Jump to content

Bills Offensive Coordinator Interviews have started according to Jeremy Fowler


JoeF

Recommended Posts

If you want to win a Lombardi and your Head Coach is a defensive guy, you need a great OC.  

 

The opposite is true, too.  That's why Reid has Spags.   They're an excellent combo.  

 

Brady is just okay.  I suppose it's possible to surround him with enough great coaches that our offense becomes great.   Ideally, though, we'd have a creative genius with great leadership skills as our OC.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Billever76 said:

Does anyone think McDermott would allow an oc to come in here and run the offense how he sees fit? I know that won't happen.it happened with daboll and mcd isn't gonna let some oc come and wreck his vision....the process is surrounding yourself with all yes men that obey apparently 

Absolutely bc McDermott only wants an oc who is gonna run the offense how he wants..no proven oc is coming here to ve told how he is allowed to run an offense

Is it though? The rift between dabol and McDermott was over the way dabol ran the offense..mcd has a certain way he believes this offense needs to be and by damned that's the way its gonna be.......so mcd will hire guys who have little to no exp as oc and have them run his process

That is a 100% guess. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Back2Buff said:

Am I the only one that doesn't want Brady?  I was fine with giving him an opportunity, but the passing game was really bad under him.  Like it takes a special coordinator to see that big of a drop off in Diggs.  Brady's only solution to Diggs was screen passes.  Is that the coordinator you want?

 

He was fired in Carolina.

 

He gets way too much credit for that LSU offense.  He wasn't even the sole OC.   He was so new in the position, my guess he was more of a coffee runner at LSU.

I guess i’m confused. After he took over for Dorsey the team completely turned things around to make it to the 2nd seed. In my eyes it could not have gone any better. 
 

As for diggs, he was getting plenty of targets. Him and Josh just were not in sync all season. I have to put it on Diggs because Shakir looked amazing all season. Which leads me to believe it’s not just bad scheme. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

If you want to win a Lombardi and your Head Coach is a defensive guy, you need a great OC.  

 

The opposite is true, too.  That's why Reid has Spags.   They're an excellent combo.  

 

Brady is just okay.  I suppose it's possible to surround him with enough great coaches that our offense becomes great.   Ideally, though, we'd have a creative genius with great leadership skills as our OC.  

 

Does McDermott ALLOW total offensive autonomy for his OC? Would he want to or be able to hire the kind of candidate you profile above?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bieniemy intrigues me. Seems like he can be an a hole at times but we could use someone being the bad cop and pushing players.

 

Thought he did a solid job in Washington getting out of Reid's shadow which was the biggest question surrounding him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offensive gameplan against KC was perfect and executed very well.  I liked Brady.  It wasnt fireworks but it was good situational football that was a stark contrast to Dorsey's playcalling that melted when it mattered.  The problem with the playoff loss was that the D did not show up...again. We all understand the injuries had their impact but the D was completely ineffective but for a fumble and one forced punt. 

 

Do they need more weapons on Offense?  Yeah they do and its no surprise to see the Bills and Gabe Davis fine with parting ways. However, the willingness to be tougher more physical team on offense is the right philosophy.  They just need a complimentary thumping back to Cook, preferably one that is also a receiving threat and a 1b WR that is able to adjust to throws and win contested catches.  Josh trusted Gabe too much in that role and Gabe for either a lack of ability (he is a bit of a stiff WR when it comes to adjusting) or lack of desire wasnt consistent in fighting to win those battles leading to turnovers.  He did from time to time, but he also seemed to get frustrated that Josh didnt put the ball where he wanted it and IMO didnt always give 100% in fighting DBs on contested throws.  You could see it in his body language. 

 

I wont agree that the team was better without Gabe, but they can upgrade and that is a priority.  There are plenty of options this year to try in the draft. 

 

I just dont trust that they will change their philosophy to try to level up the offense and will continue feeding the D draft picks and end up being fatally flawed on both sides (coaching on D and not enough talent around great QB on O).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, transient said:

Did you really just base your argument on kind words spoken at his retirement?

 

I lived in NOLA and watched almost every TIgers game between 2017 and 2022. Ensminger was interim OC after Les Myles was fired, TE's coach in 2017, and was OC for the 2018 season. That offense, with Burrow, was not explosive. Burrow threw for 2800+ yds and 16 TDs. Because the passing game was so unimpressive, Ogeron went to Sean Payton and inquired about someone who could help implement a pro-style offense, and he recommended Joe Brady, who was widely regarded in the area as the reason Burrow threw for 5600+ yds and 60 TDs. Granted, he was throwing to Justin Jefferson and J'Marr Chase with Clyde Edwards-Helaire and Leonard Fournette in the backfield, and Randy Moss's son at TE, but he had the same weapons in 2018.

 

Thank you for a thoughtful and informative post.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

I love the way Joe schemed the RBs open in the passing game if only Cook didn’t have stone hands. 
But the elephant in the room regardless who the coordinator is…is getting receivers who constantly catch the ball. 

 

One correction/addition: "... is getting receivers who 'can run, get separation' and constantly catch the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

 

I know this isn’t directed to me, and again I am not trying to argumentative, just kind of presenting my thought process on this, knowing full well it isn’t going to happen. 

So are you talking win/loss record here? If so you are 100% correct, he has a losing record as HC in both the pros and college. 
 

But he’d be coming as an OC, so to me his overall record isn’t significant in this case. I look at it has he coached guys like Case Keenum, Johnny Football, obviously Mahomes, Davis Webb, Baker Mayfield and they all put up some ridiculous numbers in his system. The guy can coach offense and that is what I would want him to do here. Let McDermott coach the defense. Based on what I just watched, I think it’s clear you have to try to outscore KC, and if that’s the goal, Kliff is the guy imo. 
 

Our Jedi knight QB could use a little slice of the dark side of the force. Forget about complimentary football, let’s beat everyone by 70 with our unicorn. 
 

 

 

The long term advantage I see in a guy like Kliff would be you are unlikely the face the "1 or 2 good years and he is a HC again" issue. I am fine with Brady getting the gig, I think he is one of the better candidates tbh. But if the Bills offense hums next year he is gone. He had a HC interview this year after a season and a half as a QB coach and 6 or 7 games as an OC. He had HC interviews before after a pretty ropey season as the Panthers OC. If the Bills are good he gets a Head Coach job. 

 

I think Kliff's road back to a Head Coaching job in the NFL is a very long one. Not respected as a leader, basically a play caller in way over his head running a team, his teams never finish (his record down the stretch of the season as a HC in college and the pros is abysmal). It would take more than 1 or 2 good years calling plays for Josh Allen to make him a serious HC candidate again. I think he is a guy you might get 3-5 years of at the spot (which is a lifetime of continuity in the modern NFL). 

 

In terms of scheme carry over there is some spread concept in what we do, was under Daboll, less under Dorsey, started to come back a bit under Joe. But you would need a pretty radical re-make of the WR room I think and you might need to think longer term about left tackle because Dion would be living on an island a LOT.

 

I do see the logic in him as a candidate. But I'd be surprised if the Bills go that route knowing what we know about how they value character. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, JoeF said:

Jeremy Fowler

@JFowlerESPN

·

25m

The #Bills are starting their offensive coordinator search in earnest, and interim OC Joe Brady will interview for the full-time job, per source. Brady acquitted himself well over nine games as the play caller, and Josh Allen has vouched for him getting the job.

Not convinced Brady the guy,  I do not like his run heavy offence.  You can't win in the playoffs playing that way,  I just saw some many wasted downs trying to run th ball last in games putting us behind the sticks.  I think the Bills need to upgrade this coaching position because we need to get back to being an explosive offence

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I hope they interview: 

 

Joe Brady

Kliff Kingsbury

Kellen Moore

Arthur Smith

Zac Robinson

Brian Johnson

Mike LaFluer

 

Kingsbury would be my top choice. If you want change, you take a demanding prick and put him in the building. He is not a yes man. 

Where's Josh McDaniels? He should be the front runner in my opinion or heavy consideration. 

 

#1- McDaniels runs the same offense (Erhart Perkins) that Allen flourished under with Daboll he even knows that offense more so then Daboll. 

 

#2- McDaniels days as a head coach are over he had 2 chances so if we hire him we don't have to worry about losing him or him getting job interviews during the playoffs. 

 

#3- McDaniels has big time experience in big time games and knows the recipe to winning it all . 

 

#4- McDaniels offense is perfect for the players we have already on the team I can see knowing exactly how to use Cook, Kincaid, Knox, Shakir & Diggs and especially Josh Allen. 

 

#5- I love how McDaniels knows how to diagram plays for the passing and running games and how they both correspond with one another. McDaniels uses every part of the field. 

 

#6- The fact that McDaniels offense is very similar with Daboll offense would make his hiring a smooth transition for Josh Allen and the rest of the offense. McDaniels might not be a good head coach but he's a great OC with a ton of success on the highest levels of this game. I would love to see how he will use Kincaid and Knox in 2 TE sets as well as Cook in the passing game . McDaniels should be considered for this job no doubt about it . 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

If you want to win a Lombardi and your Head Coach is a defensive guy, you need a great OC.  

 

The opposite is true, too.  That's why Reid has Spags.   They're an excellent combo.  

 

Brady is just okay.  I suppose it's possible to surround him with enough great coaches that our offense becomes great.   Ideally, though, we'd have a creative genius with great leadership skills as our OC.  


the problem is there are no OCs left from the 2022 season so either you hit on that and immediately have to try again or you miss and the same. Whereas with an offensive head coach you get stability on both sides 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, JoeF said:

Jeremy Fowler

@JFowlerESPN

·

25m

The #Bills are starting their offensive coordinator search in earnest, and interim OC Joe Brady will interview for the full-time job, per source. Brady acquitted himself well over nine games as the play caller, and Josh Allen has vouched for him getting the job.

The reality is this is a passing league,  you have one of best QB'S in the NFL.  We need a coordinator that gets us back to being an explosive offence,  I did not like watching our slow 12-14 play drives that take 7-8 mins .  Some would think your controlling the clock and keeping your defence fresh. I think it works against you because you have less opportunities to score and games than come down to final drives

 

Another point,  James Cook is not built to be a workhorse RB like Thurman Thomas.  You give him so many carries then he wears down just as much as the defense.  I just saw so many late game drives where Brady seemed like he had to run on first down and we wasted a down doing so putting us behind the sticks.  It happened on Sunday on final drive

 

With Brady as coordinator the offence may overall look better but the passing game took steps back and we had far less big chuck plays.  If McDermott really wants to keep his job and see this team get over the hump then he hires someone that can get this offence to being explosive and stays the F—k out or else he will continue to be Reid's whipping boy come playoff time.  McDermott said this league was about passing the ball,  get a guy who can scheme guys open and pass the ball

 

Huge mistake just listening to Allen & other players that they likes Brady,  Allen said the same thing about Ken Dorsey and we made excuses for him for his first year after Dabol left.   Only got worse the second year,  sorry I was not impressed with the play calling on Sunday.  16 passes at the line of scrimmage when you have a QB with the strongest arm in the NFL.  

 

Edited by Niagara Dude
SPELL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

Not convinced Brady the guy,  I do not like his run heavy offence.  You can't win in the playoffs playing that way,  I just saw some many wasted downs trying to run th ball last in games putting us behind the sticks.  I think the Bills need to upgrade this coaching position because we need to get back to being an explosive offence

 

I think it was a case of what we can do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NastyNateSoldiers said:

Where's Josh McDaniels? He should be the front runner in my opinion or heavy consideration. 

 

#1- McDaniels runs the same offense (Erhart Perkins) that Allen flourished under with Daboll he even knows that offense more so then Daboll. 

 

#2- McDaniels days as a head coach are over he had 2 chances so if we hire him we don't have to worry about losing him or him getting job interviews during the playoffs. 

 

#3- McDaniels has big time experience in big time games and knows the recipe to winning it all . 

 

#4- McDaniels offense is perfect for the players we have already on the team I can see knowing exactly how to use Cook, Kincaid, Knox, Shakir & Diggs and especially Josh Allen. 

 

#5- I love how McDaniels knows how to diagram plays for the passing and running games and how they both correspond with one another. McDaniels uses every part of the field. 

 

#6- The fact that McDaniels offense is very similar with Daboll offense would make his hiring a smooth transition for Josh Allen and the rest of the offense. McDaniels might not be a good head coach but he's a great OC with a ton of success on the highest levels of this game. I would love to see how he will use Kincaid and Knox in 2 TE sets as well as Cook in the passing game . McDaniels should be considered for this job no doubt about it . 

 

I'd be good with it. I thought BB was going to get that Atlanta job and take McDaniels with him, but I'd do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

 

I'd be good with it. I thought BB was going to get that Atlanta job and take McDaniels with him, but I'd do it. 

 

I'd be good with McDaniels as a candidate too. If you look at Mac with McDaniels vs Mac with B'OB (who is an experienced OC) I think you come away with the conclusion he can coordiante an offense.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

I think it was a case of what we can do. 

I think they need to explore all options and not just hand him the job like they did with Dorsey. Allen liked Dorsey and how did that turn out?  When have we seen change at primary coaching positions with this team in the past 5 seasons?  When have they brought someone from the outside to be defensive or offensive cordinator. 

 

I think the last time was when he hired Dabol

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

I think they need to explore all options and not just hand him the job like they did with Dorsey. Allen liked Dorsey and how did that turn out?  When have we seen change at primary coaching positions with this team in the past 5 seasons?  When have they brought someone from the outside to be defensive or offensive cordinator. 

 

I think the last time was when he hired Dabol

 

 

 

The outside point is a fair one. But they didn't just hand Dorsey the job. They interviewed two other candidates. He was always the front runner - but then he was one of the hottest OC candidates on the market that year. He had OC interviews the year before too. 

 

But I do take the outside perspectives point. I am not saying I'd hand Brady the job. I'd bring some credible external candidates in. But it wouldn't shock me if Brady ended up with it. He will be an OC somewhere in the NFL next season. If it isn't here he will be somewhere else.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BillMafia716ix said:

Eric Bienemy wouldn’t be a bad look. Has experience with superstar QB’s and star Tight Ends. 

Another good one to consider,  again it would be a mistake to just hand Brady the job because he really did not improve the passing game and Bills could have easily lost to the Chiefs/Chargers and Dolphins who were missing so many players.  All 3 of those games were decided on final drives

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, HappyDays said:

I think on reflection I would prefer to move on from Brady. It's nothing he did specifically. I just still see an overall lack of crispness in the finer details of the offense and that's what separates champions from divisional round losers. The routes aren't precise in a way that opens up other routes, the players aren't always on the same page, there appears to be an overall lack of accountability. I think Brady is a perfectly fine play designer and play caller. But I want a true coach at the position. Someone that the players respect and fear. Brady is probably too young to have that kind of reputation amongst 20-something multimillionaires. He still has his dues to pay in the league.

 

So for me I think my preference is Eric Bieniemy. He has a reputation that players don't enjoy working for him. I take that as a positive. He isn't afraid to hold anybody accountable, not even Mahomes when he was in KC. That more than an offensive whiz kid is what I think this offense needs to be more consistent on a week to week basis. He learned under the best of the best and for a time was even making Sam Howell look competent. He is a complete 180 from the coaching styles of Dorsey and Brady... maybe that's just what we need.

If you want someone like that, I think Josh McDaniel is someone they should be talking to. Yes, his head coaching gigs didn’t work out, but he ran incredibly well-designed offenses in NE that adapted weekly to whoever the opponent was. And he got a Pro Bowl season out of Mac Jones. Is he likable? Maybe not, but neither is Bienemy.

 

I also thought Washington’s offense this year was ragged and too high-risk. The sack numbers were ridiculous, and while a lot of that is on Howell, a good part of it is on the structure of the offense too.

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The outside point is a fair one. But they didn't just hand Dorsey the job. They interviewed two other candidates. He was always the front runner - but then he was one of the hottest OC candidates on the market that year. He had OC interviews the year before too. 

 

But I do take the outside perspectives point. I am not saying I'd hand Brady the job. I'd bring some credible external candidates in. But it wouldn't shock me if Brady ended up with it. He will be an OC somewhere in the NFL next season. If it isn't here he will be somewhere else.

 

I just think we need to look closer what the offence did in final games,  we won but the defence also came up strong

 

Even Pats game,  we had all those turnovers in the first half and still the offence could not put them away. The Dolphins game against a team missing so many defensive starters we struggled,  easily could have lost Chiefs game had Toney not lined up offside and our offence struggled in Chargers game

 

Not sure why anyone is totally sold on Brady,  I thought Sunday the play calling was borderline stupid.  The Chiefs adjusted when they saw us bring in extra lineman and he just kept running.

 

Everyone talks about wasting Allen's prime years with McDermott,  then the next best thing is to hire a cordinator that gets the most out of him.  Were going to live and die with out top paid and top player Allen.  You need to have the best cordinator possible and not just a guy who was around and got promoted

Edited by Niagara Dude
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

If you want to win a Lombardi and your Head Coach is a defensive guy, you need a great OC.  

 

The opposite is true, too.  That's why Reid has Spags.   They're an excellent combo.  

 

Brady is just okay.  I suppose it's possible to surround him with enough great coaches that our offense becomes great.   Ideally, though, we'd have a creative genius with great leadership skills as our OC.  

I'm going to reserve judgement about how good he actually is until I see him with a full year as a OC. As I've said before, and will say again: we did not see Brady install an offense this year. What he saw him do was call better situational plays from Ken Dorsey's and introduce a few Shanahan inspired wrinkles. Dorsey's scheme in turn was heavily inspired by what Daboll had done.

 

While I suspect that Brady will use similar verbiage that the players are familiar with, you definitely saw differences: far more run heavy that what Daboll and Dorsey did. All used motion, but Brady seemed focused on it as a way to diagnose defenses rather than the high speed attack Miami uses.

 

So I can't really say how he is overall as an OC. Maybe he pooped the bed in his interview when asked how he would change the offense and we get blown away by another candidate. All I know is that he called a hell of a better offense since anyone since Daboll. Maybe better than Daboll.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Niagara Dude said:

 

I just think we need to look who the offence did in final games,  we won but the defence also came up strong

 

Even Pats games,  we had all those turnovers in the first half and still the offence could not put them away. The Dolphins game against a team missing so many defensive starters we struggled,  easily could have lost Chiefs game had Toney not lined up offside and our offence struggled in Chargers game

 

Not sure why anyone is totally sold on Brady,  I thought Sunday the play calling was borderline stupid.  The Chiefs adjusted when they saw us bring in extra lineman and he just kept running.

 

Everyone talks about wasting Allen's prime years with McDermott,  then the next best thing is to hire a cordinator that gets the most out of him.  Were going to live and die with out top paid and top player Allen.  You need to have the best cordinator possible and not just a guy who was around and got promoted

 

I'm not totally sold on Brady. But I think he is a credible candidate. And I disagree re. the playcalling on Sunday. I think he called a good game. The big issue that has thwarted both OCs this year is the Bills inability to separate vertically. It has forced us to be a small ball offense. We won't be explosive again without upgrading the explosiveness outside. It is a Brandon Beane issue as much as an offensive coordinator one. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

 

I just think we need to look closer what the offence did in final games,  we won but the defence also came up strong

 

Even Pats game,  we had all those turnovers in the first half and still the offence could not put them away. The Dolphins game against a team missing so many defensive starters we struggled,  easily could have lost Chiefs game had Toney not lined up offside and our offence struggled in Chargers game

 

Not sure why anyone is totally sold on Brady,  I thought Sunday the play calling was borderline stupid.  The Chiefs adjusted when they saw us bring in extra lineman and he just kept running.

 

Everyone talks about wasting Allen's prime years with McDermott,  then the next best thing is to hire a cordinator that gets the most out of him.  Were going to live and die with out top paid and top player Allen.  You need to have the best cordinator possible and not just a guy who was around and got promoted

Really? Because I thought overall he did a good job against the Chiefs.

 

The running worked extremely well through the third quarter. It wasn't until the 4th when they started changing up things to stop them. The two 4th quarter stalls were the drive when the Chiefs finally adjusted, the first has the Bills in 3rd and makable when Allen gets a pass batted, and the next is where they get stuffed and Sherfield can't bring it in deep.

 

He DOES adjust on the final drive. The Chiefs are run blitzing. Allen takes his third big deep shot that is catchable and it slides through Diggs' hands. Allen starts hitting hot routes for blitz beaters, which is one of the easier ways to attack the Chiefs now that they need to blitz to stop the run. Kincaid had three catches averaging 7 YPA and that's the kind of thing you take all day. I don't even mind the run call at the two minute warning because I was thoroughly expecting KC to call a timeout and it was to our benefit that they didn't.

 

That Shakir and Diggs were both open on that 2nd and 9 and there were bodies available to make it a 4th and short decision on 3rd down speak more to Allen's decision making than Brady's scheming and playcalling.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Really? Because I thought overall he did a good job against the Chiefs.

 

The running worked extremely well through the third quarter. It wasn't until the 4th when they started changing up things to stop them. The two 4th quarter stalls were the drive when the Chiefs finally adjusted, the first has the Bills in 3rd and makable when Allen gets a pass batted, and the next is where they get stuffed and Sherfield can't bring it in deep.

 

He DOES adjust on the final drive. The Chiefs are run blitzing. Allen takes his third big deep shot that is catchable and it slides through Diggs' hands. Allen starts hitting hot routes for blitz beaters, which is one of the easier ways to attack the Chiefs now that they need to blitz to stop the run. Kincaid had three catches averaging 7 YPA and that's the kind of thing you take all day. I don't even mind the run call at the two minute warning because I was thoroughly expecting KC to call a timeout and it was to our benefit that they didn't.

 

That Shakir and Diggs were both open on that 2nd and 9 and there were bodies available to make it a 4th and short decision on 3rd down speak more to Allen's decision making than Brady's scheming and playcalling.

 

You watched the same game I did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't see explosive offense anymore because we don't have prime Brown and prime Beasley anymore.  We have an unreliable Davis that is a one trick pony, Sherfield, and Harty.  Yes, we have Shakir as well and I think he is the most explosive player on the team but he still isn't prime Beasley.  At least not yet.  There is no one on the team to stretch the field, get quick separation, has reliable hands, makes contested catches, makes catches that aren't perfect balls, etc.  If you want to see explosive offense then you need more talent.  Davis, Harty, and Sherfield are not it.

 

I dunno if Brady is the guy or not.  I like some of what he did.  I think some of what he didn't do was being hampered by lack of talent.  This team desperately needs another outside receiver.  I think if we get that we get more explosive offense instead of dink and dunk all the time.  You can not consistently score by just taking what the defense gives you every single play. Especially when those little short passes don't get that YAC.

 

When Brady was the master of dink and dunk it worked because those guys could take a 3 yard pass and rip off 10-20 more yards.  That makes up for big throws downfield.  They still had big throws downfield too. You have to have guys that can break what the defense gives you and makes a play too.  Throwing 2-5 yards all game is only going to beat bad teams.  Sure, you need to be able to do it but that can't be for entire games.  Too much room for error to expect to score 7 points on 10-15 play 6-8 minute drives every drive.  No top offense in the league relies on just getting 2-5 yards per play.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Tough to fault Brady when there were 3-4 huge drops and both Diggs and Shakir were open on the missed TD play. 
 

Also tough to argue against the turnaround after he was made OC.

 

There was no turn around on the offense with him as coach.  The offense struggled just as much, if not more.  There were games where they had turnover luck that greatly benefited them.

 

Really the only difference was Allen running more, which is that something you really want for 17 games in a season?

 

Go back and read about all the issues Brady had in Carolina, he sounds awfully familiar.

 

There's nothing complex about Brady's scheme. It's very basic, which is why he struggled to have positive results. In this league, you can't be predictable. You have to throw in a bunch of motions, double moves, RPO's, rub routes, and present the defense with some eye candy pre-snap. From what I can tell, 90% of the motions are just to expose if the defense is in man or zone coverage. There are very few motions into routes, blocks, or once again, eye candy.

 

That quote about, is exactly what we seen with the Bills.  The Bills added more motion, but it was literally just what was described above.  Look at the motion that Miami runs, vs the motion that Brady ran.

 

Read some of these responses from Carolina fans.  This is the same things that we seen in his short time here.  It's really concerning.

 

Fan POV

 

Joe Brady is/was the guy who ran the same 5 plays on Madden against the A.I. and impressed his friends.

Then he went online and everyone else knew how to stop those plays.

 

How many times are we going to see the WR screen?

 

This is so true. He was also terrible at making adjustments, our 3rd quarter scoring being a prime example. Overall, I think he was decent at play & scheme design, but could never put it into action for longer than a few drives

 

The second halfs were terrible under Brady.  1st KC game, 14 in 1st/6 in 2nd.  LA game, 14 in 1st/10 in 2nd.  7 points in 2nd half vs NE.  10 points in 2nd half vs Pitt.  7 points in 2nd half vs KC.

 

 

His scheme was pretty chaotic and bad overall. There were multiple plays where receivers end up in the same spot once the route develops. Even his short yardage play is terrible.

I honestly can't say what I think his strength was overall because nothing about him was amazing. As I mentioned in another post, his play designs rely on having physically dominant talent and once you get to the NFL--everyone is kind of on a level playing field.

 

Didn't we have WR running into each other vs KC.  Being physically dominant sounds familiar with the Dallas game.

 

Often looked like the opponents knew what play was coming. Seemed like play calling tended not to be balanced it would be all screens or no screens, All runs or no runs etc. There were things that felt like strengths from a fans perspective that we almost didn’t use at all at times like short routes to CMC and runs with Cam. No offensive player has really shown improvement while the defensive players seem to work on their weaknesses. Maybe it’s our lack of understanding of the complexity but from my perspective it’s hard to find something that it appears he excelled at. The main defense is just that our offensive players are not good.

 

This hits home big time.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what game some of you were watching on Sunday. The Bills strategy worked perfectly until the final series of plays. The ‘long ball’ wasn’t going to accomplish anything in that game other than to give the ball back to an opponent we simply couldn’t stop. Heck, even one of the announcers called it in the pregame. With an injury depleted defense the Bills had only one choice….keep the damn ball! Which they did perfectly (go look at the number of plays and time of possession) until a total brain cramp caused them to try a go deep. Huge mistake! 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

We don't see explosive offense anymore because we don't have prime Brown and prime Beasley anymore.  We have an unreliable Davis that is a one trick pony, Sherfield, and Harty.  Yes, we have Shakir as well and I think he is the most explosive player on the team but he still isn't prime Beasley.  At least not yet.  There is no one on the team to stretch the field, get quick separation, has reliable hands, makes contested catches, makes catches that aren't perfect balls, etc.  If you want to see explosive offense then you need more talent.  Davis, Harty, and Sherfield are not it.

 

I dunno if Brady is the guy or not.  I like some of what he did.  I think some of what he didn't do was being hampered by lack of talent.  This team desperately needs another outside receiver.  I think if we get that we get more explosive offense instead of dink and dunk all the time.  You can not consistently score by just taking what the defense gives you every single play. Especially when those little short passes don't get that YAC.

 

When Brady was the master of dink and dunk it worked because those guys could take a 3 yard pass and rip off 10-20 more yards.  That makes up for big throws downfield.  They still had big throws downfield too. You have to have guys that can break what the defense gives you and makes a play too.  Throwing 2-5 yards all game is only going to beat bad teams.  Sure, you need to be able to do it but that can't be for entire games.  Too much room for error to expect to score 7 points on 10-15 play 6-8 minute drives every drive.  No top offense in the league relies on just getting 2-5 yards per play.

 

As you know I agree totally that the Bills need an outside receiver who can get vertical and gives them a more explosive element. That said their YAC numbers were much better this year. I think @Shaw66 said they were 6th in the league. That has been a problem other seasons, but actually by design when you are so small ball the YAC comes. 

17 minutes ago, Back2Buff said:

 

I was very critical of Brady in Carolina. He was in over his head IMO and he did not do a great job. That said, here Dorsey was the predictable one and Brady DID incorporate a bunch of motions, stack formations, pre-snap movement and rub routes. He ran the same plays broadly but dressed them up with better eye candy and misdirection. So that element of the criticism from the Panthers has not, to this point, carried across to the Bills. He also use leverage really cleverly and used the middle of the field which were Dorsey weaknessed. 

 

Again, not me saying they "must" hire Joe Brady. I don't think that. But I do think he is a credible candidate for the job and will be an OC somewhere in the NFL next year. Let's see who else they bring in for interview.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Joe Brady having an off-season to work on his concepts. Allen is dealing with much smaller windows to fit balls in than around the league. Will be interesting to see, definitely should leave no stone unturned when the best minds should be fighting to get a job here. Cause 1-2 years of good production will get a look at HC based on NFL trends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, extrahammer said:

Instead of JUST landing with Brady, why not hire a team of offensive experts? Like an offensive board of directors for Brady to report to. 

 

So they have Rob Boras as TE coach who has been around a while and spent some time as an interim head coach for the Rams. Mike Shula is on staff who is a former OC, QB coach, and head coach in college as a consultant. They also have Adam Henry, who I am not sure did a very good job, but he has been around while and got his start under Lane Kiffin with the Raiders. Plus Aaron Kromer has been an OC and run game coordinator and interim head coach in the league before in multiple schemes. So experience on the offensive staff isn't the issue imo. Hopefully whoever they hire finds guys who will help implement their vision for the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

One low key interesting storyline to the OC/DC search.

 

McD may be hiring his successor, could that impact who he hires? Frank Reich and Eric Washington aren’t replacing him…

No it won't. If they fire McDermott, they are not replacing him with anyone on staff. That such a rare thing in sports

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

 

So they have Rob Boras as TE coach who has been around a while and spent some time as an interim head coach for the Rams. Mike Shula is on staff who is a former OC, QB coach, and head coach in college as a consultant. They also have Adam Henry, who I am not sure did a very good job, but he has been around while and got his start under Lane Kiffin with the Raiders. Plus Aaron Kromer has been an OC and run game coordinator and interim head coach in the league before in multiple schemes. So experience on the offensive staff isn't the issue imo. Hopefully whoever they hire finds guys who will help implement their vision for the offense. 

 

IMO it is, because our last two OC's, Brady and Dorsey, were first time OC's. And also IMO I highly doubt all these consultants are collaborating and optimizing the offense every week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

If you want someone like that, I think Josh McDaniel is someone they should be talking to. Yes, his head coaching gigs didn’t work out, but he ran incredibly well-designed offenses in NE that adapted weekly to whoever the opponent was. And he got a Pro Bowl season out of Mac Jones. Is he likable? Maybe not, but neither is Bienemy.

 

I also thought Washington’s offense this year was ragged and too high-risk. The sack numbers were ridiculous, and while a lot of that is on Howell, a good part of it is on the structure of the offense too.

Would not have to be a complete offense overhaul.  McDaniel is a EP offense coach.  He certainly has more experience running it compared to the last 3 including Dabol.  Would be a good fit possibly.   What I always liked about NE is they were adaptable not trying to put square pegs in round holes.   I am sure that he is accustomed to making half time adjustments. Something I don’t think we stress as a team unless it is to protect the D with a lead.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...