Jump to content

Four Different Starting QBs in One Season


Gugny

Recommended Posts

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gugny said:

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

Well people say the Bills suck and mock them.   

 

Well the Bills are out to prove them right.  

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

5 technically 

 

I'm sorry, but no.  Peterman, Allen, Anderson, Barkley.

 

I'm talking about how many different QBs start games; not how many different starters (i.e. - Peterman, then Allen, then Peterman again = 2 different starters).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gugny said:

there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position.  Am I wrong?

It would definitely be harder to prove you are wrong. How few games Peterman started and how many times he was benched during or after them is insane.

 

McClappy's insistence that Peterman could succeed only resulted with both having so much egg on their faces that they're both a bit of a "yolk" league wide.     

Edited by I am the egg man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey listen...keep trying guys until you find a good one. Even if it’s not by design. Eventually law of average is going to kick in and we are going to get lucky on a guy. Maybe that was kind of Fitz but Chan was so inept that the rest of the team made Fitz look bad. Someday we are going to have acceptable QB play again. Who knows? Maybe it will end up being tomorrow. You never know when a guy is just going to match up with a system and reach maximum potential. Maybe Dabol and Barkley will just click. Doubt it, but who knows?

Edited by Brianmoorman4jesus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

5 technically 

In agreement with your contention, there was some discussion the other day on talk radio that the direct snap to McCoy to start the Bills' offensive game vs. New England resulted in McCoy being technically listed as the starting QB for the game.  I heard only parts of the total discussion, so I do not know if the rule / statistic is correct.

 

 

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Clarification.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

The 1991 Philadelphia Eagles were similar to us albeit they were a better team.  Randall Cunningham went down in the first game of that year and they had at least three quarterbacks the rest of the year.  Also like the Bills they had a solid defense, theres was arguably the best in the league that year.

 

While theres parallels there the Eagles finished 10-6 that year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Another Fan said:

The 1991 Philadelphia Eagles were similar to us albeit they were a better team.  Randall Cunningham went down in the first game of that year and they had at least three quarterbacks the rest of the year.  Also like the Bills they had a solid defense, theres was arguably the best in the league that year.

 

While theres parallels there the Eagles finished 10-6 that year 

So they were sort of like the 2018 Bills, but completely different in pretty much every way imaginable.

 

Got it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

So they were sort of like the 2018 Bills, but completely different in pretty much every way imaginable.

 

Got it.

Both teams had to use several quarterbacks while having a solid defense.  And unless a miracle happens they both arent playoff teams 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

 

Botch?  So injuries are the coaches fault?  They said they intended Allen to start week 1, but his 3rd preseason game made them want to sit him a little early In this season and NP just flopped and JA got out in during week 1. 

 

Now hes hurt.  NP failed so they signed DA but had to keep NP too with Allen still hurt.  So they signed Barkley with both DA and JA still hurt, but again have to keep NP in case Barkley gets hurt.

 

So what did they botch?  Injuries are injuries, only reason it will be 4.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Elite Poster said:

The starter going into game 1 is HEALTHY.

 

How freaking embarrassing. BTW you guys remember Vontae Davis? 

 

We had a receiver run around naked and bloody, INCOGNITO (just generally the whole offseason), the woods retirement debacle, our rookie qb Twitter, the mccoy saga, traded for and cut Coleman like 10 days apart, poyers family stuff.... at some level I think we are numb to drama this year and it all blurs together.

 

For such a straight laced coach it’s really been something. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

Were you in the "Start Pete because he earned it" crowd before week one? Were you in the "Just trade AJ " crowd before week one?  I will hang up and listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

I'm sorry, but no.  Peterman, Allen, Anderson, Barkley.

 

I'm talking about how many different QBs start games; not how many different starters (i.e. - Peterman, then Allen, then Peterman again = 2 different starters).

 

He's correct.  Should Barkley start tomorrow we would technically have had 5 starters.  Those you listed and McCoy.

Edited by loedward22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, just wow....what's fun about this season is that if you, for some reason, like life gets in the way, can't stay current for a couple of hours with twitter, instagram, the interweb, etc. there is always gold coming out of 1 Bills Drive....Matt Barkely?  Really?  I bet half this board knows the playbook better than he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

 

We had a receiver run around naked and bloody, INCOGNITO (just generally the whole offseason), the woods retirement debacle, our rookie qb Twitter, the mccoy saga, traded for and cut Coleman like 10 days apart, poyers family stuff.... at some level I think we are numb to drama this year and it all blurs together.

 

For such a straight laced coach it’s really been something. 

Much like the America we now live in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gugny said:

If Barkley starts tomorrow, he will be the 4th different QB to start a game for the Bills in 10 weeks.

 

From what I could find on the Interwebs, the 1987 Patriots have the record with five ... but that was in a strike season (in which Doug Flutie crossed the line and started one game before the strike ended).

 

I feel like there's been no team in the history of the NFL to botch the handling of the QB position (some consider it an important position in the NFL).  Am I wrong?

 

 

Injuries happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KW95 said:

Matt Barkley...

 

Jesus man...a new low!

 

NO QB, NO WR, NO O-LINE.....a strong Jets Defence...Its gonna be ugly folks!

 

 

 

This is better than Derek, but half this board was convinced Derek was a Messiah

 

 

24 minutes ago, LittleJoeCartwright said:

The Vikings should be really embarrassed that they looked past this team and lost to them at home.

 

Handing over 17 points early is no way to play a game

 

still think the mob fixed this one, ruined 95 percent of survivor pool entries and destroyed every teaser on the planet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the 5th time in franchise history that 4 or more players started the season at QB: 1960 and 1961 before they found Kemp, 1968 when Kemp was injured in preseason and out for the year, 1987 during the strike year, and now 2018.

 

The other four seasons had better excuses. This one is just sad and is due to McDermott's hard-on for fellow Jesus freak, Nate Peterman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MichaelAbdallah said:

This is the 5th time in franchise history that 4 or more players started the season at QB: 1960 and 1961 before they found Kemp, 1968 when Kemp was injured in preseason and out for the year, 1987 during the strike year, and now 2018.

 

The other four seasons had better excuses. This one is just sad and is due to McDermott's hard-on for fellow Jesus freak, Nate Peterman. 

 

How are those others teams excuses any better than the Bills. Two of the Bills quarterbacks got injured. Do you even watch the Bills. At a bare minimum they would have three starters and with this offensive line 4 or even 5 is possible. Barkley will be lucky to survive tomorrow. 

Edited by Kevin1778
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...