ChicagoRic Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclepete Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Edited November 20, 2017 by unclepete 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. On one hand, Tyrod probably doesnt throw 5 picks. On the other hand, he goes 3-out as usual so it really is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 it was certainly winnable with TT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNubbins Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. lol A fictional fact, then? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Dream on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imissbeastmode Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Two bad weeks by Tyrod, one bad game by Peterman. Bills need a QB. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. No he really doesnt he doesnt outscore Chargers now does he Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Maiden Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, unclepete said: They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Yet, the thread title.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Defense still sucks. Doubt we win it but don't think the game gets that out of hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. Not that this matters a whole lot, but 14 of those 54 points were off of turnovers. The first 24 points came off of turnovers. Things might have been a bit different without all the turnovers, who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PABillsfan23 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Where do people come up with this nonsense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No way in hell. Would have been closer but they wouldn't have won Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramza86 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod needed to be benched to throw the ball down the field? What kinda crap is that? Why couldnt he just be aggressive naturally? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lfod Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Well I appreciate Tyrod more now. I still don't think we win this game but Nathan rekindled my love for Tyrod man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 So when we lose it's Tyrod's fault. But when we lose with out him it's the defense. This is just getting so stupid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, mannc said: No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said: On one hand, Tyrod probably doesnt throw 5 picks. On the other hand, he goes 3-out as usual so it really is the same. We would've still lost, just not by as much....this team needs a complete overhaul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Yeah, nooooo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ramza86 said: Tyrod needed to be benched to throw the ball down the field? What kinda crap is that? Why couldnt he just be aggressive naturally? He is flawed for sure. But 3 ints for the year? That does mean something. Just now, LABILLBACKER said: We would've still lost, just not by as much....this team needs a complete overhaul. Like another rookie QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. Lol. He likely would’ve pulled out the win? No doubT that peterman was the worst qb on the planet today but our defense is a joke. Our front 7 is close to useless. Need 2 new DTs and 2-3 new linebackers (Milano might be one, but he doesn’t play anymore so we won’t know til next year). Alexander is one of my favorite players but he can’t play LB. he should be a pass rusher and ST player. He tried and I applaud him for that. He’s just not good playing 4-3 SLB. I hate Preston Brown. Always will. Please leave via free agency. Please. Poyers play has fallen off a cliff since his injury. Leonard Johnson is a gamer but isn’t very good in coverage half the time. White played a solid game. Gaines had his moments but we just couldn’t come up with the stops on 3rd down. Rivers showed us what good QB play is. Something our QBs don’t currently have. Peterman or Tyrod today. I doubt it would’ve changed the result. Our offense isn’t good enough to save this defense when playing be a good qb. Shady would’ve kept it close, but an L in the loss column nonetheless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imissbeastmode Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, nedboy7 said: He is flawed for sure. But 3 ints for the year? That does mean something. Can’t throw interceptions if you don’t throw the ball. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billieve420 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) With this defense doubt Taylor would have won the game anyway. Trading away Dareus mid season for a nothing pick will be a decision they regret. With how the season has unfolded, I would go back to Peterson next week. I did not agree with benching Taylor while still in contention and I am sure the Vets on the team would agree. However, what is done is done and the season is lost as this was a must win game. However, with how this team has been playing the most important objective now is to see what you have in Peterman. Need to see if you can even count on him to be the backup next year or if you need to sign another veteran. What I wouldn't do is pick up Taylor's option and try to trade him. If you are going to stick with Dennison then you need to find QB who fits system they are trying to run. Edited November 20, 2017 by billieve420 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulbills Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: The gross exaggerations of Tyrod are incredible on here. What exaggerations? He's ranked 27th in pass attempts and his average is under 30 a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Imissbeastmode said: Can’t throw interceptions if you don’t throw the ball. I guess we were 5-4 without throwing the ball. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Um, no. TT does not bring us back from the 50 burger the D gave up. I also saw a completely different Tyrod in the 2nd half. McD delivered a message and Tyrod received it. Go downfield. Stick it in tight windows. Hopefully we'll see a better Tyrod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 21 minutes ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. Hard to say that when the defense played on a short field literally the entire first half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: Um, no. TT does not bring us back from the 50 burger the D gave up. I also saw a completely different Tyrod in the 2nd half. McD delivered a message and Tyrod received it. Go downfield. Stick it in tight windows. Hopefully we'll see a better Tyrod. 5 ints Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 25 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. shoulda woulda coulda!!!! FTW!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkirchofer Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 22 minutes ago, unclepete said: They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Three and outs are no better than an INT except for field position. They still hang 50 on us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, nedboy7 said: 5 ints The turnovers didn't matter, the D didn't force a punt until the 4th quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod def wins this game. We ran the ball well, the qb option runs picked up chunk yardage and he was good throwing the ball today. Or maybe thats cuz the rookie you all ballwashed was so bad at it? Nah man. CoT is in session. Were looking at a duplex real estate in denver and jax now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 28 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. Pretty HOT take for a D that could stop nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livinginthepast Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 TT wins only if he plays on D and sacks Rivers or maybe stays within 5ft of an open Charger receiver. Hell he couldn't have been worse than the Bills D today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrbojanglezs Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No chance in hell tyrod wins this game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simool Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 28 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. You are no more correct than the 85+% of posters here who thought Peterman was the next coming of Christ himself. Can we stop with bs conjecture? A winning team is built from the inside out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNubbins Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 FIVE PICKS IN A HALF Historical terribleness! Why can't you guys admit we have a better shot with Tyrod than anyone else on the roster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts