Who else is in the let’s get Gabe Davis signed to an extension camp?

[Einstein]

31 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Agree with all of that except the "skill" part.

 

 Davis lacks the movement skills to excel at a wide variety of routes and has naturally hard hands.

 

The latter is why he claps at the ball, IMO.   He knows his hands suck so he's developed this weird technique that looks ridiculous when he drops the ball.........but at this point it seems likely that he is more comfortable catching the ball with his hands in motion than stationary like more highly skilled pass catchers.   

 

Gabe Davis is a hard worker but he's more of an overachiever than a guy with WR2 skill,  IMO.

You're right. I redact my skill comment.

[WhoTom]

45 minutes ago, DasNootz said:

This is a business - he has one shot at setting he and his family up for life.  He lives in Florida in the off-season.  He will (and should) follow the money if offered a better contract elsewhere.  

 

Even a team-friendly deal would net him tens of millions of dollars - more than enough to set someone up for life. If he's happy with the team and his role, then he may give the Bills a hometown discount. He often talks about listening to his mother, who told him not to chase the money but to be grateful that he's living the dream right now.

 

Milano, Poyer, and others have hit FA and stayed with the Bills even though they could have made more money on the open market. Some players want the ring more than they want the outrageous payday.

 

The question is whether the Bills think he's worth a modest contract extension or if they'll simply let him play out his contract and let him walk without an offer. I think the jury is still out on that one.

Edited September 27, 2023 by WhoTom

[NoSaint]

27 minutes ago, WhoTom said:

 

Even a team-friendly deal would net him tens of millions of dollars - more than enough to set someone up for life. If he's happy with the team and his role, then he may give the Bills a hometown discount. He often talks about listening to his mother, who told him not to chase the money but to be grateful that he's living the dream right now.

 

Milano, Poyer, and others have hit FA and stayed with the Bills even though they could have made more money on the open market. Some players want the ring more than they want the outrageous payday.

 

The question is whether the Bills think he's worth a modest contract extension or if they'll simply let him play out his contract and let him walk without an offer. I think the jury is still out on that one.

the bills don’t have the luxury of paying a guy that hasn’t stepped up 8 figures a year. 

[78thealltimegreat]

7 hours ago, finn said:

He might be an overall liability, actually, and the Bills might do better letting him go after this season. Look at the last game, for instance. Five targets, one catch for a TD, one drop, one interception that arguably was his fault. Not a fair sample, maybe, but his career catch rate is low, his drop rate high, he's not quick, has a hard time getting open, and often runs lazy routes. 

 

The positives people have pointed out (except for the blocking) flow almost entirely from playing with a future Hall of Fame quarterback. 

Oh I agree and a team like the Giants who of course he would have ties to us going to way overpay him. Next year is going to be one of the deepest receiver classes in years they don’t need to do this . 

[ColoradoBills]

2 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Oh I agree and a team like the Giants who of course he would have ties to us going to way overpay him. Next year is going to be one of the deepest receiver classes in years they don’t need to do this . 

 

There is also a big number of big name WRs in FA next year.  Gabe has a market value currently of $11.2M.  He probably will get that

unless the wheels fall off of his game.  Like @NoSaintsaid above, the Bills can't do 8 figures for him.  I'm hoping for a 4th round comp pick

and a Day 1 or Day 2 drafted WR.

[Old Coot]

Part of Gabe's problem with dropped passes may be that he does not have large hands for a WR. His hand size is 9 1/4 inches. Given that Josh throws fireballs (or Firebaughs), the combo of hand size and pass velocity might, in part, cause Gabe's dropsey.

[BADOLBILZ]

14 minutes ago, Old Coot said:

Part of Gabe's problem with dropped passes may be that he does not have large hands for a WR. His hand size is 9 1/4 inches. Given that Josh throws fireballs (or Firebaughs), the combo of hand size and pass velocity might, in part, cause Gabe's dropsey.

 

Eh, it doesn't help him I'm sure but he just doesn't have good hand eye coordination so his hands don't make that subtle adjustment at the catch point to decelerate the ball and create that "soft hands" look.

 

Davante Adams, for example, has smaller-than-Gabe 9" hands and his hands are great.    

 

Gabe had an astonishingly poor 10% drop rate last season..........Adams was at 3.9% last year after a couple years where he was sub 1% and sub 2% in 2020-2021.

 

 

[Solomon Grundy]

10 hours ago, GustheDog33 said:

Bills first round pick in 2024 needs to be a dynamic WR with size and speed.  Oh and Gabe will be fine wherever he ends up, but I don't think he is getting a second contract from Buffalo.

AD Mitchell from Texas or Johnny Wilson from FSU

[Dr.Sack]

Sign me up 

[Thurman#1]

8 hours ago, NoSaint said:

yea, I want to cheer for him. Seems like a good enough guy and the type you’d like to see succeed - even beyond the fact that we have the need… 

 

but he just isn’t naturally gifted at the job when compared to guys who are top 64 at it. Doesn’t have short or long speed. Doesn’t have exceptional hands. 
 

Even his long TD this week wasn’t particularly fluid or skilled as an example of success despite the challenges instead of success because of high skills. 
 

He’s not a bum or lazy or anything. He just seems to be a tier or two higher than his natural skill set would normally warrant.

 

 

Ability doesn't equal skills. It's a ton of different things, how hard you work, mental processing ability, fitness, strength. Fit with the QB and the system. There's a lot to it. But Josh loves him, there's no question about fit with Josh. And he absolutely does have speed, that's not a question either. Not Tyreek speed, or even close, but he gets open deep a lot and a lot of the time it's because he outruns his guy.

 

But without the skills, you don't even get in the door. Gabe's got skills, and a lot of them. It would certainly be nice if we had - outside of Diggs - yet another guy with #1 skills. But very very few teams are in that position, particularly teams that consistently draft later than #20.

 

 

 

 

8 hours ago, NoSaint said:

the bills don’t have the luxury of paying a guy that hasn’t stepped up 8 figures a year. 

 

 

Very true. However, that's not Gabe, Gabe has stepped up. He's a #2, and a productive one. For a 4th round pick, that is without question stepping up bigtime.

 

It's not clear that they'll re-sign him. They want to, but they absolutely won't be able to make all the moves they'd like to and retain everyone they would retain in an ideal world.

 

 

[Thurman#1]

18 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Don’t overpay Gabe he’s a number 3 receiver masquerading as a number 2 

 

 

You know what they call a number 3 receiver masquerading as a number 2? 

 

They call them a number two. 

 

If  you can do the things a number two can - and Gabe absolutely does - you're a #2. And the people who call you a #3 are wrong.

 

Gabe is currently on track for 901 yards and 11.3 TDs. That would make him 27th in yards and put him in a four-way tie for 3rd in TDs if you put him into last year's rankings.

 

Now in reality three games isn't a big enough sample size. We don't really know how he'll do yet. Duh. But he's performing well.

 

He just is.

 

 

[Richard Noggin]

2 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

You know what they call a number 3 receiver masquerading as a number 2? 

 

They call them a number two. 

 

If  you can do the things a number two can - and Gabe absolutely does - you're a #2. And the people who call you a #3 are wrong.

 

Gabe is currently on track for 901 yards and 11.3 TDs. That would make him 27th in yards and put him in a four-way tie for 3rd in TDs if you put him into last year's rankings.

 

Now in reality three games isn't a big enough sample size. We don't really know how he'll do yet. Duh. But he's performing well.

 

He just is.

 

 

 

You might mean he's PRODUCING well? Projecting season totals has nothing much to do with efficacy, and almost everything to do with opportunity. 

 

Performing well, in my mind, would include a couple more catches already, given the targets he's already seen. 

[Thurman#1]

1 hour ago, Richard Noggin said:

 

You might mean he's PRODUCING well? Projecting season totals has nothing much to do with efficacy, and almost everything to do with opportunity. 

 

Performing well, in my mind, would include a couple more catches already, given the targets he's already seen. 

 

 

Richard, you're a great poster.  But come on.

 

Production doesn't mean you're playing well? Dude, that's ridiculous. 

 

You can have all the opportunity you want and you still either end up producing ... or not. Plenty of guys who get opportunities fail with them. Davis is succeeding.

 

As for receiving opportunities, let's look at both last year and this year.

 

Last year he was 33rd in yardage in the NFL and tied for 15th (a 9-way tie), putting him in the top 23 in the league in TDs ... all despite being 48th in the league in terms of targets. In other words, he got an awful lot more production than his opportunities would have led you to expect. 33rd and tied for 15th are both excellent production for having the 48th most opportunities in the league.

 

This year so far, he's 66th in the league in targets. And despite that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs.

 

He's OVER-producing for the opportunities he's had.

 

And projected season numbers have a great deal to do with efficacy. Everything, really. They are produced directly from his productivity. He's been very productive. That's why his projected effectiveness is high.

 

 

Edited September 28, 2023 by Thurman#1

[Billsatlastin2018]

I don’t care how ‘good’ a dude you are, how well you fit in, how fabulous you practice.

 

On EVERY game day, as a WR, do you get open and do you catch the ball?

 

if either are deficient, as they ARE, you cannot play on this high calibre team!

[BananaB]

2 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Richard, you're a great poster.  But come on.

 

Production doesn't mean you're playing well? Dude, that's ridiculous. 

 

You can have all the opportunity you want and you still either end up producing ... or not. Plenty of guys who get opportunities fail with them. Davis is succeeding.

 

As for receiving opportunities, let's look at both last year and this year.

 

Last year he was 33rd in yardage in the NFL and tied for 15th (a 9-way tie), putting him in the top 23 in the league in TDs ... all despite being 48th in the league in terms of targets. In other words, he got an awful lot more production than his opportunities would have led you to expect. 33rd and tied for 15th are both excellent production for having the 48th most opportunities in the league.

 

This year so far, he's 66th in the league in targets. And despite that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs.

 

He's OVER-producing for the opportunities he's had.

 

And projected season numbers have a great deal to do with efficacy. Everything, really. They are produced directly from his productivity. He's been very productive. That's why his projected effectiveness is high.

 

 

Everyone knows Davis gets yardage. He makes big plays. Problem is he is very inconsistent in between the big plays. We need a guy who is reliable to help move the chains, not just produce on deep routes. 

Edited September 28, 2023 by BananaB

[NoSaint]

6 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Ability doesn't equal skills. It's a ton of different things, how hard you work, mental processing ability, fitness, strength. Fit with the QB and the system. There's a lot to it. But Josh loves him, there's no question about fit with Josh. And he absolutely does have speed, that's not a question either. Not Tyreek speed, or even close, but he gets open deep a lot and a lot of the time it's because he outruns his guy.

 

But without the skills, you don't even get in the door. Gabe's got skills, and a lot of them. It would certainly be nice if we had - outside of Diggs - yet another guy with #1 skills. But very very few teams are in that position, particularly teams that consistently draft later than #20.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Very true. However, that's not Gabe, Gabe has stepped up. He's a #2, and a productive one. For a 4th round pick, that is without question stepping up bigtime.

 

It's not clear that they'll re-sign him. They want to, but they absolutely won't be able to make all the moves they'd like to and retain everyone they would retain in an ideal world.

 

 

Unfortunately his measurables don’t match what you are saying and his tape doesnt show a burner deep frankly. 
 

his agility measurables are very low for a guy in the league and we see that pretty consistently in his play specifically. 
 

 

[NoSaint]

3 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Richard, you're a great poster.  But come on.

 

Production doesn't mean you're playing well? Dude, that's ridiculous. 

 

You can have all the opportunity you want and you still either end up producing ... or not. Plenty of guys who get opportunities fail with them. Davis is succeeding.

 

As for receiving opportunities, let's look at both last year and this year.

 

Last year he was 33rd in yardage in the NFL and tied for 15th (a 9-way tie), putting him in the top 23 in the league in TDs ... all despite being 48th in the league in terms of targets. In other words, he got an awful lot more production than his opportunities would have led you to expect. 33rd and tied for 15th are both excellent production for having the 48th most opportunities in the league.

 

This year so far, he's 66th in the league in targets. And despite that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs.

 

He's OVER-producing for the opportunities he's had.

 

And projected season numbers have a great deal to do with efficacy. Everything, really. They are produced directly from his productivity. He's been very productive. That's why his projected effectiveness is high.

 

 

has it struck you yet that he’s not getting the targets because Josh and Dorsey might like him less than you? 

 

to be an established WR2 on a team that runs a top 5-10 play volume (and passing volume) and be 66th in targets is in and of itself a red flag. 

[GustheDog33]

10 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said:

AD Mitchell from Texas or Johnny Wilson from FSU

Love Wilson. He is like 6'6" and can run.  Let's get him!

[Thurman#1]

4 hours ago, Billsatlastin2018 said:

I don’t care how ‘good’ a dude you are, how well you fit in, how fabulous you practice.

 

On EVERY game day, as a WR, do you get open and do you catch the ball?

 

if either are deficient, as they ARE, you cannot play on this high calibre team!

 

 

Thing is, it takes more than you capitalizing the word "ARE" to make a statement true. They are not deficient.

 

If they were deficient, he couldn't do the job, and yet he can and does. Well enough that pretty much everyone agrees that he's likely to get a contact in the eight figures per year range. 

 

He could be better, as could everyone, really. But he's not deficient.

[Thurman#1]

3 hours ago, BananaB said:

Everyone knows Davis gets yardage. He makes big plays. Problem is he is very inconsistent in between the big plays. We need a guy who is reliable to help move the chains, not just produce on deep routes. 

 

 

When you look at the guys who have YPCs close to Davis's, most of them are inconsistent. It's really hard to be inconsistent when you're catching longer balls. The QB is likely not to be able to be as accurate and things just get tougher. Catch/target ratios go down for guys who are getting thrown a lot of longer balls. And that's Davis.

 

It would be nice if we had a guy who could do everything well. But very few guys can, and those guys get paid like #1s. Very few teams have two of them. That's just the way it is. Gabe gets big plays, and that is a very very important and valuable skill.

 

 

 

2 hours ago, NoSaint said:

Unfortunately his measurables don’t match what you are saying and his tape doesnt show a burner deep frankly. 
 

his agility measurables are very low for a guy in the league and we see that pretty consistently in his play specifically. 
 

 

 

 

Could you just point out where I said he was a burner?

 

I didn't. I did say that he does run past guys consistently. The reason I said that is because he does run past guys consistently. It's one of the reasons he often gets open deep.

 

I'm not going to argue the measurables. I'm arguing that he gets open deep, that he's effective and productive. He is. This is what makes him a very legit #2.

[gobills404]

9 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

You know what they call a number 3 receiver masquerading as a number 2? 

 

They call them a number two. 

 

If  you can do the things a number two can - and Gabe absolutely does - you're a #2. And the people who call you a #3 are wrong.

 

Gabe is currently on track for 901 yards and 11.3 TDs. That would make him 27th in yards and put him in a four-way tie for 3rd in TDs if you put him into last year's rankings.

 

Now in reality three games isn't a big enough sample size. We don't really know how he'll do yet. Duh. But he's performing well.

 

He just is.

 

 

Gabe is an almost textbook example of a big bodied WR2. When people say he’s not and “we need a true #2 WR!!”, what they really mean is they want a second WR1.

[Warriorspikes51]

my opinion of Gabe seems to change on a play by play basis hahahaha 

[whorlnut]

6 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Gabe is an almost textbook example of a big bodied WR2. When people say he’s not and “we need a true #2 WR!!”, what they really mean is they want a second WR1.

And what is wrong with wanting that? This is a wide receiver centric offense. You act as if that’s a bad thing. 

[Thurman#1]

2 hours ago, NoSaint said:

has it struck you yet that he’s not getting the targets because Josh and Dorsey might like him less than you? 

 

to be an established WR2 on a team that runs a top 5-10 play volume (and passing volume) and be 66th in targets is in and of itself a red flag. 

 

 

If they liked him less than me, they could cut him from the team. They could make him inactive. They could sit him on the bench. They could just not throw to him.

 

The idea that him being 66th in targets is a red flag is ridiculous. They're throwing to him in such a way that he's OVER-producing for his targets. The idea they'd be angry or frustrated about that is flat-out nuts.

 

Instead, they've thrown him enough passes that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs. That is a flag alright, but a very very green one.

 

He's number two in targets on the Bills, more than Kincaid, more than Knox, more than Cook.... Unsurprisingly, Diggs is number one. But we are an offense that has some good targets but likes to spread it around.

[whorlnut]

1 hour ago, GustheDog33 said:

Love Wilson. He is like 6'6" and can run.  Let's get him!

Yeah this guy is really intriguing. Mike Evans 2.0?

[gobills404]

3 minutes ago, whorlnut said:

And what is wrong with wanting that? This is a wide receiver centric offense. You act as if that’s a bad thing. 

Nothing. I’d love another WR1 for Josh to throw to. Doesn’t mean I’m gonna make Gabe my whipping boy and spout “huurrrr durrrr Gabe is a WR3/4 he sucks” every week.

Edited September 28, 2023 by gobills404

[Jerry Jabber]

Just now, whorlnut said:

And what is wrong with wanting that? This is a wide receiver centric offense. You act as if that’s a bad thing. 

Agreed. If your #1 WR goes down due to injury, you need your #2 WR to step up and be able to produce.

 

If Diggs was injured and had to miss time, how many people would feel confident Davis could handle the load of being the Bills #1 WR?

[Thurman#1]

Just now, Jerry Jabber said:

Agreed. If your #1 WR goes down due to injury, you need your #2 WR to step up and be able to produce.

 

If Diggs was injured and had to miss time, how many people would feel confident Davis could handle the load of being the Bills #1 WR?

 

 

That doesn't really make sense. Nobody argues Davis is a #1.

 

Other than the three or four teams with two guys who have claims at being a #1, there really isn't a team that would get #1 production from their #2 consistently. I mean, that would be ideal, but it's not really realistic.

 

Practically what teams do when their #1 goes down is make it up by spreading it around more, everybody gets a few more. They don't just throw the extra five or six targets to the #2 guy.

[BananaB]

22 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

When you look at the guys who have YPCs close to Davis's, most of them are inconsistent. It's really hard to be inconsistent when you're catching longer balls. The QB is likely not to be able to be as accurate and things just get tougher. Catch/target ratios go down for guys who are getting thrown a lot of longer balls. And that's Davis.

 

It would be nice if we had a guy who could do everything well. But very few guys can, and those guys get paid like #1s. Very few teams have two of them. That's just the way it is. Gabe gets big plays, and that is a very very important and valuable skill.

 

 

 

 

 

Could you just point out where I said he was a burner?

 

I didn't. I did say that he does run past guys consistently. The reason I said that is because he does run past guys consistently. It's one of the reasons he often gets open deep.

 

I'm not going to argue the measurables. I'm arguing that he gets open deep, that he's effective and productive. He is. This is what makes him a very legit #2.

Dude he’s inconsistent catching every type of pass it got nothing to do with length of route.  

[SCBills]

I don't need Gabe to be a WR1a, but I need to see that he can win - consistently - on various types of routes.

 

I haven't seen that. 

 

He flirts with getting me to buy-in from time to time, but there's never consistency.   

 

So far.. he's a luxury high end WR3 with WR1 deep ball skills and elite blocking. That's too easy to gameplan for as the compliment to Diggs. 

 

 

Edited September 28, 2023 by SCBills

[NoSaint]

40 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

When you look at the guys who have YPCs close to Davis's, most of them are inconsistent. It's really hard to be inconsistent when you're catching longer balls. The QB is likely not to be able to be as accurate and things just get tougher. Catch/target ratios go down for guys who are getting thrown a lot of longer balls. And that's Davis.

 

It would be nice if we had a guy who could do everything well. But very few guys can, and those guys get paid like #1s. Very few teams have two of them. That's just the way it is. Gabe gets big plays, and that is a very very important and valuable skill.

 

 

 

 

 

Could you just point out where I said he was a burner?

 

I didn't. I did say that he does run past guys consistently. The reason I said that is because he does run past guys consistently. It's one of the reasons he often gets open deep.

 

I'm not going to argue the measurables. I'm arguing that he gets open deep, that he's effective and productive. He is. This is what makes him a very legit #2.

and I’m arguing that he’s been running past guys deep a lot less often since his big KC game because he’s not fast enough to be a consistent deep threat. 

[Jerry Jabber]

24 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

That doesn't really make sense. Nobody argues Davis is a #1.

 

Other than the three or four teams with two guys who have claims at being a #1, there really isn't a team that would get #1 production from their #2 consistently. I mean, that would be ideal, but it's not really realistic.

 

Practically what teams do when their #1 goes down is make it up by spreading it around more, everybody gets a few more. They don't just throw the extra five or six targets to the #2 guy.

Have to disagree. Your #2 WR should be able to run all the same routes as your #1 WR.

Most times, your #1 WR gets double covered, depending on how well the rest of the WR’s on the team are. If the rest of the WR’s are sub-par/mediocre, good luck trying to spread the ball around.

 

I don’t know about you, but I would love to have the caliber of top WR’s the Dolphins have with Waddle and Hill. If Allen had that type of caliber #2 WR, Allen could be leading the league in passing.

[Straight Hucklebuck]

34 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

If they liked him less than me, they could cut him from the team. They could make him inactive. They could sit him on the bench. They could just not throw to him.

 

The idea that him being 66th in targets is a red flag is ridiculous. They're throwing to him in such a way that he's OVER-producing for his targets. The idea they'd be angry or frustrated about that is flat-out nuts.

 

Instead, they've thrown him enough passes that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs. That is a flag alright, but a very very green one.

 

He's number two in targets on the Bills, more than Kincaid, more than Knox, more than Cook.... Unsurprisingly, Diggs is number one. But we are an offense that has some good targets but likes to spread it around.

Isn't one of the options to rotate in Shakir or Sherfield? 

 

Is it Gabe at 0% snaps or 95% snaps only? 

The question to me is why he has to be on the field so much? 

I do think NoSaint is right, he's on the field all the time and is still a one trick pony. 

He can't change direction, he runs two routes, he drops the ball, he's not getting faster. Nice player for the 4th Round, but at minimum, not sure why we have to be beholden to Gabe. 

[NoSaint]

27 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

If they liked him less than me, they could cut him from the team. They could make him inactive. They could sit him on the bench. They could just not throw to him.

 

The idea that him being 66th in targets is a red flag is ridiculous. They're throwing to him in such a way that he's OVER-producing for his targets. The idea they'd be angry or frustrated about that is flat-out nuts.

 

Instead, they've thrown him enough passes that he's 41st in yards and tied for 6th in TDs. That is a flag alright, but a very very green one.

 

He's number two in targets on the Bills, more than Kincaid, more than Knox, more than Cook.... Unsurprisingly, Diggs is number one. But we are an offense that has some good targets but likes to spread it around.

“if they don’t like him they could cut him or make him inactive or not throw to him”

 

as a wr2 -ie top 64 wr- that he is down at 66 in targets on a passing offense that is top 10 in plays run and passes thrown might indicate to you that they are limiting their play design to him. They aren’t scheming up gabe, they are letting people forget gabe. 

[Buffalo_Stampede]

1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Isn't one of the options to rotate in Shakir or Sherfield? 

 

Is it Gabe at 0% snaps or 95% snaps only? 

The question to me is why he has to be on the field so much? 

I do think NoSaint is right, he's on the field all the time and is still a one trick pony. 

He can't change direction, he runs two routes, he drops the ball, he's not getting faster. Nice player for the 4th Round, but at minimum, not sure why we have to be beholden to Gabe. 

He’s also our blocking WR so that’s why he hardly ever comes off the field. 
 

I think if they were forced to play another WR in his role we’d find out just how replaceable he is.

[NoSaint]

2 minutes ago, Jerry Jabber said:

Have to disagree. Your #2 WR should be able to run all the same routes as your #1 WR.

Most times, your #1 WR gets double covered, depending on how well the rest of the WR’s on the team are. If the rest of the WR’s are sub-par/mediocre, good luck trying to spread the ball around.

 

I don’t know about you, but I would love to have the caliber of top WR’s the Dolphins have with Waddle and Hill. If Allen had that type of caliber #2 WR, Allen could be leading the league in passing.

ultimately, at what moment does anyone here say “it’s gabe Davis time”

 

he’s the deep threat that can’t outrun guys

 

hes the big body that isn’t a reliable 3rd down move the chains target 

 

he’s not a bum that doesn’t belong in the league but he’s kind of a tweener that’s not particularly good at any identifiable role or skill set 

[Matt_In_NH]

I'm in the let's let this play out and if someone wants to pay him >15M then let them camp.  Draft a guy, sign a vet for a year if needed.  You don't have to sign every guy to big contracts and in the case of Gabe, he is so hot and cold, they can probably do better with a lesser contract.   BUt I love the guy...

[JaCrispy]

1 hour ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Thing is, it takes more than you capitalizing the word "ARE" to make a statement true. They are not deficient.

 

If they were deficient, he couldn't do the job, and yet he can and does. Well enough that pretty much everyone agrees that he's likely to get a contact in the eight figures per year range. 

 

He could be better, as could everyone, really. But he's not deficient.

If true, this would tell me the Bills aren’t serious about improving their offense like the Dolphins are…They will always be limited so long as Davis is the #2…And with Diggs getting older and slower, the Bills are simply going to need more speed…

 

Just look at what Cook’s speed is doing for the run game…Now imagine the upgrade to the WR room that speed would bring…👍

 

Gabe Davis is the “Devin Singleterry” of WRs…

 

 

Edited September 28, 2023 by JaCrispy

[BADOLBILZ]

27 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

That doesn't really make sense. Nobody argues Davis is a #1.

 

Other than the three or four teams with two guys who have claims at being a #1, there really isn't a team that would get #1 production from their #2 consistently. I mean, that would be ideal, but it's not really realistic.

 

Practically what teams do when their #1 goes down is make it up by spreading it around more, everybody gets a few more. They don't just throw the extra five or six targets to the #2 guy.

 

SF, Miami, Philadelphia, Cinci and Seattle all clearly have two dynamic WR1 talents as their second receiver.   That's 5 indisputable examples not 3.  There are a bunch of other teams that have have two WR1 talents when both are healthy or if the QB play is even adequate.   Some of them even have WR3's that could be fringe WR1's like Cinci with Boyd and Seattle with JSN.  

 

The Bills are not one of these teams.   They have a very clear WR1 and a big drop-off to Gabe as a WR3 talent with clear limitations.

 

So to imply that it's "unrealistic" to have a WR1 level talent opposite your primary target is not so.........it's closer to a 25% scenario than "unrealistic" and most of the teams that have such setups are SB contenders.  

 

Why you choose to look like a fool on hills like this and those of Star Lotulelei and Tremaine Edmunds etc.. is a curiosity.

[whorlnut]

56 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Nothing. I’d love another WR1 for Josh to throw to. Doesn’t mean I’m gonna make Gabe my whipping boy and spout “huurrrr durrrr Gabe is a WR3/4 he sucks” every week.

Good for you

52 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

That doesn't really make sense. Nobody argues Davis is a #1.

 

Other than the three or four teams with two guys who have claims at being a #1, there really isn't a team that would get #1 production from their #2 consistently. I mean, that would be ideal, but it's not really realistic.

 

Practically what teams do when their #1 goes down is make it up by spreading it around more, everybody gets a few more. They don't just throw the extra five or six targets to the #2 guy.

You’re missing the point. This is a wr centric offense. Yea the bills went and got Kincaid, but over the course of Allen’s career, he makes his hay by throwing to WRs. Having another top option if Diggs goes down minimizes the opportunity that his offense would sputter.