Jump to content

Bills restructure Diggs contract; create 7.8. Mill in cap space


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said:

Love that Diggs agreed to do this.

 

Way to put the team first


I’m not disagreeing, but is there any downside for him in doing this?

 

This benefits him too because he’s get his whole salary right now, minus the min.  
 

Unless I’m missing something?

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

People are interpreting the restructuring as Diggs doing something for the good of the team, which isn't really true.

That is correct.  But it means that Diggs won’t be getting a more lucrative contract this offseason.  Some people thought he might be looking for a bump because of his production last season.  Unless it’s part of the restructure that hasn’t leaked out yet, then that just got kicked until after this season at the earliest.  Give the man credit for accepting his current pay - which is very good but not top WR money - and not demanding that he be paid commensurate with his production last season. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BarleyNY said:

That is correct.  But it means that Diggs won’t be getting a more lucrative contract this offseason.  Some people thought he might be looking for a bump because of his production last season.  Unless it’s part of the restructure that hasn’t leaked out yet, then that just got kicked until after this season at the earliest.  Give the man credit for accepting his current pay - which is very good but not top WR money - and not demanding that he be paid commensurate with his production last season. 

 

I've been saying the whole time, just give him some guaranteed money and he'll be happy for a little longer. Easy peasy. Glad they got it done. Cant wait to see what comes of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Conlan58 said:

I may be wrong, but I believe signing bonuses would be taxed at a higher rate rather than salary? Either way - restructuring is always a player doing the team a favor in my eyes. This is huge!

Either way it’s still all income that falls within the same calendar year - except the last couple games and that’s still in a year where he’d be in the same tax bracket.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

I don’t believe any of his 2021 salary was guaranteed.  So this definitely is something Diggs wouldn’t have said no to.  

I take this back.  His 2021 salary was fully guaranteed on March 21.  This restructure is almost all Diggs helping the team out.  Only benefit to Diggs is he gets is his 2021 salary right now instead of weekly checks during the season. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

It wouldn’t make any sense to trade for him. We’re literally stacked at WR and he has a bloated contract too boot also he hasn’t been able to stay healthy.

This needs to stop.

 

Prior to last season he missed 4 games in the last 6 years. 

People get hurt sometimes it happens.

 

He is one of the top 10 WRs in the NFL.

 

Acquire him if you can.

Edited by CountDorkula
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

I take this back.  His 2021 salary was fully guaranteed on March 21.  This restructure is almost all Diggs helping the team out.  Only benefit to Diggs is he gets is his 2021 salary right now instead of weekly checks during the season. 

Considering you can invest a lot of that money, it's definitely a big benefit.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

I take this back.  His 2021 salary was fully guaranteed on March 21.  This restructure is almost all Diggs helping the team out.  Only benefit to Diggs is he gets is his 2021 salary right now instead of weekly checks during the season. 

That's a pretty big benefit, lol...

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said:

 

 

I know but I think of Tyreek Hill who said "once Im signed, Im signed" and that he wouldnt restructure 

 

Nice to not have that problem 

 

FWIW I suspect it's an automatic restructure.  That is, I believe the Bills have the right to convert the money from roster bonus money to signing bonus without the consent of the player.  I don't have the contract, but that's my understanding. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

They just gave him his entire salary in one go. He didn't sacrifice anything.

 

Not to say Diggs is selfish or anything like that, but in this instance it is actually beneficial to the player.

 

23 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

People are interpreting the restructuring as Diggs doing something for the good of the team, which isn't really true.

 

Serious question...does accelerating his up front payment have tax implications for Diggs?  I mean, if there is literally nothing but a benefit to Diggs to do this it seems like it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eball said:

 

 

Serious question...does accelerating his up front payment have tax implications for Diggs?  I mean, if there is literally nothing but a benefit to Diggs to do this it seems like it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

 

Depends on the tax code.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eball said:

 

 

Serious question...does accelerating his up front payment have tax implications for Diggs?  I mean, if there is literally nothing but a benefit to Diggs to do this it seems like it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

No

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Digs was the biggest opportunity for restructure cap savings. Looks like the Bills could create another $20 mil in cap space if they did all the restructure moves identified on the overthecap web site. Seems like plenty of room to do as many deals as they want....

Edited by Desert Bills Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Desert Bills Fan said:

Looks like the Bills could create another $20 mil in cap space if they did all the restructure moves identified on the overthecap web site. Seems like plenty of room to do as many deals as they want....

 

It's stuff like this why I often make the tongue-in-cheek statement of "The salary cap is a myth".

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

It's stuff like this why I often make the tongue-in-cheek statement of "The salary cap is a myth".

Just have to be careful and only do it with players you know you won't have to cut or trade since the signing bonus would be due in full at that point, instead of spread over the contract.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, teef said:

thank you for everything you do!

You asked if it had anything to do with Allen extension. And I answered. Allen’s new contract when it is done is an extension. It will have no impact on his salary in 2021. It’s how the CBA works for second contracts of draft picks. So the answer to your question, freeing up salary cap space in 2021 has nothing to do with Allen’s extension.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

It wouldn’t make any sense to trade for him. We’re literally stacked at WR and he has a bloated contract too boot also he hasn’t been able to stay healthy.

I don't think we are either. I was just posting that to get some folks going who were advocating for us getting Julio in a previous thread. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Desert Bills Fan said:

Digs was the biggest opportunity for restructure cap savings. Looks like the Bills could create another $20 mil in cap space if they did all the restructure moves identified on the overthecap web site. Seems like plenty of room to do as many deals as they want....

There’s really not a lot of those moves you’d WANT to make though.  A Dawkins restructure is about it IMO.  The Bills are now set up to make it through the season comfortably.  The Bills could even make a move with a relatively modest hit this year.  Even a bigger move - like with a Steven Nelson level contract - could be made if it were a longer contract or if voidable years were used on a short one. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

You asked if it had anything to do with Allen extension. And I answered. Allen’s new contract when it is done is an extension. It will have no impact on his salary in 2021. It’s how the CBA works for second contracts of draft picks. So the answer to your question, freeing up salary cap space in 2021 has nothing to do with Allen’s extension.

and i said, thank you for everything you do.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuscott16 said:

Just have to be careful and only do it with players you know you won't have to cut or trade since the signing bonus would be due in full at that point, instead of spread over the contract.

Actually it is the opposite. Yes the money is paid in full at the beginning of the year but the real risk is they cut the player the following year. Then all that prorated signing bonus money becomes dead cap space. That is how they lower the cap hit this year by spreading it over the next several years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key here is the timing.  June 1st is a key date for trades/cuts, because of how dead money is converted off contracts.  

 

Brandon Beane could have restructured Stephon Diggs at pretty much anytime after the season ended.  He could have signed a player like Steven Nelson or Richard Sherman months ago during free agency.  There is no rush for him to extend either Josh Allen or Tremaine Edmunds.

 

The fact this happened today in the A.M., tells me Beane is eying a post-June 1 cut/trade candidate.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Conlan58 said:

I may be wrong, but I believe signing bonuses would be taxed at a higher rate rather than salary? Either way - restructuring is always a player doing the team a favor in my eyes. This is huge!

He will get taxed by ny standards rather than say game checks in Florida re Jacksonville and Miami where there is no tax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

People are interpreting the restructuring as Diggs doing something for the good of the team, which isn't really true.

Well, Tyreek Hill has refused to do that in the past, for no good reason.

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Virgil said:


I’m not disagreeing, but is there any downside for him in doing this?

 

This benefits him too because he’s get his whole salary right now, minus the min.  
 

Unless I’m missing something?

All bonus money will be paid upfront at ny tax rates game checks like Miami and Jacksonville do not get taxed because there is no state income tax.

 

So he will lose some money yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...