Jump to content

Cordy Trade - do you like it?


Bakin

Do you like the Glenn Trade?  

249 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Cordy Trade?



Recommended Posts

FWIW,

i like it. 

Glenn was a good player for us but he clearly was replaceable and Dion played well last year. Nice to get rid of his salary and his recent injuries were clearly concerning. 

 

Cogs’ fantastic season was a key reason for Dawkins excellent performance, and so I would expect that if that side of the line stays healthy we should get the same or better results next year. 

 

The traded netted us the equivalent of a mid to late 2nd (based on draft point value). 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abso Freakin lutely!!!!

I asked last year if people trusted McBean after the Sammy trade and people were hemming and hawing.

How many were calling for one or the others head last year at some point. Ridiculous amounts of shade thrown at the both of ‘em.

“ How ya like me now?!!!”

They know we can do without him. My hunch is he doesn’t stay healthy from here on out for long stretches.

How did Sammy do last year?

How did Darby do last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cordy seems to be a breaking down a bit; 16 starts last two seasons. He can turn it around, but it appears he's been replaced...thus expendable. We move up to possibly get a QB in this years draft. How can you not like it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheTruthHurts said:

Yes. Smart. They basically traded Glenn for a 2nd round pick. That's the value.

What do you mean? It's the 12th pick of the 1st round

 

BTW I think picks are overrated! Many rookie players don't pan out. While proven starters are... proven. This makes sense because it was a case of his huge salary becoming expandable since his replacement played well. And now the Bills have ammo to trade for the top picks. Yet sooooo many busts in the first picks I can't believe people still worship draft picks to that extent! You can find the precious gems, but many duds in there too.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jerome007 said:

What do you mean? It's the 12th pick of the 1st round

 

The draft value chart says moving up to 12 would have cost a 2nd round pick. 

 

This trade will be hard for even the negative nancy crew to dislike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jerome007 said:

What do you mean? It's the 12th pick of the 1st round

 

BTW I think picks are overrated! Many rookie players don't pan out. While proven starters are... proven. This makes sense because it was a case of his huge salary becoming expandable since his replacement played well. And now the Bills have ammo to trade for the top picks. Yet sooooo many busts in the first picks I can't believe people still worship draft picks to that extent! You can find the precious gems, but many duds in there too.

 

 

Moving from 21 to 12 is normally worth a 2nd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a dupe Glenn post.... But with a poll:)

 

Oddly, I'm shocked Bengals fans love this as much as they do. They don't seem to mind the $$, the injury, or oddest of all moving down. In fact, the like it because they were worried about reaching at 12. Man does that seem backwards. Shame they don't have any other higher picks:)

Edited by gobills1212
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We essentially got a mid 2nd round pick for him AND dropped his salary. The amount of money we will have in free agency is SICK!

 

PS and it helps us move up in the draft to grab our future QB.

Edited by aceman_16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheTruthHurts said:

Moving from 21 to 12 is normally worth a 2nd round pick.

And so they got 2nd round pick for a way-overpriced, often-hurt, pretty good player.  I'm OK with that.  Especially if it was a pretty good player who wasn't going to be on the team next year anyway.  A second for Glenn, and the first third for Taylor.  Yeah, I'm OK with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jeremy2020 said:

 

The draft value chart says moving up to 12 would have cost a 2nd round pick. 

 

This trade will be hard for even the negative nancy crew to dislike.

Like I posted, the move is good because his huuuuuuge salary made him expandable since his replacement played well - and who knows if he'll play like before given his injuries. Just trading a proven starter for a pick would be bad. But salary caps, years left on contract, injuries, etc. so many factors to consider. I voted yes because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gobills1212 said:

So a dupe Glenn post.... But with a poll:)

 

Oddly, I'm shocked Bengals fans love this as much as they do. They don't seem to mind the $$, the injury, or oddest of all moving down. In fact, the like it because they were worried about reaching at 12. Man does that seem backwards. Shame they don't have any other higher picks:)

 

It's not that odd. We've seen the Cordy Glenn Injury show for 3 years now. They haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Utah John said:

And so they got 2nd round pick for a way-overpriced, often-hurt, pretty good player.  I'm OK with that.  Especially if it was a pretty good player who wasn't going to be on the team next year anyway.  A second for Glenn, and the first third for Taylor.  Yeah, I'm OK with that.

Amazing trade. For example, Texans gave up 2017 25th pick and 2018 1st round pick to Cleveland for pick 12 last year. We gave up 21 and Glenn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only like it if we package #12 and continue to move up to get a top QB

Sitting at #12 means that at 4 QBs most likely will go before we pick, if the reports are true about Cousins to Minny, and Miami wanting Mayfield.

(Browns, Denver, Jets are almost certainly in, and Miami might go Mayfield if he's available)

 

That's really bad if we just made that trade to not get any of the top4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

It's not that odd. We've seen the Cordy Glenn Injury show for 3 years now. They haven't.

very true. they are in the "what if" stages of the relationship. what if this guy is finally healthy? what if he returns to form? what if he is our lock down LT for the next decade? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

It's not that odd. We've seen the Cordy Glenn Injury show for 3 years now. They haven't.

A simple use of the Google machine tells a pretty accurate story.  

Dude gets paid a ton, is a bit of a reclamation project, and 12 to 21 is HUGE. 

No funny business, I kinda feel for em. To rationalize that 12 was too high a pick... that must mean they have been through the ringer. That can't be fun. That is some serious abuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good move for the ambitions of the team. It represents good value for the player. They still have to nail the next trade, the QB pick and find a long term answer at RT for me to be overjoyed at it.

 

Cordy has been one of my favourites since his rookie year, I'm sad to see him go. Hard worker, heart of a warrior, never caused a second of trouble, high calibre individual on and off the field.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, swnybillsfan said:

i like glenn quite a bit. but i will LOVE it if we can grab one o' them there franchise QBs!

 

No kidding! Need #1 is a Franchise QB. LT is high on the list but we have a proven replacement. High cap figure makes it even easier. Anything to get the QB. Well done! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...