Jump to content

Salary cap question, Leonard Floyd’s dead cap


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

No

Yikes. So technically whatever we sign him to later you can basically add $4.3 million to it. That would be terrible cap management by Brandon Beane. Doubt they’ll extend him today.

 

Im guessing they won’t be bringing Floyd back. Should’ve extended him.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Tyler Matakevich is on that list. So he accomplishes absolutely nothing being on the roster and now he’s costing us almost a quarter million in cap space for not being on it. The gift that keeps on giving. Bang up job McDermott. Having a need for these useless scrubs to play Special Teams 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess there’s 2 pieces of news in that tweeted chart… Savage, Davenport, Zeitler, Tyron Smith and Mike Evans will all best testing FA if you’re in the market. Think the 4 latter still have decent football left to play. 
 

Savage is a baller and I hope if he isn’t pricing himself out of the situation that we make an attempt to sign him. 

1 minute ago, mrags said:

I see Tyler Matakevich is on that list. So he accomplishes absolutely nothing being on the roster and now he’s costing us almost a quarter million in cap space for not being on it. The gift that keeps on giving. Bang up job McDermott. Having a need for these useless scrubs to play Special Teams 


So important you pay the position when they’re not even there! 🤯

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BBFL said:

Guess there’s 2 pieces of news in that tweeted chart… Savage, Davenport, Zeitler, Tyron Smith and Mike Evans will all best testing FA if you’re in the market. Think the 4 latter still have decent football left to play. 
 

Savage is a baller and I hope if he isn’t pricing himself out of the situation that we make an attempt to sign him. 


So important you pay the position when they’re not even there! 🤯

Apparently 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Virgil said:

I don’t get this.  Didn’t he sign a one year deal?  How is there a cap hit this year?


They split the $7m over two years instead of paying it all in one season. Might have been because they believed he was going to hit the contact incentives built in? I don’t know why they chose to do it that way. Pretty rough either way though as that $4.3m is a decent chunk of change. 
 

 

Edited by BBFL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I understand but (and freely admit I may be wrong) is they had until today to work out a new deal where if they had they 4.3M would have rolled over to his new contract. Being that they didn't it's the same as cutting him due to the contract being voided this the dead cap hit for this season. 

 

 

All in all on that list including Hyde, Settle and others it appears the Bills will be hit with around $12M total dead cap hits today. Very ouch.

Edited by BuffaloBillyG
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BBFL said:


They split the $7m over two years instead of paying it all in one season. Might have been because they believed he was going to hit the contact incentives built in? I don’t know why they chose to do it that way. Pretty rough either way though as that $4.3m is a decent chunk of change. 
 

 


Kicked the can down the road is how I see it…

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Virgil said:

I don’t get this.  Didn’t he sign a one year deal?  How is there a cap hit this year?

1 year, $7M with 3 additional void years. Salary of $1.165M plus a signing bonus of $5.835M. 2023 cap hit of $2,623,750. That’s the salary plus 1/4 of the signing bonus. 2024 dead cap of $4,376,250, which is the remaining 3/4 of the signing bonus. 

 

His contract also had incentives. I believe that he earned an additional $1M which would bring his 2024 dead dead cap up to $5,376,250. 

Edited by BarleyNY
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

The way I understand but (and freely admit I may be wrong) is they had until today to work out a new deal where if they had they 4.3M would have rolled over to his new contract. Being that they didn't it's the same as cutting him due to the contract being voided this the dead cap hit for this season. 

 

 

All in all on that list including Hyde, Settle and others it appears the Bills will be hit with around $12M total dead cap hits today. Very ouch.

Pretty much it, the contract was set up to allow them an extra player they couldn’t afford last year, now you eat it.   It’s a pretty common practice, just kicks the can down the road.  The Bills have to hit re-set here soon and eat ***** for a year or continue to be just good enough to disappoint.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

The way I understand but (and freely admit I may be wrong) is they had until today to work out a new deal where if they had they 4.3M would have rolled over to his new contract. Being that they didn't it's the same as cutting him due to the contract being voided this the dead cap hit for this season. 

 

 

All in all on that list including Hyde, Settle and others it appears the Bills will be hit with around $12M total dead cap hits today. Very ouch.

The $4.3 with Floyd hurts most because he’s actually a player many thought would return. I don’t think the Bills would take on $4 million and then sign him later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

The $4.3 with Floyd hurts most because he’s actually a player many thought would return. I don’t think the Bills would take on $4 million and then sign him later. 

Yes, they would have to account for it. It was money paid so it must hit the cap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BBFL said:


100%. I just don’t know why they’d do it that way. 

Because they thought they were winning a Ship this year. Same with last year and Von. 
 

if he only had a coach worth a chit 

Edited by mrags
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BBFL said:


100%. I just don’t know why they’d do it that way. 

 

They were trying to be competitive in 2023. The Bills had (and still have) a large amount of cap tied up in unproductive defenders. This - and several other contracts - were their work around to mitigate some of that.

 

In general, it is advantageous to kick the can down the road as long as the cap rises. Every cap dollar kicked into a future year is discounted by the percentage the cap has increased. If a team staggers parting ways with high contract players, then they can structure contracts like this indefinitely. Unfortunately the Bills have a logjam of such players. 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BBFL said:


They split the $7m over two years instead of paying it all in one season. Might have been because they believed he was going to hit the contact incentives built in? I don’t know why they chose to do it that way. Pretty rough either way though as that $4.3m is a decent chunk of change. 
 

 

Thanks, very interesting,  didn'tevenknowthis was a thing,  wasn't aware of this, Hyde too 🙄 but at the same time allows Beane to sign guys by manipulating the cap

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did everyone in here think we got a Free Agent DE the caliber of Leonard Floyd on a 1 year deal at just a 1.16m salary, a 1.45m signing bonus, and a 2.6m cap hit? 

 

Every year people look at our cap situation and say there's things we can do to finesse it and make certain signings happen. And in the moment, they don't care what it takes. "Add void years" is a common refrain amongst posters who want to make a deal happen with someone. 

 

But then when we do and those void years come where we're paying for a player who isn't here, now they don't like it. This is why I'm always saying "it's not that simple" when people want to do these things.

 

"Void years" don't void the numbers attached in those years. It's always great in the moment to fit a player in when we don't have room. But the bill always comes due and it's not fun when it does.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Billsflyer12 said:

What exactly are the “cap is not real” people mean when they say that constantly?

 


They mean it as a way of justifying risky and even unwise contract decisions ..

Edited by Aussie Joe
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

The $4.3 with Floyd hurts most because he’s actually a player many thought would return. I don’t think the Bills would take on $4 million and then sign him later. 

I'm pretty sure they did that with Jordan Phillips last year. Wasn't as big of a dead cap hit, maybe half of Floyd IIRC.

53 minutes ago, Sweats said:

Anybody still think Beane is a number wizard?!?

 Never did. Beane isn't the numbers guy. That's Overdorf from what I understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you don’t push too much into the future, it’s smart cap management that every team does.  You get to push current liabilities at today’s prices onto future cap years that are growing 7-10% every year.  It’s borrowing at 0% when you know your salary goes up every year.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Virgil said:

I don’t get this.  Didn’t he sign a one year deal?  How is there a cap hit this year?

It's called a void year.  Yes, we signed him to a one-year deal, but on paper, it was a 2-year deal so that Floyd could get the money he wanted and the Bills could limit the cap hit in 2023.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

As long as you don’t push too much into the future, it’s smart cap management that every team does.  You get to push current liabilities at today’s prices onto future cap years that are growing 7-10% every year.  It’s borrowing at 0% when you know your salary goes up every year.  

It’s a great way to manipulate the cap but there’s no way Beane is re-signing Leonard Floyd. If he does he literally wasted $4.3 million.

 

My guess is Von Miller will get Floyd’s snaps and they will draft depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Billsflyer12 said:

What exactly are the “cap is not real” people mean when they say that constantly?

 

There are always real consequences for cap maneuvering, some just come sooner then later.
 


It’s a similar principle as losing non-conference games helps your playoff odds 😇

Edited by strive_for_five_guy
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

It’s a great way to manipulate the cap but there’s no way Beane is re-signing Leonard Floyd. If he does he literally wasted $4.3 million.

 

My guess is Von Miller will get Floyd’s snaps and they will draft depth. 

Not following that logic.  It’s cap money, not real money.  That $4.3m dead cap is less than 2% of $243m and it doesn’t matter where it came from at this point.  Floyd clearly prefers the 1 year contract thing and if McBeane decides to bring him back the $4.3m dead cap will have no bearing on that decision.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Yikes. So technically whatever we sign him to later you can basically add $4.3 million to it. That would be terrible cap management by Brandon Beane. Doubt they’ll extend him today.

 

Im guessing they won’t be bringing Floyd back. Should’ve extended him.

Whoever we sign will be in addition. It’s simply accounting for bonus money paid last year. 

1 hour ago, BarleyNY said:

 

They were trying to be competitive in 2023. The Bills had (and still have) a large amount of cap tied up in unproductive defenders. This - and several other contracts - were their work around to mitigate some of that.

 

In general, it is advantageous to kick the can down the road as long as the cap rises. Every cap dollar kicked into a future year is discounted by the percentage the cap has increased. If a team staggers parting ways with high contract players, then they can structure contracts like this indefinitely. Unfortunately the Bills have a logjam of such players. 

 


And also if you don’t spend the money saved, you just roll over the extra cap space to cover it the following year 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the beyondthesteelcurtain website, as good an explanation as I've seen:

 

Void Years

Sometimes teams add void years onto a contract in order to spread out the salary cap hit of the initial signing bonus. A void year is simply fake years on a contract just to spread out the signing bonus but the player does not have a base salary for those years and are set to become a free agent once the contract voids. If a player has void years in their contract and they are not re-signed before the contract voids, all of the remaining money from any of the void years gets transferred into dead money for the next season.

 

Unless any of the 5 re-signed today, it all goes to dead cap in '24. Also of note per Spotrac it lists the Bills as having 58 signed players, once these all void then they are down to 53. That money is all accounted for in the amount over the cap so shifting from void years to dead cap has no impact on the cap status. 

 

This is just one of the cap work-arounds that most/all teams use. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

Pretty much it, the contract was set up to allow them an extra player they couldn’t afford last year, now you eat it.   It’s a pretty common practice, just kicks the can down the road.  The Bills have to hit re-set here soon and eat ***** for a year or continue to be just good enough to disappoint.

That's why I say take the cap hits this year, draft well amd do nothing FA wise until after June 1st.  At some point we have to do this, I say get it over with now.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Not following that logic.  It’s cap money, not real money.  That $4.3m dead cap is less than 2% of $243m and it doesn’t matter where it came from at this point.  Floyd clearly prefers the 1 year contract thing and if McBeane decides to bring him back the $4.3m dead cap will have no bearing on that decision.  

I spent a few minutes looking it up and realized Floyd only had about $3 million cap hit in 2023. So the remaining cap hit was just his 2023 salary. It makes more sense now.

 

That $4.3 should actually be looked at as savings from last years cap. It was just pushed to this year.

 

They could/will probably do the same thing this year. Sign a veteran with a cap hit of around $3 million and push 4-5 million into 2025.

30 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

Whoever we sign will be in addition. It’s simply accounting for bonus money paid last year. 


And also if you don’t spend the money saved, you just roll over the extra cap space to cover it the following year 

Yes realize that now. Beane’s job is safe.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billsflyer12 said:

What exactly are the “cap is not real” people mean when they say that constantly?

 

There are always real consequences for cap maneuvering, some just come sooner then later.
 


It’s hyperbole obviously, but it means that the cap is easily negotiated with some planning and utilization of various creative (and allowed) accounting and contracting practices, void years being just one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...