Jump to content

Falcons declining fifth-year option on TE Hayden Hurst


Recommended Posts

 

image.png.58e93934367d2b8847d36e7393500ad8.png

 

The Atlanta Falcons added a game-breaking tight end in Kyle Pitts with the No. 4 overall pick over the weekend. Incumbent TE Hayden Hurst will become a free agent next offseason.

The Falcons aren't picking up the fifth-year option on Hurst, NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported, per a source informed of the decision.

ESPN first reported the news.

Hurst is set to make $1.984 million in 2021. He'll be a free agent come 2022 if he plays out the final year in Atlanta without an extension. The Falcons could also look to trade the tight end in the coming months after adding Pitts and blocking TE Lee Smith this offseason.

 

https://www.nfl.com/news/falcons-declining-fifth-year-option-on-te-hayden-hurst

 

 

 

 

Edited by HOUSE
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that we've exercised the 5th year option on Edmunds, we could always tag Hurst next year if we need more time to re-sign him.

 

A 2nd is a bit high for what could possibly be a 1-year rental, but I dont want to throw any long term money at him until we see him perform in our offense.

 

But I also wouldnt hate it if we made the trade and immediately inked him to a 3 year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Process said:

What am I missing here? Why would we trade anything for this guy?

 

Cause that one time he scored a TD in the Ralph when no one covered him? He did look fast on that play. 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

No higher than 4 for me

 

I have no idea what his value is, and threw that out to get the discussion going. 4th or lower sounds better than a 2nd to me! 👍

 

My entire thought process was "Well, he's probably better than Freiermuth"

 

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would offer a conditional 4th that can escalate to a 3rd based on Hursts performance. I like pairing him up with Knox and the team has the transition tag if they want to resign him. Got to push in for a "win now" move and this is a fairly affordable way to add another piece to the team. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that Hurst tried baseball before he came back to football. He is still raw and will be 28 years old going into the season. Still upside there, and he's a good player, but I'd still roll with a raw 24 years old Knox. 

 

Not to mention, I think Jacob Hollister can do all of the same things Hurst can. Is younger, and faster. 

Edited by MrEpsYtown
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

for 1 season? I could get behind a 3rd day pick (4th contingent on resigning him, if not later). I wouldn't want to give up a 2nd day pick.

 

Yeah, there are a lot of different variables that could drastically change the trade value.

 

Whether we could work out a long term deal. IF Beane would even want to do that. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

This is the guy that married Stephanie McMahon.  Too much drama.  Pass.

That’s Helmsley. Triple H, not double😎. I have to say Macho Fan stole the show at the draft. RIP Dick “the Destroyer” Beyer 

Edited by Solomon Grundy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Now that we've exercised the 5th year option on Edmunds, we could always tag Hurst next year if we need more time to re-sign him.

 

A 2nd is a bit high for what could possibly be a 1-year rental, but I dont want to throw any long term money at him until we see him perform in our offense.

 

But I also wouldnt hate it if we made the trade and immediately inked him to a 3 year deal.


the thing with rentals is we are transitioning into letting guys walk in free agency, so a late 2 for a 3rd compensatory is a good backstop for value loss 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

That’s Helmsley. Triple H, not double😎. I have to say Macho Fan stole the show at the draft. RIP Dick “the Destroyer” Beyer 

The NFL network guys seemed confused and thought it might actually be Savage.  That would have been a cool trick if Macho pulled it off.  “Macho Lazarus.......oh yeah”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, First Round Bust said:

would be his 3rd team since 2018 - a first round bust given the Falcs passing O and the Ravens heavy TE-centric approach...doesnt excite me as stats are mediocre at best...would just muddy the waters I think

guitar slide GIF by Muddy Waters

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Arkady Renko said:

 

So does Lee Smith.  

Offset by his numerous penalties 

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

The NFL network guys seemed confused and thought it might actually be Savage.  That would have been a cool trick if Macho pulled it off.  “Macho Lazarus.......oh yeah”.

Hell, he fooled me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atlanta traded a 2nd rd pick to Baltimore last year to get him.  The 5th year option would have cost $5.4 M.  He's set to make $2 M this year.  

 

Beane likes his draft picks.  I wonder if he'd trade a player to get Hurst.  Maybe throw in the pick they got for Lee Smith 😁

Edited by DCbillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

i dont disagree, but tough offense to pull targets in... maybe the only WR room better than ours in the league

 

He had 88 targets last year.  That's double what Knox saw.  Double Knox's targets and he actually has the same yardage and TDs as Hurst.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...