Jump to content

WTF is Peter King thinking?? Picks Dolphins to win AFC East


Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


So except for the Chargers, Rams, Bears, Colts, and Steelers he was “pretty spot on”?

 

I get that nailing appreciably more than 50% of the playoff field isn’t a cake walk, but “pretty spot on except for the 42% he got wrong” is kind of weird to say.


As to his de facto prediction, meh, go ahead and pick Miami. It’s gutsy and edgy; Buffalo is the trendy, mainstream pick. May as well be ahead of the curve.

 

Doesn't make much sense though. They’re not close to Buffalo in terms of talent...yet. Another solid offseason and they will be.

Of the 8 division winners, he had 5 correct and had 7 of them making the playoffs. He also hit the Super Bowl winner.  He also had the 49ers, a 4-12 team the season before, in the playoffs.  Acting like he’s some sort of hot take artist is completely disingenuous.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Billl said:

Of the 8 division winners, he had 5 correct and had 7 of them making the playoffs. He also hit the Super Bowl winner.  He also had the 49ers, a 4-12 team the season before, in the playoffs.  Acting like he’s some sort of hot take artist is completely disingenuous.  


So Miami at 10-6 doesn’t qualify as hot-take territory for you? Very good then.

 

Of course, “Tyreek Hill is completely innocent and a model father” also doesn’t qualify as a hot-take for you, so I have to consider that as part of the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BillsFanThru-N-Thru said:

I generally respected Peter King and his takes on the NFL but this one is out of left field.  He only considers the Bills a 3rd tier team, along with numerous others.  He has the Chiefs and Ravens as Tier 1 and the Titans as the only tier 2.  That being said picking the Dolphins as to win the AFC East with the potential win 10 games seems ridiculous to me.  Here's the link just scroll down to the 2020 predictions ...

 

https://t.co/BWqwmoDnZq?amp=1

Is it possible he doesn't view the Bills with red, white, and blue tinted glasses, and sees Josh Allen's inherent deficiencies for what they are?

 

Having said that, I'm not putting any money down on the Fish.  LOL.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Yes, the master plan to save SI is to fire up the second smallest market in the NFL.  

The best part about It is he no longer works for SI and hasn’t for two or three years now. So the master plan is quite possibly flawed, but your humor and the irony isn’t lost. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

You’re way off here.  By DVOA, the Bucs had a top 10 defense last year.  They got murdered by Winston’s turnovers, some leading directly to scores.  They have the best group of receivers and TEs and just added a 1,000 yard rusher.  Brady is what Brady was but if he can be a B level starter, they should be very good.

 

i would argue that you must just hate Brady to not see the potential on that team.  Brady might be completely shot but that is a really well rounded team. 

OMG!!! Stop with this.  Always the victim.  The Bills her plenty of love from the media.  But the second some doesn’t say awesome we are, it’s “the media hates us.”

 

I think the Fins are on the right track but I completely disagree with them winning the division.  But this victim mentality Some Bills fans have is insane.  Not everyone is going to love our team or predict them to win every game.  It doesn’t mean they hate us.  

 

You are nothing if not consistent. Always there to defend the Patriots honor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

King reports on the “quick take” thought process that has invaded NFL reporting. He hasn’t had a creative, in-depth original thought in years. He hasn’t done any investigative columns about real football things in a long time. He’s gone from a guy I used to love to a guy I have no respect for. 
 

One thing you can always count on, however, is him gushing over Brady, Belichick, and all things New England or ex-new England in every column or interview.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PromoTheRobot said:

 

You are nothing if not consistent. Always there to defend the Patriots honor.

You need to get a new slant.  It’s hilarious because I was once the angry homer like you.  Now if you aren’t completely biased towards the Bills, you hate them and love NE.  
 

my favorite part of the angry homers is they don’t even choice to counter the post.  And you know Brady is on the Bucs right? 
 

OMG!!! Peter King hates us!!! He’s so mean!!!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/2019/12/nbcs-peter-king-predicts-buffalo-bills-win-playoff-game-in-january.html%3foutputType=amp

4 minutes ago, todd said:

King reports on the “quick take” thought process that has invaded NFL reporting. He hasn’t had a creative, in-depth original thought in years. He hasn’t done any investigative columns about real football things in a long time. He’s gone from a guy I used to love to a guy I have no respect for. 
 

One thing you can always count on, however, is him gushing over Brady, Belichick, and all things New England or ex-new England in every column or interview.

So if the Bills won 6 SBs and went to 9 in 15 years, so you think writers won’t be gushing over us?  
 

guess what people are biased towards??? Winning.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

You’re way off here.  By DVOA, the Bucs had a top 10 defense last year.  They got murdered by Winston’s turnovers, some leading directly to scores.  They have the best group of receivers and TEs and just added a 1,000 yard rusher.  Brady is what Brady was but if he can be a B level starter, they should be very good.

 

i would argue that you must just hate Brady to not see the potential on that team.  Brady might be completely shot but that is a really well rounded team. 

OMG!!! Stop with this.  Always the victim.  The Bills her plenty of love from the media.  But the second some doesn’t say awesome we are, it’s “the media hates us.”

 

I think the Fins are on the right track but I completely disagree with them winning the division.  But this victim mentality Some Bills fans have is insane.  Not everyone is going to love our team or predict them to win every game.  It doesn’t mean they hate us.  

They have potential.   To think the Bucs are Super Bowl champs is silly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

You’re way off here.  By DVOA, the Bucs had a top 10 defense last year.  They got murdered by Winston’s turnovers, some leading directly to scores.  They have the best group of receivers and TEs and just added a 1,000 yard rusher.  Brady is what Brady was but if he can be a B level starter, they should be very good.

 

i would argue that you must just hate Brady to not see the potential on that team.  Brady might be completely shot but that is a really well rounded team. 

OMG!!! Stop with this.  Always the victim.  The Bills her plenty of love from the media.  But the second some doesn’t say awesome we are, it’s “the media hates us.”

 

I think the Fins are on the right track but I completely disagree with them winning the division.  But this victim mentality Some Bills fans have is insane.  Not everyone is going to love our team or predict them to win every game.  It doesn’t mean they hate us.  


DVOA can be useful, but cmon, TB allowed 449 points in 2019, only 3 teams were worse.

 

Yes, they have a lot of talent at WR, and a very good offensive staff. Their OL has some weak points, and they have a LONG way to go with their run game.

 

Brady is still a good QB, but he’s not TOM BRADY anymore. He hasn’t been TOM BRADY in 3 years. Anybody expecting 5,000 yards from him (like Winston had in 2019) probably needs to lower their expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC Rankings 

Tier 1 - KC

Tier 2 - Baltimore (They will go no less than 5-1 in the division and will be hungry after early playoff exit)

Tier 3 - Buffalo, Colts(Rivers and Reich could make a SB run if the defense is as good as advertised), Titans(I'm not sold on this team and my guess is the pressure will cause Tannyhill to crack but they should still win no less than 9 games and the head to head mathcups with Colts/Texans will make the difference)

Tier 4 - Texans(they will miss Hopkins), Patriots(Cam will get them 8 wins but the talent on offense is terrible), Dolphins(solid coach and enough talent to get to 8 wins and be in the conversation until Nov), Steelers(the team most likely to implode), Chargers(team could win 10 games or lose 10 games)

Tier 5 - Browns(never been a Mayfield fan), Jets(never been a Darnold fan but he showed a bit last year, that said their team has so little talent), Raiders(QB controversy all year), Broncos(another swing team that could win 10 or lose 10 but I'm predicting that latter)

Tier 6 - Cincinnati, Jags (I'd be shocked if these teams have 6 wins combined)

Edited by Ethan in Portland
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

You need to get a new slant.  It’s hilarious because I was once the angry homer like you.  Now if you aren’t completely biased towards the Bills, you hate them and love NE.  
 

my favorite part of the angry homers is they don’t even choice to counter the post.  And you know Brady is on the Bucs right? 
 

OMG!!! Peter King hates us!!! He’s so mean!!!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/2019/12/nbcs-peter-king-predicts-buffalo-bills-win-playoff-game-in-january.html%3foutputType=amp

So if the Bills won 6 SBs and went to 9 in 15 years, so you think writers won’t be gushing over us?  
 

guess what people are biased towards??? Winning.  


I get your point, but there are other teams to write about in the nfl. Not only that, Brady wasn’t t very good last year. Does he still deserve the wall to wall coverage?

 

Or I could just be sick of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrPJax said:

I have to admit I am a little skeptical that McD has addressed the O enough to keep up with KC , RAVENS, and even the Titans who also got aggressive with their D by adding  Clowney.  New O additions of Diggs , and three rookies ( Moss, Davis, Gilliam ) , with a tight end room with Knox being the only one with much upside and an o line basically unchanged,   does not show a great deal of change that will guarantee , IMHO, a vastly improved offense  that can score more than 19 points a game.   McD , who has had great success with his D, continued to bring in more support with adding several proven defensive veterans and even opted to take Epenesa when JK Dobbins had fallen into our lap (a 2000 yard proven rusher from a major conference who was immediately nabbed by the Ravens to bolster their already impressive rushing attack),  appears to keep his emphasis on defense even after we are seeing the leagues more successful franchises featuring very productive offenses.   We can’t ignore KC’s ability to score and they added even more fire power to their O.  The road to the SB will most likely go thru KC or Baltimore for the AFC teams as I see the Bills as a 10/11 win team given the schedule.  We still have zero playoff wins with McD ( love the guy and love his culture, but he needs improvement as losing a 16 point lead in the wild card game reflects on a need for game management improvement ), and I am not sure just adding Diggs and three rookies ( 4 if we include Bass) in a COVID shortened season translates to more offensive success on the road against already proven offensive juggernaut franchises.   We did also lose to Baltimore at home last year so we can’t just downplay them either as I routinely see little mention of them as a team we might  have to go thru to get to the SB. 
 

So, did we do enough on O?  Not sure until we see if Allen can progress as I am hoping he does , and I also have to see if Daboll can use Diggs and Moss creatively  in a way that matches all the preseason hype. So far McD continues to be very aggressive with addressing his D, but I am not sure he has done enough to get the offense up around 24/25 points a game where we can actually be a bona fide Super Bowl contender. Peter King suggesting the fins take the division is ludicrous, but we are not locks to knock off KC, TITANS , RAVENS , and the SB is really the ultimate goal.  It’s about to get real!  

Coaching is my greatest concern with this offense. We have lots of talent, but Daboll hasn’t shown the ability to lead a quality offense. We have no idea if our talent will be utilized properly. I love everything about this team. McD and Beane have righted the ship, but I’m not sure how many good offense minded guys we have on this coaching staff. I’m fine with the Singletary and Moss duo, and happy we didn’t use a high pick on a guy like Dobbins.
 

Our biggest question mark on offense is the development of Allen, and the TE position. We’ll need to be bold and innovative on offense to compete with teams like KC and Baltimore. Playing not to lose isn’t going to win a title. McD needs to learn not to slip back into a shell with the offense when they take a lead. We basically allow opponents to get back in the game by taking our foot off the pedal with our defense first mentality. We have the talent, it’s time for the coaches to trust them this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thenorthremembers said:

Guess we will see how good Tua is minus three first round wideouts.  I think he has a weak arm and is prone to injury but who knows.

 

Thats why they play the games.  Teams dont get trophies for being picked to win in the offseason.  Just some guys opinion.   Mine is the Pats are still the favorites until someone knocks them off.

 

Rex never really caught on to that little fact......

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, todd said:


I get your point, but there are other teams to write about in the nfl. Not only that, Brady wasn’t t very good last year. Does he still deserve the wall to wall coverage?

 

Or I could just be sick of him.

Haha, I definitely understand being sick of him. But i respect greatness.  You don’t think Michael Jordan would get wall to wall coverage?  Or LeBron when he finally slips.  There was a love fest over Peyton who was horrible and won a SB.  
 

and Brady had 4,000 yards and 24 tds with a lot of garbage around him and they went 12-4.  That would be one of the best qb seasons in Bills history.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:


Tampa Bay is this year’s Browns?

 

lol

 

 

 

Really? You can't see the comparison? A team that hasn't made the playoffs in over ten years makes a couple of splash signings and becomes media darlings before ending up with a .500 record.

Perhaps you think that Brady is unbeatable simply because he's had his foot on the Bills neck for so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

Hmmm, gonna disagree with the comparison. At a high level TB is a stable org with BA, Brady is walking into an offense that Winston was able to run well. Solid defense that is also stable and established - versus - Freddie Kitchens, a young qb, a defense that supposed to be good but has trouble staying healthy?

 

Is stability a useful quality when your organisation has underachieved for years? You're right that at that level they are nothing like the Browns but I really wasn't comparing organizational competency.

 

More the fact that they are serial disappointments who have made notable signings to add to some blue chip players already there. Just like the Browns last year they are being over hyped Their D is NOT solid. They had a guy who had a sensational once in a lifetime sack number. They were a top team against the run. But their pass D was among the worst. Bad enough to be nowhere near the playoffs despite record offensive output 

 

Now people are saying superbowl and that's a hell of an assumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillsFanThru-N-Thru said:

I generally respected Peter King and his takes on the NFL but this one is out of left field.  He only considers the Bills a 3rd tier team, along with numerous others.  He has the Chiefs and Ravens as Tier 1 and the Titans as the only tier 2.  That being said picking the Dolphins as to win the AFC East with the potential win 10 games seems ridiculous to me.  Here's the link just scroll down to the 2020 predictions ...

 

https://t.co/BWqwmoDnZq?amp=1

 

I think he's trying to get clicks.

No thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seoulofstone said:

 

Really? You can't see the comparison? A team that hasn't made the playoffs in over ten years makes a couple of splash signings and becomes media darlings before ending up with a .500 record.

Perhaps you think that Brady is unbeatable simply because he's had his foot on the Bills neck for so long. 

 

Only if you knew nothing about the Bucs last season would you imagine some "comparison" to the Freddie Kitchens Browns of last season.

 

Since you couldn't be bothered to look it up, I have volunteered to help you:

 

Tampa's offense scored 458 points (for comparison, the Bills scored 314 and NE 420)--3rd in the NFL last year.  That's the 7th most of any team not making the playoffs in the past 28 years----with Jameis Winston at the helm.

 

Tampa had 30 ints and 11 lost fumbles last year.  Yet they still scored more points than they allowed all season..  You think Brady will throw 30 ints?

 

6 of their 9 losses were of 7 points or less.  Maybe the turnovers were a factor, you think?

 

Only 6 of their 16 games this season are against teams who had winning records last year.

 

Bruce Arians isn't Freddie Kitchen's

 

Lazy take----no points for you.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Only if you knew nothing about the Bucs last season would you imagine some "comparison" to the Freddie Kitchens Browns of last season.

 

Since you couldn't be bothered to look it up, I have volunteered to help you:

 

Tampa's offense scored 458 points (for comparison, the Bills scored 314 and NE 420)--3rd in the NFL last year.  That's the 7th most of any team not making the playoffs in the past 28 years----with Jameis Winston at the helm.

 

Tampa had 30 ints and 11 lost fumbles last year.  Yet they still scored more points than they allowed all season..  You think Brady will throw 30 ints?

 

6 of their 9 losses were of 7 points or less.  Maybe the turnovers were a factor, you think?

 

Only 6 of their 16 games this season are against teams who had winning records last year.

 

Bruce Arians isn't Freddie Kitchen's

 

Lazy take----no points for you.

 

 

 

 

Well said. Tampa goes 12-4 (5-1 in the division) and has a first round bye.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seoulofstone said:

 

Really? You can't see the comparison? A team that hasn't made the playoffs in over ten years makes a couple of splash signings and becomes media darlings before ending up with a .500 record.

Perhaps you think that Brady is unbeatable simply because he's had his foot on the Bills neck for so long. 

WEO may have responded but since I have an opinion I have to say; the comparison isn't exactly apples to apples. Cleveland is well.....Cleveland. Arians is definitely an improvement over Kitchens, Chudzinski, Williams, Pettine, Shurmur, Mangini.....by some exponential factor, I just don't have the metric handy. Even a diminished Marcia is better than Mayfield and Winston combined. Marcia with weapons and a chip on his shoulder in a Bruce Arians-Byron Leftwich offense could be lightning in a bottle. Winston was lighting it up, he was just turning the ball over A LOT. Tommy Boy isn't known for that. And New England has had their foot on a lot of necks for a while now. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Well said. Tampa goes 12-4 (5-1 in the division) and has a first round bye.

 

Full disclosure: I stole almost all those stats from today's NYP I read at JFK lol.  But still, comparing Tampa's prospects this year to the hype the Browns (I even did some of that) had last year is comparing fantasy to reality.

Edited by Mr. WEO
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, George C said:

Until Allen shows he can connect on all passes, which he has not, he will remain the issue. I’m not drinking the Kool-Aid until I see all of the passes..

Tua? If 100%? Get ready to face a qb who was almost unstoppable. 

I think there's a strong chance Tua sucks in the NFL. A lot of champion Bama QBs have come before him and they've all sucked since Bart Starr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Only if you knew nothing about the Bucs last season would you imagine some "comparison" to the Freddie Kitchens Browns of last season.

 

Since you couldn't be bothered to look it up, I have volunteered to help you:

 

Tampa's offense scored 458 points (for comparison, the Bills scored 314 and NE 420)--3rd in the NFL last year.  That's the 7th most of any team not making the playoffs in the past 28 years----with Jameis Winston at the helm.

 

Tampa had 30 ints and 11 lost fumbles last year.  Yet they still scored more points than they allowed all season..  You think Brady will throw 30 ints?

 

6 of their 9 losses were of 7 points or less.  Maybe the turnovers were a factor, you think?

 

Only 6 of their 16 games this season are against teams who had winning records last year.

 

Bruce Arians isn't Freddie Kitchen's

 

Lazy take----no points for you.

 

 

 

 

 

  To be honest I never once said I was comparing Arians to Kitchens or Winston to Brady. That was entirely you. What I am comparing is two teams that both haven't been to the playoffs in over ten years both making flashy pickups and being predicted to do great things as a consequence. What they have In common is an exceedingly long period of terrible underachievement. That was what I was alluding to 

 It's great that you're a Brady fanboy and that you think he's so great that they will not only reach the playoffs but make the big game. I can see how years of watching him obliterate an abysmal AFCE particularly the Bills would make you that much in awe of him but he may find that especially the Falcons and Saints won't just roll over for him.

Your stats are correct but it hasn't helped Tampa in the past. You're dead right that Brady won't throw as many interceptions but do you honestly think that he's going to be throwing bombs downfield like Winston?  He won't be playing with a lead against terrible offenses. He will be playing from behind against some of the most prolific teams in the league. Assuming that it will be business as usual for Brady is about as smart as assuming that they will make the Superbowl.

 

Anyway agree to disagree and time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seoulofstone said:

 

  To be honest I never once said I was comparing Arians to Kitchens or Winston to Brady. That was entirely you. What I am comparing is two teams that both haven't been to the playoffs in over ten years both making flashy pickups and being predicted to do great things as a consequence. What they have In common is an exceedingly long period of terrible underachievement. That was what I was alluding to 

 It's great that you're a Brady fanboy and that you think he's so great that they will not only reach the playoffs but make the big game. I can see how years of watching him obliterate an abysmal AFCE particularly the Bills would make you that much in awe of him but he may find that especially the Falcons and Saints won't just roll over for him.

Your stats are correct but it hasn't helped Tampa in the past. You're dead right that Brady won't throw as many interceptions but do you honestly think that he's going to be throwing bombs downfield like Winston?  He won't be playing with a lead against terrible offenses. He will be playing from behind against some of the most prolific teams in the league. Assuming that it will be business as usual for Brady is about as smart as assuming that they will make the Superbowl.

 

Anyway agree to disagree and time will tell.

 

 

You did this while ignoring everything else about each team prior to the respective seasons.  So your comparison is doomed no matter what.  It doesn't matter what the Bucs did the previous 10 years.  "Most prolific teams in the league"?   Right...

 

And I'm not picking them to go to the SB, let alone win it (most see them "reach the playoffs", obviously), so you are veering even further off-point as you strain to make a point.  

 

There is no meaningful comparison between the Browns entering 2019 and the Bucs entering 2020.  Quit while you're behind.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, George C said:

Until Allen shows he can connect on all passes, which he has not, he will remain the issue. I’m not drinking the Kool-Aid until I see all of the passes..

Tua? If 100%? Get ready to face a qb who was almost unstoppable. 

 

So you aren't buying Allen unless he completes 100% of his passes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

You did this while ignoring everything else about each team prior to the respective seasons.  So your comparison is doomed no matter what.  It doesn't matter what the Bucs did the previous 10 years.  "Most prolific teams in the league"?   Right...

 

And I'm not picking them to go to the SB, let alone win it (most see them "reach the playoffs", obviously), so you are veering even further off-point as you strain to make a point.  

 

There is no meaningful comparison between the Browns entering 2019 and the Bucs entering 2020.  Quit while you're behind.

 

 

 I love the way you highlight me agreeing that TB are perennial high scorers (which I never contested) to suggest that they have nothing in common.im not comparing QB, HC, coaching or stats. I'm comparing the lazy take on the Browns last year to what were seeing this year with TB.So let me put it in bold too.

 They both haven't made the playoffs in over 10 years and are popular picks to not only end that but progress to the SB going into this season.

 That and my prediction of how this will end is what I'm saying they have in common. I'm sorry that I have to spell it out to you. 

 I will be sure to tag you to remind you when TB crash and burn.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seoul, I’m not going to beat on you.  You’re saying the Bucs haven’t made the playoffs in 10 years.  You’re absolutely right.  The Bills didn’t make the playoffs in 17 years.  Did that keep them in 17 from making it, and again in 19, and most likely again in 20?  The Bucs increased their defense significantly last year in the second half of the year when Bowles defense started to take hold.  Their front 7 was good.  Their back end sucked in the beginning, but came on i the last half of the year.  Granted I keep up as I live here now, even though raised on South Park Ave.  Their offense was lacking only one thing.  A rushing game.  They just added Fournette.  People hate Brady, but he had no one around him.  He has basically the best weapons in the NFL Now between the WR’s, TE’s, and a RB.  The defense added another round of secondary with our son Winfield of a great CB for us.

 

Im not saying SB, but enough on the Tampa hating just because Brady beat us like a girl you asked out in high school five times and she kept saying no.  No doubt he can be a cry baby.  That doesn’t mean they are not going to have a good team.  You’ll se so no worries arguing about it.  
 

There is one thing for sure.  The Bills will contend with the Ravens, Chiefs, Steelers, and Titans in the playoffs.  After that who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iinii said:

 And New England has had their foot on a lot of necks for a while now. 

 

 

 

That was really a reference to the dominance Brady held over the AFCE. It's not a given that he will be dominant in a new division. Like I said to Mr Weo wasn't going for apples to apples. Yes Arians is better than Kitchens but it's a low bar. Arians wasn't able to fix Winston. Don't agree about Brady. He represents the opposite of the deep ball game that Tampa have run. Brady will find himself under pressure to put points on the board without a great D to keep the other team in check. The Godwin connection will be great but he will be behind a shaky line and every game will be a dogfight in the NFC South. If things start going south  it will be fun watching Brady scowl on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

Seoul, I’m not going to beat on you.  You’re saying the Bucs haven’t made the playoffs in 10 years.  You’re absolutely right.  The Bills didn’t make the playoffs in 17 years.  Did that keep them in 17 from making it, and again in 19, and most likely again in 20?  The Bucs increased their defense significantly last year in the second half of the year when Bowles defense started to take hold.  Their front 7 was good.  Their back end sucked in the beginning, but came on i the last half of the year.  Granted I keep up as I live here now, even though raised on South Park Ave.  Their offense was lacking only one thing.  A rushing game.  They just added Fournette.  People hate Brady, but he had no one around him.  He has basically the best weapons in the NFL Now between the WR’s, TE’s, and a RB.  The defense added another round of secondary with our son Winfield of a great CB for us.

 

Im not saying SB, but enough on the Tampa hating just because Brady beat us like a girl you asked out in high school five times and she kept saying no.  No doubt he can be a cry baby.  That doesn’t mean they are not going to have a good team.  You’ll se so no worries arguing about it.  
 

There is one thing for sure.  The Bills will contend with the Ravens, Chiefs, Steelers, and Titans in the playoffs.  After that who knows.

 

 Thanks MGK. I live in Carolina so I watch a lot of NFC south. I agree with you that these runs come to an end and it doesn't surprise me at all that Tampa fans feel optimistic- so they should 

 

 I feel like my point here was misrepresented.   

 

Previous TB high scoring isn't a given to continue because Brady isn't a pure deep ball guy. If there's one thing we know it's that his bread and butter is that he's dink and dunk. Agree that Fournette will help their run game and balance. Ideal if they're ahead, a non factor if behind. But even if successful that in itself should lead to less points as they slow the game down. Their run D impressed me Via finally came good it will be interesting to see if he can sustain which he hasn't yet, but I don't see Shaq Barrett coming close to what he did last year. Their secondary is bad and their schedule will be tougher this year with higher expectations. I don't hate TB but I think it's too easy to join the dots and forget about the great rosters and sustained success of NO and ATL. Even CAR have dangerous individuals.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Seoulofstone said:

 

Is stability a useful quality when your organisation has underachieved for years? You're right that at that level they are nothing like the Browns but I really wasn't comparing organizational competency.

 

More the fact that they are serial disappointments who have made notable signings to add to some blue chip players already there. Just like the Browns last year they are being over hyped Their D is NOT solid. They had a guy who had a sensational once in a lifetime sack number. They were a top team against the run. But their pass D was among the worst. Bad enough to be nowhere near the playoffs despite record offensive output 

 

Now people are saying superbowl and that's a hell of an assumption.

As a bills fan I'm going to say yes to this one.

 

Their pass defense was among the worst? At what, starting field position? They had the most attempts against and still didn't do badly, especially when the stats are averaged in to the attempts. Seems like they could use a safety, but I don't know their team very well. We've seen the same thing here - if a team doesn't need to pass against you your pass d looks great, and the same can be said for the run d. What that D will be able to count on is a lot of rest and to be on the field closer to 900 snaps instead of over 1000.

 

If you think TB will flame out at 6-10 you might as well bet their games this year and make some real money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Sustained success of ATL? They’ve been a disappointing team for 2 years in a row now. 

There’s no rule that you have to make the playoffs a few years first before going straight to the SB....

 

 They had a horrific start then finished with a long winning streak that saved Quinn's job. 2017 they beat the Rams before falling narrowly to the SB winners. A year prior to that they were leading by 20 in the SB.  (Thanks Scott law for the fact check). They have been contenders in recent years.

 

 It's true that TB can make the playoffs. But NO and ATL shouldn't be disrespected. CAR are more than capable of outscoring TB too. Just my opinion.

 

Edited by Seoulofstone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

As a bills fan I'm going to say yes to this one.

 

This is an interesting one to me. You refer of course to McD and Beane and what we're beginning to see bear fruit at Buffalo.

 

So where I will agree with you is that stability is what every franchise should want. My question is would McB have been here if they hadn't achieved success on the field? 2 visits to playoffs in 3 years is what has given them legitimacy while they dismantled things. Even then I've seen people criticise them on these boards and pan them as incompetent for specific moves and shortcomings.

 

Having stability in a perennial loser should on the other hand be a red flag. Arians got his legitimacy from previous jobs that's why he was given more time.

 

The Interesting thing will be if they entirely remake their O to fit Brady. For me you don't just plug in Brady to this team without completely changing the way they play. That's the opposite of continuity 

 

14 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

They’ve gone 7-9 two years in a row. 

 

You're right. I stand corrected.

Edited by Seoulofstone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miami is a team on the rise right now. Yes, they are trotting out Ryan Fitzpatrick to start the season, but we all know he can win 6-7 games before the wheels fall off. By then, Tua could be ready to take over. They have what it takes to pull off a winning record, at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seoulofstone said:

 

This is an interesting one to me. You refer of course to McD and Beane and what we're beginning to see bear fruit at Buffalo.

 

So where I will agree with you is that stability is what every franchise should want. My question is would McB have been here if they hadn't achieved success on the field? 2 visits to playoffs in 3 years is what has given them legitimacy while they dismantled things. Even then I've seen people criticise them on these boards and pan them as incompetent.

 

Having stability in a perennial loser should on the other hand be a red flag. Arians got his legitimacy from previous jobs that's why he was given more time.

 

The Interesting thing will be if they entirely remake their O to fit Brady. For me you don't just plug in Brady to this team without completely changing the way they play. That's the opposite of continuity 

 

According to reports I've read, they are merging their offenses. I'm guessing that Peyton Manning ran a lot of the stuff he was used to in Den and the same will apply here. 

 

As far as McBeane, they are here because of what they did with what they had. Not only can McDermott get his players to play above their talent level, but Beane can spot both pro and college talent. And as you said, that is while dismantling things. Really the only question now is if Josh will continue to improve enough (for me over the next two years) to move into the franchise qb floor. I will say McBeane have rolled out the red carpet for him and if he can't, I think they will be able to find someone else to do it.

 

With BA it's kind of funny that Brady is there, it's like a rebound girlfriend for him. Bastard Billy and Arians are opposite ends of the spectrum so it will be interesting how long that "new relationship" vibe will last, but with that talent Brady should be able to get more than a few wins this year. I don't know about a Super Bowl, but I think they should go deep into the playoffs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...