Jump to content

Beane’s “trade” his real mistake


4merper4mer

Recommended Posts

There has been a lot of criticism of Beane on here, mostly centered around the draft.  I disagree with the claims that Beane is some sort of bad drafter, but there is more to assembling a team.  Beane says he iis trying to build a team that is a perennial contender but also one that brings it all home.  In 2022 he made a “trade”.

 

What he gave up:

 

2023 and beyond of captain and team leader Jordan Poyer

2023 and beyond of captain and still young Tremaine Edmunds

Viable help via FA along the Oline in 22 or 23 and beyond  I’d say in 22 for sure but I don’t think there was much left at the time of the trade.

Another reasonable if unspectacular weapon at TE or WR

 

What he got:

 

Big plays in games against a horrible Rams team and our perceived main rival KC

Arguably some help developing our young DEs for a few weeks

A really cool video about burning things

Lots of stuff on Instagram

An unfulfilled promise of a quick return from injury

Three more years of huge gobs of money…..probably for little to no production beyond a lot of social media content and laudable work in the community

 

If you are listing Beane’s mistakes, the Miller pickup was first on the list once you consider the end result.  It isn’t fair to be too critical knowing the results……he couldn’t have known back when he made the decision.  He rolled the dice for 2022.  Sometimes it has to be done……but he made his goal of a long term consistent contender a lot more difficult when he rolled the dice and got a big fat snake eyes with Von.  Everyone hits and misses with draft picks.  Everyone.  He took a calculated risk with Von and lost.  I’m not one for hindsight….to me it was a 50/50 decision and it could have easily worked out for 2022…….but it didn’t.  I still like Beane and hope he is here for a long time, but he lost on this gamble and it cost him a lot.  To an extent it is back to the drawing board.  I wonder if he’d do it again.  To me it is still a 50/50 roll of the dice.  I hope he learns but does not overcorrect.

 

Personally, I think Beane has drafted well if measured against reasonable expectations,  The holes he has to fill in 2023 are less the result of “bad drafting” than the poor results and opportunity cost of a Von Miller contract that turned into nothing on the field.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Vomit 2
  • Eyeroll 9
  • Shocked 1
  • Disagree 8
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Von signing is a product of poor drafting after he used 4 top 2 round picks on DL with almost nothing to show for it.  He also drafted a 3rd round special teams linebacker who doesn’t fit the defensive scheme, and all the while ignoring OL and WR in top 3 rounds!

 

The BEST one can say about his drafts are that they are maybe average.

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 10
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To some degree you're right. 

 

Von was 32 when he signed, and 33 this season. 

 

He'll be 34 this upcoming season. 

 

In the span of all possibilities, banking on an older player past his prime staying healthy was indeed a risk. 

 

 

 

Would it have been smarter to get in other WR action, and say given up a first and a second and a new contract for Davante Adams? 

 

Chiefs unlikely to trade Hill to the Bills. But AJ Brown was potentially an option. 

 

 

 

All of this to say, Beane's roster has stalled because the last A-talent player he's added to this offense was Diggs in 2020. The Bills have stopped adding elite skill talent since that point. John Brown got old, Beasley got old, Emmanuel Sanders should have never been signed. 

 

This year, the Bills have to find a way to get another elite-traits WR on the field. 

 

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ClemsonBills said:

Yeah, we were all upset in March with him rolling the dice. It's a 3 year contract essentially, so not all doom and gloom. I also trust a healing Von more than the rest of our dline. 

I don’t criticize the dice rolling, but the result was poor.  It cost us Poyer, Edmunds and more.  We received a burn down video as the season highlight,  

4 minutes ago, Billsflyer12 said:

Von signing is a product of poor drafting after he used 4 top 2 round picks on DL with almost nothing to show for it.  He also drafted a 3rd round special teams linebacker who doesn’t fit the defensive scheme, and all the while ignoring OL and WR in top 3 rounds!

 

The BEST one can say about his drafts are that they are maybe average.

Out of the hundreds of players available AFTER our picks at DL, I’m sure you can cherry pick a few that have succeeded in the NFL thus far.  That’s not a realistic way to criticize though.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

and our perceived main rival KC

You mean the team going to the Super Bowl from the AFC? Got to love how this just get's a glancing mention like "let's quickly sweep this under the rug."

 

Not like this wasn't actually a really important game.

Edited by Warcodered
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

I don’t criticize the dice rolling, but the result was poor.  It cost us Poyer, Edmunds and more.  We received a burn down video as the season highlight,  

Out of the hundreds of players available AFTER our picks at DL, I’m sure you can cherry pick a few that have succeeded in the NFL thus far.  That’s not a realistic way to criticize though.

So then you tell me, how do you define successful drafting?

 

Im not really sure what your point is here.  You defending or criticizing Beane?

Edited by Billsflyer12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

You mean the team going to the Super Bowl from the AFC? Got to love how this just get's a glancing mention like "let's quickly sweep this under the rug."

 

Not like this wasn't actually a really important game.

He made a really good play and helped us win a big game.  Was that worth the cost to you?  If so, congrats, you win.

2 minutes ago, Billsflyer12 said:

So then you tell me, how do you define successful drafting?

Well that’s a difficult question and pretty complex.  What it doesn’t contain is an expectation to get hall of famers with every pick or be able to pick guys at 27 that were actually drafted at 4.  It also doesn’t include expectations that all players we pass over will become abject failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think Von realized the level of loyalty most Bills fans demand from their players. When he went on and in about his love for LA and how hard it was to sign in Buffalo, essentially saying it was the money, most fans were rubbed the wrong way.

 

 I knew right from the start he was destined to be a whipping boy unless he went off.

 

nobody to blame but himself, I’m hoping he bounces back from injury and helps this team win a title.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

There has been a lot of criticism of Beane on here, mostly centered around the draft.  I disagree with the claims that Beane is some sort of bad drafter, but there is more to assembling a team.  Beane says he iis trying to build a team that is a perennial contender but also one that brings it all home.  In 2022 he made a “trade”.

 

What he gave up:

 

2023 and beyond of captain and team leader Jordan Poyer

2023 and beyond of captain and still young Tremaine Edmunds

Viable help via FA along the Oline in 22 or 23 and beyond  I’d say in 22 for sure but I don’t think there was much left at the time of the trade.

Another reasonable if unspectacular weapon at TE or WR

 

What he got:

 

Big plays in games against a horrible Rams team and our perceived main rival KC

Arguably some help developing our young DEs for a few weeks

A really cool video about burning things

Lots of stuff on Instagram

An unfulfilled promise of a quick return from injury

Three more years of huge gobs of money…..probably for little to no production beyond a lot of social media content and laudable work in the community

 

If you are listing Beane’s mistakes, the Miller pickup was first on the list once you consider the end result.  It isn’t fair to be too critical knowing the results……he couldn’t have known back when he made the decision.  He rolled the dice for 2022.  Sometimes it has to be done……but he made his goal of a long term consistent contender a lot more difficult when he rolled the dice and got a big fat snake eyes with Von.  Everyone hits and misses with draft picks.  Everyone.  He took a calculated risk with Von and lost.  I’m not one for hindsight….to me it was a 50/50 decision and it could have easily worked out for 2022…….but it didn’t.  I still like Beane and hope he is here for a long time, but he lost on this gamble and it cost him a lot.  To an extent it is back to the drawing board.  I wonder if he’d do it again.  To me it is still a 50/50 roll of the dice.  I hope he learns but does not overcorrect.

 

Personally, I think Beane has drafted well if measured against reasonable expectations,  The holes he has to fill in 2023 are less the result of “bad drafting” than the poor results and opportunity cost of a Von Miller contract that turned into nothing on the field.

 

 

Von put his team over the top last year. At a position of need. Hes been fairly healthy throughout his career. Nobody can predict or prevent an ACL.

I think we win a chip this year with even just regular normal amount of injuries and minus the adversity that was out control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure this is quite fair, since no one can predict injuries. If Beane had gone for AJ Brown, say, and Brown had been injured, we could criticize Beane for ignoring the team's deficient pass rush for a player who helped us win two games at WR before getting hurt. The team landed the elite DE the team needed, and the gamble was paying off until mid-season. I'm fine with the trade, given the need.

 

But I'm not happy with Beane's performance elsewhere. Zack Moss, Spencer Brown, Terrell Bernard, Roger Saffold, EJ Epenesa, Boogie Basham... He's had some hits, but regularly drafting/signing players of this caliber will not get you a championship. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the miscalculation was in overvaluing the existing skill players on offense and not sufficiently replacing the roles/production of peak Brown/Sanders and Beasley. Davis didn't perform when put in the position of a true #2, Crowder got hurt as his history suggested he would, McKittrick was the McKittrick we thought he was and not the McKittrick of his one "breakout game" against the Patriots***. Add to that, despite FA signings that were supposed to shore up the OL in addition to Kromer's masterful coaching, the line was downright offensive.

 

We saw what Von did earlier in the season. He was brought in purely to close out the 3-4 games that he didn't even get to play in. My hope for 2023 is his recovery from the ACL puts him on the field around the middle of November, and he rounds into form in December... it's as close as we'll get to bubble wrapping him for the playoffs... and that the Bills have much better injury luck next year.

 

Re re-signing Poyer; I love the player. He has been a warrior and given this team his all every game he has played in. But, as bittersweet as it is, I think his best days are behind him. Between him and Hyde, I think Hyde is the more cerebral player and the one that is harder to replace, which is why he was re-signed and Poyer wasnt'. If you swap Poyer's physicality for Hyde's leadership and communication this past season, I don't think our secondary gets roasted the way it did down the stretch.

 

I think they re-sign Edmunds. Rightly or wrongly, I think the Beane and McDermott value him much more than the members of TBD.

 

I agree about the ill spent 1st and 2nd round picks on the DL. They would have been better of spending them on OL and WR and bringing in FAs to fill out the DL given their apparent lack of scouting prowess at this position group... though I still hold out hope that Groot develops when he's not playing on a DL where the majority of the remaining players are either gutting it out through what could have been season ending injury or complete stiffs.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Von is an older player, but has the legs of a 20 year old. He still looked spry and fresh, easily the fastest DE we’ve had on this team since an in his prime Jerry Hughes - only he was still bendier and stronger than a young Jerry. Hopefully it doesn’t take him the 2 years it usually takes to fully recover. We don’t have the time. And yes, Beane has been horrid on evaluating the trenches and WR.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, not about to criticize Beane for signing Von to (essentially) a 3 year deal.

 

Defensive Line is THE most important part of your Defense - and is critical to post-season success. 

 

Year 1 didn't work out.  It is what it is.

 

I still believe Von will give us above average DE play with elite flashes in big moments for the next 2 years.  To me, that's worth the monetary investment at that position. 

 

What we should do with the DL this off-season, however, is clean up the mistakes and prepare for the future.. 

 

-Ship Oliver and Basham out of here for whatever we can get. 

 

-Extend Daquan Jones. 

 

-Work out a way to get Jerry Hughes back. 

 

-Draft a space eating DT.

 

-Bring back Shaq and Phillips.

 

Gives us Von, Hughes, Rousseau, Epenesa and Shaq at EDGE, with Daquan, Draft Pick, Settle and Phillips inside.   Also gives us Von, Rousseau, Daquan and a Draft Pick locked up past next year. 

 

 

Edited by SCBills
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

Nah, not about to criticize Beane for signing Von to (essentially) a 3 year deal.

 

Defensive Line is THE most important part of your Defense - and is critical to post-season success. 

 

Year 1 didn't work out.  It is what it is.

 

I still believe Von will give us above average DE play with elite flashes in big moments for the next 2 years.  To me, that's worth the monetary investment at that position. 

 

What we should be on the DL, however, is clean up the mistakes and prepare for the future.. 

 

-Ship Oliver and Basham out of here for whatever we can get. 

 

-Extend Daquan Jones. 

 

-Work out a way to get Jerry Hughes back. 

 

-Draft a space eating DT.

 

-Bring back Shaq and Phillips.

 

Gives us Von, Hughes, Rousseau, Epenesa and Shaq at EDGE, with Daquan, Draft Pick, Settle and Phillips inside.   Also gives us Von, Rousseau, Daquan and a Draft Pick locked up past next year. 

 

 

 Von is a freak. If anyone can be a productive pass rusher in his late 30’s it’s Von Miller. 
 

Im just very frustrated with how it played out. We needed him so bad. Went out and got him in free agency. Then the injury. So frustrating.  I wish they found a way to keep Hughes and still bring on Miller.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Von put his team over the top last year. At a position of need. Hes been fairly healthy throughout his career. Nobody can predict or prevent an ACL.

I think we win a chip this year with even just regular normal amount of injuries and minus the adversity that was out control

My post was not to say it was a bad move or to say “I told you so” about Miller in any way.  It was to say that the move for Miller came with a cost.  That cost has created holes that need to be filled.  
 

There are people all over this board saying Beane has drafted poorly which is simply not true.  Poorly would imply worse than at least 16 other teams.  Has anyone even attempted to make that case?  No.  They cherry pick how we could have had DK Metclaf or other stupid anecdotal stuff.  
 

The Miller move could have resulted in a Super Bowl championship this weekend.  It didn’t.  It resulted in a video with stuff burning, a bunch of roster holes, and an injury.  Now, if Beane doesn’t fill all of those holes it will just “prove” that he is bad at drafting to some here.  That’s dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

 

Agree, about 90%.

 

I'm starting to think pass rush from the interior is more important than from off the edge.

 

Age aside, would you rather have a Chris Jones or a Von Miller?

 

With these quick passing offenses, it's more about disruption in the lap of the QB and the quickest route to the QB is up the middle.  

 

It's another reason why the Ed Oliver pick was such a big miss.  Imagine Jeffrey Simmons next to Daquan Jones?  We could be fine with Epenesa & Basham types off the edge because the interior would be collapsed with regularity. 

 

As much as I loathe the obsessive Defensive investment.... I think Beane SERIOUSLY needs to look at getting small, undersized Oliver, with his big cap hit, off this roster and replaced with another Daquan Jones.... and tbh, if he trades Oliver, I'd be ok with a high pick DT investment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

I don’t criticize the dice rolling, but the result was poor.  It cost us Poyer, Edmunds and more.  We received a burn down video as the season highlight,  

Out of the hundreds of players available AFTER our picks at DL, I’m sure you can cherry pick a few that have succeeded in the NFL thus far.  That’s not a realistic way to criticize though.

The only thing that got burned down were our expectations. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 

Agree, about 90%.

 

I'm starting to think pass rush from the interior is more important than from off the edge.

 

Age aside, would you rather have a Chris Jones or a Von Miller?

 

With these quick passing offenses, it's more about disruption in the lap of the QB and the quickest route to the QB is up the middle.  

 

It's another reason why the Ed Oliver pick was such a big miss.  Imagine Jeffrey Simmons next to Daquan Jones?  We could be fine with Epenesa & Basham types off the edge because the interior would be collapsed with regularity. 

 

As much as I loathe the obsessive Defensive investment.... I think Beane SERIOUSLY needs to look at getting small, undersized Oliver, with his big cap hit, off this roster and replaced with another Daquan Jones.... and tbh, if he trades Oliver, I'd be ok with a high pick DT investment. 

Ed in there against the run is a liability.  Plain and simple.  I much preferred a healthy Phillips or Settle in there against the run.  We need heft in there to stop the run.  It would be one thing if Ed could use speed to get off his blocks and make plays, but he doesn't.  He just gets pushed around.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, finn said:

 

 

But I'm not happy with Beane's performance elsewhere. Zack Moss, Spencer Brown, Terrell Bernard, Roger Saffold, EJ Epenesa, Boogie Basham... He's had some hits, but regularly drafting/signing players of this caliber will not get you a championship. 

This is what I’m talking about.  Cherry picking things and calling them failures.  He’s had some hits?  You mean like 3 straight division titles?  But the standard is now every third round pick has to be an immediate superstar?  
 

You’re not going to get every pick perfect and the guys you list are mostly still young.  Miller was a calculated risk, but a risk nonetheless.  Beane might do it again given the same circumstances.  Heck, I might.  But there is no denying that it created more holes than a perceived “miss” on Bernard.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

My post was not to say it was a bad move or to say “I told you so” about Miller in any way.  It was to say that the move for Miller came with a cost.  That cost has created holes that need to be filled.  
 

There are people all over this board saying Beane has drafted poorly which is simply not true.  Poorly would imply worse than at least 16 other teams.  Has anyone even attempted to make that case?  No.  They cherry pick how we could have had DK Metclaf or other stupid anecdotal stuff.  
 

The Miller move could have resulted in a Super Bowl championship this weekend.  It didn’t.  It resulted in a video with stuff burning, a bunch of roster holes, and an injury.  Now, if Beane doesn’t fill all of those holes it will just “prove” that he is bad at drafting to some here.  That’s dumb.

Ok i can get down with the sentiment. That said. Gimme the gm that pulls these type of moves, 100 of 100 times

 

And i never want the gm scared to pull the trigger on moves like this

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, OP, but what should Beane "learn" from the Miller deal? Don't sign older free agents because they have a greater chance of injury?

Miller is a 1st ballot hall of famer and an outlier and can't be compared to 95% or more of other players his age.

If he doesn't get hurt, maybe we're still playing now. Beane's made a lot of mistakes (mostly top end of the draft) but I don't see Miller as one.

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

 

I made this point yesterday. Similarly last year when we lost to KC and then Cincy beat them... the difference was Cincy got pressure on Mahomes!

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

Ed in there against the run is a liability.  Plain and simple.  I much preferred a healthy Phillips or Settle in there against the run.  We need heft in there to stop the run.  It would be one thing if Ed could use speed to get off his blocks and make plays, but he doesn't.  He just gets pushed around.  

Oliver is a conundrum. He’s very good at winning 1 on 1’s, which is excellent when Von and Jones are on the field with him. Rousseau is similar in winning 1 on 1’s, but he can still set the edge against RT&TE doubles and pulling guards. Groot also has more growth potential considering his lack of experience at DE and his age. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

No. It’s the whole scheme. Chris jones blowing up their line - only really matters bc they play tight man to man up on the line. It makes qb hold a bit longer 

 

even if Von and Hyde we still lose. We’re 10 yards off and give them whatever they want 

33 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

No. It’s the whole scheme. Chris jones blowing up their line - only really matters bc they play tight man to man up on the line. It makes qb hold a bit longer 

 

even if Von and Hyde we still lose. We’re 10 yards off and give them whatever they want 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

Ed in there against the run is a liability.  Plain and simple.  I much preferred a healthy Phillips or Settle in there against the run.  We need heft in there to stop the run.  It would be one thing if Ed could use speed to get off his blocks and make plays, but he doesn't.  He just gets pushed around.  

 

I mean two years ago this was true. This year, it definitely wasn't. Ed played a LOT better vs the run than either Phillips or Settle. It really isn't close. There was a BIG drop off this year when either Jones or Oliver were out of the game between the Bills starting DTs and their backups. Neither Settle or Phillips played up to their contract. That is just a stone cold fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

No. It’s the whole scheme. Chris jones blowing up their line - only really matters bc they play tight man to man up on the line. It makes qb hold a bit longer 

 

even if Von and Hyde we still lose. We’re 10 yards off and give them whatever they want 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I mean two years ago this was true. This year, it definitely wasn't. Ed played a LOT better vs the run than either Phillips or Settle. It really isn't close. There was a BIG drop off this year when either Jones or Oliver were out of the game between the Bills starting DTs and their backups. Neither Settle or Phillips played up to their contract. That is just a stone cold fact. 

Earlier in the season when Phillips was actually healthy and not playing with 1 arm, I'd take him anyday vs the run over Ed.  

Edited by Billz4ever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Counter argument: The biggest difference between the defenses KC and the Bills put up against the Bengals was that KC got pressure on Burrow quickly. The impact that one KC player made was largely responsible for that. A healthy Von could’ve done the same for us. I’m not saying there weren’t other issues that day, but he’d have solved one. 

Von Miller doesn’t make a difference in that CIN game, not with the calls Frazier sent in. Burrow got the ball out somewhere around 2 seconds, to wide open receivers. It’s not like he was holding it, waiting for someone to come open. The game plan was flawed, as it is most of the time in the playoffs. Miller doesn’t get pressure because nothing the Bills did forced Joe to hold the football. It was pitch and catch in the snow.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

There has been a lot of criticism of Beane on here, mostly centered around the draft.  I disagree with the claims that Beane is some sort of bad drafter, but there is more to assembling a team.  Beane says he iis trying to build a team that is a perennial contender but also one that brings it all home.  In 2022 he made a “trade”.

 

What he gave up:

 

2023 and beyond of captain and team leader Jordan Poyer

2023 and beyond of captain and still young Tremaine Edmunds

Viable help via FA along the Oline in 22 or 23 and beyond  I’d say in 22 for sure but I don’t think there was much left at the time of the trade.

Another reasonable if unspectacular weapon at TE or WR

 

What he got:

 

Big plays in games against a horrible Rams team and our perceived main rival KC

Arguably some help developing our young DEs for a few weeks

A really cool video about burning things

Lots of stuff on Instagram

An unfulfilled promise of a quick return from injury

Three more years of huge gobs of money…..probably for little to no production beyond a lot of social media content and laudable work in the community

 

If you are listing Beane’s mistakes, the Miller pickup was first on the list once you consider the end result.  It isn’t fair to be too critical knowing the results……he couldn’t have known back when he made the decision.  He rolled the dice for 2022.  Sometimes it has to be done……but he made his goal of a long term consistent contender a lot more difficult when he rolled the dice and got a big fat snake eyes with Von.  Everyone hits and misses with draft picks.  Everyone.  He took a calculated risk with Von and lost.  I’m not one for hindsight….to me it was a 50/50 decision and it could have easily worked out for 2022…….but it didn’t.  I still like Beane and hope he is here for a long time, but he lost on this gamble and it cost him a lot.  To an extent it is back to the drawing board.  I wonder if he’d do it again.  To me it is still a 50/50 roll of the dice.  I hope he learns but does not overcorrect.

 

Personally, I think Beane has drafted well if measured against reasonable expectations,  The holes he has to fill in 2023 are less the result of “bad drafting” than the poor results and opportunity cost of a Von Miller contract that turned into nothing on the field.

 

 

I personally would NEVER have thrown a ton of money at a "pass rusher" in the twilight of his career.

 

It's stupid GM-ing 101.

 

It doesn't translate enough to added wins.  

 

Having said that, I like Beane a lot and think he is smarter than most in his profession.

 

I'd be happy to see McDermott go tomorrow, but I want to keep Beane around for a long time.

 

He is not without his mistakes, however.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

Personally, I think Beane has drafted well if measured against reasonable expectations,  The holes he has to fill in 2023 are less the result of “bad drafting” than the poor results and opportunity cost of a Von Miller contract that turned into nothing on the field.

 

Disagree.  
Roster problems always start with drafting.  And while Brandon Beane has not been a "bad drafter" overall (compared to the other GMs around the league), the quality has certainly gone down over the last few years.

 

2017 (although pre-Beane) landed us Tre White, Dion Dawkins and Matt Milano.  

2018 landed us Josh Allen, Tremaine Edmunds and Taron Johnson.  Not to mention Wyatt Teller, an All-Pro we later traded away.

First two drafts for this regime, and we have multiple All-Pro and Pro-Bowl caliber players.  Excellent foundation that set us up as a Super Bowl contender.

 

2019 got us Ed Oliver, Devin Singletary and Dawson Knox.  Overall very solid draft, netting us three starting caliber players.  But unlike the previous two, none of these guys are real difference makers.

 

2020 was good for getting us Stefon Diggs.  But that's pretty much it.  The best guys we actually drafted were Tyler Bass (a kicker), Gabe Davis, Dane Jackson and AJ Epenesa.  All role players at best, who are better in the NFL as backups.  All positions we still need to upgrade.  That is definitely a bust of a draft.

 

2021 got us Greg Rousseau... and some other guys who aren't making much impact.  Spencer Brown was a liability this year.  Damar Hamlin was OK.  Boogie Basham is a backup who does very little.  These guys deserve one more season, but this draft appears below average to date.

 

2022 has some potential to be solid.  But probably not an elite group.  Kaiir Elam looked good at times, but it's fair to question his fit in our defensive scheme.  James Cook brings some speed, and has value in a 1-2 punch.  Khalil Shakir flashed.  Christian Benford may have something, and is being talked about as a potential safety.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...