Jump to content

Which of these do we need to retire first?


Cliche  

214 members have voted

  1. 1. Which needs to go more?



Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Now that we have reached peak offseason it feels like a good time for some spring cleaning. Which of these 2 gets voted off the island first? While they both need to go, let’s see which one TBD finds more annoying.

I am partial t McBeane ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Logic said:


How did this even get to be a way of describing a hard working player? 

What is it about consistently bringing lunch to work that equates to work ethic?

Isn't it equally possible that an extremely lazy player would still bring food for himself to eat every day?

I just don't get it.

It is a long standing characteristic of a "blue collar worker" who by that very description is in reference to a hard worker.

A worker who is more driven and steady than skilled and carries the day because he never gives up. He just keeps on keeping on like the energizer bunny. He does not have the skills to be promoted or move up to a higher position in his field and just eats lunch day after day after day.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cba fan said:

It is a long standing characteristic of a "blue collar worker" who by that very description is in reference to a hard worker.

A worker who is more driven and steady than skilled and carries the day because he never gives up. He just keeps on keeping on like the energizer bunny. He does not have the skills to be promoted or move up to a higher position in his field and just eats lunch day after day after day.

I've never been a tradesman, but I've always wondered if they actually stuff their lunch in a "pail." If not, this whole lunchpail analogy is a big fat con!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

I've never been a tradesman, but I've always wondered if they actually stuff their lunch in a "pail." If not, this whole lunchpail analogy is a big fat con!

 

Think of a hard working 4th grader. And Spider Man! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

I've never been a tradesman, but I've always wondered if they actually stuff their lunch in a "pail." If not, this whole lunchpail analogy is a big fat con!

This is a lunch pail. And yes it was and is still a thing. Was actually a pail back in the day.

 

 

lunch pail.jpg

old lunch pail.jpg

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

I’m fine with both.  I am, however, in favor of retiring “quick first step,” “lunch pail guy,” and “high motor.”

Gym rat? sneaky athleticism? plays faster than his tape? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

I’m fine with both.  I am, however, in favor of retiring “quick first step,” “lunch pail guy,” and “high motor.”

 

I feel the same about “giving 110%”

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I wasn’t going to add it because it is used about 5% as often as the other 2. They are all terrible and lazy though.

Didn't trust the process actually come from Flicky McBean?  Unlike the other two, fans did not originate trustworthy processes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might need to be changed to "blindly trust the process".   They have never laid out the process for any of us to believe in.   

 

Whatever they do we take it as pre planned and call it "the process".   Processes are documented before execution and communicated to create what is called mobilized commitment.       

 

This doesn't mean they don't have a process planned.  You just can't ask people to believe in something they don't have any knowledge of.   

 

Maybe "trust us" or "trust the path" would be a better tagline. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bill from NYC said:

Process all the way. It is embarrassing how he plagiarized that from Nick Saban, who has the championships to back up his call for a "process."

So, he shouldn't borrow a philosophical position on how to run a team from the most successful college coach of all time?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ColeB said:

 

I feel the same about “giving 110%”

 

When Madden was on MNF, I remember him talking about a player who had a 4.4 GPA in college. He said it was because the kid took graduate classes as an undergrad, so they counted as more. I was thinking, "Come on, John ... say it: he gave 110%." The one time it would have been correct, and he didn't say it.

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, WhoTom said:

 

When Madden was on MNF, I remember him talking about a player who had a 4.4 GPA in college. He said it was because the kid took graduate classes as an undergrad, so they counted as more. I was thinking, "Come on, John ... say it: he gave 110%." The one time it would have been correct, and he didn't say it.

 

Madden was maddening 

 

Helmet speakers ....  To increase the volume they changed the "attenuation" which would get the QB's attention to improve or some such silliness 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TigerJ said:

So, he shouldn't borrow a philosophical position on how to run a team from the most successful college coach of all time?

No you shouldn't.

 

college and NFL is apples to oranges in regard to championships.

 

In the past champions were "voted" in.

since beginning of time all the best top players go to the same 5 programs. Just like Duke in basketball.

if you can not have success getting all the top athletes in your sport every year like these top programs get then you are not a good coach. Or even average.

 

Patriots would win every Super Bowl into infinity if they got the top 10 drafted players every year and top 5 free agents every year like Alabama effectively does.

Edited by cba fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cba fan said:

No you shouldn't.

 

college and NFL is apples to oranges in regard to championships.

 

In the past champions were "voted" in.

since beginning of time all the best top players go to the same 5 programs. Just like Duke in basketball.

if you can not have success getting all the top athletes in your sport every year like these top programs get then you are not a good coach. Or even average.

 

Patriots would win every Super Bowl into infinity if they got the top 10 drafted players every year and top 5 free agents every year like Alabama effectively does.

The flip side to that is that the college coaching job is a combination of coaching and GM. The overall “program” isn’t much different from the NFL. The NFL has taken a big page from college recently in terms of “recruiting (hence the new facility). You need to create an environment that maximizes the player’s value and satisfaction. The Bills signed the most FA (I think) and NO ONE would argue that it’s a prime FA destination. It’s the infrastructure in place that allows them to attract guys that the Bengals can’t. Alabama couldn’t recruit with David Shula, Notre Dame with Bob Davies, the Bills with Modrak/Guy, UM with Brady Hoke, and now you are seeing it at USC. It isn’t that different. 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I’m removing “McClappy” from the poll. It isn’t used anywhere near as often as the other 2 and is kind of an “easy out” because it’s meant to be insulting. Which saying that people use (that sucks) needs to go? It is Process vs. McBeane

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

This poll is the closet race ever.  I think we need a state no one wants to live in to decide it (I kid!). 

We have a couple of evenly matched candidates that no one wants to win. It’s the 2016 election all over...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, jeremy2020 said:

"Chip on their shoulder"

My father has ALWAYS been the guy with a chip on his shoulder just daring you to knock it off, cuz he will kick you and your three buddies asses if you do (so the legend goes).

 

So, it is a good cliche, but definately over used and inappropriate for most.

 

Pops is 69 and lives with me now so I have heard the tales 2000 times lol. Angry SOB wanted to throw down with some young bucks over his fishing spot last weekend!

Edited by BUFFALOKIE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, blacklabel said:

 

Yeah, I'm a fan of McBeane, it's a combination of the two dudes running this team. Easier than always saying, "Beane and McDermott."

That’s what I hate about it. They have different jobs!! We don’t refer to Josh Allen and Jerry Hughes as “Hallen.” 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, without a drought said:

I hope everyone realizes that McBeane is not a cliche. It takes a little more than something just said too often.

 

Might as well remove that one from the poll also.

Or just change the title to, “which of these is worse?” That will hopefully appease the grammar police. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind trust the process because I trust the process.  I don't mind McBeane because I like having a GM & HC working together to make us a contender for the first time in 20 years.  McBeane is also good for not getting sucked into arguments over which of McDermott or Beane was directly responsible for this or that.  Was Ed Oliver McDermott's guy, or Beane's guy?  In truth, he was McBeane's.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Buffalo86 said:

I don't mind trust the process because I trust the process.  I don't mind McBeane because I like having a GM & HC working together to make us a contender for the first time in 20 years.  McBeane is also good for not getting sucked into arguments over which of McDermott or Beane was directly responsible for this or that.  Was Ed Oliver McDermott's guy, or Beane's guy?  In truth, he was McBeane's.

 

This is where we are in 100% disagreement. The scouting staff prepares the reports. The personnel department analyzes the players and the GM picks the guy that they want. The Bills are certainly collaborative but personnel decisions are made by Beane’s team. Joe Schoen and Dan Morgan ABSOLUTELY have a bigger say in that room than McDermott. That’s always the case. They aren’t interchangeable despite their collaboration.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, without a drought said:

Who said anything about grammar?

“Grammar Police” has commonly been used around here to refer to those taking issue with something other than the topic. You took issue with “cliche” applying to McBeane. One of the definitions of “cliche” is “something that has become overly familiar or commonplace.” I would say that McBeane, especially in these parts, would meet that definition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/7/2019 at 2:47 PM, Kirby Jackson said:

Now that we have reached peak offseason it feels like a good time for some spring cleaning. Which of these 2 gets voted off the island first? While they both need to go, let’s see which one TBD finds more annoying.

 

Oh yeah? Well the Cliche store called and they want to retire YOU!

 

I'll be using both through the rest of this season. I Trust McBeane's Process!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

“Grammar Police” has commonly been used around here to refer to those taking issue with something other than the topic. You took issue with “cliche” applying to McBeane. One of the definitions of “cliche” is “something that has become overly familiar or commonplace.” I would say that McBeane, especially in these parts, would meet that definition. 

So grammar police is a cliche?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...