Jump to content

JROC INTEL

Community Member
  • Posts

    401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

2,095 profile views

JROC INTEL's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (4/8)

295

Reputation

  1. For those wanting Kubiak, explain to me how you’re more comfortable hiring someone without HC experience over the other options like gruden, bill, tomlin etc? To me experience means a lot, and we don’t have time for a learning curve.
  2. Belichick. He wants a revenge FU tour against the pats organization, and this is his best opportunity for another ring.
  3. According to google… Based on 2025 NFL rule changes, simply tucking the ball is no longer sufficient on its own to be considered a completed "football move" (or "act common to the game") for establishing a catch.
  4. In my opinion, although we would all like calls to be consistent, using previous calls or different games should not effect this singular play and whether it’s a correct call or not. I think it is adding unnecessary variables where you could be comparing to other “bad calls”
  5. I honestly think if he just holds on to the ball for 1 extra second, it’s a catch. But he just lost it too quick, but it sucks that’s really a interpretation call not exact science
  6. Under my interpretation, you can have possession, with your knee down and still not complete the process of a catch. Therefore you can’t be down by contact, as that is something only after you complete the process of a catch. I don’t think he completed the process of a catch because he did not hold on to the ball for a reasonable amount of time which would fall under the “football move” category. Maybe I’m misinformed but thats my interpretation, open to opinions
  7. harsh. Of course I haven’t read the whole rule book, stop. I’ve read the rules of completing a catch, and I don’t believe the 3rd aspect was met of having possession for a reasonable amount of time. I’m open to hearing your opinion on that, and what rule I may be missing.
  8. Oh i’m not arguing that it hasn’t been called both ways. I’m arguing for accuracy, and to me the call was correct. I understand i’m in the minority here. But to me the process of a catch was not completed.
  9. Don't you need to maintain possession for a reasonable time to complete the process of a catch? Cooks is not a runner, to me it’s an Int. As the refs stated, the process of completing the catch never happened, so because the ball never hit the ground it’s anyones ball until someone completes the process of a catch. Just as if a WR catches a ball in the endzone with both toes down and both hands on the ball, but comes down with it bobbling, its not a touchdown. Same thing applies here imo.
  10. I put the chance of McD getting fired around 10%
  11. Duke Williams if you can read this… 📞
  12. Good question, I guess in my head the Texans already beat us and we have shown we can beat the Pats, kind of prefer to play the pats right now. What do you think? I just feel like if the Texans are on they are dangerous. Cj is playing awful but I know what he is capable of on a good day
  13. I want Steelers to win for sure, much lower ceiling
×
×
  • Create New...