Jump to content

Gabe Davis to Jags


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said:


He could have been offered slightly more from another team but he essentially gets to go home to play for an offensive HC where he can start. Someone must’ve have offered him 15 a year but we’ll never truly know 

 

Either way its good for us, helps keep the WR market from going over the top.  Surprisingly, its the RB market that is going a little whacko right now with these $8M a year deals out the gate and talk over a $12M+ deal for Saquan possibly in Philly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BBFL said:


Might work out for them. Engram/Kirk/Jones/Davis isn’t exactly awful. 


imagine paying gabe-kirk-zay like 40-45m per year (or whatever the averages shake out to be combined)

 

and then a TE more than 10m on top. 
 

50+ on pass catchers and kirks your best one? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He definitely is going to get every opportunity in Jacksonville to be even more than that.

Yes, it's obvious what they plan for hm. Hoping a guy figures out problems he's had for years and ascends even higher is a bold strategy.

Edited by Malazan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

After the 13 seconds game I thought he was going to be a superstar on this team. I still really dont know what happened? Was it Gabe or the change of OCs? or neither?


it was putting too much weight on one game (or even worse, a couple catches)

 

he’s always been too slow to be the deep guy but not had the hands or agility to be a possession guy. 
 

The problem the jags will have is zay has some of the same issue and ran a lot of the low percentage routes to free up Ridley and Kirk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


imagine paying gabe-kirk-zay like 40-45m per year (or whatever the averages shake out to be combined)

 

and then a TE more than 10m on top. 
 

50+ on pass catchers and kirks your best one? 

 

 


Listen, if it were us I wouldn’t be a fan of it but Lawrence is still on a rookie deal so there’s that to factor in. With they way that franchise has been for years, they’re in a bind where they have to “over-pay” free agents… No different than us coming out of the drought years. 
 

You only take a discount to play for a proven winner. You only take peanuts to play for a team that’s in absolute contention for Championships or a Lombardi. Jacksonville in the past 13 seasons have only finished higher than 3rd three times… two of them are their past 2 seasons. 2022 being the year they paid big money to both Kirk and Jones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

So $39M is the real number. He gets $3M AAV more than MVS got when he signed with the Chiefs. Sounds about right after two years of salary inflation.

 

Considering the lack of WR's available, I thought someone would be dumb enough to give him 15 mil per.  However, looks like people saw the way he disappears for games and the demand maybe wasn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BBFL said:


Listen, if it were us I wouldn’t be a fan of it but Lawrence is still on a rookie deal so there’s that to factor in. With they way that franchise has been for years, they’re in a bind where they have to “over-pay” free agents… No different than us coming out of the drought years. 
 

You only take a discount to play for a proven winner. You only take peanuts to play for a team that’s in absolute contention for Championships or a Lombardi. Jacksonville in the past 13 seasons have only finished higher than 3rd three times… two of them are their past 2 seasons. 2022 being the year they paid big money to both Kirk and Jones. 


put another way: do you prefer having 3 incomplete players, or better off actually getting an elite guy and adding a decent vet plus a pick?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

After the 13 seconds game I thought he was going to be a superstar on this team. I still really dont know what happened? Was it Gabe or the change of OCs? or neither?

Neither - it was JA17. They don't "click" off the field. Gabe is a great WR and we will miss him. It just so happens that we didn't use him the way we drew it up. Even Brady had him open on too many occasions and Josh looked the other way. Good luck to Gabe - I hope he finds success in Duval with Goldie Locks. We sure didn't use him the way we should have.

  • Disagree 2
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


put another way: do you prefer having 3 incomplete players, or better off actually getting an elite guy and adding a decent vet plus a pick?

 


Who are the elite guys they were adding those years, 2022 & 2024? This year the top guys who could be argued resigned with their respective teams… 2022 they picked up the best option in Kirk and acquired the best TE that FA period unless Uzomah was your preference…

 

Could they do better? Absolutely. But the options the last 3 years aren’t exactly littered with any star receiver… 2023 saw who? Jarvis Landry? Kenny Golladay? 
 

Again, I’m looking at the bigger perspective of what they’ve had to work with. They haven’t done that bad seeing as they’ve been in the position to over pay and have acquired the best possible players at the receiving position whether you like them or not over the past 3 year period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comp pick 🎉🎊🪅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BBFL said:


Might work out for them. Engram/Kirk/Jones/Davis isn’t exactly awful. 


The comment was “Ridley is a downgrade from Davis.”  
 

I’m saying I’d rather have Calvin Ridley than Gabe Davis at WR.  They downgraded the WR2 position from one season ago

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JohnNord said:


The comment was “Ridley is a downgrade from Davis.”  
 

I’m saying I’d rather have Calvin Ridley than Gabe Davis at WR.  They downgraded the WR2 position from one season ago


I know. I agree but the point is they cant/aren’t willing to shell out for Ridley if that’s what they paid Gabe…

 

The next best option isn’t that bad was simply my point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BBFL said:


I know. I agree but the point is they cant/aren’t willing to shell out for Ridley if that’s what they paid Gabe…

 

The next best option isn’t that bad was simply my point. 

We don’t even know what kind of money Ridley is getting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Not that anyone knows anymore, but is this contract big enough to count positively for Buffalo in the Comp Pick formula?

I have no idea, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Not that anyone knows anymore, but is this contract big enough to count positively for Buffalo in the Comp Pick formula?

I mean it should be, the formula is based on signings vs lost though, so we're going to need to wait and see who we sign to offset.  

 

But yes this will count, but who knows if it's more than a 7th now a days lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...