Jump to content

AB asks Raiders to release him on Instagram (update: Raiders oblige and release him)


Reed83HOF

Recommended Posts

I wonder what's the age of the ones defending him. Millenial thought process. 'Oh I can his POV", "he's a victim", "no matter the money he's treated harshly like an employee"...

 

You are little precious princesses, aren't you.  99.9% of players in the NFL can grind it out - and almost all for less money - but somehow that poor little diva is a 30 million victim??? You guys need a dose of real life if you think AB has it that rough! 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Stop.  They tried to trade for him in the first place.  

 

Beane got completely lucky that he hated the thought for playing for the Bills.  Stop trying to change the narrative. It’s disingenuous.  

 

hA7A191E8

 

Wrong.  Beane looked into him and decided not to pay him.  There was no luck at all.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JR in Pittsburgh said:

I don’t quite understand what’s going on.

 

what if he plays Monday and blows out his knee? The raiders can just release him and owe him nothing further? 

Right now he has $0 earned from the Raiders so he would get his game check from Monday if he dressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JR in Pittsburgh said:

I don’t quite understand what’s going on.

 

what if he plays Monday and blows out his knee? The raiders can just release him and owe him nothing further? 

 

He's not going to play for the Raiders.

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

Stupid should hurt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RobbRiddicksTDLeap said:

 

Why do we assume he’s mentally ill?

 

He is by far the best WR in the game at the moment. 

 

He had had a legitimate beef with Big Ben, and the Steelers made a choice with him, and gave him what he wanted. 

 

He hurts his feet, the NFL makes him

comply with their uniform rules based more on endorsement money than actual safety, and the Raiders (in their way) embraced the media hurricane that came with it. 

 

Then they fined him after “standing by him”. 

 

From his point of view, nothing has changed for him. He’s still “owned” by someone; and those someone’s still don’t appreciate what he does or what he brings. 

 

Im not saying i agree with him, but i can certainly understand his point of view.

I feel like you are just as crazy as he is for feeling sorry for him. The guy has made more in a few short years than most people will make in their lives. 

 

It’s all his own fault for being an egomaniac that thinks he’s better than his team, teammates, and the game itself. It’s not about proving a point that someone owns him. He’s delusional. He had an interview that he said he doesn’t need football, that football needs him. That’s all I ever needed to hear to know I didn’t want this jackass. 

 

If hes released, I don’t see him being picked up by anyone. At least not right away. It’ll wait until some SB hungry team loses their number 1 WR. And well after Brown has had time to think about his failures in this situation. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

Yeah, so as a technical matter I think AB was already in breach with loss of the guarantee as of when he first missed practice. The contract, or what remains of it, would now have to be amended to reinstate the guarantee, otherwise it's gone for good. I think the Raiders FO and Gruden have known where they were going with this. Gruden is probably playing his own sinister game of hardball with AB "Sure you are welcome to play Monday night, and get paid, only without the guarantee. Have a nice day, dufus."

If the language surrounding the guarantee is not standard boilerplate, and is special to AB, then it looks to me that the Raiders protected themselves very well. Maybe AB's agent could have done a better job protecting his client (and himself) given who he was representing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Stop.  They tried to trade for him in the first place.  

 

Beane got completely lucky that he hated the thought for playing for the Bills.  Stop trying to change the narrative. It’s disingenuous.  

 

hA7A191E8

Just because a narrative was put out there doesn’t mean it’s true... 

 

Wawrow has never backed down from criticizing the Bills when warranted...pretty sure he knows what really happened

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chemical said:

 

Why didn’t you answer the question that was asked. Yes if he is injured he gets nothing. Why would he risk that?

Pretty sure I answered both. 

 

He's not getting paid anything now. 

 

He would get paid his game check if he plays on Monday. 

 

What did I miss? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CNYfan said:

Ratings and attention.  

 

Now Gruden is going to look even worse; he should have backed his GM, but chose Brown thus undermining Mayock.   Now Brown has betrayed him again.

 

Seahawks, Chiefs or Patriots.  

This just made me think. Gruden is one sly dog. Maybe he’s the one trying to get fired. After all, he has a contract with partial ownership doesn’t he? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chemical said:

 

Why didn’t you answer the question that was asked. Yes if he is injured he gets nothing. Why would he risk that?

 

AB is a nut job, but why in the world would he be out there playing with no guaranteed money? 

 

I really cant understand the raiders. Every time they get AB back to a semi-stable state, they ratchet up the temperature and it blows everything up again. 

 

These two deserve each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrags said:

This just made me think. Gruden is one sly dog. Maybe he’s the one trying to get fired. After all, he has a contract with partial ownership doesn’t he? Lol

Davis will never fire Gruden. 

 

He told del Rio he wanted Gruden when del Rio w still the coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chemical said:

 

Why didn’t you answer the question that was asked. Yes if he is injured he gets nothing. Why would he risk that?

No, if he’s on the roster for week 1 (which is at 4pm today) then he wouldn’t get “nothing”. His 2019 salary would be guaranteed under CBA.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said:

 

You want a team that has over half its squad with two or less years in the league to take on this guy?

 

LOL

yes sir! Strong cultures are built for it, and all we have heard for 3 years is what a great culture they have built! Getit done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Wrong.  Beane looked into him and decided not to pay him.  There was no luck at all.

 

You keep saying this nonsense and it makes no sense. Why would Beane look into someone he wasn’t willing to pay?

 

Especially when you consider the contract he got from the raiders could easily fit within our cap structure. It’s only guaranteed for 2 years. (Less now)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Could an arbitrator really rule in favor of AB?

Isn't there enough concrete evidence that he was detrimental to the team?

 

And that’s just the stuff In the media... imagine what has gone on behind closed doors... I’m sure the raiders (mayock specifically) have concrete documentation of every issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Just because a narrative was put out there doesn’t mean it’s true... 

 

Wawrow has never backed down from criticizing the Bills when warranted...pretty sure he knows what really happened

 

I love when people say "don't/stop being such and such..." and then do the exact same thing. :lol:

 

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

So the termination pay wasn't...terminated?  If so, they're not going to release him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

Only one thing to do now: suspend him.

Agreed.  I don't know how it would work, but they took away his bonuses from what I heard because of his conduct...so now suspend him without pay and make him sit and wonder and stew about things...and not let him sign with another team.for as long as possible.

 

As far as him saying you will upset a lot of people when you do what is right for YOU?  When you have already made millions...and you are playing games like this that are a large part about money......AND, when you do stuff like this 'for you' that has a potential huge negative impact on your entire team (your teammates, your coaches...everyone in the organization) because you think you have the right to stop your feet like a little baby.....yeah...his comment is really crazy, just a stupid sound bite he is trying to apply to himself that doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

And that’s just the stuff In the media... imagine what has gone on behind closed doors... I’m sure the raiders (mayock specifically) have concrete documentation of every issue.

 

Oh I would bet a lot of money that there’s so much more.  

ESPN is probably already getting together a team of investigators to start making his 30 for 30.  I think it’ll be jaw drop after jaw drop.  Hell, there could be enough for an 8 part series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...