Jump to content

Bills open practice 9/1 and media


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Keeping Hollister doesn’t change anything though. He isn’t some great weapon in the passing game. 

I agree in a sense with this, but he seemed pretty darn reliable. I still have hopes for Knox but his hands are inconsistent, and Sweeney I like as well but he seems to be injured quite often. Maybe Gilliam surprises us as he looks like he can do a number of things.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Odd that the Bills will add 2 QBs to the Practice Squad


 

Not surprising really - I think this gives them some COVID protection just in case and neither Webb nor Fromm shined.  It might be a position they can flex out of if they decide they want someone else later on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

Does that really make them worse.  Sweeney has shown himself to be as good as Kroft and nearly everyone complained about Lee Smith even being on the roster.

 

I wouldn’t argue they are better, but I am not sure they are worse.

 

That last is where I am

 

I am not sure Sweeney has shown himself to be as good as Kroft - we didn't see him at all in 2020 or past the 1st week of training camp

But, I also don't think he has shown himself to be worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

That last is where I am

 

I am not sure Sweeney has shown himself to be as good as Kroft - we didn't see him at all in 2020 or past the 1st week of training camp

But, I also don't think he has shown himself to be worse.

 

Sweeney cannot get himself on the field - availability is a skill, he lacks it.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


So Knox and Sweeney can’t accomplish those things? 
 

What exactly am I missing here? What does Hollister do that nobody else on the roster can’t?

 

Catch the ball?  j/k kinda

 

My only reasoning is if Knox gets injured we have someone.  Sweeney is almost always injured.  I guess Gilliam can fill that role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Somebody ask him why he consistently keeps 5 CBs when 3 are on the field at all times. Meanwhile, he keeps 9 OL for 5 spots and 6 LBs for 2 spots. I've gotten used to it, but going thin at the CB position is a frustrating hallmark of this regime.

Just like that frustrating hallmark of winning most of the time, 

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Somebody ask him why he consistently keeps 5 CBs when 3 are on the field at all times. Meanwhile, he keeps 9 OL for 5 spots and 6 LBs for 2 spots. I've gotten used to it, but going thin at the CB position is a frustrating hallmark of this regime.

Just like that frustrating hallmark of winning most of the time, 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

I don't care about Hollister - he's a JAG.  I'd have liked them to upgrade at the position this past offseason.  Their only move was bringing in Hollister, whom they've now cut.

 

We operate on this philosophy at my work of 80%. Focus on delivering something good for 80% of the users over something that 100% of users will find useful because the diminishing returns of getting that last 20% spikes rapidly. 

 

TEs are the 20%. Why a bunch of resources there when 80% of your offense runs through WRs? 

 

This idea that "if they had a better TE then they'd use them more!" is a fallacy. Stop searching for the right 'tool' to fit your perception of what you need and use what you have...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 wide, 3 wide will be 90% of the offense.  I do not see a lot of multiple te sets.  I think Brown and or Bates will be on goaline plays.  Short yardage hurry up and Allen keeping is the staple play. 

Edited by Mat68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Somebody ask him why he consistently keeps 5 CBs when 3 are on the field at all times. Meanwhile, he keeps 9 OL for 5 spots and 6 LBs for 2 spots. I've gotten used to it, but going thin at the CB position is a frustrating hallmark of this regime.

You see, your priorities are not the Buffalo Bills priorities, that is maybe your frustrating hallmark?  😁👍

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:
Edited by Don Otreply
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

That last is where I am

 

I am not sure Sweeney has shown himself to be as good as Kroft - we didn't see him at all in 2020 or past the 1st week of training camp

But, I also don't think he has shown himself to be worse.

 

6 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Sweeney cannot get himself on the field - availability is a skill, he lacks it.

 

4 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Catch the ball?  j/k kinda

 

My only reasoning is if Knox gets injured we have someone.  Sweeney is almost always injured.  I guess Gilliam can fill that role?


 

Sweeny’s availability has not been worse than Kroft - who missed significant time each year due to injury.

 

I would also watch the PS as it sounds like Morris (nice potential receiving TE) and perhaps Becker (Blocking role) will be re-signed - meaning if Knox or Sweeney are injured they can call up a replacement for either role.  
 

I also would not rule out a trade at a later time if something shakes free, but I think they are happy with the grouping of guys they have.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine but why does Sweeney offer more than Hollister? That's what I don't understand. It can't be a cap move because Hollister was only set to make a couple hundred thousand more than Sweeney. Usually even with the moves I disagree with I can see the logic in, this one I just don't see it.


when Sweeney is healthy, I would argue he has as much upside as Knox. I like Sweeney a lot. He has solid hands and a good blocker just can’t stay healthy. If he cab stay on the field he could end up TE 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

I'm sure in year 8 that Kroft is about to go off after not doing that in year 1-7

 

 

If people just think of the 4th WR on the field as a split out TE then they won't have to freak out. 

 

Jesus, that’s a good point!!…as in TDJesus…

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

They subtracted Tyler Kroft and Lee Smith and added absolutely nobody.

Addition thru subtraction in this case….👍

 

That and TD Jesus is a better version of Hollister if you think about those two, so no real loss in letting Hollister go…, 
 

Edited by Don Otreply
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine but why does Sweeney offer more than Hollister? That's what I don't understand. It can't be a cap move because Hollister was only set to make a couple hundred thousand more than Sweeney. Usually even with the moves I disagree with I can see the logic in, this one I just don't see it.

Pretty obvious to me- blocking.  Hollister is a WR playing TE.  Hollister is clearly more valuable as a pass catcher and I was hoping we’d keep him……but dude can’t block.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

We operate on this philosophy at my work of 80%. Focus on delivering something good for 80% of the users over something that 100% of users will find useful because the diminishing returns of getting that last 20% spikes rapidly. 

 

TEs are the 20%. Why a bunch of resources there when 80% of your offense runs through WRs? 

 

This idea that "if they had a better TE then they'd use them more!" is a fallacy. Stop searching for the right 'tool' to fit your perception of what you need and use what you have...

 

Yep, the old 80/20 rule.  Know it well.  I am over the TE thing.  Bills O will have up to 5 receivers on the field at times.

I'm sure some linemen will be used for "eligible receivers" in short yardage situations.

 

Maybe Sweeney can get and stay healthy.  Onward and upward.

Go Bills!

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billieve420 said:

Looks like they are fine with Quintin Morris on the practice squad in the event of an injury at TE. I am more concerned with the depth at CB looks shaky to me.

 

Hopefully a waived CB and his agent see the need and sign with the Bills PS.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

We operate on this philosophy at my work of 80%. Focus on delivering something good for 80% of the users over something that 100% of users will find useful because the diminishing returns of getting that last 20% spikes rapidly. 

 

TEs are the 20%. Why a bunch of resources there when 80% of your offense runs through WRs? 

 

This idea that "if they had a better TE then they'd use them more!" is a fallacy. Stop searching for the right 'tool' to fit your perception of what you need and use what you have...

Why does it have to be a “bunch of resources”?    How about a couple mill or a draft pick?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

Why does it have to be a “bunch of resources”?    How about a couple mill or a draft pick?

 

Or one of the dozens of UDFA gems or position-converting salvage jobs that seem to show up every year or two?  Heck the Bills actually HAD ONE OF THESE and got rid of him; he's now an upper-tier TE with the WFT.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The TBD consensus, and much of the media, was that several players released would be claimed by other teams. While there will undoubtedly be players signed after they clear waivers, it is interesting that the only player released that was claimed was McCloud.

 

I think there are two reasons:

1. A large percentage of a team's fans will overvalue their own players. See the comments/following of people on TBD over the years about players like Duke WIlliams, Da'Rick Rogers, a bunch of WR and RBs, etc.

2. With so many players in the market teams tend to know/value/trust their own which results in many/most that get cut ending back on the practice squad of the team that released them.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

That's fine but why does Sweeney offer more than Hollister? That's what I don't understand. It can't be a cap move because Hollister was only set to make a couple hundred thousand more than Sweeney. Usually even with the moves I disagree with I can see the logic in, this one I just don't see it.

Sweeney offers more flexibility at the TE position.  Specifically, he can be trusted as an in-line blocker, and Hollister cannot.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Or one of the dozens of UDFA gems or position-converting salvage jobs that seem to show up every year or two?  Heck the Bills actually HAD ONE OF THESE and got rid of him; he's now an upper-tier TE with the WFT.

Not upper tier in anyone’s book…, a bit over stated there Coach…

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Somebody ask him why he consistently keeps 5 CBs when 3 are on the field at all times. Meanwhile, he keeps 9 OL for 5 spots and 6 LBs for 2 spots. I've gotten used to it, but going thin at the CB position is a frustrating hallmark of this regime.

 

You have to have 8 per league rules and if you dress less than 8 on game day, you lose an extra active spot.  OR they kept 9, one over that amount.

 

Beane and most teams always will always tell you that they draft the best player available.  By doing that they ended up with two rookie tackles in the 3rd and 5th.  Don't think they felt they could gamble on releasing Doyle and with two rookies they needed to keep Ike and Bates.

 

Guess it came down to they felt Doyle was both better and more likely to get picked up by another team than Wildgoose.

 

Do agree on the 6 LB part, but sounds like the extra LB will fill Bam Johnson's slot on ST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Logic said:

I am absolutely flummoxed by the release of Hollister. I thought FOR SURE it was just roster gymnastics and he'd be brought back.

To go into the season with only Dawson Knox -- who still has yet to prove he can be a high quality starter at the position -- and Sweeney and Gilliam (and Gilliam is listed as a fullback, mind you) is crazy to me. It shows A TON of confidence in Dawson Knox. Even IF Knox breaks out, though, there's always health to consider. The Bills are now one Dawson Knox injury away from going into an actual NFL game with Tommy Sweeney and Reggie Gilliam as its only tight ends.

Between Hollister's athleticism, his chemistry with Josh, and just the sheer need to have more than one capable tight end in today's game, I just don't understand this move. It makes zero sense to me.


I was also very surprised by this. But ultimately this FO has earned my trust. This is essentially saying that Hollister would’ve been 3rd string behind Sweeney, and the dropoff from Hollister to the PS guys is minimal. 
 

That doesn’t really align with what I saw, but 1.) I didn't look at TE blocking at all 

during preseason, and 2.) The Bills have access to a lot more info than I do. Me reading practice reports is not the same as actually seeing the guys practice. 
 

So I’m surprised but not upset. 

 

21 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

We operate on this philosophy at my work of 80%. Focus on delivering something good for 80% of the users over something that 100% of users will find useful because the diminishing returns of getting that last 20% spikes rapidly. 

 

TEs are the 20%. Why a bunch of resources there when 80% of your offense runs through WRs? 

 

This idea that "if they had a better TE then they'd use them more!" is a fallacy. Stop searching for the right 'tool' to fit your perception of what you need and use what you have...


The problem with that logic is that “the 20%” might be what separates a Good team from a Championship team. There are strong benefits of having a real pass-catching threat at TE (who also blocks effectively in the run game). 
 

Having said that, I think Hollister has very little to do with this conversation. He looked good catching the ball to me, but still didn’t look like he’d be a difference maker.

 

If anything, I’m glad that this FO is willing to adapt their positional requirements to match their personnel. I remember multiple coaching staffs keeping 3-4 TEs on the roster who were really just practice squad level players. And a lot of talk about TE-centric offenses despite our best TE being someone like MarQueis Gray. 

 

Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Or one of the dozens of UDFA gems or position-converting salvage jobs that seem to show up every year or two?  Heck the Bills actually HAD ONE OF THESE and got rid of him; he's now an upper-tier TE with the WFT.


Logan Thomas was with us for 2 years and Detroit for another year and did nothing. Great for him that he earned a huge role with WFT last year at age 29, but I don’t think that would’ve happened on a halfway decent team. (And yes, I’m aware they won their division. I stand by what I wrote.)

 

And unless he really improved himself in the last 2 years, I still don’t think he’s a difference maker - just a guy making the most of his opportunity. The guy we had in 2017-2018 definitely wasn’t a difference maker from what I saw. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Why does it have to be a “bunch of resources”?    How about a couple mill or a draft pick?

 

I feel like this years draft and last years kind of stunk regarding tight ends.  And as for a couple mil? https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/tight-end/

 

Anyone on that list making 3m or less is not even really an upgrade.  

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cash said:


I was also very surprised by this. But ultimately this FO has earned my trust. This is essentially saying that Hollister would’ve been 3rd string behind Sweeney, and the dropoff from Hollister to the PS guys is minimal. 
 

That doesn’t really align with what I saw, but 1.) I didn't look at TE blocking at all 

during preseason, and 2.) The Bills have access to a lot more info than I do. Me reading practice reports is not the same as actually seeing the guys practice. 
 

So I’m surprised but not upset. 

 


The problem with that logic is that “the 20%” might be what separates a Good team from a Championship team. There are strong benefits of having a real pass-catching threat at TE (who also blocks effectively in the run game). 
 

Having said that, I think Hollister has very little to do with this conversation. He looked good catching the ball to me, but still didn’t look like he’d be a difference maker.

 

If anything, I’m glad that this FO is willing to adapt their positional requirements to match their personnel. I remember multiple coaching staffs keeping 3-4 TEs on the roster who were really just practice squad level players. And a lot of talk about TE-centric offenses despite our best TE being someone like MarQueis Gray. 

 


Logan Thomas was with us for 2 years and Detroit for another year and did nothing. Great for him that he earned a huge role with WFT last year at age 29, but I don’t think that would’ve happened on a halfway decent team. (And yes, I’m aware they won their division. I stand by what I wrote.)

 

And unless he really improved himself in the last 2 years, I still don’t think he’s a difference maker - just a guy making the most of his opportunity. The guy we had in 2017-2018 definitely wasn’t a difference maker from what I saw. 

 

4-2 in the worst division in football.  3-7 outside the division.  You aren't wrong lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...