that is what PO'd Aaron Rodgers last year when GB picked a QB when he wanted another piece to get to the Super Bowl.  Result: Rodgers lost at home in the NFC championship game while GBs #1 pick sat.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

You want your top pick to play.  Thinking like that is what PO'd Aaron Rodgers last year when GB picked a QB when he wanted another piece to get to the Super Bowl.  Result: Rodgers lost at home in the NFC championship game while GBs #1 pick sat.


Drafting a Wr when you have a good Wr unit is not the same as drafting a qb when you already have a franchise qb.  Multiple WRs are needed on every offensive plays.  Sometimes 5 WRs.  You never need more than 1 qb on any given play.  
 

Our team, over the next 10+ years will be predicated on having a dominant passing offense.  We have a couple aging vets and currently lack SPEED.  Any WR that can get deep and/or be a threat to score every time he catches the ball would be a HUGE addition, whether you believe it or not.  We need speed 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

 

OK but again...if he ends being Terrell Owens will anyone cry about him going 30th in 5 years?

 

The end justification for any draft pick is how they perform after being drafted not where they were graded...that is subjective and different teams have different grades.

 

How is Terrell Owens a comparison to a small slot receiver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

You want your top pick to play.  Thinking like that is what PO'd Aaron Rodgers last year when GB picked a QB when he wanted another piece to get to the Super Bowl.  Result: Rodgers lost at home in the NFC championship game while GBs #1 pick sat.


How Aaron Rodgers feels is irrelevant to me. I want playmakers on this team, regardless of the position they play. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Albany,n.y. said:

The team is in win now mode.  Don't draft a WR high when the room is already packed.  CB, RB, DL.  WR is a waste of a pick this year.  Only a team with a win in the next 2-3 years & not win now with the WRs we have would draft a WR.  


This year, the Bills are only an injured WR or two away from losing their identity. Sanders is 34 and likely won’t be on the team next year, while Beasley might have two more seasons left. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

How is Terrell Owens a comparison to a small slot receiver?

 

Just saying if his career ends up turning out like Terrell Owens...would you be happier if I compared him to Steve Smith?

2 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

He's only 5'9" but then you have the speed factor.

 

I like big, tall, physical guys who can catch any ball that is anywhere near their huge wingspan, despite being well covered.  

 

But we need a speed burner threat! 

 

 

 

 

You mean like Kelvin Benjamin?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

You want your top pick to play.  Thinking like that is what PO'd Aaron Rodgers last year when GB picked a QB when he wanted another piece to get to the Super Bowl.  Result: Rodgers lost at home in the NFC championship game while GBs #1 pick sat.

I believe GB drafted Love to piss off Rodgers, and it resulted in one of the best seasons of his career. No way he plays the way he did if he was his regular, mildly grumpy self.

Edited by Boxcar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

He's only 5'9" but then you have the speed factor.

 

I like big, tall, physical guys who can catch any ball that is anywhere near their huge wingspan, despite being well covered.  

 

But we need a speed burner threat! 

 

 

 

 

I am scarred by WR' under 6' that are fast

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Just saying if his career ends up turning out like Terrell Owens...would you be happier if I compared him to Steve Smith?

 

You mean like Kelvin Benjamin?

If you mean that Owens out-produced his draft position, then I understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

🤣🤣🤣

 

I am dying laughing watching how good this guy’s highlights are...4.29 speed and can stop on a dime...almost cartoonish...he is ALWAYS open...

20 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said:

 

I am scarred by WR' under 6' that are fast

 

 

 

This dude’s speed is other worldly...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

100% on the Rondale Moore train. Kid is going to be a monster. Hopefully he falls enough to where we can just take him in the second round after we take an impact defensive player round 1

I would trade Singletary and our 2nd round pick to move up and take him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Max Fischer said:


This year, the Bills are only an injured WR or two away from losing their identity. Sanders is 34 and likely won’t be on the team next year, while Beasley might have two more seasons left. 

Beasley and Sanders are in their 30's.  If you cant stop KC out score em.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, McBean said:

Say it with me..

 

ELIJAH. MOORE. 
 

oleeee misssss

 

Superstar 

 

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

I love Elijah Moore......would prefer him over Rondale 💯 

 

 

Permission to join your klatch, boys. Gimme Elijah over Rondale eight ways to Sunday. I would be more than happy to hear EM's name called at #30.

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...