Jump to content

D Hopkins vs Gabe Davis


RocCityRoller

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:

Nothing personal my friend, but I am looking at recent production.

 

Hopkins had 717 yards and 3 TD on 96 targets.

Davis had 836 yards and 7 TD on 93 targets.

 

Oh and Davis is much cheaper.

 

And Dhop didn't exceed 60% catch stats until year 5.

Davis is entering year 4.

 

I'll give Davis the room to improve.

And yet Davis had more Yards and TDs than Hopkins on almost the same number of targets,,,,

 

How did that happen?

Because he had the best QB in the game throwing to him on his 3 routes which take him 5 seconds to get open on? Which is why Davis did this on 33% fewer catches than Hopkins had

 

For next season only in a vacuum it is not close who would be better for this offense, the guy who can run more than 3 routes, get open quickly, and reliably toe the sideline all year long and actually make contested catches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, you don't need to build up Gabe Davis to tear down D Hop. I agree with you.... He hasn't been relevant or healthy in a while. BUT... don't put on your rose colored glasses and blame Gabe Davis' deficiencies on everything but Gabe Davis. Fact of the matter is he has MAJOR drop issues AND catch percentage issues. It's obvious the Bills feel the same way too. So much so that they were pulling guys off the couch last year to play WR. Going out on a limb and saying that they might know a little more than all of us on TSW.

Edited by Von Braun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, arcane said:

Doesn't either guy effectively have one year left anyway? I don't really care about age, we aren't giving Gabe another contract the way he's been playing

Gabe is top 35 of all WR in yards/ TDs/ yard per reception and 1st downs per reception

 

You don't let those guys go easily unless you are TSW.

1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

I prefer Jeudy… younger with more upside and better contract…. But not sure how anyone can really hate a Hopkins trade. He’s still elite. Just gotta cross fingers he doesn’t fall off a cliff and can maintain health. 

Hopkins is falling off the cliff. You get 1/2 a season of him like Manny sanders.

 

Davis has clearly out performed Jeudy by any metric.

Edited by RocCityRoller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:

Hopkins was a sub 60% catch guy for 5 years. 3 of those were as WR #1.

 

And yes, I'd rather have 24 yr old Davis to 31 yr old Hopkins.

How'd that 50 yard drop in the Cincy game sit with you. We've seen that before and you know we'll see it again.  I could care less about age. Give me a receiver who can catch the damn ball. 

Edited by LABILLBACKER
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Yeah, fans of untalented teams tend to fall in love with mediocre players that they believe to be attainable. Mediocrity is an oasis when you watch your team struggle to field remotely competitive teams for years on end. Bills fans suffered from that complex for 20 years.

 

A related but different complex is fans falling in love with mediocre players on their own team, as demonstrated by this thread.

 

You have a valid point as well.  I think Gabe is a bit more than mediocre but I get what you're saying 

 

I guess I fall in the middle of the OP and yourself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:

Gabe is top 35 of all WR in yards/ TDs/ yard per reception and 1st downs per reception

 

You don't let those guys go easily unless you are TSW.

Hopkins is falling off the cliff. You get 1/2 a season of him like Manny sanders.

 

Davis has clearly out performed Jeudy by any metric.

So in your eyes we’re just fine with Davis?

 

No need to try and add anything else but a slot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

So in your eyes we’re just fine with Davis?

 

No need to try and add anything else but a slot?

OL and Slot WR fixes a lot of what ails us.

 

Also do not forget Knox and RB.

Edited by RocCityRoller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:

He has not played a full season since 2020.

it is 2023.

 

He is 30 turning 31.

 

Old by NFL standards.

You're trying to do a comparison of Gabe and an elite WR that missed the first 6 games. Lol. They aren't even close

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, arcane said:

Davis is severely limited in the routes he runs, and the ones he's good at take forever to develop, which is part of why Allen's stats are so bad/throws to Davis are so off compared to other WRs. Hopkins is exponentially more well-rounded than Gabe, even if he hasn't stayed on the field for various reasons and is older etc. 

He had those numbers in half the games played of Gabe, on a dreadful offense with a dreadful qb who was hurt anyway


I don't even want to trade for Hopkins but this is a misleading comparison at absolute best

How do you know this is not the case with Davis?

 

Hopkins was WR#2 to Johnson for 2 years. He was sub 60% for 5 years though.... why?

I think Johnson is one of the most underrated WR of all time.

 

DHOP was still sub 50% with him. Some guys are productive but take time to excel.

 

Year 6 was when DHOP broke 60%. Houston liked him for the other metrics.

 

We should look at the other metrics with Gabe Davis too.

Edited by RocCityRoller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will see if they go the Veteran route at WR but I have my doubts. Davis started off hot last year then hurt his ankle and wasn’t the same after that. If anything I could see team drafting player versus bringing in high profile guy like Hopkins. Think Beane and Co. are still high on Davis as a player.

Edited by billieve420
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Yeah, fans of untalented teams tend to fall in love with mediocre players that they believe to be attainable. Mediocrity is an oasis when you watch your team struggle to field remotely competitive teams for years on end. Bills fans suffered from that complex for 20 years.

 

A related but different complex is fans falling in love with mediocre players on their own team, as demonstrated by this thread.

 

This is a great post and I believe it.

 

There are fans in Buffalo, the team for years, that declared war on talent.

 

That was Jauron’s entire mantra, lunch pail, try-hard players.

 

Chris Simms was saying at the end of the year, the Bengals said it by disrespecting the Bills openly. 
 

Bills lack playmaking talent, not sure why RocCity can’t accept this. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

So RocCity do we extend Gabe now? 
 

Since he’s the answer at #2? 
 

Do you acknowledge at all that he has a limited skill set? 

 

This is a fair question. And yes I do, while Gabe Davis is still a value.

He is not a WR #1. He is an excellent WR#2.

 

I have run the metrics on every WR with 50+ targets for the whole league.

By every metric other than catch %, Davis is a top 30 WR in the league.

It matches what I see. A lot of the 'non catches' are thrown away balls Davis was near.

 

He has limits. I agree.

But what he does well is well within WR #2 bounds, and he tickles WR1 stats on many things.

 

I would extend him now, 'cheaply' People here will be astounded by what he will garner on the FA market next year.

 

This was a Beane 'hit' IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RocCityRoller said:

A lot of posters here want ancient D Hopkins signed to be WR2, and spend draft capital on this stiff to replace Gabe Davis.

D Hop was a really good WR, but he has not played more than 10 games since 2020.

He hasn't passed 720 yards since 2020. He hasn't passed 8 TD since 2018.

It is 2023.

 

Last Year:

Hopkins had 717 yards and 3 TD on 96 targets.

Davis had 836 yards and 7 TD on 93 targets.

 

Davis had +119 yards, +4 TDs  on 3 fewer targets, on a rookie deal.

Many here swear Hopkins should be signed at 10+ million a year and a draft pick though.

How does that make any sense???

 

It doesn't.

 

It has also become popular here to knock down Gabe Davis and blame him for the Bills offensive struggles.

 

Nevermind the sub-par OL play, or that the slot WR position was a mess all season.

Davis and Diggs looked better with a solid slot WR like Beasley.

 

A lot of TSW wanted Beasley out, and you got your wish.

How did that work out for you?

It didn't.

 

Beasley type slot WR are available (Berrios/ Ritchie/ draft), but don't point that out here.

Beane missed on Crowder, so Ritchie and Berrios would suck too according to TSW.

 

Ignore that the OC was new to the position or that the TE and RBs were forgotten for major stretches of the season.

Forget developing Cook, or using Hines.

Go get Ekeler and his 127 targets last year... that is the answer....

 

Run game? What is that?, we have Allen, chuck it up where a guy looks open.

That was often Davis downfield, as seen by yards per target.

The catch % reflects it, but TSW won't admit it. Much like D Hopkins in his first 5 years.

 

48/ 836/ 7 TD apparently is bad now for a WR #2.

A lot of teams and fans would love that production from a #2 WR.

That was top 35% WR production in the league for ALL WR.

 

When looking at all WR with 50+ targets Davis scored top 1/3 in a lot of categories.

But no: 52% catch rate last year = sucks.

It was a bad stat for certain, but how many of those balls were actually catchable?

 

TSW thinks Gabe Davis stinks. Then again I've recently seen TSW attack Tre White recently too.

 

So replace Davis with D Hopkins huh?

A WR that did less with more opportunities, costs more and is ancient?

Smart team building there.

 

Maybe we should chill out a bit as fans.

 

Did you know Deandre Hopkins never had a catch % higher than 60% for his first 5 seasons?!

 

Hopkins catch % was 57.1%/ 59.8%/ 57.8%/ 51.7%/ 55.2% over his first 5 seasons.

 

Gabe Davis is 56.5%/ 55.6%/ 52.6% as a #2, but he 'stinks'.

 

It took 4 seasons as WR #1 for Hopkins to exceed 60% catch %

but WR don't improve their catch % per TSW.

 

Many here think Buffalo should trade for an older version of the guy we already have, is less productive, and costs more

 

Brilliant.


where to start with this mess of a post.

Hopkins is nto the player he once was, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. While injury concerns are valid, it's not the end of the world. We have a top-notch medical staff here as well.

As for wanting Beasley out - I was definitely one of them. However, the plan never should have been to replace him with McKenzie, and once it was it should have been remedied after a couple of games of McKenzie proving that he's awful. That's like when people point out how good Tremaine was when Dodson was playing. Being better than terrible depth players shouldn't be the yardstick by which we measure.

Beane didn't "miss" on Crowder either. Crowder is a known quantity and a very good football player that got hurt in a freak injury in week 4 and never recovered. That's just bad luck. He didn't have much of a chance to do anything good or bad through 3 games and change.

I don't want a "Beasley type" slot and you shouldn't either. Short and slow guys who can only catch the ball and fall down are of minimal value in a heavily vertical offense. Give me someone bigger, faster and stronger with ideally less attitude problems any day over him. A guy like Berrios has no business anywhere near this team. We're looking to upgrade from McKenzie, not clone him.

Gabe Davis is a #4 WR on any decent team. He has a limited route tree and questionable hands. His best role is run down the field and hope he gets wide open vs 1on1 coverage. The experiment with him last year as a #2 was a failure. Over half of his production came through the first 6 games of the season last year, including one where he didn't play and the two after where he was badly hobbled. He would go on to score only 3 more touchdowns over the remaining 11 games and would not top 100 yards.  No doubt someone will pay him based on potential, but it shouldn't be us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopkins was very good after returning from suspension last season. Mind you, he released an absurd “don’t call it a comeback” hype video before his first game, but yes he was still very effective. 
 

The issue is what compensation he’d cost (likely a 2nd + pick swap), salary/contract issues, and the ever dangerous 30+ age wall. 

Edited by Airseven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RocCityRoller said:

 

This is a fair question. And yes I do, while Gabe Davis is still a value.

He is not a WR #1. He is an excellent WR#2.

 

I have run the metrics on every WR with 50+ targets for the whole league.

By every metric other than catch %, Davis is a top 30 WR in the league.

It matches what I see. A lot of the 'non catches' are thrown away balls Davis was near.

 

He has limits. I agree.

But what he does well is well within WR #2 bounds, and he tickles WR1 stats on many things.

 

I would extend him now, 'cheaply' People here will be astounded by what he will garner on the FA market next year.

 

This was a Beane 'hit' IMO.

There was a reason he was a 4th Rounder though. 
 

He doesn’t have elite traits.

 

He had a huge game against Pittsburgh and a few other good games, but he went missing for numerous games this year in the 3 catch-35 yards range. 
 

He gets credit for being the hardest worker on the team, but the guy has a belly. 
 

I know Beane scolded everyone for having too high of expectations, but I was let down by his performance overall. Inconsistent and a lot of games with low output.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


what? I’m a troll because I like Hopkins???

Lol feels like it’s Opposite Day around here.  9/10 nfl fans are taking Hopkins over gabe Davis.  Not to say anyone is right or wrong for preferring gabe Davis but you certainly can’t be a troll for liking Hopkins more

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Airseven said:

Mind you, he released an absurd “don’t call it a comeback” hype video before his first game

Just another example in a long line of them of what a tool this guy is.  Mind you, it has nothing to do with his football prowess, but yeah, he’s a douche.


On the Hail Murray:

“Hopkins has plans of having a chain made to commemorate the play, he revealed during his Pro Bowl Verzuz on Thursday night with L.A. Rams cornerback Jalen Ramsey, and the level of disrespect is over the top.

“I’m going to get a chain made with their three names on there and a cemetery,” he said.

He basically wants to tell White, Hyde and Poyer to rest in peace.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HurlyBurly51 said:

Just another example in a long line of them of what a tool this guy is.  Mind you, it has nothing to do with his football prowess, but yeah, he’s a douche.


On the Hail Murray:

“Hopkins has plans of having a chain made to commemorate the play, he revealed during his Pro Bowl Verzuz on Thursday night with L.A. Rams cornerback Jalen Ramsey, and the level of disrespect is over the top.

“I’m going to get a chain made with their three names on there and a cemetery,” he said.

He basically wants to tell White, Hyde and Poyer to rest in peace.”


The chain idea reminds me how Arizona overrates the whole Hail Murray catch.  Yes it was an unbelievable catch but in the grand scheme the win wasn’t very significant for the Cardinals as they went on a losing streak missing the playoffs.  Fans were still bragging the catch into the off-season which I thought was silly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dan in Owego said:

Davante Adams

Cooper Kupp

Justin Jefferson

Ja'Marr Chase

Deebo Samuel

 

Nope not top 5, setting aside his 20 million cap hit he is on the decline which puts him out of our discussion wholly and completely.


D Hop is a better WR than Deebo who is a hybrid WR.  But WR to WR, in terms of receiving skills, D Hop is better and just about any GM or player in the NFL would affirm that.  And I’m a big fan of Deebos too, but he isn’t as good as Hopkins at being a WR.  
 

And he is not on a decline, you just stating that doesn’t make it true.  He was as good as ever this year.  His per game averages out him at 120 catches and 1400 yards catching passes from mostly bad quarterbacks.  
 

Anytime someone says he is on the decline I immediately know they really didn’t pay attention to him this year.  He was as good as ever.
 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Hopkins is the better player but some of you got so caught up in names. With injuries, suspension, and age, Hopkins is a declining player. I’d rather have him than Davis but it’s not nearly as crazy as it was 3 years ago,


How can you look at what he did this year with scrubs and honestly say he is on the decline?  He was on pace for 120 catches and 1400 yards catching passes from Murray for a few games and scrubs the rest.  And on a bad overall team too with bad coaching.  
 


 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


How can you look at what he did this year with scrubs and honestly say he is on the decline?  He was on pace for 120 catches and 1400 yards catching passes from Murray for a few games and scrubs the rest.  And on a bad overall team too with bad coaching.  
 


 

 

I’ll be honest, I probably am over stating. But a few things: over 30 and declining YAC makes me nervous. Plus I think he is kinda of headache. But yes, he’s the much better player Davis. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


D Hop is a better WR than Deebo who is a hybrid WR.  But WR to WR, in terms of receiving skills, D Hop is better and just about any GM or player in the NFL would affirm that.  And I’m a big fan of Deebos too, but he isn’t as good as Hopkins at being a WR.  
 

And he is not on a decline, you just stating that doesn’t make it true.  He was as good as ever this year.  His per game averages out him at 120 catches and 1400 yards catching passes from mostly bad quarterbacks.  
 

Anytime someone says he is on the decline I immediately know they really didn’t pay attention to him this year.  He was as good as ever.
 

 

Deebo plays with bad qbs in a good system. As much as I don’t like Kyler, he would be better than the SF qbs in their system than vice Versa. JMO. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I’ll be honest, I probably am over stating. But a few things: over 30 and declining YAC makes me nervous. Plus I think he is kinda of headache. But yes, he’s the much better player Davis. 

 

 

Deebo plays with bad qbs in a good system. As much as I don’t like Kyler, he would be better than the SF qbs in their system than vice Versa. JMO. 


Deebo is a great player, love watching him play as my wife is a hard core niner fan.  But he’s not necessarily a “great” WR and many Niners fans see Aiyuk as the better pure WR when they need a play downfield.
 

He is a fantastic weapon though as he is a nightmare with YAC and also dangerous running the ball.  But he specializes in short throws where he makes plays more than a downfield threat.  He isn’t the most polished route runner and doesn’t have the most reliable hands further down field.  Don’t get me wrong, I’d love Deebo on our team, so not a knock on him.  But just comparing receiving ability, Hopkins is better.

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

First ballot HOF?  That’s a stretch. What has he won? 

He’s already 36th in all time Rec yards and 28th all time in catches, playing with mostly scrubs at QB.  He’ll likely finish his career inside the top 10 in both categories, especially if he goes to a team w a real QB. Not to mention he’s a 5 time All-pro, the guy is a first ballot HOF player.  He’s played on trash teams, not hard to see that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

He’s already 36th in all time Rec yards and 28th all time in catches, playing with mostly scrubs at QB.  He’ll likely finish his career inside the top 10 in both categories, especially if he goes to a team w a real QB. Not to mention he’s a 5 time All-pro, the guy is a first ballot HOF player.  He’s played on trash teams, not hard to see that.

He did have Watson tossing to him for a while…that doesn’t sound right…

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gabe Davis in 3 full seasons has three 100 yard games.  
 

Hopkins in 1 full season and 2 half seasons the last 3 years has nine 100 yard games and would have had several more if Murray didn’t tear his ACL this year.  
 

Someone shoot this thread, put it out of its misery and bury it in the back yard to never be spoken of again.   
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clear here, we are comparing Josh Allen to Matt Schaub, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Brian Hoyer, Brock Osweiler, and Tom Savage?

 

Good grief.

 

Watson first year as full time starter DHops line was 115 catches for 1,572 yards, 11 td.

 

That was 2018, not that long ago.

 

 

Edited by JJGauna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is 2023 THE absolute year we go all in with no other options to compliment Diggs?  If not (as in we believe in an extended Superbowl window), then let Diggs and maybe Beasley be our older veterans while we use our draft capital to stock the youth pipeline.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s no comparison between Davis and Hopkins. Davis is a WR4 while Hopkins is still a top 8-10 WR in the league. 
 

The debate is whether upgrading from Davis to Hopkins is worth the trade compensation, salary + more cap issues, and risk of aging/slowing.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

      I guess I don’t  totally understand the issue.  I think the OP did a nice job of compiling all that information in the post.  But i thought we are looking at adding another stud type receiver to diversify the offense and give JOSH more weapons.  So isn’t the reason to mention Hopkins at all is to think about him as a legit #2 at this point    (And hey, i resent and resemble that crap about AARP ! So to the wise  guy that said the aarp team stuff, WAIT TILL YOU GET THERE!  LOL!  They start sending card apps out when you turn 50 so it’s going to sneak up a lot quicker than you think !).  😊

So wouldn’t the goal be to still have Gabe , but allow him to return to his #3 role so he doesn’t have to face #1 corners when teams double Diggs and roll their 1 to cover Gabe?    It’s not supposed to be an either or situation, its about ADDING weapons for Josh , and even at 31, Hopkins would be aa great addition as we need more guys on the field who can reliably catch but also make it difficult to take Diggs away as teams did. In the latter part oft the  the season…

 

       The goal is to bring in another weapon , not to subtract  Gabe , and see if he improves and then is worth a second contract., while also adding youth via the draft and let it play out.  Gabe will have to improve, as I don’t care what those year end stats say, he dropped too many balls at critical times and he killed drives.  He was too hot and cold and if that continues , he cant be relied upon regardless of his stats.  The Bills cant keep having Josh and Diggs as their only dependable talents, its a recipe for losing against good teams as it becomes easy to limit at least one of them in critical times.

I know some drops were not his fault, but he failed to make noticeable catches when the ball was dropped right where a WR has to make that type of reception.  ( deep balls that could have been scores or put us in fg range). It’s like edmunds, don’t let the stats deceive your eyes or gut feeling about things.  Stats can be deceiving, film and your eyes are believable.  Gabe has to improve his reliability or the BILLS just won’t keep him. 

         Doing great against 2-3 weaker teams and then disappearing is a sure way to lose trust from Josh, or get him hurt as he has to drop back again and teams are sending the house knowing the line is avg at best. .   Hopkins has been a legit 1  receiver and Gabe probably will just never be that so presenting all those stats , while being a GREAT job on the OP’s part, was  driven by a bias that doesn’t fit the situation the Bills are in;  they need a quality, ADDITIONAL reliable guy with an ability to create separation. Last year Gabe was too inconsistent , regardless of his year end totals .  I bet even the QP remembers more than a handful of bad , drive hampering or killing muffs by Gabe. When you watch KC, it’s the opposite as his WR’s make drive sustaining catches, and surprisingly didn’t miss HILL, who lead the league in receiving yards i believe. Gabe can be a part of a great offense , he just needs to be in a situation facing the #2 or 3 corners and adding someone like Hopkins, would  help Gabe in that way and he would be single covered much more. Then add some speed or a RAC type wr thru the draft to sustain things for the future and as insurance against injury. 

   

       We are creating cap room hopefully to add talent , not keep SUBTRACTING and staying on the current PLATEAU of divisional losses..  Having both WR’s for a year is one way to actually have a shot at the SB.  IF you didn’t see it , RODGERS gave a FA wish list to the jets, and they already signed one of the guys he asked for.(lazaar i think , so the jets are serious).   Other teams are improving and aren’t standing still ; they are close to overtaking the Bills. .  If we don’t make the right moves, it’s like being the same old Bills;  having a generational talent at QB and letting him stagnate.   We are  letting prime years starting to drift  by while  its NOW more obvious to everyone, this wr corp lacks consistent pass CATCHERS and we are lacking innovation in our passing attack.  Trends are  being set by  likely SB contenders ( KC, CINCY, MIAMI , JETS , CHARGERS,  maybe the BROWNS  too, seem able to  RUN in addition to their prime passing focus which depends on a FEW dependable  RAC capable wrs , not just one lone star like Diggs ).  GABE is still a vital cog, as your hard work proved in your post , and  I don’t get discussions advocating just letting him go or replacing him as we should be looking to add another, possibly more consistent option (see Cincy), so he can face corners he is more likely to beat, and he could probably match this years totals in yardage/ TD’s but with less attempts and being more efficient on offense.  

     

      McD needs to let his REID come out, not be afraid to change the roster and his approach  or we will be out of the playoffs as we face a very tough schedule and a very improved afc conference,  We split withe the FINS & JETS last year with head coaches less tenured than McD, and who last year had less overall talent.  That  gap will be gone, so mcd must  improve along with DORSEY, or we will very likely  take a step backward.  

Edited by DrPJax
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RocCityRoller said:

A lot of posters here want ancient D Hopkins signed to be WR2, and spend draft capital on this stiff to replace Gabe Davis.

D Hop was a really good WR, but he has not played more than 10 games since 2020.

He hasn't passed 720 yards since 2020. He hasn't passed 8 TD since 2018.

It is 2023.

 

Last Year:

Hopkins had 717 yards and 3 TD on 96 targets.

Davis had 836 yards and 7 TD on 93 targets.

 

Davis had +119 yards, +4 TDs  on 3 fewer targets, on a rookie deal.

Many here swear Hopkins should be signed at 10+ million a year and a draft pick though.

How does that make any sense???

 

It doesn't.

 

It has also become popular here to knock down Gabe Davis and blame him for the Bills offensive struggles.

 

Nevermind the sub-par OL play, or that the slot WR position was a mess all season.

Davis and Diggs looked better with a solid slot WR like Beasley.

 

A lot of TSW wanted Beasley out, and you got your wish.

How did that work out for you?

It didn't.

 

Beasley type slot WR are available (Berrios/ Ritchie/ draft), but don't point that out here.

Beane missed on Crowder, so Ritchie and Berrios would suck too according to TSW.

 

Ignore that the OC was new to the position or that the TE and RBs were forgotten for major stretches of the season.

Forget developing Cook, or using Hines.

Go get Ekeler and his 127 targets last year... that is the answer....

 

Run game? What is that?, we have Allen, chuck it up where a guy looks open.

That was often Davis downfield, as seen by yards per target.

The catch % reflects it, but TSW won't admit it. Much like D Hopkins in his first 5 years.

 

48/ 836/ 7 TD apparently is bad now for a WR #2.

A lot of teams and fans would love that production from a #2 WR.

That was top 35% WR production in the league for ALL WR.

 

When looking at all WR with 50+ targets Davis scored top 1/3 in a lot of categories.

But no: 52% catch rate last year = sucks.

It was a bad stat for certain, but how many of those balls were actually catchable?

 

TSW thinks Gabe Davis stinks. Then again I've recently seen TSW attack Tre White recently too.

 

So replace Davis with D Hopkins huh?

A WR that did less with more opportunities, costs more and is ancient?

Smart team building there.

 

Maybe we should chill out a bit as fans.

 

Did you know Deandre Hopkins never had a catch % higher than 60% for his first 5 seasons?!

 

Hopkins catch % was 57.1%/ 59.8%/ 57.8%/ 51.7%/ 55.2% over his first 5 seasons.

 

Gabe Davis is 56.5%/ 55.6%/ 52.6% as a #2, but he 'stinks'.

 

It took 4 seasons as WR #1 for Hopkins to exceed 60% catch %

but WR don't improve their catch % per TSW.

 

Many here think Buffalo should trade for an older version of the guy we already have, is less productive, and costs more

 

Brilliant.

You are aware DHop missed the 1st 6 games right?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...