Jump to content

Big Nickel


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Been thinking today, McD could really use a toy for a big nickel hybrid kinda guy. Last year it was Chinn and Dugger. Anybody like that coming out this year? I feel like it was this time last year that the Dugger name was starting to pop up around our team. Anybody got anything?

Owusu-Koramoah.  He probably goes long before 30.  But I can see Beane trading up to 20 or so.  Beane will move to get his guy, that and this draft is about quality not quantity. Can the guy help them right now?   Late round picks will have a hard time making this roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Been thinking today, McD could really use a toy for a big nickel hybrid kinda guy. Last year it was Chinn and Dugger. Anybody like that coming out this year? I feel like it was this time last year that the Dugger name was starting to pop up around our team. Anybody got anything?

Yeah having a weapon like Jeremy Chinn (two-time Defensive Rookie of the Month last season) who has the athleticism and traits to run/cover like a safety and shed blocks/tackle like a LB would be huge for our defense. Also worth pointing out that McDermott and Beane drafted Shaq Thompson in Carolina despite already having Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis in their primes. I don't think Thompson was necessarily used as a Big Nickel specifically, but he represented that type of player who was a bit undersized but had the range and cover skills to stay on the field for all three downs.

 

In the 2021 draft, I would rank the Big Nickel options as follows (certainly some projection here as some guys won't have played in this capacity much): 

 

1) Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah- Hard to ask for a better prototype, one of my favorite prospects in the entire draft. Freak athlete who is undersized as a LB. Excellent in coverage even lining up over the slot WR at times and has a knack for creating turnovers and negative plays. Great instincts and takes good angles to the ball. Ferocious hitter who's always looking to dislodge the ball. Super impressive pro day backs up what I watched on Saturdays. 

2) Trevon Moehrig- One of the top safeties in the draft, but has the size and length that could project to a Buffalo Nickel type role. Great athlete who possesses corner-like cover skills. Excellent tackler/plus run defender who triggers quickly and navigates traffic well. Above average ball skills.

3) Chazz Surratt- Very raw prospect who only played 2 seasons at LB after converting from QB. Excellent see-and-chase LB with an ideal athletic profile and build to become a Buffalo Nickel if a team can be patient and develop him. His below-average instincts/angles/play diagnosis will likely improve as he continues to learn how to be a defender and he has tons of upside. A clear tier below/more boom or bust potential than the previous two guys though.

4) Talanoa Hufanga- Played all over the field for USC and was their ballhawk/difference maker in the back seven. Would need to add a bit more weight (currently 200 lbs), but his instincts/awareness and ability to recognize and jump routes stood out on film. Not a burner, but his game speed looked faster than his 40 time which would be my biggest concern. 

 

Honorable Mention- Hamsah Nasirildeen (has possibly the best combination of length/size for a Buffalo Nickel role in the class, but his underwhelming production at FSU and average pro day testing knocks him down the list for me), Trill Williams (played out of position at SU but has the size and upside to switch), JaCoby Stevens (I like LSU DBs and his size/big game experience/explosive numbers on his jumps at the pro day are impressive, but I worry about his speed in coverage, same with Divine Diablo who I think is even slower/less athletic).

 

There you go, just one guy's opinion, but as you can tell, I'm excited about adding a Buffalo Nickel/hybrid defender who can stay on the field with their athleticism on all downs and help us match up with some of the more athletic offenses in the league. Go Bills!

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Rumor was they wanted Duggers bad last year, I imagine the big nickel will be primarily a super athletic 220 pound LB 

 

 

Dugger is doing a lot more than LB stuff with the Pats. He did a lot of many different things. Which is what I think the Bills are going to ask of their big nickel, though it's impossible to be sure.

 

"Dugger’s Pro Football Focus grade sat behind only Antoine Winfield Jr. of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Kamren Curl of the Washington Football Team and Xavier McKinney of the New York Giants among safeties from his draft class.

 

"PFF credited Dugger for four quarterback hurries and 11 stops against the run. His coverage was held responsible 274 receiving yards and no touchdowns.

Dugger’s in-the-box role brought assignments versus tight ends and running backs. It was spelled by work in the slot as well as in the outfield. It saw him start seven of the final eight games while playing no fewer than 53% of the downs in the process.

 

"The longest look came in the finale versus the New York Jets. Dugger never left the defensive huddle over the course of New England’s 28-14 win. He served as an inside linebacker amid a series of injuries, with veteran arrival Adrian Phillips’ in-game exit being one of them."

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverthomas/2021/01/14/kyle-duggers-rookie-season-proved-to-be-a-hit-for-new-england-patriots/?sh=5551c7a74f5c

 

They rush him, he played slot corner, deep safety, LB, covering TEs and RBs ...

 

The Bills love to try to prevent QBs from getting easy pre-snap reads. Having a guy who can do nearly anything adds a lot of confusion to the pictures you can present.

 

Many on here seem to think that big nickel means "guy to cover tight ends." And that is very far from the only thing a guy like that would be used for, though it certainly is one of the possibilities for a good one.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I saw a Jacoby Stevens mention somewhere in this thread already, but another mid to late round option I like is Jamien Sherwood out of Auburn.

 

6’2”, 220 lbs. Seems to have that tweener skill set. Can cover and hit.

 

Not sure what round he’ll go in, but I doubt he’ll break the bank.
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel about the Big Nickel a lot like I feel about drafting a 1T. We could certainly use it, bordering on calling it a need, but unless it's a truly special player (would've LOVED to somehow get Simmons last year), I don't think it's something worth throwing a valuable pick at. I could probably be convinced that JOK is special enough to take at 30, but he's not worth trading up for. Behind him though...

  • Naz in the 3rd (or possibly w/ a trade back from 61) would potentially be interesting (but probably not happening)
  • Mukuamu possibly trading back from our 3?
  • Stephens and Deablo maybe with one of our 5s?

The big Nickel is a fun concept that makes a lot of sense as a counter to a lot of the biggest offensive trends in football, and obviously McD is more or less the inventor of the role, so there's plenty of logical connections that are easy to make for why we'd do it. But just because a guy is too small to play linebacker and too slow to be a true safety doesn't mean he's going to automatically be a fit for that role. If a guy we like is at or near the top of the board for one of our picks and there's not a more glaring need for it, by all means let's do it. But I think the hype around here of just assuming it's on the shopping list because we don't have one is maybe getting out over our skis a little much. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I love his size. I was a little disappointed with his tape though. He looked like a big athletic guy who didn't really know how to play football to me. Interested to hear anyone else's views on him because I know some decent evaluators who are high on him. Maybe I watched the wrong games but I was lukewarm at best.

I still need to get to Hamsah's tape but his reps at senior bowl looked good.  He did well in press and had the physicality i would want in big nickel (deployed against 2 TE sets).  Overall FSU seems to not be coaching talent well lately so he may have more room to grow more than most.  Ill get back to you after i watch some of the available youtube tape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, glazeduck said:

I feel about the Big Nickel a lot like I feel about drafting a 1T. We could certainly use it, bordering on calling it a need, but unless it's a truly special player (would've LOVED to somehow get Simmons last year), I don't think it's something worth throwing a valuable pick at. I could probably be convinced that JOK is special enough to take at 30, but he's not worth trading up for. Behind him though...

  • Naz in the 3rd (or possibly w/ a trade back from 61) would potentially be interesting (but probably not happening)
  • Mukuamu possibly trading back from our 3?
  • Stephens and Deablo maybe with one of our 5s?

The big Nickel is a fun concept that makes a lot of sense as a counter to a lot of the biggest offensive trends in football, and obviously McD is more or less the inventor of the role, so there's plenty of logical connections that are easy to make for why we'd do it. But just because a guy is too small to play linebacker and too slow to be a true safety doesn't mean he's going to automatically be a fit for that role. If a guy we like is at or near the top of the board for one of our picks and there's not a more glaring need for it, by all means let's do it. But I think the hype around here of just assuming it's on the shopping list because we don't have one is maybe getting out over our skis a little much. 

This is a great post.  "Big Nickel" carries some magical connotation, but the idea is a bigger extra DB who can cover and play the run well is better than a smaller smaller extra DB.  Having someone who can do both makes the defense a little less vulnerable against the run when in nickel.

 

The "Big Nickel" is only special if you have a special player to play it - like pretty much every position.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@GunnerBill I see some of your concerns now.  I would not ever trust him in a deep zone and I would be a bit worried with him covering a TE through a seam.  Hopefully those could be coached a bit.  However, him cover hook/curl and flats looked really good.  I also think he showed really good run fits when lined up at the LOS.  I def see your concerns though cause he gave up some really big plays.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the Bills actually draft guys with their first two picks this year with names we cannot pronounce?

 

The CB from Syracuse who is climbing upward big time and the “whatever” position player from FSU.

 

😂😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

This is a great post.  "Big Nickel" carries some magical connotation, but the idea is a bigger extra DB who can cover and play the run well is better than a smaller smaller extra DB.  Having someone who can do both makes the defense a little less vulnerable against the run when in nickel.

 

The "Big Nickel" is only special if you have a special player to play it - like pretty much every position.

It doesn't *have* to be a special player -- most players on every roster aren't special players. But when you have a capable nickel DB in TJ already, other more pressing needs and aren't just stocked to the gills with picks, it becomes more of a luxury pick at a point where it's hard to justify taking a luxury pick.

 

That's my 2 cents. Fun idea, obvious benefits when done right, not worth force-fitting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I def want this type of player on the team....the question is what kind of resource do you allocate?

 

For instance....a first round pick needs to see a lot of snaps to make it worth the investment

In Carolina Shaq Thompson filled this role and he was a 1st Round pick, 25th overall in 2015. 

Edited by The Jokeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Right.....but what was Shaq Thompson's snap count.......starter right?

Isaiah Simmons' snap count was 30ish% and that guys' one of the freakiest athletes to ever get drafted. Better draft capitol than Thompson too. 

 

That's not starter numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, YattaOkasan said:

I still need to get to Hamsah's tape but his reps at senior bowl looked good.  He did well in press and had the physicality i would want in big nickel (deployed against 2 TE sets).  Overall FSU seems to not be coaching talent well lately so he may have more room to grow more than most.  Ill get back to you after i watch some of the available youtube tape.

 

Agree with your FSU point. To me he just looks a bit lost out there. There is definitely potential, he is big and athletic... but right now, not sure how much of a footballer he is. And so that limits how high I'd be prepared to take him probably to the extent that someone else will take him before it gets to the spot where I'd be comfortable if that makes sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldTimer1960 said:

This is a great post.  "Big Nickel" carries some magical connotation, but the idea is a bigger extra DB who can cover and play the run well is better than a smaller smaller extra DB.  Having someone who can do both makes the defense a little less vulnerable against the run when in nickel.

 

The "Big Nickel" is only special if you have a special player to play it - like pretty much every position.

Yep.  JOK would definitely help this defense but so would any bigger player in the back 7 who can cover.  With how advanced and precise passing games have become, you need some length and size in the back 7.  Edmunds is our only back 7 player with length and size but he has zero ball skills.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dont Stop Billeiving said:

Yeah having a weapon like Jeremy Chinn (two-time Defensive Rookie of the Month last season) who has the athleticism and traits to run/cover like a safety and shed blocks/tackle like a LB would be huge for our defense. Also worth pointing out that McDermott and Beane drafted Shaq Thompson in Carolina despite already having Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis in their primes. I don't think Thompson was necessarily used as a Big Nickel specifically, but he represented that type of player who was a bit undersized but had the range and cover skills to stay on the field for all three downs.

 

In the 2021 draft, I would rank the Big Nickel options as follows (certainly some projection here as some guys won't have played in this capacity much): 

 

1) Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah- Hard to ask for a better prototype, one of my favorite prospects in the entire draft. Freak athlete who is undersized as a LB. Excellent in coverage even lining up over the slot WR at times and has a knack for creating turnovers and negative plays. Great instincts and takes good angles to the ball. Ferocious hitter who's always looking to dislodge the ball. Super impressive pro day backs up what I watched on Saturdays. 

2) Trevon Moehrig- One of the top safeties in the draft, but has the size and length that could project to a Buffalo Nickel type role. Great athlete who possesses corner-like cover skills. Excellent tackler/plus run defender who triggers quickly and navigates traffic well. Above average ball skills.

3) Chazz Surratt- Very raw prospect who only played 2 seasons at LB after converting from QB. Excellent see-and-chase LB with an ideal athletic profile and build to become a Buffalo Nickel if a team can be patient and develop him. His below-average instincts/angles/play diagnosis will likely improve as he continues to learn how to be a defender and he has tons of upside. A clear tier below/more boom or bust potential than the previous two guys though.

4) Talanoa Hufanga- Played all over the field for USC and was their ballhawk/difference maker in the back seven. Would need to add a bit more weight (currently 200 lbs), but his instincts/awareness and ability to recognize and jump routes stood out on film. Not a burner, but his game speed looked faster than his 40 time which would be my biggest concern. 

 

Honorable Mention- Hamsah Nasirildeen (has possibly the best combination of length/size for a Buffalo Nickel role in the class, but his underwhelming production at FSU and average pro day testing knocks him down the list for me), Trill Williams (played out of position at SU but has the size and upside to switch), JaCoby Stevens (I like LSU DBs and his size/big game experience/explosive numbers on his jumps at the pro day are impressive, but I worry about his speed in coverage, same with Divine Diablo who I think is even slower/less athletic).

 

There you go, just one guy's opinion, but as you can tell, I'm excited about adding a Buffalo Nickel/hybrid defender who can stay on the field with their athleticism on all downs and help us match up with some of the more athletic offenses in the league. Go Bills!

 

 

 

What about Jabril Cox? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, freddyjj said:

 

If the Bills go this route I think there are a few OLB prospects that are a bit light for that NFL role that could easily transition to a heavy nickel role.  The Bills need to do ensure they do not run into the same developmental struggles they have with Edmunds by finding prospects that are instinctive diagnosing plays and can get off blocks to make tackles while still being solid in coverage.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:

Just watching when the Bills defense was at its most effective both late last year and in 2018/2019 - the 5th DB needs to be able to cover a TE and still get off blocks to make plays out wide on RBs.  Hybrid with size and speed.

 

The Bills were most effective with Milano and Edmunds both over the “A” gaps on either side of the center.  2 DTs (Oliver and probably Obada this year) on the outside shoulder of the guards, and Hughes and Addison at DE.  Essentially 6 guys across the line of scrimmage and you bring 5.  The 5 remaining DBs need to cover lots of space with WRs and TEs and pick up flaring RBs.  They were really good at TEs in 2018 + 2019, but struggled against RBs in screen situations.  Last year they were better against the RBs, but the TEs ate them alive.  
 

I would love to see that hybrid speed player to fill out the defense and this year with the decrease in talent at TE we will see - the numbers should look better just based on schedule, but that is a critical role that we seem to be missing- especially with Marlowe a FA.

 

Geisicki, Smith and Henry in NE, Kelce, Gronk+Brate/howard, Hurst, Ebron - some good ones on the schedule this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hamsah Nasirildeen S FSU

 

A tackling machine. I feel Beane loves this kid too hence the FSU visit. Watch interviews of this kid, he talks about being played all over the field, including OLB, blitzing a lot, filling the gap etc. 

 

Hes got size and his wing span was over 80”, at 6’4” if he could play at 225 lbs, he’d be a great Big Nickle. Cover TEs drop into coverage is his strength. 
 

If he last past 55 I’d be surprised but he may slip to 61 and I’d love the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

18 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Been thinking today, McD could really use a toy for a big nickel hybrid kinda guy. Last year it was Chinn and Dugger. Anybody like that coming out this year? I feel like it was this time last year that the Dugger name was starting to pop up around our team. Anybody got anything?

 

These are the guys I see that can play Big Nickel. 

  • Hamsah Nasirildeen S FSU
  • Jeremiah Owuso-Koramoah LB ND
  • Jamar Johnson S Indiana
  • Jacoby Stevens S LSU
  • Tyrie Gillespie S Missouri
  • Divine Deablo S Va Tech
  • Richie Grant S UCF
5 hours ago, Motorin' said:

 

What about Jabril Cox? 

 

Cox and Owusu-Koramoah can probably both ply Big Nickel but I'm not sure either will be around before we pick in the 2nd. I don't expect us to spend a 1st rder on a big Nickel, though I wouldn't be against it. Pats will be in 12 personnel 90% of the time.

Edited by ndirish1978
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Height/Length is an under-rated quality for DB’s and LB’s.  Always been important for OT’s and edge rushers.  But with how much teams throw now, it’s more important than ever to have some coverage guys with length.  Hopkins easily jumped over our 3 best DB’s for the Hail Murray.  Tight Ends typically have a 5-6 inch height advantage over our DB’s and Milano.   Including Milano, Bills have 6 guys in coverage who are 6 feet or under.  Give me a 6’1”+ CB with long arms or a 6’3+ LB with coverage skills.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

 

These are the guys I see that can play Big Nickel. 

  • Hamsah Nasirildeen S FSU
  • Jeremiah Owuso-Koramoah LB ND
  • Jamar Johnson S Indiana
  • Jacoby Stevens S LSU
  • Tyrie Gillespie S Missouri
  • Divine Deablo S Va Tech
  • Richie Grant S UCF

 

Cox and Owusu-Koramoah can probably both ply Big Nickel but I'm not sure either will be around before we pick in the 2nd. I don't expect us to spend a 1st rder on a big Nickel, though I wouldn't be against it. Pats will be in 12 personnel 90% of the time.

 

I think the upside of taking a very fast / under sized OLB to play Big Nickel is that they also double as LB depth in case of injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CEN-CAL17 said:

 

Hamsah Nasirildeen S FSU

 

A tackling machine. I feel Beane loves this kid too hence the FSU visit. Watch interviews of this kid, he talks about being played all over the field, including OLB, blitzing a lot, filling the gap etc. 

 

Hes got size and his wing span was over 80”, at 6’4” if he could play at 225 lbs, he’d be a great Big Nickle. Cover TEs drop into coverage is his strength. 
 

If he last past 55 I’d be surprised but he may slip to 61 and I’d love the pick.


This mock posted today has him falling to us in the 3rd

 

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-mock-draft-weissman-6.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2021 at 10:36 PM, Buffalo716 said:

Taron johnson 

 

And that's why it's a sub package because it's never going to see the field more than 20% of the snaps 

 

With nickel basically being our base, and johnson being so valuable

Is Johnson so valuable? I know he made a couple great plays down the stretch last year (one a historic play), but he is a liability sometimes in pass coverage. I like the way he plays the run, but I wouldn't mind if we had more options than just Taron Johnson.

 

Don't get me wrong, I don't think he completely deserved all the hate he got early last year, but he does have his issues. And obviously McDermott agrees because he benched him against the Chiefs the first go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I am not sure I agree with you on Taron's value. For the first half of last season he couldn't cover squat. He did round into some form later in the year but I think a Kyle Dugger type would have seen way more than 20% of the snaps last year. 

 

It is fundamentally the question though for the "big nickel" if you spend decent resource on the spot - and Kirby gave us good intel that if Dugger was there last year he would have been the pick - how much are you getting him on the field. 

 

To the OPs question a guy I like day 3 is Tariq Thompson out of San Diego State. Played safety in college but projects better as a dime backer in the NFL. He is a little bigger than Taron and a better hitter though also a little slower. At the spot you are picking him he would be much more of the 20% sub package type but he is an intriguing prospect. Just has a nose for the football.

 

I mean playing a 1 tech defensive tackle as a nickel would definitely classify him as a "big" nickel.

You beat me to it. My thoughts exactly. I actually like Taron Johnson, but he is totally replaceable and an upgrade there would help this defense a ton.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Motorin' said:

 

I think the upside of taking a very fast / under sized OLB to play Big Nickel is that they also double as LB depth in case of injury. 

 

Agreed, the issue is when you're looking at players like the two LBs mentioned, they are good enough to be starters at LB on other teams and as such will be drafted early to fill those roles. I don't think we're spending a 1st on a player who will play 20-30% of the time just to have them around as a backup. Best scenario for the Bills is they find a starter at CB/DE in the 1st and pick up Nasirildeen in the 2nd/3rd. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MJS said:

Is Johnson so valuable? I know he made a couple great plays down the stretch last year (one a historic play), but he is a liability sometimes in pass coverage. I like the way he plays the run, but I wouldn't mind if we had more options than just Taron Johnson.

 

Don't get me wrong, I don't think he completely deserved all the hate he got early last year, but he does have his issues. And obviously McDermott agrees because he benched him against the Chiefs the first go around.

For how hard it is to play nickel. There are a lot worse options

 

And over three seasons he shown to be a above average cover corner. As McDermott puts it , it takes three guys to replace him when he gets hurt 

 

You say he's totally replaceable and an upgrade would help.. but there's not 10 nickel corners better than him in the NFL... It'd be hard to upgrade him day one

 

 

Edited by Buffalo716
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

For how hard it is to play nickel. There are a lot worse options

 

And over three seasons he shown to be a above average cover corner. As McDermott puts it , it takes three guys to replace him when he gets hurt 

 

You say he's totally replaceable and an upgrade would help.. but there's not 10 nickel corners better than him in the NFL... It'd be hard to upgrade him day one

Based on what? If he is a top 10 nickel corner, why did McDermott bench him?

 

I totally agree that you can do worse than Taron Johnson. If we go with him in 2021 I will not be shocked or disappointed. But he is just an average player. I don't see how anyone could think he is top 10 at his position. He makes plays sometimes. He gets beat fairly often. An upgrade would be nice at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MJS said:

Based on what? If he is a top 10 nickel corner, why did McDermott bench him?

 

I totally agree that you can do worse than Taron Johnson. If we go with him in 2021 I will not be shocked or disappointed. But he is just an average player. I don't see how anyone could think he is top 10 at his position. He makes plays sometimes. He gets beat fairly often. An upgrade would be nice at some point.

Why did he get benched? Maybe to send a message like McDermott does.  Like hey cam Lewis can play over you.. he started in a slump.. but McDermott's praised him for 3 years

 

He played more snaps than any cornerback besides Tre White, if we should be upgrading anybody first it's Levi Wallace.. who is still fine in McDermotts system but not as valuable as Johnson

 

Again McDermott has always called Johnson extremely valuable and it takes three players to replace him when he gets hurt.. three players to do his job

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Motorin' said:

 

What about Jabril Cox? 

Great shout, he crossed my mind shortly after I posted this...he isn't undersized for a LB in today's NFL really so I think he could stick there, but he does have the athleticism to probably be a Big Nickel for someone. Would probably put him third on my list behind JOK and Moehrig.

 

Love him as a fit for the Bills and would be thrilled with him in the second or third rounds. There are obviously exceptions with any school, but I'm a big fan of LSU defenders in most instances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Big Nickle subs in a safety for the slot cover DB. From an X's & O's perspective how is the Big Nickle formation used?

 

Obviously it gives up something against the slot receiver.  Those guys are small speedy & shifty and can cut both ways.  They are harder to cover than a WR flanked out wide because the DB can't use the sideline defensively.  This is probably why the Big Nickle formation is usually a sub package used only against certain formations.

 

I can see that a Big Nickle DB formation would be better against the run than the standard Nickle.  Also better coverage matchups against the TE (hear that Travis) and an RB running a pass pattern.

 

Apparently the Big Nickle S is also better at blitzing off the edge than a standard DB.  In zone the Big Nickle can cover the middle for slants, low crossers and other shallow to medium routes.

 

Are there any other strengths or weaknesses of the Big Nickle formation

 

Here are some studies of the Big Nickle formation:

 

https://www.footballstudyhall.com/2014/8/22/6052637/college-football-nickel-backs-lamarcus-joyner

 

https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2014/6/23/5829794/will-the-cowboys-use-more-heavy-nickel-formations-in-2014

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said:


This mock posted today has him falling to us in the 3rd

 

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-mock-draft-weissman-6.0

You never know. That would be awesome. I personally think if this kid didn’t get hurt he’d be an early round 2 pick. Maybe there’s still red tape if he goes nearly round 4. I’ve seen him mocked many times late round 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...