Jump to content

Sunday Night Football: Rams at 49ers 8:20 ET


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, NobesBLO13 said:

Are they trying to make it seem that it’s impressive that the rams are 4-0 against the nfc east?

Right isn’t everyone pretty much undefeated vs the NFC east?

Ok I looked it up and the only non nfc East teams to actually lose to one are the Niners (lost to Eagles) and falcons (lost to cowboys)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another fairly deep cut outro, FNM We Care A Lot. But this from the 90s.

 

I'm fine if Mostert's out, he's on an opposing roster in one of my league. If he stays out I'll be up ~10 heading into tomorrow. I have Allen and Kyler Murray, they have Stefon Diggs. The strategery and Bills homer move is start Allen. If Diggs goes off for TDs (yay!), Allen getting points will dilute it (yay!). But man, Dallas D is a suckhole of suckitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JerseyBills said:

I'd be furious as a Rams fan for not sticking with the run. I know their run game sets up pass but they're getting great yardage. Also be furious for not running twice with Henderson at the 1 after he got them down there with ease. 

Yeah was really curious why the Hell they pulled him during that series. I thought he must have been totally gassed but they are desperate right now, LA should be winning this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Rams are so unimpressive. 

I hope they are only this way because the loss to the Bills crushed their spirits.  I'd still like to think the Bills beat a quality opponent when they beat them earlier this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both the Giants and 49ers who don't have good defenses this season have played well vs the Rams yet our defense gave up a 28-3 lead. 

 

I'm starting to think our defense is far worse than some of us think....might be bottom 3 in the league. That desperately needs to get fixed. 

Edited by Penfield45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for what it’s worth, although logically you go for two points first when down by 9, statistically it is shown not to matter.

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

 

They should of gone for two how is this a real debate.


Logically it is not a debate. You are right. But when 538 ran the Numbers, it didn’t make a difference. Basically if you miss the two point conversion it doesn’t really matter when you miss it. You lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Penfield45 said:

Both the Giants and 49ers who don't have good defenses this season have played well vs the Rams yet our defense gave up a 28-3 lead. 

 

I'm starting to think our defense is far worse than some of us think....might be bottom 3 in the league. That desperately needs to get fixed. 

 

Actually the Giants and 49ers both have decent defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SDS said:

And for what it’s worth, although logically you go for two points first when down by 9, statistically it is shown not to matter.


Logically it is not a debate. You are right. But when 538 ran the Numbers, it didn’t make a difference. Basically if you miss the two point conversion it doesn’t really matter when you miss it. You lose.

Which makes sense I mean having to score two more times instead of 1 is always going to be much lower odds it just makes sense to know with as much time as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...