Jump to content

Time to hate PFF again...Allen #40, Diggs #45...


eball

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, eball said:

...in their rankings of the top 50 players in football regardless of position.

 

Pff is short for pffffffft.

Just "click bait".

 

Edited by cd1
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

At least they're on the list. It's hard to rank a top 50. It really depends what players at their positions are ranked higher. 

Were the players ranked higher player of the week/ month multiple times in 2020? Impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw yesterday that they have defensive lineman Cam Heyward listed higher than Josh Allen.

Heyward is a very good player, no doubt about it. That said, he had 4 sacks and 7 TFLs in 2020. Any system that would rank Heyward higher than a QB (the most important position in the game) that scored 45 TDs and finished second in league MVP voting is clearly absurd.

  • Like (+1) 19
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, loyal2dagame said:

Were the players ranked higher player of the week/ month multiple times in 2020? Impossible.

It can't be a straight 2020 performance ranking. Some injured players are ranked higher. 

 

It's just a top 50 overall, not 2020.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

It can't be a straight 2020 performance ranking. Some injured players are ranked higher. 

 

 

That is correct; the rankings are supposedly based upon how they expect the players to perform in the future.  Of course, they're expecting Josh to regress.

  • Shocked 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eball said:

 

That is correct; the rankings are supposedly based upon how they expect the players to perform in the future.  Of course, they're expecting Josh to regress.

Most people here expect a regression. Not a huge one. They still have him top 7 for QB's. 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

AJ Brown is a beast. 

Fair enough. He's not better than Diggs. And i'd bet money he wont be going forward. Diggs not only has the track record before 2020 but he just got done leading the NFL in in catches and yards while basically taking over 2 different playoff games. Its ridiculous to have Brown ranked ahead of him.

Edited by Stank_Nasty
  • Like (+1) 7
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Most people here expect a regression. Not a huge one. They still have him top 7 for QB's. 

 

Most people will be wrong.  His decision making, confidence, and leadership will only grow.  PFF are still clinging to their (last) hope that Josh's 2020 was an anomaly.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stank_Nasty said:

Fair enough. He's not better than Diggs. And i'd bet money he wont be going forward. Diggs not only has the track record but he just got done leading the NFL in in catches and yards while taking over 2 different playoff games. Its ridiculous to have Brown ranked ahead of him.

Different offenses. Brown might be the best run after catch WR in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eball said:

 

Most people will be wrong.  His decision making, confidence, and leadership will only grow.  PFF are still clinging to their (last) hope that Josh's 2020 was an anomaly.

Maybe. Regression from where he was isn't saying he's bad. He might be a a better more efficient QB but his numbers drop. 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Different offenses. Brown might be the best run after catch WR in the NFL. 

This is literally the first time i've even heard anyone mention Brown in the same breath as Diggs.... not sure what your aim is here. do you honestly believe that ranking is justified?

 

thats a really weak hill to die on.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Maybe. Regression from where he was isn't saying he's bad. He might be a a better more efficient QB but his numbers drop. 

 

Do you believe Josh reached his ceiling last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stank_Nasty said:

This is literally the first time i've even heard anyone mention Brown in the same breath as Diggs.... not sure what your aim is here. do you honestly believe that ranking is justified?

 

thats a really weak hill to die on.

I wouldn't rank Brown over Diggs. I don't care about opinions. Why do people get sensitive when their favorite players are ranked lower than they think? 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I wouldn't rank Brown over Diggs. I don't care about opinions. Why do people get sensitive when their favorite players are ranked lower than they think? 

I could deal with mike thomas being ahead of him at #44. proven elite track record. But Brown? no way. and the fact that you even entertain it is absurd to me. It just looks like you have some sort of odd allegiance to PFF. thats the only way i could see anyone not just downright scoffing at that ranking over Diggs. Brown has absolutely no business being in that convo at this point.

 

 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Do you believe Josh reached his ceiling last year?

Allen can have a 5000 yard 50 TD season but I think he will be a consistent 4000 yard 30 TD QB. 

1 minute ago, Stank_Nasty said:

I could deal with mike thomas being ahead of him. proven elite track record. Brown? no way. and the fact that you even entertain it its absurd to me. Brown has absolutely no business being in that convo at this point.

Why not? Because Diggs gets more targets? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I think he will be a consistent 4000 yard 30 TD QB

 

I'd say that means your answer to my question is yes since those numbers are significantly lower than what Allen did last season.  "Ceiling" is a player's sustained best, not one crazy good year.  Let's just say we disagree about what Josh's "average" year going forward will look like.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, eball said:

...in their rankings of the top 50 players in football regardless of position.

 

Pff is short for pffffffft.

...

 

...bring me the head of this fool so that I may urinate on it!

 

or I just plain don't agree with them and leave it at that.  One or the other is fine.  

 

#40 and #45...pfft, ridiculous is right.

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Allen can have a 5000 yard 50 TD season but I think he will be a consistent 4000 yard 30 TD QB. 

Why not? Because Diggs gets more targets? 

Ok. I'm done with this. You are obviously just being difficult for the sake of it or have some sort of odd allegiance with PFF. Elite weapons usually get more looks. That how it works. Anyone even entertaining the idea that Brown is better than Diggs cant be taken seriously. Good talk.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

This is literally the first time i've even heard anyone mention Brown in the same breath as Diggs.... not sure what your aim is here. do you honestly believe that ranking is justified?

 

thats a really weak hill to die on.

I mean it's not as bad as their ranking for Allen.  AJ Brown is a great WR, he's a better YAC and contested ball WR than Diggs.  Diggs is more consistent and is more crafty getting open.  Brown is a freak of nature athlete..  He doesn't get a ton of looks in that offense though for some reason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's going to be interesting is as Josh gets older and his athletic abilities start to decline (as to when he's just a great athlete for the position and not a FREAK athlete), how his game evolves.  He's worked a ton on being able to read defenses and become a smart passer, and an excellent leader, so I think it's quite possible that his stats never again approach 2020 levels (especially in rushing), but he continues to be a top 5 QB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

It can't be a straight 2020 performance ranking. Some injured players are ranked higher. 

 

It's just a top 50 overall, not 2020.

Good point.  The ratings would make sense if they’re factoring in things like consistency, longevity, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...