Jump to content

National Reporters: A Big Move Up the Board Unlikely for Bills


Recommended Posts

NATIONAL REPORTERS: A BIG MOVE UP THE BOARD UNLIKELY FOR BILLS

Quote

senior-bowl-qbs-1-25-story.jpg


Bills GM Brandon Beane stated they would not pay a king's ransom to get to the top of the board to chase quarterbacks. Buffalobills.com spoke to some national reporters who concurred with Beane that overpaying to get to quarterback territory on the draft board would be ill advised.

 

DANIEL JEREMIAH: "WE ARE GOING TO SEE A RUN" (2:56)
Bills' Insider Chris Brown and NFL Network Draft Analyst Daniel Jeremiah discuss what potential options the Bills have coming out of the Senior Bowl in Mobile Alabama.

 

GREG MCELROY: "A LOT OF TALENT, GOOD DEPTH" (5:13)
Bills' Insider Chris Brown and ESPN College Football Analyst Greg McElroy discuss the quarterback class at the Senior Bowl in Mobile Alabama.

 

IAN RAPOPORT: "THEY COULD MOVE AROUND" (4:35)
Bills' Insider Chris Brown talks with NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport about the upcoming draft and QB options for the Bills from the Senior Bowl in Mobile Alabama.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah its not happening IMO... because of the QB run up top, excellent higher rated players, in positions of need,  will be falling to us.

Edited by ddaryl
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Beane say they would not do it or did he simply say, "It's a high price to pay", or something along those lines?  In any case, I've always advocated that if the move up is small move up, but if it takes a kings ransom, we have way too many holes on the team to do that, IF our goal is to continue to build on the success we had this past season.  We'll see what happens.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Canadian Bills Fan said:

We will be hearing so many smoke screens from now through draft day. 

 

I don't put much emphasis on reports like these

 

It's pretty early in the game. We'll have to wait to see exactly what value the Bills place on the 2018 QB class.   We most likely won't know one way or the other until the 1st round actually begins on April 26th. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Guaranteed that the Eagles don't regret making the move for Wentz.

 

 

Guaranteed the Redskins regret moving up for RG3.

 

There's two sides to every coin.  I'm on record and I still believe if you can get into the top 4 and get the QB who is #1 on your board, do it, but there's a very real cost.

Edited by Chuck Wagon
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chuck Wagon said:

 

Guaranteed the Redskins regret moving up for RG3.

 

There's two sides to very coin.  I'm on record and I still believe if you can get into the top 4 and get the QB who is #1 on your board, do it, but there's a very real cost.

 

Indeed. Especially since they were drafting a guy who was pretty raw in doing so many of the things that are rudimentary to playing QB at the NFL level.  Huge difference between Wentz and RGIII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Guaranteed that the Eagles don't regret making the move for Wentz.

 

1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

Guaranteed the Redskins regret moving up for RG3.

 

There's two sides to very coin.  I'm on record and I still believe if you can get into the top 4 and get the QB who is #1 on your board, do it, but there's a very real cost.

 

At the end of the day, OBD has to trust their eyes. You can't predict the future, but if your board says a guy is the guy, then that very real cost is worth taking the chance. Can't let Wentz get you too high or RG3 get you too low. Each prospect is their own guy and OBD should pull the trigger if a prospect looks like the guy. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BuffaloDave55 said:

Anyone have a list of QB's taken in 1st round in last 5 to 8 years?  How many are starters?  How many are still in the league?  I would love to see a complete list.  Of those wonder who made trades to get those picks.

 

Dating back to 2010's draft, in order:

 

Sam Bradford

Tim Tebow

Cam Newton

Jake Locker

Blaine Gabbert

Christian Ponder

Andrew Luck

Robert Griffin III

Ryan Tannehill

Brandon Weeden

EJ Manuel

Blake Bortles

Johnny Manziel

Teddy Bridgewater

Jameis Winston

Marcus Mariota

Jared Goff

Carson Wentz

Paxton Lynch

Mitch Trubisky

Patrick Mahomes

Deshaun Watson

 

Edit: I bolded the ones that I think most would agree worked out pretty fine (maybe not Tannehill?) The Underlined might be a little bit too early to say for sure, but they look like they'll probably work out. I didn't touch this past year's class since we've seen so little of all of them.

Edited by DCOrange
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't expect them to make a big move up the charts for a QB either. OBD does not hold QB in a high enough regard, new staff same idea, win now forget about later. 

 

I fully expect a QB taken later in the draft after other needs are addressed. Why? Because it is a known trend at OBD. They will either stay with the last staffs QB (the great QB guru Rex choice at QB)or find some other journeyman to try to win now with. If this staff falls to have another miracle season in 18 or 19 the next staff will come in with the exact same problems the last staffs have had since Kelly, a team with no franchise worthy QB and a team that has a bunch of needs. Wash repeat to another long playoff drought.

 

Things will not change until the owner tells a new staff before hired they need to go big on a QB and to not worry about win now as much as addressing the QB problem correctly first because without a franchise worthy QB there is no dynasty just a staff on its last leg trying to get a miracle to happen while using other teams not good enough in the most important position in football. 

 

IMO fix the QB position and the rest will fall into place with patience. Build around a QB first because by the time you get a good QB your other positions you got first are now on contract that are too expensive to keep, you need them rookies to fall in line behind a QB that is established and controlling the team, it is why NE has ran the NFL for so long, all starts with QB. Find a real talent at QB and build to win later, win now just takes us to the next staff, time to rebuild again, say goodbye to most of the talent you just spent a bunch of draft picks on. That MD pick was a wonderful pick over picking Cam. A top player for 3 years that ends up elsewhere is not a good investment but a top QB will last maybe 15 years is. Got to look long term.

Edited by xRUSHx
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Indeed. Especially since they were drafting a guy who was pretty raw in doing so many of the things that are rudimentary to playing QB at the NFL level.  Huge difference between Wentz and RGIII.

 

How does the adage go - You can't hit a home run without taking a swing? 

 

In light of the analytics team revamp, hopefully they can do the proper analysis on the rationale to move up in the draft.   History is generally more favorable for moving up to draft QBs than for other positions

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Although I support a trade up, what would people think of taking a QB at #21 and #22?

 

If you look at the draft as a lottery, then why not buy more QB tickets and hedge your bets?

 

My guess is it would be Jackson and Rudolph. Let them duke it out in camp?

I'd rather trade up if that were going to be the strategy. Now taking a QB like Lamar at 21 and then following up with another QB later in the draft (like Lauletta, White, Litton, etc.)? That I could get on board with. With the number of needs this team has, I'm not sure how I feel about a trade up, but I definitely would not be on board with taking multiple QBs in the 1st round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

And realistically none of them will be as valuable as a good QB prospect. Id take a good QB over 3 to 4 good players at any other positions without question. 

 

The QB position trumps every position BY FAR. 

 

**** look at th Bills. They've actually drafted pretty well outside of th QB position before the drought was broken this past season. Where has it gotten them? 

 

It's really not a hefty price if you land a good QB with that trade up.

 

Outstanding Scott, I agree 100%

 

Look at all those good players now on other teams because we could not afford to keep them. A real good QB you keep as the franchise guy for 10+ years unlike other positions you can replace with a much easier move after the first contract.

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

To be fair, he would be an absolute idiot to come out and say" we will do whatever it takes to get into the Top 5" , and I don't think he is an idiot:lol: !

 

Thank you.  Those of you who believe anything being reported up until the draft are fools.

 

/thread

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, NewEraBills said:

Did Beane say they would not do it or did he simply say, "It's a high price to pay", or something along those lines?  In any case, I've always advocated that if the move up is small move up, but if it takes a kings ransom, we have way too many holes on the team to do that, IF our goal is to continue to build on the success we had this past season.  We'll see what happens.

 

 

Exactly how Whaley ran the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BuffaloDave55 said:

Anyone have a list of QB's taken in 1st round in last 5 to 8 years?  How many are starters?  How many are still in the league?  I would love to see a complete list.  Of those wonder who made trades to get those picks.

I would search that interweb thing...if it's still around

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You either find your QB or you end up unemployed in this league.

 

Who says Terry doesn't want to open the checkbook for Cousins so they can keep all the picks? To me that's the best move of all.

 

You suddenly have your QB and now you also have a ton of draft capital to build your team. Anything but watching Tyrod throw for barely 100 yards a game. The Bills offense is just painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

You either find your QB or you end up unemployed in this league.

 

Who says Terry doesn't want to open the checkbook for Cousins so they can keep all the picks? To me that's the best move of all.

 

You suddenly have your QB and now you also have a ton of draft capital to build your team. Anything but watching Tyrod throw for barely 100 yards a game. The Bills offense is just painful.

 

I have to say, while I tend to lean more towards trading up for a rookie QB than signing Cousins, the idea of having QB "settled" with #21, #22, #53, #56, #95, #117, #149, and #157 does sound appealing. That very well could mean starters at WR/OT/DT/DE/LB and heavy contributors at HB/CB. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Cousins' play will equal the salary he will command.  I prefer moving up for a cost-controlled rookie with franchise qb potential.  If you hit, you are set for fifteen years.  Of course, you may miss and Cousins' established floor is pretty good qb.  I can certainly see the logic of going that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Beane also say you take a guy where you value him? So if you value a guy at top 5 at their position (I believe he means league wide, not in this draft), then you go get him no matter what it costs. I feel like people are just looking at what was said and picking the part they want to emphasize as Beane's position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if the 2 that you value are the top 2, and they are gone before you can even trade for anyone... it doesn't make sense to trade for a guy you view as the 3rd best QB in the draft.  If its true and 5 qb's go in the first like 15 picks (Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield, Allen, and rudolph/jackson) - good players will be available at 21/22. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

So torn on this.

 

A) I was pro-tank for this very reason. Nabbing a top QB was THE imperative for this off-season BUT

 

B) I SO enjoyed the feeling of making the playoffs.

 

:unsure:

 

I would say it was worth it to make the playoffs .

 

They needed to end that long drought 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...