Jump to content

Bills Release Bryce Brown


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not sure I get the "Whaley got fleeced" crowd either. Didn't we only give up a fourth rounder?

 

Some 4th rounders turn into all-pros, and some into also-rans. It's a crap shoot. Not a huge price to pay for what looked like a promising (and cheap) young RB. Didn't work out, oh well. Funny how worked up folks were over Whaley holding onto "his guy" though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All GM's make mistakes.

 

Especially when they are willing to make moves. How do you want it Whaley bashers? Gutless and timid like Darcy Regier was. Waiting ad nauseum for the perfect trade or someone with some sack who swings for the fences but strikes out from time to time. I'll take the latter. Did I spell latter right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Some 4th rounders turn into all-pros, and some into also-rans. It's a crap shoot. Not a huge price to pay for what looked like a promising (and cheap) young RB. Didn't work out, oh well. Funny how worked up folks were over Whaley holding onto "his guy" though.

and id point out very few turn into all pros. in fact more are off the team that drafted them in a year, than making the probowl at any point in their career if i had to guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a positive sign

 

DW saying I made a mistake and we have moved on from it.

 

Nothing wrong with admitting you were wrong.

 

Karlos is the back up and Dixon is a better third option.

 

Get a guy who can help on ST, plus we need better LB/DB depth. Replace the roster spot correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I get the "Whaley got fleeced" crowd either. Didn't we only give up a fourth rounder?

 

We also received a 4th for Lynch. Seahawks traded Christine for duct tape and he had more "potential" than Brown. Yes, it was only a 4th, but RBs with Brown's production should cost no more than a 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not release IKE? No one's going to pick him up for their roster and he'd be better served on the Bills' PS.

Thought IKE was on the PS. They were one over with Marcel coming back. Besides, what has Brown shown besides the ability to cough up the ball? Edited by DirtDart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We also received a 4th for Lynch. Seahawks traded Christine for duct tape and he had more "potential" than Brown. Yes, it was only a 4th, but RBs with Brown's production should cost no more than a 5th.

the gap between a 4th and a 5th is really hanging you up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We also received a 4th for Lynch. Seahawks traded Christine for duct tape and he had more "potential" than Brown. Yes, it was only a 4th, but RBs with Brown's production should cost no more than a 5th.

 

Not saying you're wrong, but I'd be curious just how much of a difference there is in average NFL longevity between 4th and 5th round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I'm just repeating what others have said. I just skimmed the previous posts.

 

This is a bit of a surprise to me, given the number of backs left on the roster. Plus Bryce is a pretty explosive back---far from just run of the mill, IMO. It's true he has a ball security issue, but we've (at least I've) seen players turn that around, with the right coaching. I kinda thought they were stashing him on the inactive list, to have a quality healthy back in case of injury. Perhaps Bryce wasn't thrilled with the arrangement and was becoming a problem.

 

It also seems odd for a team that purports to be a running team, to have so few backs. But one thing about RBs is, in a pinch, there are guys who can step in and (hopefully) get reasonable results. Typically it isn't the train wreck you get if you have to do it with some other positions.

 

If nothing else, the claims Whaley cut Fred BECAUSE of his ego, since he traded for Brown, is finally exposed as total foil-hat wearing BS. But they guy is clearly a gambler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those overreacting, it was a fourth round pick. How many of those do other teams burn? It really is that simple.

 

Bryce will catch on somewhere else, think he might have requested it as he has too much talent to not be dressed.

 

Richardson for a 1st is still in recent memory as well.

 

Losing a 4th round pick is HUGE!!!

 

We could have had another Tim Euhus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I'm just repeating what others have said. I just skimmed the previous posts.

 

This is a bit of a surprise to me, given the number of backs left on the roster. Plus Bryce is a pretty explosive back---far from just run of the mill, IMO. It's true he has a ball security issue, but we've (at least I've) seen players turn that around, with the right coaching. I kinda thought they were stashing him on the inactive list, to have a quality healthy back in case of injury. Perhaps Bryce wasn't thrilled with the arrangement and was becoming a problem.

 

It also seems odd for a team that purports to be a running team, to have so few backs. But one thing about RBs is, in a pinch, there are guys who can step in and (hopefully) get reasonable results. Typically it isn't the train wreck you get if you have to do it with some other positions.

 

If nothing else, the claims Whaley cut Fred BECAUSE of his ego, since he traded for Brown, is finally exposed as total foil-hat wearing BS. But they guy is clearly a gambler.

 

Brown is explosive, but as someone said earlier he is "perennial potential." The only players you keep on the 53 for their potential are your highest and/or most recent year's draft picks. Brown has been in the league long enough for him to have realized his potential. He couldn't crack the active roster either of the last two years except for injury and doesn't play special teams. It's not just that Brown wasn't good enough, it's also that this roster is loaded. Brown could probably find a spot on another roster and get a few carries. We will see what happens! In this league, many running backs come and go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I called this one after the first preseason game.

"5) Karlos Williams looks like a real gamer. He ran 14 times for 40 yards and plunged the ball in for his first NFL TD. His upright running style reminds one of the great Eric Dickerson.

Bryce Brown's career in Buffalo is in real jeopardy."

Of course, I also said that EJ was toast, but I'll take a victory where I can get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Some 4th rounders turn into all-pros, and some into also-rans. It's a crap shoot. Not a huge price to pay for what looked like a promising (and cheap) young RB. Didn't work out, oh well. Funny how worked up folks were over Whaley holding onto "his guy" though.

Some 1st rounders turn all-pro and some are third stringers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thigpen can be used in the backfield if needed as well. Are folks really now upset that the guy they thought was kept over Freddy wasn't really all that much in the equation? Or are they upset that they thought Whaley wouldn't admit the trade for Brown didn't pan out?

 

Whaley is friggin' awesome. He has shown once again that his ego will not get in the way of trying to make the Bills better -- and in this case, "better" meant keeping another player on the 53 over a guy he liked and traded for but had clearly not seized his opportunity.

Perfectly stated! Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could have just cut Andre Fluellen and held onto to BB? Ok. In Doug I trust.

Yeah, it's a bit surprising in light of how "shady" Shady was in the opener. Not sure why the 5th DT is more valuable than the 4th RB, especially since Boobie and Karlos are different types of runners than McCoy ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the gap between a 4th and a 5th is really hanging you up?

At best it's a 5th, but realistically it should have been 6th or 7th. . Bills traded effectively a 6th for a QB who could have been a starter. I think Whaley panicked when he couldn't swing a deal to draft Hyde.

Edited by GG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's a bit surprising in light of how "shady" Shady was in the opener. Not sure why the 5th DT is more valuable than the 4th RB, especially since Boobie and Karlos are different types of runners than McCoy ...

except fluellen is a vested vet - so hed be full years salary for one game instead of BB costing us like 50k against the cap.

 

and its not like shady is being benched so who cares how he looked week 1 in that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I have no problem do this....I do have to ask.....what exactly does Fluellen bring to this team where we keep picking him up and dropping him off.


If I had to guess......Brown wasn't too pleased with not being on the active roster and probably asked for his release.

 

If Cierre Wood ends up starting for this team in November that won't do much for Whaley's approval rating.

 

When you wanna' run the ball 35-40 times per game you need some RB's.

 

 

 

That would only be if Cierre Wood didnt come in and perform well....if he did then Whaley's approval right might even go up since he brought him in as well.

 

I thought Wood looked ok in pre season......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I have no problem do this....I do have to ask.....what exactly does Fluellen bring to this team where we keep picking him up and dropping him off.

 

i think hes ours now.... which is odd, if he wasnt dressed even with MD out. but as a vet, i think we are keeping him for the duration at this point (barring odd circumstances arriving)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is totally disrespectful to Freddy. They should've done it the same day or right before.

How would it be better? Fred gets cut either way. In fact it would be worse to cut him now.

Not at all. We have lots of players who can carry the ball, even at positions you wouldn't expect.

1. Shady

2. Williams

3. Dixon

4/5. Clay

4/5. Felton

6. Harvin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think hes ours now.... which is odd, if he wasnt dressed even with MD out. but as a vet, i think we are keeping him for the duration at this point (barring odd circumstances arriving)

 

Being a vested vet, I found it an odd signing. But maybe he is versatile?

Clay aint poundin the rock

 

MarQueis might though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...