Jump to content

Prediction: Nathan Peterman Bills Starting QB Wk. 1 vs. Ravens


Recommended Posts

Ive changed my mind a few times over the past month, but I think they go with Peterman Week 1..

 

Im not down on Allen at all, and think that his play his preseason has been above my expectations, but I don't see what putting him out there to cop a beating for the first month or so will achieve...

 

Hopefully the OL looks a bit better around Week 7 or so and you can bring him in then for the rest of the year...

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

Ive changed my mind a few times over the past month, but I think they go with Peterman Week 1..

 

Im not down on Allen at all, and think that his play his preseason has been above my expectations, but I don't see what putting him out there to cop a beating for the first month or so will achieve...

 

Hopefully the OL looks a bit better around Week 7 or so and you can bring him in then for the rest of the year...

 

Mostly agree but i do not think this line will improve in the pass blocking. I think we have a bunch of maulers who love smashing a defensive player but who can not back pedal and plant properly. I fear for a qb who can get get to the line of scrimmage and decide where ball is going before snap 90% of time. Peterman is right now a better fit for the talent on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

Ive changed my mind a few times over the past month, but I think they go with Peterman Week 1..

 

Im not down on Allen at all, and think that his play his preseason has been above my expectations, but I don't see what putting him out there to cop a beating for the first month or so will achieve...

 

Hopefully the OL looks a bit better around Week 7 or so and you can bring him in then for the rest of the year...

 

 

How many 1st team defenses has Peterman seen so far ? 

 

Even Tom Brady would've been crushed behind that pathetic excuse for an OL today. 

 

With that being said, I'm in favor of either McCarron or Peterman in Game 1. Allen needs a year or maybe more. 

 

McDermott is lucky Allen didn't get a concussion on that one play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First time opening this thread as well.  Wouldn't have anticipated the McCarron injury.

 

Anyway I'd start Peterman and just let him chuck it all over the place.  I figure even if he throws 5 INT's again he's not the future here.  Really don't want to see Allen's confidence shot and or take beatings like today.  Like it or not he's a valuable asset to protect

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Another Fan said:

First time opening this thread as well.  Wouldn't have anticipated the McCarron injury.

 

Anyway I'd start Peterman and just let him chuck it all over the place.  I figure even if he throws 5 INT's again he's not the future here.  Really don't want to see Allen's confidence shot and or take beatings like today.  Like it or not he's a valuable asset to protect

 

i think whoever we put in should NOT be throwing it all over the yard. Establish the run game and play ball control.  Let the D do it's thing and capitalize on TOs.  I believe that to be the process.

 

I partially blame the coaches for the Nasty Nate Chargers debacle. Bring a rookie QB in on the road against a strong pass rush and have him throw it all over the yard. Especially after the 3 play all run play drive to put us back in the lead.

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nathan Peterman is super impressive. He put in the work. He earned it. I was wrong as well in the "Get Ready for the Peterman Era" thread. Josh Allen will have to sit down and watch Nasty Nate light it up. Sucks for Josh Allen fans.

Edited by Buffalo Ballin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

Nathan Peterman is super impressive. He put in the work. He earned it. I was wrong as well in the "Get Ready for the Peterman Era" thread. Josh Allen will have to sit down and watch Nasty Nate light it up. Sucks for Josh Allen fans.

 

Just look at these stats. These guys are gonna light it up too: National Football League Stats - by Player Category | NFL.com  ;)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Just look at these stats. These guys are gonna light it up too: National Football League Stats - by Player Category | NFL.com  ;)

Josh Allen is at number 50 when sorted by total yards at the moment. Doesn't look good right now for him. Allen can still start though. You have the video game called "Madden" anywhere? You can start him there.

 

I sort by, AS OF RIGHT NOW,  total yards, QB rating, total completions, touchdowns, and completion percentage and Nasty Nate is on the top 10 for all of those categories. Super impressive.

Edited by Buffalo Ballin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

Josh Allen is at number 50 when sorted by total yards at the moment. Doesn't look good right now for him. Allen can still start though. You have the video game called "Madden" anywhere? You can start him there.

 

I sort by, AS OF RIGHT NOW,  total yards, QB rating, total completions, touchdowns, and completion percentage and Nasty Nate is on the top 10 for all of those categories. Super impressive.

 

:lol: at basing anything on preseason stats.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, major said:

Time to admit I was wrong- for all my peterman jabs over the past few months. He deserves to start week one and I hope he does well the entire season 

props to you my man. ....although i'm willing to bet you're the only one with the stones to fan up and admit it.

6 hours ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

Nathan Peterman is super impressive. He put in the work. He earned it. I was wrong as well in the "Get Ready for the Peterman Era" thread. Josh Allen will have to sit down and watch Nasty Nate light it up. Sucks for Josh Allen fans.

i stand corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, billsredneck1 said:

props to you my man. ....although i'm willing to bet you're the only one with the stones to fan up and admit it.

i stand corrected.

 

So what happens if Peterman starts next week and gets decimated behind this sad line?

Asking for a friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

So what happens if Peterman starts next week and gets decimated behind this sad line?

Asking for a friend.

assuming you mean against the ravens....well he's the guy who gets the ball out in 2 seconds or less,  so hopefully we have a shot.  even if he gets k.o.'d,

we would have to throw a.j. in.  i do not want to see allen taking a beating.

 

on the flipside...what if he gets a w in balt. and then puts on a clinic at home and beats LA?  that would be frigging awesome....

Edited by billsredneck1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, billsredneck1 said:

assuming you mean against the ravens....well he's the guy who gets the ball out in 2 seconds or less,  so hopefully we have a shot.  even if he gets k.o.'d,

we would have to throw a.j. in.  i do not want to see allen taking a beating.

 

on the flipside...what if he gets a w in balt. and then puts on a clinic at home and beats LA?  that would be frigging awesome....

 

No.

I actually did mean next week.

The next preseason game.

We still have anything to game to play 

Why would you assume I meant against the Ravens?

Whomever starts behind this sack of sh*t line is going to get murdered.

Allen didn't even have 2 seconds to get the ball off most of the plays.

 

(For the record I have said this repeatedly that I think np should start the season, since I don't want Allen to get annihilated against those dlines early on, but I refuse to act like I think np is a better QB than Allen)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hemma said:

I think Peterman has earned the start, but with that OL, it won't mean very much.

Unless the OL tightens up, we'll go through a long list of QBs this year.

To be fair, Peterman played behind this same O-line when he was with the 1's and didn't take a beating. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hemma said:

I think Peterman has earned the start, but with that OL, it won't mean very much.

Unless the OL tightens up, we'll go through a long list of QBs this year.

QB makes such a big difference in pass protection. Even if the OL gets beat its nearly impossible to sack the QB if the ball is thrown on time.

Edited by TheTruthHurts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

No.

I actually did mean next week.

The next preseason game.

We still have anything to game to play 

Why would you assume I meant against the Ravens?

Whomever starts behind this sack of sh*t line is going to get murdered.

Allen didn't even have 2 seconds to get the ball off most of the plays.

 

(For the record I have said this repeatedly that I think np should start the season, since I don't want Allen to get annihilated against those dlines early on, but I refuse to act like I think np is a better QB than Allen)

sorry, thought you meant baltimore.  i hope they have made the week one starter decision already. i think they have and if not, that means they can't properly game plan.

i have no idea why they would wait til after this last game to decide. what could they possibly learn playing guys that are gonna be cut by chicago?

if this truly was a competition, nate has won the job hands down and no one can out perform in one game what he's done in 3.

 

as far as thursday goes, (again i hope they name nate the starter prior to thurs.), i would start allen and finish with a.j. 

 

fwiw i wasn't trying to throw any snark when i quoted you before.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

:lol: at basing anything on preseason stats.

gotta give it to ya, you're consistent.  you've been bashing nate for months...he won't ever play in the nfl again....he won't make the team.....he'll never start another game....

 

welp, here he is...and most likely gonna see time starting...and possibly winning. you can't deny the need we have for a qb who can get the ball out in under 2 seconds...or complete 6 or 7 straight passes on scoring drives. i don't know how you can carry such a grudge against a guy who has proven you (consistently) wrong at every turn so far. even tranny has backed off a bit.

 

 now i'm gonna wish i hadn't responded to your post because i know what's coming.

Edited by billsredneck1
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, billsredneck1 said:

gotta give it to ya, you're consistent.  you've been bashing nate for months...he won't ever play in the nfl again....he won't make the team.....he'll never start another game....

 

welp, here he is...and most likely gonna see time starting...and possibly winning. you can't deny the need we have for a qb who can get the ball out in under 2 seconds...or complete 6 or 7 straight passes on scoring drives. i don't know how you can carry such a grudge against a guy who has proven you (consistently) wrong at every turn so far. even tranny has backed off a bit.

 

 now i'm gonna wish i hadn't responded to your post because i know what's coming.

 

Bashing? I don't think he's a long term solution as the Bills' starter and I haven't seen anything from him to convince me otherwise.  

 

Let him perform in the regular season against 1st team defenses vs. complex coverage and pass rush schemes that game plan against his weaknesses and he'll convince me.  You people who think he's shown anything worth banking on in preseason action make me laugh.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Bashing? I don't think he's a long term solution as the Bills' starter and I haven't seen anything from him to convince me otherwise.  

 

Let him perform in the regular season against 1st team defenses vs. complex coverage and pass rush schemes that game plan against his weaknesses and he'll convince me.  You people who think he's shown anything worth banking on preseason action make me laugh.

 

I don't know what's meant by "banking on", but if you look at Peterman's performance this preseason vs last preseason, IMO there's no question he's improved.

Whether that improvement will translate into the regular season or persist once teams have a few games of tape in Daboll's offense to pick apart, remains to be seen.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I don't know what's meant by "banking on", but if you look at Peterman's performance this preseason vs last preseason, IMO there's no question he's improved.

Whether that improvement will translate into the regular season or persist once teams have a few games of tape in Daboll's offense to pick apart, remains to be seen.

 

Exactly to the point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joesixpack said:

Happy hundredth page!!!

 

b36fa3aa1e346bbd736beba08c713cbb.jpg

1 hour ago, billsredneck1 said:

gotta give it to ya, you're consistent.  you've been bashing nate for months...he won't ever play in the nfl again....he won't make the team.....he'll never start another game....

 

welp, here he is...and most likely gonna see time starting...and possibly winning. you can't deny the need we have for a qb who can get the ball out in under 2 seconds...or complete 6 or 7 straight passes on scoring drives. i don't know how you can carry such a grudge against a guy who has proven you (consistently) wrong at every turn so far. even tranny has backed off a bit.

 

 now i'm gonna wish i hadn't responded to your post because i know what's coming.

16 months to be more precise 

 

Lovingly,

Mrs Peterman 

1 hour ago, billsredneck1 said:

gotta give it to ya, you're consistent.  you've been bashing nate for months...he won't ever play in the nfl again....he won't make the team.....he'll never start another game....

 

welp, here he is...and most likely gonna see time starting...and possibly winning. you can't deny the need we have for a qb who can get the ball out in under 2 seconds...or complete 6 or 7 straight passes on scoring drives. i don't know how you can carry such a grudge against a guy who has proven you (consistently) wrong at every turn so far. even tranny has backed off a bit.

 

 now i'm gonna wish i hadn't responded to your post because i know what's coming.

mind boggling it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Peterman will set an unbreakable career record for pick sixes per attempt.  

 

The one pass he can't make is a curl or out to the far right sideline. I think he completed a deep out to the left to Kerley yesterday. And his pass to Reilly over the middle in between 3 defenders had plenty of zip on it. They just need to take out that one play to the right.

48 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said:

 

 

Yep that's what Allen needs work on. His internal clock is a half second too slow which is an eternity in the NFL. And there's no way his internal clock gets fixed playing behind this offensive line.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Yes, when the opposing team is up 4 scores and empties their bench, Peterman is the perfect choice to mop up the blood.  Maybe a few garbage time scores.

Yes, Nate shined against the 2's just like Josh shined against the 2's last week.   

 

You sir, are better than that. (or at least you used to be) 

 

We're DOOMED 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...