Jump to content

Joe B. All-22 vs Cowboys: Ford may have sealed his fate as a Guard in 2020


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Dkollidas said:


I think Spain has been solid, but I just have a feeling that with what’s out there this off-season, he’s going to get $7M-$9M on a 3-4 yr deal. I’m just not ready to do that for a guy who’s ok. 
Pay Dawkins, we can pay Morse, and if Feliciano keeps his play up next year, we can play him. 
 

Spain is a road grader, perfect for a run heavy scheme, but I feel his abilities aren’t very rare or hard to find. 

 

Long and a mid round draft pick along with a cheap UFA if they feel the necessity, should be able to figure that spot out. 

 

Honestly, offensive line play is bad all over the place. If we have something that works, I don’t see breaking it up. Especially since we have the money. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2019 at 7:31 PM, vincec said:

I haven't broken down film or anything, but to the naked eye it certainly looks like he has struggled in 1v1 pass protection. However, I think it's crazy to say that he has "sealed his fate" to play guard. The guy is a rookie. I think he deserves a chance to work on his game a little- at least one offseason, at minimum.

You haven't "broken down film" or anything. Are you a pro scout that can make that statement? Your ? takes are always a good laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Eric Wood thinks everyone on the Bills OL can block.   He's still a teammate.

 

Von Miller?   What was the ratio in that game 50 run plays to 25 pass plays?   That's the definition of a long day for an undersized edge player.

 

Just use your eyes.   You pointed it out yourself with that play you illustrated.   You can just throw a dart at any random pass play and there is a good chance that the only guy running free at the QB is was Ford's man.  ?     


Yeah, this whole, “what does Joe B know?” line of defense is pretty thin. He’s not looking at stunting DL and trying to figure out the protection call and discover if the mistake was Ford’s.

 

Hes watching a DE run right around a Ford and straight to the QB. Or bull rush Ford back into Allen’s lap.

 

In the Athletic article they edited together like 8-10 plays to illustrate Ford’s struggles and all but one was legit. I do take issue with the 3rd down play in the end zone where Allen stepped forward to make that ridiculous throw to Beasley. On the play Ford pushed his guy wide and deep enough. Other than that every play shown was Ford getting dismantled.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OL is playing well enough, especially compared to a lot of other OLs around the league.

 

I've been a proponent of letting Ford develop and could see him turning into a decent RT eventually.

 

All that said, I dont think Joe B has been unfair or unnecessarily negative about Ford's performances so far either. The kid does have some improving to do. I appreciate Joe focusing on it because that is a big point of interest (at least for me).

 

And even if he does end up moving to LG, he looks like he'll be a helluva good LG. So I'll take that for a 2nd round pick (yeah, and whatever we traded to move up, i dont care).

 

It's all good no matter how it shakes out.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2019 at 7:05 PM, whatdrought said:

Brian Balldinger said the exact opposite about Ford... Not sure whose take is more accurate. 

 

Also, I'm not okay letting Spain walk just to try Ford at guard. I don't care what his pedigree is. 

Joe B lost his impact after leaving TV.  He seems to feel writing something dramatic is necessary in his new job.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

You haven't "broken down film" or anything. Are you a pro scout that can make that statement? Your ? takes are always a good laugh

It was sarcasm, since most of the “experts” justify their analysis by stating that they have “reviewed the all-22 multiple times” or watched every play from said player, including Joe B from the OP. But I know that through your colored glasses every post that says something you don’t like is laughable so I don’t take your criticism seriously.

Edited by vincec
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2019 at 7:05 PM, whatdrought said:

Also, I'm not okay letting Spain walk just to try Ford at guard. I don't care what his pedigree is. 

 

I'll be surprised if they sign Spain as likely will try for a big contract which someone will offer.  Think the Bills would rather draft a guy for that position, cheaper and aligns with the "build thru the draft" concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2019 at 7:37 PM, John from Riverside said:

This is the way I think its going to play out

 

Spain is going to want a huge contract......one of the reasons he was even available to us was because he was waiting for money that never materialized and it didnt happen.

 

He has been solid this year.....on a team going to the playoffs......and when the season is over he is going to be looking for one again.

 

Ford is waiting in the wings as a starting guard....and we have a insane amount of depth at the position.

 

Ford to LT.....Jon F. gets extended at RT.......we keep the ex Jet C/G and the guy we traded for as depth......we find another RT.

 

 

 

If Ford isn't doesn't have the footwork and quickness to play RT, he's very unlikely to make a good LT. The big difference between OTs and OGs is footwork and quickness, and LTs generally need to be more agile and quicker than RTs.   It's very common for collegiate OTs to move to the inside in the pros because they fit the guard position better than they do the tackle position.  A good/great guard makes the OL better than a mediocre tackle. 

 

Edit: John from Riverside: I replied to this before I saw that you meant LG rather than LT.

Edited by SoTier
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Beane proved he can find olinemen and in particular interior ones in FA last off season. I think we will see another signing like Feliciano. I think Brandon will try to resign Spain but won’t overpay. Long is a possibility as a starter at guard next year. Bills will sign another vet tackle to compete. Ford will start at RT in training camp. Players do get better. I don’t see Beane and McDermott only giving Ford one season to show he can play RT.

 

You can't assume that either FA or the draft is going to produce the right talent that a team needs because the FO was successful in acquiring talent at that position the previous year.  The available talent changes from year to year, and that's especially true for positions like OL where the talent is very limited.  Beane lucked out in 2019. 

 

I think it would be wise for the Bills to make a serious effort to re-sign the OLers who have worked out the best for them, primarily Feliciano and Spain.   The OL is absolutely the unit where a team should spend big $$$, especially if they have aspirations for consistent success during the regular season and playoffs.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

You can't assume that either FA or the draft is going to produce the right talent that a team needs because the FO was successful in acquiring talent at that position the previous year.  The available talent changes from year to year, and that's especially true for positions like OL where the talent is very limited.  Beane lucked out in 2019. 

 

I think it would be wise for the Bills to make a serious effort to re-sign the OLers who have worked out the best for them, primarily Feliciano and Spain.   The OL is absolutely the unit where a team should spend big $$$, especially if they have aspirations for consistent success during the regular season and playoffs.  

Agreed every off season is different and who is available changes. 
I don’t think Beane ‘lucked out’. I’m pretty sure he and the staff did their due diligence before making the signings they did.

I am a big believer in that  oline is the single most important unit on a team. A little bias on my part because I played on the oline Into my college days. I trust Brandon and his staff to review all players available before making decisions and how much to pay someone. Not sure I would of been able to say that about the Bills FO for a long time.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Agreed every off season is different and who is available changes. 
I don’t think Beane ‘lucked out’. I’m pretty sure he and the staff did their due diligence before making the signings they did.

I am a big believer in that  oline is the single most important unit on a team. A little bias on my part because I played on the oline Into my college days. I trust Brandon and his staff to review all players available before making decisions and how much to pay someone. Not sure I would of been able to say that about the Bills FO for a long time.

SoTier is a joke. He will be the first to criticize moves that don't work out, but when they do it is the product of "luck."  I'm all about investing in the O-Line. WR, good or bad, barely matter.  Its the O-Line that makes tangible play in and play out impact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Agreed every off season is different and who is available changes. 
I don’t think Beane ‘lucked out’. I’m pretty sure he and the staff did their due diligence before making the signings they did.

I am a big believer in that  oline is the single most important unit on a team. A little bias on my part because I played on the oline Into my college days. I trust Brandon and his staff to review all players available before making decisions and how much to pay someone. Not sure I would of been able to say that about the Bills FO for a long time.

 

Beane lucked out in that there was talent available.  You can't sign decent/good FAs if they aren't available, and with OLers, even guys who are decent/good but not great never make it to FA.  It's the same in the draft.  Just because the Bills really need a WR1 and this looks like a good year for WRs doesn't mean that the WRs available when they pick are what they want -- or that there's not a better player at another position available that ought to be a no-brainer to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

SoTier is a joke. He will be the first to criticize moves that don't work out, but when they do it is the product of "luck."  I'm all about investing in the O-Line. WR, good or bad, barely matter.  Its the O-Line that makes tangible play in and play out impact. 

 

When you have nothing to add to discussions except to engage in ad hominem attacks, you demonstrate the quality of your football knowledge or lack of same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

SoTier is a joke. He will be the first to criticize moves that don't work out, but when they do it is the product of "luck."  I'm all about investing in the O-Line. WR, good or bad, barely matter.  Its the O-Line that makes tangible play in and play out impact. 

Image result for nailed it gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

When you have nothing to add to discussions except to engage in ad hominem attacks, you demonstrate the quality of your football knowledge or lack of same.

Sorry, man, that ship has sailed with you. You live in a fantasy land.  You simply are not to be taken seriously, especially for the exact example I cited above. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

When you have nothing to add to discussions except to engage in ad hominem attacks, you demonstrate the quality of your football knowledge or lack of same.

Give credit where credit is due, T&KP, BB & SM have done a very good job turning this once miserably run organization into a respectable professional football team.  Are they perfect?  are you perfect?, am I perfect, Hell no, is the answer,  but they are doing well with what has been available to work with, jmo. Stop being so freakin grumpy all the time, nuthin but luv...

 

Go Bills!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoTier said:

 

When you have nothing to add to discussions except to engage in ad hominem attacks, you demonstrate the quality of your football knowledge or lack of same.

 

I'll tell you what, explain to me how you justify criticizing the front office's previous misses, but call their successes "luck."  Tell me how that is not bad faith. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SoTier said:

 

Beane lucked out in that there was talent available.  You can't sign decent/good FAs if they aren't available, and with OLers, even guys who are decent/good but not great never make it to FA.  It's the same in the draft.  Just because the Bills really need a WR1 and this looks like a good year for WRs doesn't mean that the WRs available when they pick are what they want -- or that there's not a better player at another position available that ought to be a no-brainer to take.

 

3 hours ago, SoTier said:

 

When you have nothing to add to discussions except to engage in ad hominem attacks, you demonstrate the quality of your football knowledge or lack of same.

Ok, speaking of football knowledge, do we know what olineman will be available in FA this up coming year? I’m sure one of the better posters in this area can quickly provide the options. 
The draft is a little more subjective where talent will fall, but I’m sure there will be some available in every round. 
Beane showed he could find talent. If it’s luck, ok. I just think he is to smart of a guy. Like he left WR and De available as a draft option for the 2020 draft, both positions have been mentioned many places as being deep this year. Again, could be luck or could be strategy. Either way if the wins keep happening, I’ll take it.
 

Edited by atlbillsfan1975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2019 at 10:57 PM, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

It depends upon who you read.  Erik Turner (Cover1) is pretty good.  He's not 100%, but he's pretty good.

 

 

I'm not sure what you're disagreeing about - that a QB roll-out to buy time for the secondary route to develop is a part of the run and shoot?

 

You can debate that specific play - Looking again at the all 22, Ford does lose the guy at the point where Allen steps forward, then he re-engages and keeps him off Allen's back.  But it's a secondary route, and needs time beyond the primary route to develop.

 

Edit: I think this is a different play than you're quoting Cover1 about - Allen's throw from the endzone - but I think this is pretty definitive.

This is Eric Wood breaking down the play on the Bills "Chopping Wood" segment and he specifically calls out Ford IN A GOOD WAY for "driving DeMarcus Lawrence by"

https://www.buffalobills.com/video/chopping-wood-beast-mode-beasley-and-extraordinary-ed-oliver

 

PS no, the TD throw to Beas that he specifically called out as an SMU play is NOT from the pocket.  Look at it again.  That's Allen on the hashes at the 33 and Beasley on the "1" at the 10.  If you look at it very similar play from Ford where he starts to get beat outside and then drives the defender by Allen into the backfield, then Allen slides right and forward while waiting for Beas' 2ndary route.

 

image.thumb.png.e0ecfb517a9cda66b93e75a014bcdb55.png

 

 

I'm disagreeing with the whole idea of rolling out having been intended here or in any of the plays on that whole video.

 

You said, "... it's less bolting from the pocket than the designed roll-out and secondary routes concepts from Mouse Davis run-and-shoot that Beasley ran at SMU under June Jones." But it wasn't a designed roll-out, none of the plays on video had any rollout of any kind, there was no mention of rolling out or any synonym or anything like it in the rest of the article, including all the stuff on June Jones.

 

The play itself wasn't a designed rollout, it was a straight dropback with Josh being forced off his spot when Ford had trouble with the edge rush. Do you use the word "rollout" when the QB first moves up in the pocket underneath outside pressure and then runs wide? I certainly don't, and that would seem to me a misuse. Roll means a rounded shape, it implies that the QB runs or rolls around the outside of the pocket, not that he steps up and then escapes out the edge. What Josh did I would not call a rollout in any way shape or form, and it certainly wasn't designed. The dropback was straight back.

 

He did escape the pocket, but nowhere in the Mouse Davis stuff did the QB even escape the pocket, nor is that idea mentioned in the text about Mouse. QB rollouts may be a part of the run-and-shoot - they're part of nearly every offense at times such as when protection is regularly breaking down and on certain plays - but neither of those college plays was a rollout, designed or not, nor did the QB leave the pocket.

 

Here's June Jones, Beasley's coach who he learned the play from, breaking down that exact play. He does not mention escaping the pocket in any way, and in fact expects the QB to generally make his mind up and throw at just about the time in the play when Allen was being forced to leave his spot. He has a video. Again, no leaving the pocket and no mention of the possibility.

 

 

Thanks for pointing me towards the "Chopping Wood" interview, it was nice. But I disagree that he said that anything very positive about Ford on that play out of the end zone you mention. He's really positive about the line as a whole, and then says Ford, "is able to drive DeMarcus Lawrence by." It's questionable whether he's saying anything more positive there than that Ford didn't quite let Allen get sacked. That's hardly "in a good way," to my ears. More like that with the help of Allen stepping up and ducking under, Ford didn't allow a sack, though he did allow the rusher to force Allen to leave his spot. Since the guard and center both did a great job, Allen was able to step up and then escape, but while Ford didn't allow a catastrophe, he also didn't do well.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2019 at 2:51 AM, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Eric Wood seems to think he can.  Von Miller gave him props.  Huh.

 

 

Again, I don't think it's all that clear that Wood thinks he can.

 

In the same Eric Wood video you mentioned, on Beasley's TD, Wood says, "... and Josh Allen operating out of an empty set is able to identify the coverage pre-snap, he does a great job of avoiding the rush, stepping up to his right and he finds just ..."

 

Strangely, Eric doesn't mention Ford specifically on that play, in which it is Ford's man who forces Josh to do a great job of avoiding the rush.

 

 

 

I hope the more optimistic folks here are right. If he can get better and start handling faster edge rushers better, it'd be great news for the Bills. It's early, maybe he can do it, but it looks to me more like a physical inability to move that quickly rather than anything technique-related. I could be wrong though.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, SoTier said:

 

Beane lucked out in that there was talent available.  You can't sign decent/good FAs if they aren't available, and with OLers, even guys who are decent/good but not great never make it to FA.  It's the same in the draft.  Just because the Bills really need a WR1 and this looks like a good year for WRs doesn't mean that the WRs available when they pick are what they want -- or that there's not a better player at another position available that ought to be a no-brainer to take.


My god dude grow up.  You will lead a crusade of negativity against the Bills but when there’s success, it’s “luck”.  You’re so one sided in your views it’s ridiculous.

 

Beane hires scouts to scout players.  These are the players they targeted.  They understood the market.  That’s not luck like you will stubbornly say it is.  
 

If the Bills win Sunday, won’t hear much from you.  If they lose...man you’ll be singing on these boards.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Sorry, man, that ship has sailed with you. You live in a fantasy land.  You simply are not to be taken seriously, especially for the exact example I cited above. 

 

 

Want to know how much in fantasy land he really is?  This was an argument he had with me before the season.  This just shows you he just blurts things out without putting any thought behind it.  He's telling me he never brought up first time HC's....that I was the one who did.  It was so bizarre...I had to save it.

SoTier.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

 

Want to know how much in fantasy land he really is?  This was an argument he had with me before the season.  This just shows you he just blurts things out without putting any thought behind it.  He's telling me he never brought up first time HC's....that I was the one who did.  It was so bizarre...I had to save it.

SoTier.jpg

 

I keep using the word beautiful to describe it. I've just never seen anything like it. It is a beautiful chaos.  Good to keep receipts on guys like him. Total hypocrite. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2019 at 7:01 PM, nedboy7 said:

What did PFF have to say about this???

I know mentioning PFF around here is guaranteed to get eye rolls, but FWIW (and they review/grade every play from scrimmage, something most of us don't have time or skill to do) here's they're scores for our O line so far this year. I don't pay PFF for premium, but I think the 60ish range is considered the floor for an above "replacement level" player. 70 and above is usually a starter grade. 85 and above are pro bowlers.

 

Ford 54.2

Spain 59.5

Morse 60.9

Feliciano 61.4

Nsekhe 67.3

Dawkins 71.5

 

Quick points from my non-expert perspective:

-I think the ranking is about right (e.g., Dawkins clearly the best, Ford clearly the worst), although I don't have any basis to say something like "Nsekhe is 13 points better than Ford." Better? Indeed.

-I also think you have a veteran group (minus Ford) that works together better than perhaps the individual performances would suggest. A kind of "whole is greater than the sum of the parts" thing. And the line was so awful last year - particularly at the start of the year - that simple competence is pretty remarkable for Bills fans. It was a huge turnaround, and combined with a couple veteran/above average receivers and Allen's growth, the offense has gone from awful to solid (with better to come?) in record time.

 

EDIT: I'll note that Knox/Smith/Kroft are huge upgrades over what we got on the blocking side of the equation from Clay/O'Leary/Croom last year, so that helps too. Yes, even Lee Smith (in the average range for TEs overall, and we know he contributes zero in the receiving category)

 

By the way, thanks to many of the insightful commenters here. I enjoy reading a thread and feeling like I've actually learned something. (Or maybe I'm just in the mood to spread holiday cheer)

 

Edited by The Frankish Reich
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BurpleBull said:

I think he'd thrive at G for the most part, but I think he'd still struggle a bit picking up blitzes that aren't coming straight at him. 

 

Stop trying to fit a square peg in a round hole and just find a high quality replacement at RT. 

I think that is entirely possible especially with the Beane "We will start him out at RT" comment he made before the draft

 

The question is....what RT possibilities WILL be available.....def not against drafting one.....what will be available in free at RT in free agency.   I dont want to sign someone just to sign someone remember we also have Waddle coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I know mentioning PFF around here is guaranteed to get eye rolls, but FWIW (and they review/grade every play from scrimmage, something most of us don't have time or skill to do) here's they're scores for our O line so far this year. I don't pay PFF for premium, but I think the 60ish range is considered the floor for an above "replacement level" player. 70 and above is usually a starter grade. 85 and above are pro bowlers.

 

Ford 54.2

Spain 59.5

Morse 60.9

Feliciano 61.4

Nsekhe 67.3

Dawkins 71.5

 

Quick points from my non-expert perspective:

-I think the ranking is about right (e.g., Dawkins clearly the best, Ford clearly the worst), although I don't have any basis to say something like "Nsekhe is 13 points better than Ford." Better? Indeed.

-I also think you have a veteran group (minus Ford) that works together better than perhaps the individual performances would suggest. A kind of "whole is greater than the sum of the parts" thing. And the line was so awful last year - particularly at the start of the year - that simple competence is pretty remarkable for Bills fans. It was a huge turnaround, and combined with a couple veteran/above average receivers and Allen's growth, the offense has gone from awful to solid (with better to come?) in record time.

 

EDIT: I'll note that Knox/Smith/Kroft are huge upgrades over what we got on the blocking side of the equation from Clay/O'Leary/Croom last year, so that helps too. Yes, even Lee Smith (in the average range for TEs overall, and we know he contributes zero in the receiving category)

 

By the way, thanks to many of the insightful commenters here. I enjoy reading a thread and feeling like I've actually learned something. (Or maybe I'm just in the mood to spread holiday cheer)

 

 

One caveat I might add to this is that we don't know how they are graded for running versus passing. I believe that Ford has been touted as a better run blocker than pass blocker, while I would expect that it's the opposite for all or most of the rest of our lineman.

 

Also, our highest paid lineman Morse :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2019 at 7:49 AM, SoTier said:

 

Beane lucked out in that there was talent available.  You can't sign decent/good FAs if they aren't available, and with OLers, even guys who are decent/good but not great never make it to FA.  It's the same in the draft.  Just because the Bills really need a WR1 and this looks like a good year for WRs doesn't mean that the WRs available when they pick are what they want -- or that there's not a better player at another position available that ought to be a no-brainer to take.

 

Your assessment would be more accurate if most of Beane's successful signings were in super strong free agent classes flushed with talent. But Beane hit on many middling and under-appreciated free agents. This O-line market was not flushed with players. Feliciano, Spain, and Ty were mid-market or lower market free agents who are available in any free agent market. 

 

The WR market was rather average. Tyrell Williams, Adam Humphries, and Randle Cobb were some of the best talents on the market outside of Brown and Beasley. John Brown was an often injured WR whose most productive season was barely above 1000 yards several years ago. Cole Beasley was a mid-level solid slot WR. Neither Brown nor Beasley were exactly slam dunk signings. Beane's only duh signing was Andre Roberts who was so cheap for a pro-bowl special teams player at a position of need (although how many times have the Bills not made those types of signings.) 

 

The overall free agent market this past off-season while not bad was nothing special (No NFL free agency class is really special thanks to the Franchise tag and the fact that players will often get taken care of before they hit free agency.) Some of Beane's biggest hits in this market were on Feliciano and Spain players who were signed to lower end deals. 

 

Beane also made these massive improvements without tying up their cap long term. Only Mitch is hard to get out of past 2020. So the team is going to be in a position to supplement an already good roster over the rest of the course of Josh's rookie deal the next 3 seasons as even when Tre, Dawkins, Milano, Poyer and others come up for extensions some other significant contracts like Star will be able to be dropped.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Reader said:

 

One caveat I might add to this is that we don't know how they are graded for running versus passing. I believe that Ford has been touted as a better run blocker than pass blocker, while I would expect that it's the opposite for all or most of the rest of our lineman.

 

Also, our highest paid lineman Morse :(

Good points. I agree re: run vs. pass blocking. I think every veteran O lineman we picked up in the offseason graded higher last year in pass blocking vs. run blocking. Obviously protecting Allen and giving him time to learn/progress was the priority. Thankfully we also got Singletary, who appears fully capable of making yardage even when the holes aren't there.

On Morse: PFF may also undervalue him as he may be the key part to the "whole is more than the sum of the parts" thing, as the leader/caller on the O line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I think that is entirely possible especially with the Beane "We will start him out at RT" comment he made before the draft

 

The question is....what RT possibilities WILL be available.....def not against drafting one.....what will be available in free at RT in free agency.   I dont want to sign someone just to sign someone remember we also have Waddle coming back.

 

Jack Conklin is going to be a FA... I don't know how he's played lately, (based on how bad the TEN line is, probably not good) but his rookie year he made all-pro, if I'm not mistaken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I think that is entirely possible especially with the Beane "We will start him out at RT" comment he made before the draft

 

The question is....what RT possibilities WILL be available.....def not against drafting one.....what will be available in free at RT in free agency.   I dont want to sign someone just to sign someone remember we also have Waddle coming back.

 

Waddle is a free agent next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

 

Your assessment would be more accurate if most of Beane's successful signings were in super strong free agent classes flushed with talent. But Beane hit on many middling and under-appreciated free agents. This O-line market was not flushed with players. Feliciano, Spain, and Ty were mid-market or lower market free agents who are available in any free agent market. 

 

The WR market was rather average. Tyrell Williams, Adam Humphries, and Randle Cobb were some of the best talents on the market outside of Brown and Beasley. John Brown was an often injured WR whose most productive season was barely above 1000 yards several years ago. Cole Beasley was a mid-level solid slot WR. Neither Brown nor Beasley were exactly slam dunk signings. Beane's only duh signing was Andre Roberts who was so cheap for a pro-bowl special teams player at a position of need (although how many times have the Bills not made those types of signings.) 

 

The overall free agent market this past off-season while not bad was nothing special (No NFL free agency class is really special thanks to the Franchise tag and the fact that players will often get taken care of before they hit free agency.) Some of Beane's biggest hits in this market were on Feliciano and Spain players who were signed to lower end deals. 

 

Beane also made these massive improvements without tying up their cap long term. Only Mitch is hard to get out of past 2020. So the team is going to be in a position to supplement an already good roster over the rest of the course of Josh's rookie deal the next 3 seasons as even when Tre, Dawkins, Milano, Poyer and others come up for extensions some other significant contracts like Star will be able to be dropped.

Agreed. This was a fantastic offseason for Beane. As is often the case, its clear (Kroft) or uncertain (Morse) whether the big dollar signings were worth it. But the mid-level (Brown, Beasley, re-signing Jordan Phillips, Nsekhe) and cheapo (Gore, the other O linemen, even Lee Smith) have all been hits. The only one I might argue about (here I agree with you too): Andre Roberts. He's been exactly what they thought he'd be, but he's definitely on the high end for a return-only guy. Not a bust, just pricey.

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Jack Conklin is going to be a FA... I don't know how he's played lately, (based on how bad the TEN line is, probably not good) but his rookie year he made all-pro, if I'm not mistaken. 

 

Looks like he might be available.  Titans didn't pick up his 5th year option.  He's had some knee issues.

I'm wondering how much the Bills will be looking for a swing tackle if Ty doesn't make the team next year.

There is no real backup at LT other than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...