ColoradoBills Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 I would rather have only 5 quality rookies come to camp vs. 10 or 11 lesser quality players. I'm for staying at #9 and even moving up in the 3rd or 4th rounds if need be to get quality guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Cripple Creek said: Nope, but why take 2nd or 3rd best on your board at a position of you can potentially go get #1? LOL Â Who says they are #1? Â Who says the gap from 1 or 2 is big or small? Â Â My point is, when you put it like "2nd or 3rd best" at the position, you phrase it to read like there is a big drop off. Â Just because one guy goes ahead of the other doesn't mean he is a better prospect either. Â its how the team sees each guy as a fit for their team, systems, coaches, etc. Â There are going to be blue chip stud prospects on the board at multiple positions when we are on the clock at 9. Â Its all subjective, so this arbitrary ranking is a reason to give up big assets to go get a guy. Â Â One thing I have found very ironic lately is some people seem fine trading up from 9 (which is crazy thought to me personally given the talent that will be there at 9) and yet so many still complain we traded up for Edmunds last year just because LVE had a good year for Dallas. Â Â So what happens if we trade up from 9, get a guy thats good for us, but then see similar prospects have big years that were taken at 9 or later? Â Everyone is going to call Beane an idiot for giving up assets when we could have not and still got a pro bowl type player at 9. Â Beane will go get a guy if he wants him, not doubt about it. Â But I just don't see it being above 9 because the top 10 is very rich in talent. Â We are going to get a guy at 9 that would go top 3 in most draft years. Â Top 10 is very talent heavy this year. Â Â Personally I think Beane will try and trade back, if he cant find the right deal, he will stay at 9 and take a stud. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) One scenario I like is to trade down to 20 , get compensated for such a large drop. At 20, some possibilities are Jeffery Simmons, TJ, Cordy Ford, DK, Paris, Clevin Ferrell, Andre Dillard, Christian Wilkins, Fant, Tillery, Gary, Greedy-surely one of them will still be available-and every one would start most likely. So lets say we pick up a 2nd and 3rd- that is 2 2nds, 2 3rds, 2 4ths, 2 5ths, 1 6th, and 2 7ths. That gives Beane much ammo to load up on top 100 picks. IMO we need OT, DE, DT, TE, G, RB, LB. We could end up with 4-5 new starters if we play it right. That would be a stacked roster 1 to 53. A good draft could send us on a Superbowl run the next several seasons! Edited March 15, 2019 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted March 15, 2019 Author Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:  Who says they are #1?  Who says the gap from 1 or 2 is big or small?   My point is, when you put it like "2nd or 3rd best" at the position, you phrase it to read like there is a big drop off.  Just because one guy goes ahead of the other doesn't mean he is a better prospect either.  its how the team sees each guy as a fit for their team, systems, coaches, etc.  There are going to be blue chip stud prospects on the board at multiple positions when we are on the clock at 9.  Its all subjective, so this arbitrary ranking is a reason to give up big assets to go get a guy.   One thing I have found very ironic lately is some people seem fine trading up from 9 (which is crazy thought to me personally given the talent that will be there at 9) and yet so many still complain we traded up for Edmunds last year just because LVE had a good year for Dallas.   So what happens if we trade up from 9, get a guy thats good for us, but then see similar prospects have big years that were taken at 9 or later?  Everyone is going to call Beane an idiot for giving up assets when we could have not and still got a pro bowl type player at 9.  Beane will go get a guy if he wants him, not doubt about it.  But I just don't see it being above 9 because the top 10 is very rich in talent.  We are going to get a guy at 9 that would go top 3 in most draft years.  Top 10 is very talent heavy this year.   Personally I think Beane will try and trade back, if he cant find the right deal, he will stay at 9 and take a stud.  What I am saying is: you can wait and pick at your turn. That leaves you open to the top players at positions of need being selected.  You can trade back if you have a partner. Trading back will net you more players but not a top 10 player. When you already have 10 FAs signed and 10 draft picks you do not want to add additional picks.  So, you act proactively and seek a trade up to get someone you covet.  As far as who says they’re number 1, 2,  3 etc I thought I was clear...the Bills draft board. I don’t care who I like and I care even less who you like. Who McBeane like is all that matters.  No executive wants to go into a year with 50% of his team being brand new.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Cripple Creek said: What I am saying is: you can wait and pick at your turn. That leaves you open to the top players at positions of need being selected.  You can trade back if you have a partner. Trading back will net you more players but not a top 10 player. When you already have 10 FAs signed and 10 draft picks you do not want to add additional picks.  So, you act proactively and seek a trade up to get someone you covet.  As far as who says they’re number 1, 2,  3 etc I thought I was clear...the Bills draft board. I don’t care who I like and I care even less who you like. Who McBeane like is all that matters.  No executive wants to go into a year with 50% of his team being brand new.  Half of the team will not be new.....what was nice about having all that cap space and 10 picks is we ALREADY had several players under contract.  Lets not forget that the bills have been pretty decent in plucking out of UDFA's as well....Foster and Wallace came from that group.  It honestly would not shock me to see the bills trade down for a 1st rounder in the following draft........ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Cripple Creek said: What I am saying is: you can wait and pick at your turn. That leaves you open to the top players at positions of need being selected.  You can trade back if you have a partner. Trading back will net you more players but not a top 10 player. When you already have 10 FAs signed and 10 draft picks you do not want to add additional picks.  So, you act proactively and seek a trade up to get someone you covet.  As far as who says they’re number 1, 2,  3 etc I thought I was clear...the Bills draft board. I don’t care who I like and I care even less who you like. Who McBeane like is all that matters.  No executive wants to go into a year with 50% of his team being brand new.   First off, there will be top 10 talent that gets drafted outside the top 10.  Why?  Because QB needy teams for instance will over draft to get a QB even though they are not top 10 prospects overall, but the best prospects at a position of desperate need.   So again, at 9, we are going to get not only a top 10 talent, but also a prospect that in most years would be a top 3 guy.  Its a top heavy draft.   That being said, I do not disagree that Beane will do whatever he wants to get a guy he covets.  So its not out of the question, but I think its very unlikely.  He covets draft picks A LOT.  Its one thing to trade up somewhere else in the draft where it costs you less to do so, its a whole other animal to trade up in the top 10 where you are giving up premium draft picks.  And unless there is a huge drop off or you need a QB, that just doesn't happen much at all.   And this year, we do not need a QB and there is not a big drop in talent level at the 9th pick.  So I get what you are saying, it just lacks the context of this exact draft, this exact team, and this exact GM to have much likely hood of happening.  One thing I definitely agree with though and have said many times all offseason, is that I do NOT believe Beane intends to walk out of the draft with 10 or more picks (more would be if we traded down and got more).  I fully believe there will be at least one, if not more than one trade up along the way, I just do not believe that will include a trade up from the 9th pick though.  I think trading up from our 2nd to get another first rounder or earlier 2nd rounder is very plausible though or trading our 3rd to get back into the 2nd for an additional pick too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 I really like the idea of trading down for a 1st round pick next year. Beanes MO is accumulating, and parlaying draft picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Trade down is "definitely" in play. Picking up extra draft picks is always a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 21 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: Â Who says they are #1? Â Who says the gap from 1 or 2 is big or small? Â Â My point is, when you put it like "2nd or 3rd best" at the position, you phrase it to read like there is a big drop off. Â Just because one guy goes ahead of the other doesn't mean he is a better prospect either. Â its how the team sees each guy as a fit for their team, systems, coaches, etc. Â There are going to be blue chip stud prospects on the board at multiple positions when we are on the clock at 9. Â Its all subjective, so this arbitrary ranking is a reason to give up big assets to go get a guy. Â Â One thing I have found very ironic lately is some people seem fine trading up from 9 (which is crazy thought to me personally given the talent that will be there at 9) and yet so many still complain we traded up for Edmunds last year just because LVE had a good year for Dallas. Â Â So what happens if we trade up from 9, get a guy thats good for us, but then see similar prospects have big years that were taken at 9 or later? Â Everyone is going to call Beane an idiot for giving up assets when we could have not and still got a pro bowl type player at 9. Â Beane will go get a guy if he wants him, not doubt about it. Â But I just don't see it being above 9 because the top 10 is very rich in talent. Â We are going to get a guy at 9 that would go top 3 in most draft years. Â Top 10 is very talent heavy this year. Â Â Personally I think Beane will try and trade back, if he cant find the right deal, he will stay at 9 and take a stud. Â Â ...nice assessment 'Dawg.............and agree on the trade back............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted March 15, 2019 Author Share Posted March 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Half of the team will not be new.....what was nice about having all that cap space and 10 picks is we ALREADY had several players under contract.  Lets not forget that the bills have been pretty decent in plucking out of UDFA's as well....Foster and Wallace came from that group.  It honestly would not shock me to see the bills trade down for a 1st rounder in the following draft........ John, They have signed 10 free agents. They have 10 draft picks.   That is 20 players. If the Bills add picks through trading down that number increases above 20.  You will I’ll agree that they would then be approaching 50% turnover based on roster size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 We wont finish with 10 draft picks EVEN IF we trade down and accum picks....  More then likely  a. They will be used in trade up scenario's targeting specific players b. Some of them could be traded into the following year for BETTER draft picks  We will be nowhere close to 50 percent turnover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 hours ago, formerlyofCtown said: How often does NE has a top 10 pick  I don't see how that matters to the point the OP is making (that with the amount of guys we have, we won't be picking up more picks for more bodies). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Mantis_Toboggan Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) Still have needs on the Edge, DT, OL (both G and T), OLB (that can cover and spell, potentially replace Lorax), TE, WR (Zay is garbage), HB (upgrade over Ivory, Gore and possibly Shady after last year), CB (K Johnson is injury prone, one concussion from it being a career for him, T Johnson coming off injury), and I would like a QB to replace Anderson after the debacle last season. Find a prospect who is a poor man’s JA, not sold on Barkley either after just one good game. Point is this team still has plenty of areas to upgrade, no need to squander draft picks.  We will undoubtedly see some maneuvering. Could he trade up? Sure... Will he? It’s just as likely that he trades down.  Btw, that’s 10 positions, if you count both G and T.  Hopefully there is a couple more signings before draft day to give them even more flexibility, but those 10 spots should be addressed one way or another still. Edited March 15, 2019 by Dr.Mantis_Toboggan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billzfan23 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 4 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:  Really? Josh endures a sophomore slump and we kick him to the curb? What exactly have you seen from him to even suggest he wouldn’t be worth a 3rd year?? I'm not saying you cut him after a sophomore slump, I'm just saying you can still go QB and draft another one. It's been 20 years since we've had a QB even in the top half of the league. We've never had anyone that could win a game on their own, that's for sure. They should have been drafting another 1 EVERY year of this drought just to find one that can play. That position is everything. I never understood these guys that want glorified game managers with a strong defense and run game. First, that's boring - second...it's not a sustainable way to win long term. That's why Brady, Manning, Rothleisberger, Brees, Wison, Warner, and Rodgers had the most success - the last 2 decades. They are THE ONLY hands down, no doubt about it - "franchise" guys. In a tier all their own. Matt Ryan and Eli in the second tier of that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjd1001 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 I'd still like to see a trade down. Draft picks are lottery tickets. I'd rather have a low(teens or early 20's) first and an extra second than a higher first (8th).   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said:  I don't see how that matters to the point the OP is making (that with the amount of guys we have, we won't be picking up more picks for more bodies). I wasnt responding to that.  I was responding to a comment on NE always trading down.  The quality of player youre getting in the top 10 is likely much better.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 I just don't see anything worth trading up for, if we need pass rush help there will be plenty of options, same with TE, OT, DT, WR, I think were set up real nice that even a trade down is a very real possibility. I like what we've done so far but we can still be upgraded all over the OL, DL, TE and WR imo. I don't see the value in trading up since we have our QB now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum Force Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 minute ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said: I just don't see anything worth trading up for, if we need pass rush help there will be plenty of options, same with TE, OT, DT, WR, I think were set up real nice that even a trade down is a very real possibility. I like what we've done so far but we can still be upgraded all over the OL, DL, TE and WR imo. I don't see the value in trading up since we have our QB now. The only players I can see trading up for are Josh Allen 2 and Bosa if for some strange reason they fall within range to where a trade up is feasible. Or if Beane really likes one of the DTs , Hockenson or even possibly Metcalf that much and he wants to ensure that he gets that player. But right now we seem to be sittting really good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullBuchanan Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 8 hours ago, Thurman#1 said: Please. Â May be off the table for you, but for nobody else is trading back gone. Might not happen, but you can bet they still think it's an option. Â Trading up? Yeah, not in the first round. Last year they had two massive holes they needed to fill, particularly at QB but also at the Kuechle spot in McD's defence. This year no massive holes. Not unless someone like Bosa falls to sixth or seventh or something wild like that. No massive holes? We have ZERO skill position players of any significance. I dont think 3rd tier players like Brown, Beasley and Gore are going to do a thing to address the offensive incompetence that's been on display for this team. The AFC continues to get stronger and stronger, and the Bills just stand pat. As of now, we're the 3rd most talented team in our own division, and unless they make significant improvements between now and August, I think we're on pace to be in a similar or worse draft position next April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Magnum Force said: The only players I can see trading up for are Josh Allen 2 and Bosa if for some strange reason they fall within range to where a trade up is feasible. Or if Beane really likes one of the DTs , Hockenson or even possibly Metcalf that much and he wants to ensure that he gets that player. But right now we seem to be sittting really good It would take quite a bit to move up much like we did when we traded up for Sammy Watkins, most definitely a 1st next year if we're moving up into the top 5, you don't give up a 1st next year for a LB or a DE who is coming off a season ending injury it just doesn't make sense imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum Force Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said: It would take quite a bit to move up much like we did when we traded up for Sammy Watkins, most definitely a 1st next year if we're moving up into the top 5, you don't give up a 1st next year for a LB or a DE who is coming off a season ending injury it just doesn't make sense imo. I wouldn't give up our 1st next year in a trade down for Bosa...but if he dropped for that reason and got close enough...I would inquire on what the price would be. I would take him with our 9th and not think twice about it if he were there. I really don't see this happening anyways. Edited March 15, 2019 by Magnum Force Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFL Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, Magnum Force said: I wouldn't give up our 1st next year in a trade down for Bosa...but if he dropped for that reason and got close enough...I would inquire on what the price would be. I would take him with our 9th and not think twice about it if he were there. I really don't see this happening anyways. Not likely Bosa falls passed #3, but who knows.  A perfect scenario for me is to stick with #9, OR trade up if OUR GUY can be had without selling the farm....losing our 2nd or next years first is off the table IMO. Package some picks and get another pick in the 3rd round. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum Force Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, RFL said: Not likely Bosa falls passed #3, but who knows.  A perfect scenario for me is to stick with #9, OR trade up if OUR GUY can be had without selling the farm....losing our 2nd or next years first is off the table IMO. Package some picks and get another pick in the 3rd round. Basically what I was saying is that I don't think Bosa's injury is too much of a concern and he will probably go pick 2 or 3. I agree with what you said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsredneck1 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 9 hours ago, SCBills said: We don’t need anymore 5th-7th Round Picks, but I guarantee you Beane would think about moving back if netted him a later 1st and an extra 2nd/3rd. can you imagine getting the raider's 2 late 1sts for 9? maybe we gotta throw a later rd. pick or whatever but, we can still get a premier player and a later 1st to fetch a 2nd and 3rd. as far as the 2 5th's and 2 7th's, by all means pair them for rd. 4 or higher.  we could end up with 7 or more picks rds. 1 thru 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Magnum Force said: I wouldn't give up our 1st next year in a trade down for Bosa...but if he dropped for that reason and got close enough...I would inquire on what the price would be. I would take him with our 9th and not think twice about it if he were there. I really don't see this happening anyways.  i don't want to say anything is impossible but I'd have to say if he free falled like that then the injury is much worse then speculated, highly doubtful but in your scenario then yes I'd inquire for sure if he started falling down the board. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 How exactly is a trade down off the table? Â Did Beane actually come out and say this? Â Otherwise, a trade down IS NOT out of any equation whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 1 hour ago, njbuff said: How exactly is a trade down off the table?  Did Beane actually come out and say this?  Otherwise, a trade down IS NOT out of any equation whatsoever. That didn't happen. As the roster sits there are no glaring holes. Optimistically, I dont see Buffalo drafting in the top 10 for a few years. Use the pick and get a premier player. Trade down makes sense to fill out the roster. They are in need of a impact player. The further down you go less impactful they theoretically are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehfeuh57 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 if you add a pick next year you can 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted March 16, 2019 Author Share Posted March 16, 2019 16 hours ago, John from Riverside said: We wont finish with 10 draft picks EVEN IF we trade down and accum picks....  More then likely  a. They will be used in trade up scenario's targeting specific players b. Some of them could be traded into the following year for BETTER draft picks  We will be nowhere close to 50 percent turnover What % turnover is 11 (apologies for saying 10 above) FA’s?  (Hint: 21) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 22 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:  That place looks awesome! Is this a franchise? I’m really bummed ihop is closing so many places. Every time I go, there’s at least an hour wait. So the demand is still very high. I don’t get it.  Its so good, but I think the only one is in downtown Syracuse. There was one in Rochester but I'm not sure if it's open anymore. Anytime I am anywhere near Syracuse, like within an hour or two, I will take a detour to go. I think it was started by two Syracuse college kids or something like that. Thanksgiving Waffle is amazing.  https://www.foodnetwork.com/videos/funk-n-waffles-in-new-york-0246754?soc=sharetw 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan1988 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 21 hours ago, RyanC883 said: I think trading is a possibility. Say LB White is available. The Steelers NEED an ILB. They would likely swap 1st and give us a 2nd or 3rd. That'd be hard to pass-up, esp. if we think one of the Iowa TE's is available at 20, and get an Edge before the draft.  ON THE OTHER HAND:  Say something crazy happens like Bosa, Williams, or Allen is available at say 4. I could see a trade-up. The Raiders are crazy? Perhaps Zay Jones and our 1st to trade up.  Most likely: we stay where we are and choose between White and Oliver. A great problem to have, IMO!  Then trade back into the first and grab an OT. I would want a 2 and a 1 next yr to swap with Pitt. 11spots in this draft is huge drop off in talent. But I do agree take the TE @#20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark92 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 It's starting to look like the Bills might be zeroing in on the DL at #9. Oliver would be the 3 technique that McDermott needs for his defense. If they went OL I wouldn't complain but adding 4 players through FA is quite a haul so I would imagine they use the 1st pick somewhere else. The WR room is a little full right now and they did add a TE in FA. DL is my guess unless they can get a pass Rusher between now and then. If that happens then it truly will be BPA.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 On 3/15/2019 at 8:38 AM, SCBills said: We don’t need anymore 5th-7th Round Picks, but I guarantee you Beane would think about moving back if netted him a later 1st and an extra 2nd/3rd. I agree with you, SC.  At the very least, 6's and 7's are going to have trouble making this team. I think Beane is going to use 5-7's as currency to stack picks in rounds 1-4. A trade down in the first to net an added second and fourth maybe. The a trade back into the lower first to get a target at a position of low depth in the draft. Then using a combination of 5ths, 6th and 7th to get back into the mid and lower 4th to get players.  I would be surprised if the Bills 10 picks yield more than 8 players once Beane is done trading.  There's just not room on the roster. Man, I am shocked to type this...happily shocked. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billzfan23 Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 7 hours ago, JoeF said: I agree with you, SC.  At the very least, 6's and 7's are going to have trouble making this team. I think Beane is going to use 5-7's as currency to stack picks in rounds 1-4. A trade down in the first to net an added second and fourth maybe. The a trade back into the lower first to get a target at a position of low depth in the draft. Then using a combination of 5ths, 6th and 7th to get back into the mid and lower 4th to get players.  I would be surprised if the Bills 10 picks yield more than 8 players once Beane is done trading.  There's just not room on the roster. Man, I am shocked to type this...happily shocked. Happily shocked is right...that's spot on. It's so nice to be building depth with players that have real NFL experience and have at least been serviceable spot starters. The thing we lacked the most in past years was competition at each roster spot. We always had starters at some positions that could hold their own, but man...the drop off to the backup guys was brutal. A roster full of dumpster fire retreads at best. Hell, we'd have backup offensive linemen enter the game and pick up a false start penalty on back to back drives or safeties that would leave guys running free like they didn't know the play. It was maddening.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 If they screwed up by signing too many good players, I’m gonna be pissed!   ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Sack Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 I don’t care as long as they nail the pick. Trade up, stay put or trade back. In 2017 they traded back. In 2018 they traded up. Either they love their guy at 9, or they make a draft day decision to trade back to acquire draft capital for 2020. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st&ten Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019  I think they're still evaluating players so their board isn't set yet so Beane & company probably aren't set on anything yet. We have 10 picks so I wouldn't be surprised to see Beane package that into 6 picks. Might not be the !st round but in other rounds. They can fill out the rest of their roster with UDRA's . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocCityRoller Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 completely disagree with the OP. More talent across the board. Â If you cut 'good' players then your team is improving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Says Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Beane has  leverage with those 10 picks...if he DOES trade, wouldnt surprise me to see him add FUTURE picks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimeTime101 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Trade back in first round for an extra second or third round pick. Â Trade up in 5th round to get back into mid-late 4th round. Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts