Jump to content

RB is a really GLARING need, right?


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Isn't Christian Wade a wild card here?

 

Anything is possible, but I wouldnt even count him as a wild card.

 

Most likely camp fodder to take reps during Defensive drills, and run out the clock in preseason games against other 5th stringers.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills have put themselves in a position to draft basically any back(s) they want.

 

If you are looking to draft someone late, just look at Cincinnati's Michael Warren or Memphis' Patrick Taylor.

 

Either of these two could be sleeper picks for the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what’s been reported the bills have met with:

 

Swift, Akers, Eno Benjamin, Zack Moss, and Edwards-Helaire. 
 

I’d expect Beane to go to the well here and pick someone they interviewed, but without order aft visits.... who knows who they’ve actually talked with in-depth (Mims aside). IIRC some of the staff also spent a fair amount of of time around all the senior bowl backs like Perine. They also interviewed two WRs with a lot of backfield experience (Shenault and Bowden), so drafting one of them and signing a FA RB could also happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope they sign someone else.  I think if they don’t this just alerts other teams in the draft that RB will be a top need to round 2-3 for us and I’m just afraid we won’t get who we want And teams could potentially move ahead of us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dneveu said:

They're going to sign someone.  Beane has basically always said - i like to use FA to fill gaps, and then have flexibility in the draft.  

I hope Beane is playing it a little differently in this instance.  Such as, going into the draft with an open spot for an RB.  Several advantages:

 

1  Get a player better than the old sluggish vets on the market.  They can get a fresh young playmaker. 

2.  Great talent should still be available at 54.  Only about 3 RBs will have been chosen before they would get to grab one.

3.  The FO has shown they can identify RB talent (unlike WRs), and can incorporate them into the team.  Could see immediate playing time.

4.  A young addition who really might be better than Singletary would make for a cheap RB room for about 4 more years and would grow with Josh.

5.  The season is expanding, you need to incorporate more than one RB.  And they should not be JAGs, it's an important position.

6.  Comparatively, the Bills RB room is poor (unlike the WR room which is now excellent).  I'm jealous of Clev with Chubb and Hunt.

 

If an RB they consider a value at 54 doesn't make it they could go in another direction and probably still pick up a FA.  

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I actually have no problem with Yeldon as a #2 if they actually dress him and let him play. He’s not amazing or anything, but he’s a solid #2 who could excel in the passing game. 

But it does seem likely that a Devonta Freeman type winds up here once people can take physicals. 

 

 

Here here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, The Firebaugh Kid said:

Jonathan Taylor sticks out like a sore thumb. Hes incredible. I'd be all about moving up a bit to grab him. 

The thought of moving up for a RB in this draft makes me ill. I don’t think any of them would be worth it to the Bills. Now watch them do it, and me throw things at the TV. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Yeah, their third and one guys are Allen and Singletary, who was terrific at converting third downs.

 

Thing is, there's no rush. There are 6 or 7 FAs who are legitimately solid RBs sitting and watching their prices go down, and this year is a terrific year for RB depth. There are like 15 guys who look like they can play in the NFL right away.in this draft. It's a terrific year to be looking for a relief back. A guy like Dillon from BC weighs 247 and runs a 4.53 at the combine and was outrageously productive and this year 's RB class is so good he'll probably be available in the 4th. Lamical Perine would be great in the 3rd or 4th, or Joshua Kelley somewhere around the 4th now that he ran a 4.49 at the combine. Looks like 2020 will be looked back at as a great year for RBs, a year where even more than usual you could get starter-quality guys in the mid-rounds.

Agree completely. Heck, they might even take a second RB in the 6th?  Have a stable of backs with different skill sets like the Master in Mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

The thought of moving up for a RB in this draft makes me ill. I don’t think any of them would be worth it to the Bills. Now watch them do it, and me throw things at the TV. 

I doubt they will either. I think Taylor or Dobbins should be there  at 54. I feel like they need that hr threat to spell Motor. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Happy Days Lois & Clark said:

I think a backup running back is an easier position to fill than most other positions. i would wait til the 5th round before drafting one. I'd go CB, DE, WR before RB.

With all due resptect lets play out what is very likely to happen......"Tiny" Singletary is out for4 games like he was last year,  the load has to be carried by a 5th rounder?   There are about 130 scrimmage plays in a game. Say 65 offensive.  Say 33 run and 33 pass.  So for 33 plays you want to have a "value" pick from Dollar General Store carrying the ball for the Bills?     A third string cornerack  or a fourth string DE on the bench is not going to help us then.

Edited by maryland-bills-fan
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

So if "tiny" Singletary is out for4 games like he was last year, then you are okay for the load to be carried by a 5th rounder?   There are about 130 scrimmage plays in a game. Say 65 offensive.  Say 33 run and 33 pass.  So for 33 plays you want to have a "value" pick from Dollar General Store carrying the ball for the Bills?   Think about it.

Your argument makes sense, but your never going to convince the "RBs are a dime-a-dozen" guys.  They are totally dug-in on the position that you should never draft a RB early.  

 

I would, of course, prefer to find a good starting-caliber DE in round 2 over a RB, but I don't see that in the offing with this class.  I'm just not enamored with the DE class overall, especially once you get past Young, Epenesa, Gross-Matos and Chaisson.  Even, those guys (except Young) have considerable questions - Epenesa - is he a good enough athlete to translate to NFL?  Gross-Matos and Chaisson are more athletic upside than proven production at this point.  At 54 you are looking at guys DEs like Notre Dame's Okwara, Forida's Greenard and Bradley Anae.  I expect that there will be better prospects at CB and particularly RB than there will be at DE or OT.  So then the question is do you reach for a player at a more important position (DE, OT) or take a better prospect at CB or RB?  
 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RockpileSurvivor said:

Joe Marino’s prediction on when the top 5 rb’s will be picked plus a thumbnail scouting report on each.

 

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/nfl-draft-team-fits-top-running-backs-2020

 

Yesterday he and Bruce Nolan did a deep dive into them on the Locked on Bills podcast.

When I saw Akers to KC at 63, I yelled "NO!". If he's there at 54, I have been on the grab him side. Seeing him potentially go to KC makes me want him even more. Imagine him in KC with everything else they have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Richard Noggin said:

I don't know the last time I began a thread. I didn't see one dedicated to this topic. (But I'm wrong ALL the time.)

 

Running back is a screaming,  pulsing, must-have need for the 2020 Bills. Right? I mean, behind Singletary we have Yeldon, who I don't hate as 3rd down-ish receiving back, and what? A rugby guy who I'd love to see take giant moon-leaps towards NFL relevance, but isn't exactly a reliable commodity, and a special teamer who is valuable, but not on offense. 

 

So we 100% need a valid, starter-level RB to spell Singletary and potentially fill-in in the unfortunate and often likely case of injury. Or maybe I'm dim. 

 

It's nice to have so fe, w glaring weaknesses, but this is one. In my humble estimation. 

 

Right?

Excellent thought.   If you think about it in terms of Plan A, Plan B, etc., at almost every other position, if the question is what happens if Plan A doesn't work?, the answer is "here's Plan B."   That's depth.  

 

At running back, it's different.  If the the question is what happens if Singletary gets hurt and misses four games, what's Plan B?   As you point out there is no Plan B.  There's also not much of a Plan B for who's the guy who spells Singletary for 10 minutes?    There is no Plan B.

 

The Bills need some serious help.   Beane no doubt has a strategy that helps drive decisions in the draft and decisions as free agency continues, even trades.   He knows where he's going to get the help they need.   That strategy will play out over the next few months.   Interesting to watch.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Einstein's Dog said:

I hope Beane is playing it a little differently in this instance.  Such as, going into the draft with an open spot for an RB.  Several advantages:

 

1  Get a player better than the old sluggish vets on the market.  They can get a fresh young playmaker. 

2.  Great talent should still be available at 54.  Only about 3 RBs will have been chosen before they would get to grab one.

3.  The FO has shown they can identify RB talent (unlike WRs), and can incorporate them into the team.  Could see immediate playing time.

4.  A young addition who really might be better than Singletary would make for a cheap RB room for about 4 more years and would grow with Josh.

5.  The season is expanding, you need to incorporate more than one RB.  And they should not be JAGs, it's an important position.

6.  Comparatively, the Bills RB room is poor (unlike the WR room which is now excellent).  I'm jealous of Clev with Chubb and Hunt.

 

If an RB they consider a value at 54 doesn't make it they could go in another direction and probably still pick up a FA.  

This makes a lot of sense.   I'd add that what they say about running back being the most instinctive position on the field, it's a possition where you really can count on a rookie making a difference.   Couple that with the fact that Beane and McDermott know exactly the kind of guy they're looking, and that guy may not be what the public values - the glamour runners.  Coming out of college, SIngletary didn't look the kind of guy you'd expect to be a dominant ball carrier.   McBeane understood that he a collection of attributes that could make him a dominant football player.   

 

Since McBeane are looking for a different combination of attributes, guys they like seem to last longer in the draft.   Allen, Edmunds, Ford, Singletary all are examples. 

 

Given the need, it's hard not to expect Beane to continue with BPA.   Beane's already made a win-now statement with the Diggs trade.    He can't sit back and just let the running back situation work itself out - the win-now decision has already been made.    McDermott needs someone he can count on in that role.    

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In actually think the backs will go higher than usual in this draft. If said it a few times, but with this virus situation, it’s going to be very difficult to get production out of rookies who play positions that will need significant development time. It will be more of a crapshoot than ever before. So I think teams are going to go heavy on corners, defensive line, running backs...the plug and play positions. I think the high risk, low floor players may go later than usual. 

Edited by MrEpsYtown
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Einstein's Dog said:

I hope Beane is playing it a little differently in this instance.  Such as, going into the draft with an open spot for an RB.  Several advantages:

 

1  Get a player better than the old sluggish vets on the market.  They can get a fresh young playmaker. 

2.  Great talent should still be available at 54.  Only about 3 RBs will have been chosen before they would get to grab one.

3.  The FO has shown they can identify RB talent (unlike WRs), and can incorporate them into the team.  Could see immediate playing time.

4.  A young addition who really might be better than Singletary would make for a cheap RB room for about 4 more years and would grow with Josh.

5.  The season is expanding, you need to incorporate more than one RB.  And they should not be JAGs, it's an important position.

6.  Comparatively, the Bills RB room is poor (unlike the WR room which is now excellent).  I'm jealous of Clev with Chubb and Hunt.

 

If an RB they consider a value at 54 doesn't make it they could go in another direction and probably still pick up a FA.  

 

Nothing about signing a player prohibits them from drafting a player.  I think 54 is early though - considering they drafted the starter last year at 74.  Bring in a talented player... at whatever position at 54.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

Nothing about signing a player prohibits them from drafting a player.  I think 54 is early though - considering they drafted the starter last year at 74.  Bring in a talented player... at whatever position at 54.  

True, but I'm hoping they could reallocate resources.  Save on signing these Gore/ broken Shady types and put that money, along w Murphy cut and a few mill into Clowney.  I would get a lot more excited seeing Clowney added than Hyde/Shady/Gore etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

Agreed.  Singletary is not a Bell Cow RB and that era is over anyway.   And if Singletary is 1a, Yeldon is not 1b.

 

I don't agree with the posters who seem to think RBs are a dime-a-dozen.  There's just as big a difference between JAGs and Superstars at the RB position as any other position.  I'd like the Bills 1b to be someone who's good-to-great, not just a JAG like Yeldon.  

 

Ideally, the 1a and 1b possess different skillsets.  So I'd love to see us draft a strong between-the-tackles bruiser.  

 

Agree with the notion of "RBs being a dime-a-dozen" is false.  Most teams are going to the 1a/1b system which means you probably don't

want to use a 1st round on those players.  2nd round is MAYBE too high but the thought that 5-7 and UDFAs are viable is wrong.

 

9 hours ago, nucci said:

I've heard they are a dime a dozen and you can get a really good one in 5th or 6th round....or so I've read

 

LOL so have I and I don't believe everything I read.

I go get my own facts.  I've posted this last week and I will do it again.

Sweet spot for a decent RB is the 3rd round IMHO.

People thinking they can get a good RB in rounds 5-7 need to look at the facts.

 

Last 6 years of drafted RBs ROUND 1-2.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/draft-finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=2014&year_max=2019&draft_round_min=1&draft_round_max=2&draft_slot_min=1&draft_slot_max=500&pick_type=overall&pos[]=rb&conference=any&show=all&order_by=rush_yds

 

Last 6 years of drafted RBs Round 3-4

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/draft-finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=2014&year_max=2019&draft_round_min=3&draft_round_max=4&draft_slot_min=1&draft_slot_max=500&pick_type=overall&pos[]=rb&conference=any&show=all&order_by=rush_yds

 

Last 6 years of drafted RBs Round 5-7

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/draft-finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=2014&year_max=2019&draft_round_min=5&draft_round_max=7&draft_slot_min=1&draft_slot_max=500&pick_type=overall&pos[]=rb&conference=any&show=all&order_by=rush_yds

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

In actually think the backs will go higher than usual in this draft. If said it a few times, but with this virus situation, it’s going to be very difficult to get production out of rookies who play positions that will need significant development time. It will be more of a crapshoot than ever before. So I think teams are going to go heavy on corners, defensive line, running backs...the plug and play positions. I think the high risk, low floor players may go later than usual. 

Depends on if you are only looking at this year or are projecting the value of the pick over 4-5 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

With all due resptect lets play out what is very likely to happen......"Tiny" Singletary is out for4 games like he was last year,  the load has to be carried by a 5th rounder?   There are about 130 scrimmage plays in a game. Say 65 offensive.  Say 33 run and 33 pass.  So for 33 plays you want to have a "value" pick from Dollar General Store carrying the ball for the Bills?     A third string cornerack  or a fourth string DE on the bench is not going to help us then.

The Bills still have TJ Yeldon too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Depends on if you are only looking at this year or are projecting the value of the pick over 4-5 years


I just think the circumstances this year may force teams into going for immediate value and impact over projected value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

The thought of moving up for a RB in this draft makes me ill. I don’t think any of them would be worth it to the Bills. Now watch them do it, and me throw things at the TV. 

 

What did you throw at the TV when Ryan was "coach?"  Or did it go out the window?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrEpsYtown said:


I just think the circumstances this year may force teams into going for immediate value and impact over projected value.

I think you're whole train of thought here makes sense.  

 

Because the Bills want to win now, and because this position really does seem to be a position of immediate need, it makes sense that Beane would be aggressive.   Add in your guess, and I think there's some validity to it, that this year many GMs will see value in plug-n-play positions.   That will just put more pressure on Beane to move early.   

 

Bottom line, an aggressive move, trade or draft pick, is almost certain.   Diggs was an investment for this year, with ongoing value to the team.  A running back is the other investment they need to make, and it has to be a guy who promises immediate returns.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I actually have no problem with Yeldon as a #2 if they actually dress him and let him play. He’s not amazing or anything, but he’s a solid #2 who could excel in the passing game. 

But it does seem likely that a Devonta Freeman type winds up here once people can take physicals. 


I’ve seen yeldon do good things. So unsure why he just never played, eve when it was clear the season was wearing gore down.

 

if I remember right, he had the most spectacular preseason catch from josh in a wheel route. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:


I just think the circumstances this year may force teams into going for immediate value and impact over projected value.

 

I think it's an interesting point. My best guess would be that teams who genuinely (note the genuinely bit) believe they are going to be contenders this year (they have to assume it's going to happen), will be much more likely to go after the immediate impact guys, while those who are in building, or rebuilding mode, will still go after the higher risk (and ceiling) guys.

 

In an odd way, that could help poorer teams a year or two down the line, by letting them get some better talent that needs a year or two to develop.

 

Back to the OP.

 

RB is, quite simply, a glaring need. We do not have adequate numbers (or quality) on the roster at the moment. People seem to be missing the point somewhat. We need RB help. Where we may or may not get it, is the question that comes after, 'Do we need RB help?'

 

Where we may get that help, is quite obviously through either the draft or FA.

 

The 3rd round last year, where we got Singletary, represents pretty much a steal, and a number of the prognosticators about the draft, felt that at the time, not just with the benefit of hindsight. That being the case, should an equivalent talent come up, then imho we would be foolish not to take it, as it gives us the 1-2 punch we obviously want at RB - even if that is with our 2nd round pick.

 

Failing that, or getting a later round pick the FO is high on, there is always FA. As a number of people have pointed out in this thread, some of the better veterans, (left) may not be readily available due to the lack of physicals being able to be done. It might be a blessing in disguise for the odd one or two of those vets, as they get more time to heal fully. I wouldn't necessarily rule out trying to add another one anyway, and the longer things go on, the weaker the market will be for them, so a potential bargain may be had.

 

I'm sure that something will be done to address the need, as, as Shaw pointed out, there currently is no 'Plan B' at RB, and there are plenty of options for it to be done.

 

Personally, I'm well in favour of drafting another good one, assuming there is one available to us at either our 2nd or 3rd round pick. Now we have Diggs, we can draft another WR at any point. Beane has said that the WR class is as deep as he's seen it, and I'm sure we will have draftable grades on WRs, all the way through the 7th round. 

 

We've made some very interesting additions to the D-Line, and while we definitely need to find a younger DE, I'm not sure rounds 2 or 3 are the ones to do it in. Seems like a big drop off from the top guys, who we won't get a sniff at. Next year, either with a 1st round pick, or FA, (possibly both) may be when we look to get younger at DE - sometimes you have to be realistic and understand that you can't do better than what you've got - even with future 'upside' as it were.

 

The additions of Norman and Gaines make our CB group look more solid than last year - no disrespect to Kevin Johnson, who I thought did a decent job.

 

With re-signing Waddle, and the addition of Williams, we've also pretty much covered the weakness at RT - may the best man win, with a possible 'perm any one from 4' competition.

 

While I'd prefer it if we manage to acquire a decent vet (RB) before the draft, I'm not too worried about it, as there are still plenty around. My preference being because it does mean we can purely follow our board, with no potential distractions off of need.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Turk71 said:

  Bring back Jonathan Williams cheap and draft one. Williams looked really good when Mack was injured last year.

  Use the money saved on another position.

 

When you pay cheap, you get cheap.  Even if it is  a good deal and investment,  3 times and average player gives you just a better average player.  We need to get a guy at Rnning Back who other teams have to scheme against.  That makes all the WR look better if it keeps the LB shallow and the safeties keeping an eye on the line of scrimage.   How would you like to be playing CB, when the WR, instead of making a break, plows into you and drives you into the ground when it is a run.?

12 hours ago, Cal said:

No. Edge rusher and size at WR are my top two

The 10th edge rusher in  draft is not going to take playing time from the guys already on the roster. There are NOT a dozen Bruce Smiths in the draft this year. Take that to the bank.

Edited by maryland-bills-fan
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

This makes a lot of sense.   I'd add that what they say about running back being the most instinctive position on the field, it's a possition where you really can count on a rookie making a difference.   Couple that with the fact that Beane and McDermott know exactly the kind of guy they're looking, and that guy may not be what the public values - the glamour runners.  Coming out of college, SIngletary didn't look the kind of guy you'd expect to be a dominant ball carrier.   McBeane understood that he a collection of attributes that could make him a dominant football player.   

 

Since McBeane are looking for a different combination of attributes, guys they like seem to last longer in the draft.   Allen, Edmunds, Ford, Singletary all are examples. 

 

 t win-now statement with the Diggs trade.    He can't sit back and just let the running back situation work itself out - the win-now decision has already been made.    McDermott needs someone he can count on in that role.    

Here is a concept that I am being to be able to articulate.  Beane is using the cap money to get good playoers to fill the needs of the team in free agency. He is good at seeing quality, often buried in other teams depth sand grabbing the right guys.  BelliCheck was good at that. Beane is was well.  ONCE he fills as many holes as possible with FA, then he goes to the draft and gets the players he didn't get in FA and will move up to get them. HE ALSO DOES IT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. He sees where we are going to draft, goes over who will likely be at our pick or that we can get with a trade up, and then goes shopping in FA for the guys to improve the other positions that need upgrading.   The nice thing about this second method (and they try out both approaches to see which works best), is that you can concentrate on getting real game changers in the draft AND get them with rookie contracts.  THAT is where we are right now.   Gee, no long-in-the tooth runningback?  Oh, we are going to show everyone how smart we are and get a 3rd round quality RB in the 6th round.  (BS)

Edited by maryland-bills-fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. It's a nice to have piece. We can sign guys off the street to come in and be competent backups if we really need. But I fully expect the Bills to draft someone or sign someone because we have the space and it would be nice to have.

 

Singletary is a good starter. You would only say a position is a huge need if you don't have a good starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dneveu said:

They're going to sign someone.  Beane has basically always said - i like to use FA to fill gaps, and then have flexibility in the draft.  

No, you look at the draft and who you might get,  fill the other holes with FA, and then get a real game changer cheap in the draft.

6 hours ago, Putin said:

I wouldn’t say glaring Bob 

go kick a cactus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

No, you look at the draft and who you might get,  fill the other holes with FA, and then gt a real game changer cheap in the 

I think edge is where they need to find a real game changer in the early rounds. Grab a guy like Moss, Dillon in the later rounds. Bills have a good starting running back already. They just need a guy to supplement him with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dopey said:

We have 1 rb who played any significant downs last year. The fact that the rb position is "easy" to fill does not mean it's not a glaring position of need. 1 guys, 1. Definitely a glaring need.

What about the 4 games when Singleton was out with a hammie.  Do we get a mulligan on those games?  Do your remember Davis getting us into the SuperBowl with the comeback against Houston?

 

Just now, Motor26 said:

I think edge is where they need to find a real game changer in the early rounds. Grab a guy like Moss, Dillon in the later rounds. Bills have a good starting running back already. They just need a guy to supplement him with. 

The 10th defensive end in the draft is going to be a game changer?   Why didn't the other 53 picks grab that guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

What about the 4 games when Singleton was out with a hammie.  Do we get a mulligan on those games?  Do your remember Davis getting us into the SuperBowl with the comeback against Houston?

 

The 10th defensive end in the draft is going to be a game changer?   Why didn't the other 53 picks grab that guy?


If someone drops into the early to mid  2nd I could see Beane trading up. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

When you pay cheap, you get cheap.  Even if it is  a good deal and investment,  3X and average player gives you just a better average player.  We need to get a guy at Rnning Back who other teams have to scheme against.  That makes all the WR look better if it keeps the LB shallow and the safeties keeping an eye on the line of scrimage.   How would you like to be playing CB, when the WR, instead of making a break, plows into you and drives you into the ground when it is a run.?

 

  Paying more doesn't guarantee better play and players outperform their contracts every year. The Bills already have a starting rb, are you suggesting giving a big contract to a backup? Or replacing Singletary as starter?

   Also, I have no idea what '3X and average player' means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Turk71 said:

  Paying more doesn't guarantee better play and players outperform their contracts every year. The Bills already have a starting rb, are you suggesting giving a big contract to a backup? Or replacing Singletary as starter?

   Also, I have no idea what '3X and average player' means.

What I mean is that if you fish in the 10 guys who "were not important enough for their team to franchise them" pond or even offer them a good contract... you can get a good solid just another guy, who will do an okay job.  Or maybe a real good (3x) okay job. What we can and should get is somebody who will be a couple of levels above that and scare the other defensive coordinators.  There are 3 guys who could be that and another 2-3 who have a good chance to be that guy.  Remember that the RB gets the ball on about half or a quarter of the offensive plays. Why not make that something else then plain vanilla?

12 hours ago, Turk71 said:

  Paying more doesn't guarantee better play and players outperform their contracts every year. The Bills already have a starting rb, are you suggesting giving a big contract to a backup? Or replacing Singletary as starter?

   Also, I have no idea what '3X and average player' means.

Also rookie contracts are cheap.

 

Edited by maryland-bills-fan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...