Jump to content

Interesting Draft Strategy??


wagne591

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Georgie said:

I don't want to draft TWO guys early that are recovering from injuries. I dont see  each Beane doing it ; he seems to be all in.

He drafted projects last year. I thought the same thing then, that it was dumb to be this close and not take someone that could help now. I could totally see him drafting someone like Williams. 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Love Dotson, but the Bills have nobody that is not injured who has proven that they can cover NFL receivers.


Good thing we have like 8 picks and not a lot of needs.  Agreed about the dire need for CB2, but Beane will have the picks to maneuver around in a draft that’s pretty deep with CBs.  Also, Beane seems to have a knack at finding good DB’s in the mid-late rounds.  I completely trust him.

 

I just like Dotson a lot, and would be thrilled to land him at 25.  Your point is understood though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Bills to Giants:

 

Pick 25

Next years 1st and a 5th

 

Giants to Bills:

 

7th overall

2023 4th round pick

 

 

I made this all up without looking at a trade chart it sounds good to me.  

 

 

 

Secure your CB1

Will take a lot more than that to move to 7

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

You don't draft #25 and claim you're all in.

 

Just aren't.  

 

If this was the 2019 Bills drafting yes, you stock picks or hold.  

 

 


Right, because Beane hasn’t shown he’s “all in” with this team. You have some truly awful takes…

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

You don't draft #25 and claim you're all in.

 

Just aren't.  

 

If this was the 2019 Bills drafting yes, you stock picks or hold.  

 

 


I don’t think they have to trade a future 1st to prove they’re “all in.” Maybe they trade like a 4th and a 6th to move up a few spots and get the CB they really like, but I don’t see any reason to trade all the way up for Gardner when probably McDermotts biggest strength has been coaching up DB’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:


Right, because Beane hasn’t shown he’s “all in” with this team. You have some truly awful takes…

 

Cool.  Super Bowl caliber team competing in an AFC playoff where they could see Burrow and Mahomes or Herbert or Wilson, etc I'll take my chances with my pick at 25.  Maybe trade back.  Get a few more Boogie Basham's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Blitz said:

 

Cool.  Super Bowl caliber team competing in an AFC playoff where they could see Burrow and Mahomes or Herbert or Wilson, etc I'll take my chances with my pick at 25.  Maybe trade back.  Get a few more Boogie Basham's.  


If you were a GM, I have no doubt you would single handedly destroy a franchise in one draft…

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:


If you were a GM, I have no doubt you would single handedly destroy a franchise in one draft…

 

 

Well fortunately for all I'm just a fan on the internet that wants to increase our odds of turning the 25th pick into the best starter possible for a SB team.

 

Or maybe just trade back and take the next AJ Epenessa and Zach Moss.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

Well fortunately for all I'm just a fan on the internet that wants to increase our odds of turning the 25th pick into the best starter possible for a SB team.

 

Or maybe just trade back and take the next AJ Epenessa and Zach Moss.    


Thank God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Motor26 said:


I don’t think they have to trade a future 1st to prove they’re “all in.” Maybe they trade like a 4th and a 6th to move up a few spots and get the CB they really like, but I don’t see any reason to trade all the way up for Gardner when probably McDermotts biggest strength has been coaching up DB’s.

 

 

 

Don't disagree but then again I don't know who we played in 2021 that tells me "yea we can roll with this."

 

This all comes back to how you see the defense.  

 

Been saying since 2020 they are pitiful against the run and they completely overhauled the D line.  So maybe Beane sees exactly what many of us were seeing all year and that was an overrated and flawed defense.  

 

I expect if he thinks he can move up in this draft - WITHIN REASON - to get what he thinks is an ELITE CB he will do it.  And he should do it because we are all freaking in.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

You don't draft #25 and claim you're all in.

 

Just aren't.  

 

If this was the 2019 Bills drafting yes, you stock picks or hold.  

 

 


You do if you’re not a ridiculous GM. 
 

Josh Allen is 25.  He gives us a window of over a decade.  
 

Beane, now more than ever, needs rookie contract talent.   Trading multiple high picks to move up in the first round is nonsensical.  

 

Why does he need inexpensive talent?.. Because he made the all-in move of signing Von Miller.  

 

Edited by SCBills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Don Otreply said:

It would very likely take two firsts and a second and more to get up to the 7th ish pick, or something very close to that, Beane isn’t going to do that, it very unlikely the Sauce or Stingley thing is gonna happen, 

 

First, this is a scenario where they drop a little. I've seen MANY mocks where one of the two is available around the 12-14 range.

 

Second, traditionally our 1st and 2nd would get us to 17. But in a year without QBs at the top, I get the feeling people are looking to move down and get picks for next season. So the price may be cheaper.

 

Lastly, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that if he feels either are worth it and would take us over the top - that he'd move a pick, maybe even the 1st, from next season.

 

If he retains Bates and adds another bargain guy or two he really likes - he'll really set himself up to have the team where CB is the only real need outside of developmental depth players. And he's proven in years past he likes to move up in drafts. I don't think this is crazy as you think.

 

I think he will move up, even if it's just a little, to make sure he gets one of the top 4 corners. I've seen some mocks and done some mocks online where Gardner, Stingley, McDuffie, and Booth are gone by 25. I don't see him just sitting at 25 and settling on whoever is the best available at the position. 

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SCBills said:


You do if you’re not a ridiculous GM. 
 

Josh Allen is 25.  He gives us a window of over a decade.  
 

Beane, now more than ever, needs rookie contract talent.   Trading multiple high picks to move up in the first rounds is nonsensical.  
 

Why does he need that?.. Because he made the all-in move of signing Von Miller.  

 


We haven't drafted a corner before round 4! since Tre in 2017.  And he was a late first.

 

That's a bit odd. 

 

We haven't drafted a *stud* in the first or second round outside of Allen and Tre since 2017.  Oliver is a solid top 20 DT In the league.  

 

And...he was a top 10 pick.  

 

If they think the next White is going to be there at 25...it's a deep CB group...ok.  I just think 4 will be off the board by 25.  And probably 3-4 WRs.  

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

First, this is a scenario where they drop a little. I've seen MANY mocks where one of the two is available around the 12-14 range.

 

Second, traditionally our 1st and 2nd would get us to 17. But in a year without QBs at the top, I get the feeling people are looking to move down and get picks for next season. So the price may be cheaper.

 

Lastly, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that if he feels either are worth it and would take us over the top - that he'd move a pick, maybe even the 1st, from next season.

 

If he retains Bates and adds another bargain guy or two he really likes - he'll really set himself up to have the team where CB is the only real need outside of developmental depth players. And he's proven in years past he likes to move up in drafts. I don't think this is crazy as you think.

 

I think he will move up, even if it's just a little, to make sure he gets one of the top 4 corners. I've seen some mocks and done some mocks online where Gardner, Stingley, McDuffie, and Booth are gone by 25. I don't see him just sitting at 25 and settling on whoever is the best available at the position. 


I’d agree about moving up a little for McDuffie or Booth, but they’re not going to trade all the way up for Gardner. Even if they keep Bates they’d at least want competition for RG and need oline depth in general, so I don’t see them trading their 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I don't see him just sitting at 25 and settling on whoever is the best available at the position. 

 

 

And to me it's because we have established starters at all those positions outside of maybe WR2 but they seem ready to unleash Davis and a breakout is coming.  

 

That leaves IOL and sorry I'm not sure that's a good idea if the option is IOL or trade up for one of the top 4 corners especially it it's only 5 spots or so to move up.  

 

I think you can get Guards and Centers in Rounds 3 and beyond.  We'll see what happens with Bates.  

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wagne591 said:

I will keep this short

 

In round 1:  Jameson Williams WR Ala. We have enough depth now to draft him late in the first. He is a top 10 talent that we don't have to rush back and the way WR are getting paid now it would be nice to pair him with Josh for the next 5 years.  That will take Josh into the mid-late stages of his career.

 

In round 2:  Best CB available.  I still know we are going to sign a veteran CB at some point (Beane always does) but we still need youth there.

 

In round 3 or 4 draft: David Ojabo LB Michigan.  first round talent that tour his ACL today at proday.  Again we have enough depth and he would be in no hurry to return this year.  

 

I just have a feeling it is going to be hard for a draft pick later in the draft to make this team anyway so why not set us up for the next 4 to five years with the hurt guys.

 

 


I bet Williams and Ojabo are both drafted before 25. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beane's strategy for 3 years running has been BPA in the 1st round, then fill a need in the 2nd round. That strategy hasn't exactly produced stellar results in the 2nd round but there's no reason to think that strategy will change.

 

I expect BPA at pick 25 to be a DB, and I think Beane knows it which is why he has been slow to add a CB this offseason. Booth or Gordon or Hill will be the pick IMO.

 

In the 2nd round I expect a trade up for a WR. The year we drafted Epenesa, Beane admitted after the draft that he thought a WR with a 2nd round grade would be there at pick 54. He might as well have said he wanted to draft a WR in that spot and was denied the opportunity. That was the year Higgins, Pittman Jr., Shenault, Hamler, and Claypool all went in the 2nd round before our pick. Beane is the type to try again, but more aggressively, when he fails the first time around (see: acquiring Emmanuel Sanders and Von Miller). This year there is a pack of WRs expected to go in the 2nd - Dotson, Watson, Pickens, Metchie, Moore, Austin, others I'm probably forgetting. I think Beane will have 3-4 of them that he is aiming for and once 1 of them makes it past pick 40 he'll start making calls.

 

Round 1: Best DB available

Round 2: WR trade up

Round 3: Best OL or DL available

 

That's how I see it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 Trading multiple high picks to move up in the first round is nonsensical. 

Couldnt agree more with your post. Case in point think of the Pats dynasty. How often during their run were they trading up higher into the 1st round?

They frankly did the opposite if i remember right, frequently trading down to get more picks. Because as you said, those rookie deals are important as it gets harder & harder to manage the payroll

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wagne591 said:

I will keep this short

 

In round 1:  Jameson Williams WR Ala. We have enough depth now to draft him late in the first. He is a top 10 talent that we don't have to rush back and the way WR are getting paid now it would be nice to pair him with Josh for the next 5 years.  That will take Josh into the mid-late stages of his career.

 

In round 2:  Best CB available.  I still know we are going to sign a veteran CB at some point (Beane always does) but we still need youth there.

 

In round 3 or 4 draft: David Ojabo LB Michigan.  first round talent that tour his ACL today at proday.  Again we have enough depth and he would be in no hurry to return this year.  

 

I just have a feeling it is going to be hard for a draft pick later in the draft to make this team anyway so why not set us up for the next 4 to five years with the hurt guys.

 

 

 

Not bad throughs.  I just see a few issues.  I'd prefer a different WR over Williams.  Williams was a one-year wonder at Alabama, which worries me enough.  That, on top of his injury, and I'd go elsewhere at WR.  But I'm fine with WR in Rd. 1 or CB.  Just BPA.  

 

If Ojabo is available in Rd. 3 I would def take him.  I don't think he slides that far, but for the reasons you stated, yeah, take him there! 

 

 

2 hours ago, BigAl2526 said:

Olave would be a good pick.  Dotsonn is thought by some to be more of a slot receiver, and Buffalo just signed Jameson Crowder.  Williams it somewhat faster and taller than Olave, though he's something of a one year wonder.

 

Olave would be fine at 25, otherwise, BPA is likely a CB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Beane's strategy for 3 years running has been BPA in the 1st round, then fill a need in the 2nd round. That strategy hasn't exactly produced stellar results in the 2nd round but there's no reason to think that strategy will change.

 

I expect BPA at pick 25 to be a DB, and I think Beane knows it which is why he has been slow to add a CB this offseason. Booth or Gordon or Hill will be the pick IMO.

 

In the 2nd round I expect a trade up for a WR. The year we drafted Epenesa, Beane admitted after the draft that he thought a WR with a 2nd round grade would be there at pick 54. He might as well have said he wanted to draft a WR in that spot and was denied the opportunity. That was the year Higgins, Pittman Jr., Shenault, Hamler, and Claypool all went in the 2nd round before our pick. Beane is the type to try again, but more aggressively, when he fails the first time around (see: acquiring Emmanuel Sanders and Von Miller). This year there is a pack of WRs expected to go in the 2nd - Dotson, Watson, Pickens, Metchie, Moore, Austin, others I'm probably forgetting. I think Beane will have 3-4 of them that he is aiming for and once 1 of them makes it past pick 40 he'll start making calls.

 

Round 1: Best DB available

Round 2: WR trade up

Round 3: Best OL or DL available

 

That's how I see it.

 

 

Yea these are good examples as to why sometimes you just have to trade up.  

 

From late 3rd to early 3rd....late 2nd to early 2nd.

 

With the position this team is in I think coming out of this draft with 5 guys that have a legit shot to make the team and 1 or 2 start is better then having 8 picks and you're lucky if 5 or maybe 6 are on the roster and maybe 1 starter.  

 

Just did the PFF draft simulation - trade with Giants:

 

 

Screenshot_20220322-003141_Chrome.jpg

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wagne591 said:

I will keep this short

 

In round 1:  Jameson Williams WR Ala. We have enough depth now to draft him late in the first. He is a top 10 talent that we don't have to rush back and the way WR are getting paid now it would be nice to pair him with Josh for the next 5 years.  That will take Josh into the mid-late stages of his career.

 

In round 2:  Best CB available.  I still know we are going to sign a veteran CB at some point (Beane always does) but we still need youth there.

 

In round 3 or 4 draft: David Ojabo LB Michigan.  first round talent that tour his ACL today at proday.  Again we have enough depth and he would be in no hurry to return this year.  

 

I just have a feeling it is going to be hard for a draft pick later in the draft to make this team anyway so why not set us up for the next 4 to five years with the hurt guys.

 

 

This is obviously a year Beane is going all in as evidenced by bringing  back Guys like phillips, 
Lawson, Barkley and spending on someone like Miller.   It is not a time to take on projects based on potential. We are not THAT deep that we can afford to take on two medical rehab projects who may not , probably won’t touch the field this year. What good is talent that is not available ? You are also wasting cheap years as you would be paying for rehab , not filling in depth this year. Injuries happen and no team is deep enough to waste   TWO  cost effective draft picks on guys who “ might “ get back as you are  just paying for added risk as 50% of draft picks when healthy don’t hit to begin with. You are not Setting anything up for “ 4-5 years” when you are wasting a year right off the top.
 

Most rookies improve greatly In their second year and ALREADY INJURED PLAYERS just have their  experience gained a year further down the road. Why do this at this point , are these guys superstars NOW who have shown they can produce at THIS level yet ? No, they are gifted college players who are now unfortunately carrying an extra risk as one may get back this year ( albeit in a difficult to learn wr position where we have already seen a guy like Hodges has two wasted years on medical Ir or at least never touched the field at this point ), while the other is definitely out the whole year with the Achilles tear.   If I’m an owner , I’m not using HIGH ( first three rounds )  draft picks to pay for their rehab , especially as there may be close to the same talent  present in other players, without the added risk who can play roles now in a year when we are right up against the cap and can’t afford more FA’s as injuries begin to occur which we know do every year.  You expect your top 2-3 picks to be productive right away, and in this scenario you need them for depth at a minimum as you are ready to compete for a SB NOW !  Who can afford to worry about having guys for the following year as luxury picks that are 100% never going to be anything you can depend or count on definitively this year?  It’s different if you are a team niot expected to compete this year for the SB and you are in rebuild mode and can be patient.  You don’t do this as a team bringing in a guy for 120 mil as you try to find the last pieces to get you over the hump for a title! 
 

The NFL IS CURRENTLY a year to year league as we have seen the past two SB winners load up the year they won with Tampa bringing in Brady et Al , and LA bringing in Stafford, Miller, OBJ, etc. Did you see them stockpiling drafted guys ; no , they brought in known production. Drafting injured guys means you are getting nothing , zero production NOW.   We still have holes and the top few picks need to be on the field in some capacity this year imo. It’s different if you are talking about getting injured guys in later rounds , like maybe taking s flier on ONE guy in later rounds after your major depth is taken care of. But it’s foolish to throw earlier , valuable picks at rehabbing potential for the future when your ownership is spending and going all out for a SB this year. Heck , if the Bills  get bounced early again , who is to say Mcd is around to even  see when those guys hit the field. ( unlikely but who knows in todays NFL?)  It’s that old saying , drafting for potential is drafting for the next coach.  Maybe they take a flier on one of them , but if so I would bet it’s the guy who at least their medical staff has assured them can compete at some point THIS year, but I would be shocked if they used a first round pick in a year with needs as they are feeling the pressure to make it to the SB after falling short the past two years. Beane already said it , they have to hit in the draft this year as they don’t have any further money to spend , and picking a guy to just stockpile for a year for a franchise who has never won a title seems like an unnecessary, luxury risk. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen Ojabo now mocked to Texans in the 2nd and to me that makes ton of sense.

 

As for the Bills, I really expect some combo of WR/OG/CB in first three rounds as a base plan (unless player too good to pass on drops). So we only have to find optimal value. 

 

Judging by Tankathon board the biggest problem to find value on these positions is 2nd round, where they have no OGs and very few players on other positions.

 

1st round is great since we will have probably tons of options either way (Burks/Olave/Willamson/Dotson - Johnson/Green - Booth/Elam/McDuffie/Gordon). 3rd round also seem to have value everywhere.

 

So for me its just a matter of tiers in all positions, drops between them and finding the right combo. My main wish is to find a best guard possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

You don't draft #25 and claim you're all in.

 

Just aren't.  

 

If this was the 2019 Bills drafting yes, you stock picks or hold.  

 

 

 

 

That definition of being all in is nuts. You don't throw away the future to improve your shot this year.

 

Especially with the future we have.

 

You don't go all in. You go the smart amount of in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrPJax said:

 

The NFL IS CURRENTLY a year to year league as we have seen the past two SB winners load up the year they won with Tampa bringing in Brady et Al , and LA bringing in Stafford, Miller, OBJ, etc. Did you see them stockpiling drafted guys ; no , they brought in known production. Drafting injured guys means you are getting nothing , zero production NOW.   We still have holes and the top few picks need to be on the field in some capacity this year imo. It’s different if you are talking about getting injured guys in later rounds , like maybe taking s flier on ONE guy in later rounds after your major depth is taken care of. But it’s foolish to throw earlier , valuable picks at rehabbing potential for the future when your ownership is spending and going all out for a SB this year. Heck , if the Bills  get bounced early again , who is to say Mcd is around to even  see when those guys hit the field. ( unlikely but who knows in todays NFL?)  It’s that old saying , drafting for potential is drafting for the next coach.  Maybe they take a flier on one of them , but if so I would bet it’s the guy who at least their medical staff has assured them can compete at some point THIS year, but I would be shocked if they used a first round pick in a year with needs as they are feeling the pressure to make it to the SB after falling short the past two years. Beane already said it , they have to hit in the draft this year as they don’t have any further money to spend , and picking a guy to just stockpile for a year for a franchise who has never won a title seems like an unnecessary, luxury risk. 

 

 

Tampa's drafting was consistent and fantastic. It's the reason Brady chose that team. They absolutely did not throw away high They built that team through the draft.

 

They were one of the obvious choices for Brady because they were consistently very good drafters with the exception being QB.

 

"Who is to say that Beane ... "?  Oh, you're that guy.

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first round pick almost has to be a corner. McDuffie is the guy to me. But that probably requires a mini trade up. I think the value at LB is there in the 2nd. Maybe PSU's Smith or Andersen, Leo Chenal. Then I think you go IOL. 

 

Do not draft a guard in the first round. Please! Don't do it. Don't draft a receiver either. 

 

Drafting a corner right now is the move. White is under contract for 4 more years, during which time you could have a cheap 1st round corner playing on that rookie contract. When that 5th year option comes up, White will be a free agent. Hopefully things worked out with your new corner and that point you don't necessarily have to extend both. You extend the younger guy and rinse and repeat. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

We got Tre 27th overall. We don't need a top 5 pick for a CB1.

 

 

This is part of the value of the McDermott system.

 

Look at the DBs drafted by McD in Carolina.Above the 4th round, only two, Bradberry (2nd) and Daryl Worley (3rd), in six years. Got Josh Norman in the 5th.

 

Not saying they won't, but they don't have to go CB in the 1st. It's just what most are saying. Could be IOL (got to protect Allen), CB, WR, maybe even DL.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

First, this is a scenario where they drop a little. I've seen MANY mocks where one of the two is available around the 12-14 range.

 

Second, traditionally our 1st and 2nd would get us to 17. But in a year without QBs at the top, I get the feeling people are looking to move down and get picks for next season. So the price may be cheaper.

 

Lastly, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that if he feels either are worth it and would take us over the top - that he'd move a pick, maybe even the 1st, from next season.

 

If he retains Bates and adds another bargain guy or two he really likes - he'll really set himself up to have the team where CB is the only real need outside of developmental depth players. And he's proven in years past he likes to move up in drafts. I don't think this is crazy as you think.

 

I think he will move up, even if it's just a little, to make sure he gets one of the top 4 corners. I've seen some mocks and done some mocks online where Gardner, Stingley, McDuffie, and Booth are gone by 25. I don't see him just sitting at 25 and settling on whoever is the best available at the position. 

One of them is gonna have to drop to 17-19 area, and with all the good WRs in the league and the new prospects coming out, there will be a lot of action trying to get one of the good ones, Beane may very well be active in that area, but only if there is a significant drop by one or more of them, fingers crossed 🤞 we get our targets in the draft. 
 

Go Bills!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One caveat for the trade up idea is that Brandon when he was on Pat Mcafes show yesterday did say he has to hit on some of these mid round picks with salary cap considerations coming up the next few years. 
So I wouldn’t mind if they trade up particularly this year when they have so few needs. I just don’t see Brandon doing it cause he needs the players at positions where he may have to cut a guy or two down the road. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

CB and OG now are my guesses for 1st and 2nd rounds.

 

WR middle rounds.

 

Same - I flip flop on each and it depends whos there at guard for 25.  If targets arent there for either i may look to trade down, and try and add an extra 2nd day pick.  4 picks in rounds 2-3 would help with holes at OG, CB, WR, MLB (not a hole yet, but they didn't extend him either) 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mat68 said:

With how Beane emphasized the importance of the this years draft I think they may be aggressive early.  I could see a few trade ups.  If a cb they like starts to fall or a run on cb starts I think they will aggressively pursue a trade up.  Without the big qbs the price for trading up wont be as much imo.  

I think this is more likley.  The depth at wr is impressive a quality wr will be available in Rd 2.   Corner is the only hole on the roster.  Other places could be upgraded but not as wide open as cb. 

The only thing is, trading up for Gardner or Stingley likely costs us our second round pick. I’m skeptical of a first round trade up, I think the potential trade up scenarios is second and later. This draft doesn’t have a lot of very elite talent, but tons of good talent. The second/third rounds are looking to be very good rounds to have multiple picks in. 

2 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

That definition of being all in is nuts. You don't throw away the future to improve your shot this year.

 

Especially with the future we have.

 

You don't go all in. You go the smart amount of in.

Tre was pick 27 and he not only started week 1, he did a fantastic job. We can get quality players at the end of the first and still be, “all in”. For instance, this draft isn’t loaded with elite talent, and you don’t trade up, just to trade up. 
 

The Bills will have many plans of attack for this draft and based on how things fall, they will execute said plans. I’m sure they will have plans for taking a cb/wr/iol/other in the first and corresponding rounds after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Motor26 said:


I don’t think they have to trade a future 1st to prove they’re “all in.” Maybe they trade like a 4th and a 6th to move up a few spots and get the CB they really like, but I don’t see any reason to trade all the way up for Gardner when probably McDermotts biggest strength has been coaching up DB’s.

I also think it would be very rare for Beane to trade picks from next years draft. Like you said, a small trade up would certainly be in consideration (costing this years assets only).
 

We may be making a Super Bowl push, but we are at a point where we will need guys on rookie contracts contributing. Every year we will need a one or more, and that’s easiest to do with early picks. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going all in does not mean wasting draft picks moving up.  To me going all in is using the draft to fill the hole at CB and still provide needed depth at OL and WR.

Given the depth in this draft at CB and WR, the right move is to trade down and get a fourth pick in the top 100. 

Then take CB, WR, OT, and LB in no particular order. A safety instead of a LB would be an option to. Then get a guard and a punter in round 4 and 5. Trade the rest of the picks away.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tanoros said:

I also think it would be very rare for Beane to trade picks from next years draft. Like you said, a small trade up would certainly be in consideration (costing this years assets only).
 

We may be making a Super Bowl push, but we are at a point where we will need guys on rookie contracts contributing. Every year we will need a one or more, and that’s easiest to do with early picks. 

Of all the things people say Beane does and doesn't do which are erroneous, this one is correct. He has made multiple trades up in the draft to pick certain players (Allen, Edmunds,Knox) but I believe every one was using picks in the same draft. I cant recall a single trade giving up a future draft pick to move up in the draft. He gave away a 3rd for Kelvin Benjamin and obviously a 1st for Diggs. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, wagne591 said:

I will keep this short

 

In round 1:  Jameson Williams WR Ala. We have enough depth now to draft him late in the first. He is a top 10 talent that we don't have to rush back and the way WR are getting paid now it would be nice to pair him with Josh for the next 5 years.  That will take Josh into the mid-late stages of his career.

 

In round 2:  Best CB available.  I still know we are going to sign a veteran CB at some point (Beane always does) but we still need youth there.

 

In round 3 or 4 draft: David Ojabo LB Michigan.  first round talent that tour his ACL today at proday.  Again we have enough depth and he would be in no hurry to return this year.  

 

I just have a feeling it is going to be hard for a draft pick later in the draft to make this team anyway so why not set us up for the next 4 to five years with the hurt guys.

 

 


Better resign Bates then.  
 

i don’t  think there’s much chance of ojabo making it out of round 2 let along making it to 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...