Jump to content

NFL believes it’s 12-24 months away from a return to L.A.


The Dean

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/05/nfl-believes-its-12-24-months-away-from-a-return-to-l-a/

 

We've certainly heard this before. But just because it wasn't true in the past doesn't necessarily mean it won't be true this time. Still, I believe it when it actually happens.

 

But that's not why I started this thread. I'm more interested in this:

 

 

Per a league source, the current plan is that the NFL will send one or two teams back to Los Angeles within the next 12 to 24 months.

 

 

What the hell does that mean? I know the NFL is very powerful, and has the ability to influence decisions, but can they "send one or two teams" anywhere? Since when does the NFL decide where franchises will play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oakland is the clear choice and should have never left, St Louis is another and maybe San Diego.

 

It would be stupid to have two teams there when they will have trouble even supporting one.

Edited by Max997
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to happen until they have a viable stadium plan and right now they do not have a viable stadium plan. The NFL does this every once in awhile IMO to keep the idea alive so they can use LA against cities to make new stadiums. There really isn't much thirst here for an NFL team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to happen until they have a viable stadium plan and right now they do not have a viable stadium plan. The NFL does this every once in awhile IMO to keep the idea alive so they can use LA against cities to make new stadiums. There really isn't much thirst here for an NFL team.

 

There is exactly no thirst here for one. The NFL or new owner or both will have to foot the bill for a stadium. It won't be public money, that's pretty much a guarantee. If it happens, it would probably be the Rams and Chargers.

Edited by purple haze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to happen until they have a viable stadium plan and right now they do not have a viable stadium plan. The NFL does this every once in awhile IMO to keep the idea alive so they can use LA against cities to make new stadiums. There really isn't much thirst here for an NFL team.

 

Exactly. I really don't think LA is craving an NFL team. And the league is thriving without a team there. Ratings are great without a team in the #2 tv market. This process can, and probably will happen, organically. If they had a stadium ready, they would probably get the Raiders or Chargers eventually. Maybe build a new stadium for the Chargers a but further north. I mean, look at the distance fans from San Francisco have to travel to attend a 49er game.

 

And I agree this is an NFL ploy to ratchet up the pressure in some NFL cities. But can it even be a legitimate threat anymore? I can't believe anyone with any sense believed the Bills were ever in real danger to move there. It's kind of becoming a joke, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been to some games in Jacksonville. Pathetic. Mostly Bills fans and brutally hot. They'd be worth soooo much more in LA, but they'd have to win some games. LA has had their shots and there's a reason they have no team now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in LA for a few years until about nine months ago, and on Sundays, you wouldn't even know it's Football Sunday. There's just so much more going on that it's not the only game in town like many NFL cities. LA can do without a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oakland should be forced to share stadium with the 49ers. It would be insane to ask Oakland taxpayers to build another stadium when they could easily use the one next door.

I agree with this.

 

@NFLonCBS

Football at Dodger Stadium? It could happen if the NFL returns to LA. http://cbsprt.co/1pOcuVO

LOL, Dodger Stadium?

 

Boy, Goodell and the NFL must really be desperate. And I see Goodell is still pushing for a team in London. :thumbdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

LOL, Dodger Stadium?

 

Boy, Goodell and the NFL must really be desperate. And I see Goodell is still pushing for a team in London. :thumbdown:

Not sure how a football configuration would work in Dodger stadium. Probably not great. But Dodger Stadium is one of the coolest stadiums anywhere. Truly iconic and a great experience. The Coliseum and the Rose Bowl are places in LA that suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the League's schedule ever gets expanded to 18 games they could have 2 games every weekend in LA by rotating every franchise in their twice - once as a "home" team, once as a "visitor".

They could make it more interesting by making those matchups neutral site inter-divisional rivalry games. e.g., The Bills host the Cheaters, and visit the JESTS in a rubber match, then the following year they rotate around the division, say by picking up the Fins and dropping Kraft's boys. etc., etc., etc.

 

Never happen though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raiders make all the sense in the world....

 

Still, it seems like this story comes up every couple of years. I wonder if it's for real this time.

 

If the Rams go up for sale I could see Toronto going for them.

I doubt the NFL would allow it. Bon Jovi might want to buy it but he aint moving to the Bills backyard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in LA for a few years until about nne months ago. You wouldn't even know it was a "Football Sunday." There is just so much more going on in LA, unlike many NFL cities, where a game on Sunday is the only thing going on in town. I don't think many people in LA have missed the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...