Jump to content

Patrick DiMarco - stay or go?


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

Patrick DiMarco was signed early in FA last year and I think it was more as a piece for Dennison’s scheme than anything given the way he used the FB. He was a decent blocker,  but I don’t see the value in his contract and with the change in OC his usage could be even lower than it was last year. I wonder if he’s a cut candidate or a trade chip? He’s signed through 2021 but there is a potential out for 2018 where he’s only 1.5 in dead cap

 

also he is useless as a runner or a receiver. Or on onside kicks. :censored:

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/patrick-dimarco-11222/

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I realize the value of signing with the best full-backs in the league because you're getting one of the best at the position for a relatively cheap price. Even the best kickers and punters in the league are not as cheap as the best full-backs

 

But when our new scheme I don't know if he has value that we need, ditch him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

Normally I realize the value of signing with the best full-backs in the league because you're getting one of the best at the position for a relatively cheap price. Even the best kickers and punters in the league are not as cheap as the best full-backs

 

But when our new scheme I don't know if he has value that we need, ditch him

I don’t know if he has value either because o don’t really know what Daboll wants to do. Even if he does use one, I have to think it could be done with someone who can actually be a RB or catch the ball too if called upon.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Patrick DiMarco was signed early in FA last year and I think it was more as a piece for Dennison’s scheme than anything given the way he used the FB. He was a decent blocker,  but I don’t see the value in his contract and with the change in OC his usage could be even lower than it was last year. I wonder if he’s a cut candidate or a trade chip? He’s signed through 2021 but there is a potential out for 2018 where he’s only 1.5 in dead cap

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/patrick-dimarco-11222/

That was the odd thing with him. They brought him in and paid him well, then under used him IMO. There were stretches of the season I literally forgot he was on the team.

 

If he's going to be used I have no issue keeping him, as you said he is a good blocker. But I still wish we would have ended up with Kyle Jusczcyk last year.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, YoloinOhio said:

I don’t know if he has value either because o don’t really know what Daboll wants to do. Even if he does use one, I have to think it could be done with someone who can actually be a RB or catch the ball too if called upon.

Which is why Tolbert may be here in 2018. He is not great but can do a fairly well balanced routine. Carry, catch, block, special teams.

 

If we do get rid of McCoy than DiMarco is worth keeping. Veteran leadership and worth having.

 

Of course, I'd always prefer the extra OL than a FB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KelsaysLunchbox said:

That was the odd thing with him. They brought him in and paid him well, then under used him IMO. There were stretches of the season I literally forgot he was on the team.

 

If he's going to be used I have no issue keeping him, as you said he is a good blocker. But I still wish we would have ended up with Kyle Jusczcyk last year.

They wanted Jusczyck initially and then SF backed up the brinks truck. I find it interesting that DiMarco’s contract has the out this year.i have a feeling McD hired Dennison thinking it was a 1 year trial run and this guy was a scheme fit who they didn’t know if they would need past 2017.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather eliminate the FB spot all together.  If you want a lead blocker on goal line play then use another offensive lineman that has movement skills.  Don't waste it on this guy.  I'd rather use that roster spot somewhere else.  A big back would be needed still for a more balanced run game but I don't see the need for a FB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo30 said:

I'd rather eliminate the FB spot all together.  If you want a lead blocker on goal line play then use another offensive lineman that has movement skills.  Don't waste it on this guy.  I'd rather use that roster spot somewhere else.  A big back would be needed still for a more balanced run game but I don't see the need for a FB.  

They may do that. No idea if Daboll uses one. Most teams don’t so i am guessing he doesn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

They may do that. No idea if Daboll uses one. Most teams don’t so i am guessing he doesn’t.

I just think the plan is to fix this running game and get a really big back to play off of Mccoy.  I don't see a need to have a FB on this team.  We have athletic lineman that can pull if they want to give the back a lead blocker. I'd rather use the roster spot for depth elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo30 said:

I just think the plan is to fix this running game and get a really big back to play off of Mccoy.  I don't see a need to have a FB on this team.  We have athletic lineman that can pull if they want to give the back a lead blocker. I'd rather use the roster spot for depth elsewhere.

Same here. I want a nice stable of RBs. Shady, sign a vet and draft a guy.  Keep Cadet too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I don’t know if he has value either because o don’t really know what Daboll wants to do. Even if he does use one, I have to think it could be done with someone who can actually be a RB or catch the ball too if called upon.

 

Yeah, I think that's the key point.  When DiMarco was in, you knew he was in to block.  Even he was surprised when a ball was thrown to him. 

I was surprised to see that he scored as having 7 receptions, but at a couple of key points, he certainly didn't catch it or put it out of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Patrick DiMarco was signed early in FA last year and I think it was more as a piece for Dennison’s scheme than anything given the way he used the FB. He was a decent blocker,  but I don’t see the value in his contract and with the change in OC his usage could be even lower than it was last year. I wonder if he’s a cut candidate or a trade chip? He’s signed through 2021 but there is a potential out for 2018 where he’s only 1.5 in dead cap

 

also he is useless as a runner or a receiver. Or on onside kicks. :censored:

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/patrick-dimarco-11222/

When do tryouts begin for next Summer Olympics volleyball? That is where he should be.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Da webster guy said:

If he caught that Peterman pass that hit him right square on this stone hands, that whole game might have gone differently.

 

Still mad about that, I'm holding a grudge.

 

Agreed! He’d have never played for me again. Way to support the rookie QB in his first start. Garbage 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I  think DiMarco is back. He played for Daboll for one season in Kansas City early in his career, so he will be familiar with what Daboll is going to do.

 

Over the years Daboll has used a true fullback like Lawrence Vickers and DiMarco and also made use of H back types like Charles Clay and Lex Hilliard in Miami. He also had Peyton Hillis in Cleveland and in KC. If you look at New England they pretty much always have a fullback on the roster. I see DiMarco, Clay, and O'Leary all being really good fits for what Daboll will want to do. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I  think DiMarco is back. He played for Daboll for one season in Kansas City early in his career, so he will be familiar with what Daboll is going to do.

 

Over the years Daboll has used a true fullback like Lawrence Vickers and DiMarco and also made use of H back types like Charles Clay and Lex Hilliard in Miami. He also had Peyton Hillis in Cleveland and in KC. If you look at New England they pretty much always have a fullback on the roster. I see DiMarco, Clay, and O'Leary all being really good fits for what Daboll will want to do. 

Interesting 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehhh. It's not like we get all that much cap space for cutting him and it's not like he has a roster bonus. I think it's worth keeping him around at least through the draft/UDFA. If we get a better UDFA to take his spot, great, but I'd rather not worry about yet another empty roster spot.

3 hours ago, Houston's #1 Bills Fan said:

Single-handedly ruined Peterman's start at QB by letting that pass go through his hands for interception #1. That destroyed Peterman and his future as a starter.

 

Theoretically, of course.....

 

It's ok, nate had four more changes to blow away :D 

Edited by WhitewalkerInPhilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, artmalibu said:

When will it stop!!! 

 

His cap hit is 2 mil and dead cap is 1.5 mil...  

League minimum for 2018 is 

 

drum roll please.......

 

$480,000    

 

So save 20,000 against the cap....

 

 

 

 

 

It’s really more about the roster spot given his position and performance. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...