Jump to content

"Team to Watch" - Bills to "Go for it"


Recommended Posts

it is the time to go for it.  QB on a rookie contract.  Stud CB, LB, and DT on rookie contracts.  No reason not to add the proper veterans NOW (only if they are the right ones) and go for it.  
 

I'd like to see Hooper and a veteran Edge (if possible) added.  

 

Keeping Spain was another big win.  

Just now, Lurker said:

Translating "going for it":      Trade up for Ruggs...

 

wouldn't oppose that either.  He seems like the total package.  Speed, hands, tough.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lurker said:

Translating "going for it":      Trade up for Ruggs...

I thought that it meant trading for a WR as well. It could be up for one of the top guys or trading for an established guy. I think that the Bills make 1 or 2 major moves. I’d consider either of those major moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I thought that it meant trading for a WR as well. It could be up for one of the top guys or trading for an established guy. I think that the Bills make 1 or 2 major moves. I’d consider either of those major moves.

 

I think Ruggs may be the guy.   

 

Beane has talked about having a Tyreek Hill-type player that can score on any given play.    That might also describe Lamb (but not Jeudy), but I see Ruggs as the kind of wildcard option that Daboll loves so much...   

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I thought that it meant trading for a WR as well. It could be up for one of the top guys or trading for an established guy. I think that the Bills make 1 or 2 major moves. I’d consider either of those major moves.

 

Is Ruggs a better fit than Jeudy or Lamb in a trade-up? I doubt they could trade-up high enough for Jeudy or Lamb, but what if all 3 were available at their trade-up spot? What are your thoughts on a backup QB? Do you think they add one, or go with Barkley?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PIZ said:

 

Is Ruggs a better fit than Jeudy or Lamb in a trade-up? I doubt they could trade-up high enough for Jeudy or Lamb, but what if all 3 were available at their trade-up spot? What are your thoughts on a backup QB? Do you think they add one, or go with Barkley?

IMO Lamb is the best possible scenario 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all those who were whining about the deficiencies of the team last year - THIS WAS ALWAYS THE PLAN - they have been building the team for 2020 since they got there.

42 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

wouldn't oppose that either.  He [RUGGS] seems like the total package.  Speed, hands, tough.  

 

... injured twice in this calendar year...

 

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/henry-ruggs-nfl-combine-jon-ross-40-yard-dash/k4uuhfuwuj6e1sg85g37hztvr

 

Not saying I wouldn't take him - but putting all the chips down on one guy who's popped a hamstring and gotten a concussion in the last 3 months is a little scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Is this to suggest that the last twenty years, they were NOT 'going for it'? Hmmmm...I wish they would've told me.

 

And the last time in those 20 years where they were coming off a 10-win playoff season with a rookie-contract QB, a top 3 defense, and over $80M in cap room was...?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Lurker said:

Translating "going for it":      Trade up for Ruggs...

 

I'm no scout for certain,  but I worry that he hasn't had to make alot (or any) contested catches. In his highlights he's always wide open. I don't expect this to be the norm for him in the NFL. He'll probably see more press coverage and over the top help, especially if he's moves into the #1 WR spot here. I certainly wouldn't complain if we landed him, but I'll be watching this closely if we do. Thankfully we have Beane and I trust him more than any GM we've had to date. Go Bills!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

I think Ruggs may be the guy.   

 

Beane has talked about having a Tyreek Hill-type player that can score on any given play.    That might also describe Lamb (but not Jeudy), but I see Ruggs as the kind of wildcard option that Daboll loves so much...   

 

Seriously?  Have you seen that dudes moves in the open field?  His cuts are incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PIZ said:

 

Is Ruggs a better fit than Jeudy or Lamb in a trade-up? I doubt they could trade-up high enough for Jeudy or Lamb, but what if all 3 were available at their trade-up spot? What are your thoughts on a backup QB? Do you think they add one, or go with Barkley?

We certainly seem to be a trade up team lately.  Josh, Tremaine, Cody and Knox all cost us multiple picks.   

In order to move up far enough to get any receiver we wanted it would cost us a 1st next year.  Such a move would be considered madness with the WR depth, although it looks like there's only going to be room to add one starter on offense with everyone returning (including coaches) so maybe Beaner has a specific guy in mind for that and he's willing to bet the farm on it.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, babulator said:

 

I'm no scout for certain,  but I worry that he hasn't had to make alot (or any) contested catches. In his highlights he's always wide open. I don't expect this to be the norm for him in the NFL. He'll probably see more press coverage and over the top help, especially if he's moves into the #1 WR spot here. I certainly wouldn't complain if we landed him, but I'll be watching this closely if we do. Thankfully we have Beane and I trust him more than any GM we've had to date. Go Bills!

 

 

 

Well, using Beane's benchmark of Tyreek Hill as an example, how often is Hill open or making contested catches?    Even NFL DBs are going to have problems with a 4.27 guy.     

 

That said, I do have some concerns with Ruggs' footwork in getting off the line right now.    He has some things to work on, but his ceiling is certainly "going for it" worthy, IMO... 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, PIZ said:

 

Is Ruggs a better fit than Jeudy or Lamb in a trade-up? I doubt they could trade-up high enough for Jeudy or Lamb, but what if all 3 were available at their trade-up spot? What are your thoughts on a backup QB? Do you think they add one, or go with Barkley?

Personally, I have Ruggs as my number 2. He’s just so explosive but I’d be good with any of them.

 

I would like to see them add someone to go with Barkley. Barkley and Josh have a great relationship and he’s relatively inexpensive. With that being said, if the Bills believe they are a contender, this is when you invest in backup QB. If Josh is to miss a month you have to be able to play .500 without him. I would look at someone like Keenum at the right price (or Brissett if he becomes available). The Saints were paying Teddy quite a bit to be the #2 last year because their window was open. Brees goes down and Teddy goes 5-0. That kept them from a wasted year. 

25 minutes ago, Da webster guy said:

We certainly seem to be a trade up team lately.  Josh, Tremaine, Cody and Knox all cost us multiple picks.   

In order to move up far enough to get any receiver we wanted it would cost us a 1st next year.  Such a move would be considered madness with the WR depth, although it looks like there's only going to be room to add one starter on offense with everyone returning (including coaches) so maybe Beaner has a specific guy in mind for that and he's willing to bet the farm on it.  

 

 

I don’t think that’s the case at all. As an example, Tampa at 14 is probably the earliest that you’d go to. You can get there for 22 and 54 according to the draft value chart. You’d basically be paying the premium of a 4th round pick.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Is this to suggest that the last twenty years, they were NOT 'going for it'? Hmmmm...I wish they would've told me.


I’m certain that they -“thought”- they were trying to improve...
 

Go Bills!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading up for a WR, especially Juedy or Lamb would be great (assuming price is right)...but I think Beanes is going to make a move to get a premiere edge rusher either via FA or trading for one, or trading up to get a guy he covets (if any).  

 

This draft is rich at WR, we can get a premiere prospect without making a big trade, but landing a good edge rusher is going to be a tougher task without making a big move IMO.  So think this could indicate a more likely move for someone at EDGE.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Trading up for a WR, especially Juedy or Lamb would be great (assuming price is right)...but I think Beanes is going to make a move to get a premiere edge rusher either via FA or trading for one, or trading up to get a guy he covets (if any).  

 

This draft is rich at WR, we can get a premiere prospect without making a big trade, but landing a good edge rusher is going to be a tougher task without making a big move IMO.  So think this could indicate a more likely move for someone at EDGE.

He’s not trading up for an edge in this draft (unless by some miracle Chase Young slides). There is no value there.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

He’s not trading up for an edge in this draft (unless by some miracle Chase Young slides). There is no value there.

 

I could see them doing it maybe for Chaisson if he got to an acceptable cost range.  And yeah, no way Young gets anywhere near a spot where Beane would spend to go get.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Never NEVER Give-up said:

I was surprised when I heard this - I talked to Brandon Bean at the Combine and he said Yeah This is the Year, They're gonna go for it, getting to the playoffs is not good enough . . .

 

https://www.buffalobills.com/video/around-the-nfl-why-the-buffalo-bills-are-a-team-to-watch-in-2020-offseason

need  big  improvement from JA and a better offense and for the defense to maintain. ...QB + continued good D. all depends on that.

If Josh stays making mistakes and not scoring points and the D slips at all we could be looking at 7-9 or 8-8

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love it, must be trying to swing trades for McCaffrey, Kerrigan and Kupp as we speak! Sign Conklin and Hunter Henry and our O can match our Defensive dominance

42 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

This can only mean more Carolina Panther players are coming

Who did we miss?

 

Image result for thinking gif4

McCaffrey and Coach Kuechly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

McCaffrey and Coach Kuechly

 

This ^  the only other Panthers I want to see in Buffalo.  Any more than that, if I'm Pegula, I'm wrapping Beane and McDermott in brown bags and UPSing them back to Carolina.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

This ^  the only other Panthers I want to see in Buffalo.  Any more than that, if I'm Pegula, I'm wrapping Beane and McDermott in brown bags and UPSing them back to Carolina.

Dj Moore says hello

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Is this to suggest that the last twenty years, they were NOT 'going for it'? Hmmmm...I wish they would've told me.


Well, when you consider there was at least one season where they were like $40M under the cap ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I could see them doing it maybe for Chaisson if he got to an acceptable cost range.  And yeah, no way Young gets anywhere near a spot where Beane would spend to go get.  

 


How about a trade for Ingakoue?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Personally, I have Ruggs as my number 2. He’s just so explosive but I’d be good with any of them.

 

I would like to see them add someone to go with Barkley. Barkley and Josh have a great relationship and he’s relatively inexpensive. With that being said, if the Bills believe they are a contender, this is when you invest in backup QB. If Josh is to miss a month you have to be able to play .500 without him. I would look at someone like Keenum at the right price (or Brissett if he becomes available). The Saints were paying Teddy quite a bit to be the #2 last year because their window was open. Brees goes down and Teddy goes 5-0. That kept them from a wasted year. 

I don’t think that’s the case at all. As an example, Tampa at 14 is probably the earliest that you’d go to. You can get there for 22 and 54 according to the draft value chart. You’d basically be paying the premium of a 4th round pick.

 

Yes I see.  We had 22nd pick 2 years ago, moved up to 16 for Tremaine and only had to give up 65th overall.

I was thinking a few of these WR's might go higher.  I remember being shocked at the Mike Williams, Corey Davis, John Ross picks all ahead of us a few years back.  

WR's are strange cats.  They're high risk prospects that can look so dominant in college and so average in the pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...