Jump to content

What if Allen isn't good tommorow?


Steptide

Recommended Posts

If he does poorly it means he has room to grow before taking the starting job. Once he starts he needs to stay in, the worst thing we could do is the start him, bench him yo-yo approach.  So I'd rather know that he's not ready tomorrow as opposed to during the regular season.

 

I also don't want him to start if he is going to be pressured on 95% of drop backs.  We don't need to get him hurt, or turn him into Carr.  I still remember Trent Edwards before he was murdered by the Cards, he was a real QB but after that he was Trentative. Don't need to risk Allen learning to play afraid, although he doesn't seem to be the type to become a fearful player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steptide said:

I'm as excited as the next guy for Allen to win the starting job. I'm also a Peterman advocate, and am 100% comfortable with him starting if need be. 

 

If Allen fails tomorrow though, are we back at square one with McCarron, Peterman and Allen? I'd like to think no, but listening to media this week, there seems to be this narrative that it's Allen's job to lose and I'm not so sure. 

 

 

 

Nope not square 1 we are beyond square one but it does pretty much shut the door on Allen starting week 1 unless Peterman also stinks it up as well.  If both stink it up maybe then we are back to square 1

 

Quote

I spelled tomorrow wrong. Oops 

 

I guess this does not apply to spelling but its still funny

 

Grammar-2.jpg
Edited by ddaryl
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

I want him to look great to show up the other rookie QB's. :D

 

OTOH I'm sorta hoping he falls on his face so the team starts Peterman for those first four brutal defenses. Ravens, Chargers, Vikings, Packers.

 

Let Nate get his butt kicked so his fans will start to say time for something different or perhaps he'll play great and Allen can actually sit and learn this year. Either way, I don't want to see that #7 pick wasted by having him get shell-shocked behind that crappy Bills line.

 

2 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

If he does poorly it means he has room to grow before taking the starting job. Once he starts he needs to stay in, the worst thing we could do is the start him, bench him yo-yo approach.  So I'd rather know that he's not ready tomorrow as opposed to during the regular season.

 

I also don't want him to start if he is going to be pressured on 95% of drop backs.  We don't need to get him hurt, or turn him into Carr.  I still remember Trent Edwards before he was murdered by the Cards, he was a real QB but after that he was Trentative. Don't need to risk Allen learning to play afraid, although he doesn't seem to be the type to become a fearful player.

 

The OL is an entirely different consideration.  If Allen shows he's ready to assume the responsibilities of the starting QB, he'll be behind center when the Bills kickoff the season in Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steptide said:

I'm as excited as the next guy for Allen to win the starting job. I'm also a Peterman advocate, and am 100% comfortable with him starting if need be. 

 

If Allen fails tomorrow though, are we back at square one with McCarron, Peterman and Allen? I'd like to think no, but listening to media this week, there seems to be this narrative that it's Allen's job to lose and I'm not so sure. 

I spelled tomorrow wrong. Oops 

 

Alcohol sales in Buffalo will skyrocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

I want him to look great to show up the other rookie QB's. :D

 

OTOH I'm sorta hoping he falls on his face so the team starts Peterman for those first four brutal defenses. Ravens, Chargers, Vikings, Packers.

 

Let Nate get his butt kicked so his fans will start to say time for something different or perhaps he'll play great and Allen can actually sit and learn this year. Either way, I don't want to see that #7 pick wasted by having him get shell-shocked behind that crappy Bills line.

Playing behind a suspect ( “ crappy”) O line is an adverse situation for a young QB. But can it make a QB play scared and shell shocked? I say no. It recalls that old Marv-ism about adversity not building character, but rather revealing it. Allen doesn’t strike me as a player that’s shook or plays with fear. The fact is we don’t know. We have these expectations of players, but really don’t know what’s inside that makes them tick. I’d suggest that if a potentially good player becomes “ ruined” because they had to play in less than perfect scenarios, they didn’t really have it from the start. It just took some adversity before the truth was revealed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schopp and Sal discussed this on Thursday or Friday.  

 

Consensus was that Allen may not seal the starting job with a strong performance, but he may very well convince the coaches NOT to start him in Baltimore with a bad one.

 

Agreement was also reached that the game is important to the coaching staff in terms of their starting QB decision making process.  I.E., performance in the game does matter.

 

I would still like them to start Allen for Game 1 no matter what!  The Bills have no future of any kind with the other 2 QBs.

 

It's all about Allen for the next couple years,  until he sinks or swims.  So let's get on with it! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Logic said:

If Allen stinks tomorrow, then Peterman starts the season at QB and Allen goes back to developing and learning with no pressure, from the 3rd string position.

Not rocket science.

What if Peterman stinks too? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry...no one here will overreact

34 minutes ago, Logic said:

If Allen stinks tomorrow, then Peterman starts the season at QB and Allen goes back to developing and learning with no pressure, from the 3rd string position.

Not rocket science.

goes from starter to 3rd string...doubtful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m happy with Allen’s progress. If he takes a step back it’s just proving what everyone already believed. 

 

Hes is a supremely talented guy that might need a little time to develop. 

 

With that said, if he performs well, I don’t see how he won’t start. 

Edited by Bobby Hooks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nucci said:

maybe but he will be labeled a bust so may just release him after the game

 

....not to worry....just sent the proof to my printer....should be back shortly....:thumbsup:

Just now, Augie said:

...in 2022, maybe. 

 

1 minute ago, Augie said:

...in 2022, maybe. 

 

...I'll be dead....text me in "Hell's Kitchen" and lemme know......Verizon has a new tower there.......:thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, klos63 said:

What if Peterman stinks too? 


Image result for drinking gif

11 minutes ago, nucci said:

Don't worry...no one here will overreact

goes from starter to 3rd string...doubtful


He's only "starting" tonight as part of the regular QB rotation. 

The head coach himself said that he still considers all three QBs to be on equal footing and the competition is still ongoing.

The fans may have written off AJ McCarron, but I don't believe the coaching staff has done the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

If he is 11-20, for a td, no picks and 120 yards, without making any glaring mistakes then I am perfectly fine with that.

 

in other words he doesn't have to blow the doors off for me to keep thinking of him as the starter.

 

...know it well...LOL....deja vu circa 2017, right?.....when your passing game is LESS impotent than OTAG, forfeit....I did.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steptide said:

I'm as excited as the next guy for Allen to win the starting job. I'm also a Peterman advocate, and am 100% comfortable with him starting if need be. 

 

If Allen fails tomorrow though, are we back at square one with McCarron, Peterman and Allen? I'd like to think no, but listening to media this week, there seems to be this narrative that it's Allen's job to lose and I'm not so sure. 

I spelled tomorrow wrong. Oops 

What if we don't post stupid **** on this forum ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Logic said:


Image result for drinking gif


He's only "starting" tonight as part of the regular QB rotation. 

The head coach himself said that he still considers all three QBs to be on equal footing and the competition is still ongoing.

The fans may have written off AJ McCarron, but I don't believe the coaching staff has done the same.

Right. He’s only starting tonight because of the rotation he’s earned. 

 

Youd better believe if his play wasn’t impressing them he wouldn’t be getting this opportunity. 

Edited by Bobby Hooks
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steptide said:

I'm as excited as the next guy for Allen to win the starting job. I'm also a Peterman advocate, and am 100% comfortable with him starting if need be. 

 

If Allen fails tomorrow though, are we back at square one with McCarron, Peterman and Allen? I'd like to think no, but listening to media this week, there seems to be this narrative that it's Allen's job to lose and I'm not so sure. 

I spelled tomorrow wrong. Oops 

 

You're 100% comfortable with Peterman as a starter?

 

Yikes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on how bad. If Allen looks like a rookie (a bad decision that leads to a turn over and some bad missed throws) but still shows flashes of improved footwork I will still have confidence in him. But if Allen looks horrendous then I think you have to reconsider starting him. I think that even if he is bad he won't look bad enough to consider benching him for Peterman who sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been an advocate for Peterman. As many pointed out he has shown well in preseason before. I don't disagree about his flaws. I like his potential a little more than other people. I think Peterman at least recognized that throwing to Kelvin Benjamin is money before Tyrod. 

 

Josh Allen is making some noise. I've preached caution with him. I wasn't in favor of him starting right away. He really himself has changed my mind with some of his work. I can't deny the potential. 

 

I'm ok with Josh Allen not being perfect tomorrow. I just would like to see established rythm. If it is absolutely clear Josh Allen isn't able to maintain tomorrow I will have to be in favor of giving Peterman the nod. 

 

I think any QB is starting for the Bills is going to have to react very quickly a lot of times. I hope daboll is a wizard.

 

I like Peterman but Josh Allen is the favorite for a reason. Seeing him progressing has been a treat. I would be surprised if he doesn't make some plays tomorrow. 

 

I'm in favor of Peterman getting the start this season but the story would end better if Josh Allen is the winner. 

 

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the perfect set up for everyone. McBeane are in a win win. Allen goes out and kills it on Sunday then it's a no brainier . He has a crap game and they can say we wanted to give him valuable experience  blah blah blah and they can start one of the vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BeefCurtns said:

I think this is the perfect set up for everyone. McBeane are in a win win. Allen goes out and kills it on Sunday then it's a no brainier . He has a crap game and they can say we wanted to give him valuable experience  blah blah blah and they can start one of the vets.

 

Accurate as well as succinct. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...