Jump to content

Week 7 Bills @ Patriots - on to Foxborough!


Draconator

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

They been very good against the run period, the secondary been absolutely wrecked with injuries though.


NE currently sits at #15 in rush YPG. However they are #30 in the league for opponent rush attempts. They do have the 3rd best yards per rush allowed, but my question is: 

 

If they’re so stout against the run, and so easily beaten by the pass, why are teams running on them at such a high rate? 
 

Is it game scenario specific? 
 

Curious why that would be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:


NE currently sits at #15 in rush YPG. However they are #30 in the league for opponent rush attempts. They do have the 3rd best yards per rush allowed, but my question is: 

 

If they’re so stout against the run, and so easily beaten by the pass, why are teams running on them at such a high rate? 
 

Is it game scenario specific? 
 

Curious why that would be?

If you are winning by 20+ points, most teams increase the amount of rushes.  Patriots have been spanked in several games.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:


NE currently sits at #15 in rush YPG. However they are #30 in the league for opponent rush attempts. They do have the 3rd best yards per rush allowed, but my question is: 

 

If they’re so stout against the run, and so easily beaten by the pass, why are teams running on them at such a high rate? 
 

Is it game scenario specific? 
 

Curious why that would be?

Teams have the lead going into the 4th quarter so running the ball to kill the clock. I mean 2of the last 3 games been a joke they were so lopsided. 
 

The wheels fell off for the D as far as passing goes after the Jets game. That game we lost both Gonzalez and Judon. Our best pass rusher and best corner.  As I mentioned before Gonzalez was the straw broke the secondaries back. He was the 4th to go down..  Jonathan Jones is playing again now (#2 or 3 corner) but it’s obvious he is playing threw an injury and Jack Jones just started practicing this week.  So  the last 3 weeks teams have been throwing more at the beginning of the game.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Patrick Duffy said:

 

Normally I'd agree, but considering it's against Pats and with Jones and that offense has shown it may not be as serious as you think. If Bills end up having to use extras up to defend the run, I don't see anything much that Pats/Jones have been showing that warrants very much concern they can take advantage...

 

 

That's just me though....

Oliver being out would be huge. The other DTs on the roster are poor. Daquon and Ed are well above average; everyone else sucks and teams can exploit them.

7 hours ago, Mango said:

 

Would not be shocked if the Bills taped some guys up to ensure a conference/divisional win for any seeding/tie breaker advantages. But then sat those guys against TB. 

 

 

None of these games don’t matter. They all do. Losing to TB would be very bad considering that the next couple of opponents are Cincy and KC on the road.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warcodered said:

 


Bud light has always been an official sponsor of the NFL. But Labatt has been a Bills sponsor for a while and they haven’t done any of these in some time.

 

I think Labatt USA is in big trouble. 
 

They recently laid of 70+ people. And I know for a fact they lost Josh Allen because they literally no called no showed to the meeting they scheduled with him. He didn’t choose Corona over Labatt. Labatt literally ghosted him.

 

It’s crazy that that brand went from winning F1 Championships and fell to all the way to standing up NFL super stars. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

I would agree, but that Giants game just happened. 

The giants scoring 9 points with Oliver in means that the Patriots are dangerous if he's out? Or are the Bills suddenly guaranteed to have a bad offensive outing since they've had a couple of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mango said:


Bud light has always been an official sponsor of the NFL. But Labatt has been a Bills sponsor for a while and they haven’t done any of these in some time.

 

I think Labatt USA is in big trouble. 
 

They recently laid of 70+ people. And I know for a fact they lost Josh Allen because they literally no called no showed to the meeting they scheduled with him. He didn’t choose Corona over Labatt. Labatt literally ghosted him.

 

It’s crazy that that brand went from winning F1 Championships and fell to all the way to standing up NFL super stars. 

 

**Beer break**

 

Drank a lot of Labatt in my WNY teen years, and often associated it with Bills football. I remember Labatt Ice being like effing moonshine in high school. Back when the Canadians were battling to sell the highest ABV beers possible at the time. Molson Ice? XXX?

 

But I left the region after high school, and didn't move back until I was into my 30s (visited a bunch, of course). When I returned, I started to realize that Labatt beer is kinda shite. Blue Light, especially. Full flavor Labatt is OKAY in a pinch.

 

Maybe it's just that light beer, and mass-produced North American lagers in general, are dreadful unless one intends to drink for many hours at a time. 

 

If I'm looking for a "sessionable" cookout/campfire/gameday beer, I'd rather Busch Light tbh. Or the High Life. Or [insert myriad better beers than Labatt].

 

Many of the best U.S. beers now are coming from Brooklyn, of all places.

 

(Nostalgic sidebar: In college, a 12-pack of Milwaukee's Best Ice cans, The Beast (Ice), cost $3.99. Like 6% ABV. That's 18 "normal" beers. **taps temple smugly**...and worth noting i don't even drink beer these days unless I'm watching sports or watching a fire.) 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

I think Greg Cosell stated the Bills offense is based on execution. I happen to agree with him. Of course, that could be said of every offense to an extent. 

 

With that said, this offense is very good but somewhat different. I'm not used to 15 play 10 minute drives. Seems like that's difficult to maintain and not a lot of error for mistakes. 

 

This offense needs to improve despite the good statistics. The run game and play calling has to improve. I'm not sure how good the oline is after the last two poor performances. Allen's legs have to become a weapon again. Kincaid has to be utilized in deeper seam routes. The Bills should incorporate the screen game. The Bills have to be less predictable and less reliant on Diggs. More motion more misdirection plays. Etc...

 

This offense is plenty good to beat inferior teams in the regular season. Will it be good enough come playoff time? I'm afraid it's current state is not. Plenty of time to get it right. Do we think Dorsey and McD will get it right? 

 

I've been saying that all season.  People that want this dink and dunk/take what the defense gives you for 2 yards and 15 play drives are literally asking for this offense to play perfect ball.  There is no room for error on these type of drives. It's basically just playing a field position game because there is no way any offense is going to consistently march the field on those type of drives.

3 hours ago, The Wiz said:

 

 

Was Brady still on there?

3 hours ago, PatsFanNH said:

They been very good against the run period, the secondary been absolutely wrecked with injuries though.

 

Sounds like a game Dorsey will go run heavy game plan then.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

That thread is from May

 

You are not wrong took that post down.

 

So many folks were on board with Allen playing smarter and taking what the defense was giving after that game.

 

He has actually stuck to his mantra of run Josh run, let Allen be Allen.

 

...and I am sticking to mine that Allen has to adapt his game or it will go the way of other big armed running QBs...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by WideNine
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected Dorsey/Josh to dink and dunk more and run better just as an expansion of our offense and to get teams out of that 2 high shell which limits deep/intermediate passing. 

 

I figured when teams did that, we'd go back to our bread and butter with the deep crosses and overs plus seam shots to Kincaid 

 

Boy was I wrong. We don't have the consistent playmakers for a precision offense to be successful for 60 minutes. 

 

My solution:

Easy throws to several players early to get everyone in the game 

Test out run game under center early 

More pre snap motion 

A commitment to play action 

More Josh runs or the green light to scramble when it's there 

 

Force teams out of that 2 high then hit them intermediate/deep as soon as they do. Get the big plays back in this offense. 

 

Starts with letting Josh run more (not get hit more). It can done Mahomes does it to near perfection. Uses his legs when he needs to and at key moments. 

 

Edited by RunTheBall
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seen this on twitter and had to post it.  It has nothing to do with the Bills but the Pats are in it so I am going to just put it in this thread.  I hate making my own threads. I have never seen this play.  I can't believe I never seen it.  This is hilarious.  The Colts actually thought this would work?

 

 

2 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:

I expected Dorsey/Josh to dink and dunk more and run better just as an expansion of our offense and to get teams out of that 2 high shell which limits deep/intermediate passing. 

 

I figured when teams did that, we'd go back to our bread and butter with the deep crosses and overs plus seam shots to Kincaid 

 

Boy was I wrong. We don't have the consistent playmakers for a precision offense to be successful for 60 minutes. 

 

My solution:

Easy throws to several players early to get everyone in the game 

Test out run game under center early 

More pre snap motion 

A commitment to play action 

More Josh runs or the green light to scramble when it's there 

 

Force teams out of that 2 high then hit them intermediate/deep as soon as they do. Get the big plays back in this offense. 

 

Starts with letting Josh run more (not get hit more). It can done Mahomes does it to near perfection. Uses his legs when he needs to and at key moments. 

 

 

This is what I thought and still expect too.  Dink and dunk needs to be in the arsenal but it can't be the entire offense for the entire game.  They need to play too perfect for that and that is never going to happen.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

If Big Ed is out we are in serious trouble.


If the Bills are in trouble against the Patriots because Ed Oliver is out we might as well pack it in for the year.

 

However, I just don’t see the Bills being in trouble. Ed Oliver or no Ed Oliver.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Chaos said:

If you are winning by 20+ points, most teams increase the amount of rushes.  Patriots have been spanked in several games.

 

Two.

 

Patriots have been spanked in 2 games - Cowboys and Saints.  And yes, as you might expect, those games featured a lot of rush yards given up.

 

The Patriots other 4 games have been 1 TD games.  They gave up a lot of rush yards to the Dolphins though, as though they were saying "you're not gonna beat us slinging it".

 

4 minutes ago, Beast said:

If the Bills are in trouble against the Patriots because Ed Oliver is out we might as well pack it in for the year.

However, I just don’t see the Bills being in trouble. Ed Oliver or no Ed Oliver.

 

This may not be what you mean, but it sounds as though you're saying the Bills absolutely shouldn't lose to the Pats

 

Again, 3 of the Pats losses have been one-score games, including Miami.

 

The Bills better have a sound DL in the middle, and with Da'Quan Jones out they're already thin.  They coped last week by playing Ed at 1TDT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

Two.

 

Patriots have been spanked in 2 games - Cowboys and Saints.

 

True but that is 1/3 of their games.  I don't expect to destroy the Pats the way we have been playing but we do have a significantly better team.  We should beat them but any given Sunday thing.

 

Found this article in my MSN feed...

 

Quote

The New England Patriots' quarterback play simply hasn't been good enough to make this team competitive more often than not in 2023. Mac Jones' obvious struggles, combined with Bailey Zappe underwhelming when he's been called upon, leaves this 1-5 team searching for an answer at the game's most important position.

While head coach Bill Belichick has remained loyal to Jones as starter, it appears the tides are turning.

On Wednesday, ESPN's Dan Graziano co-wrote an insider column that discussed the Patriots' QB room. According to Graziano, recently promoted practice squad quarterback Malik Cunningham is being prepared for a "somewhat significant" role in the game plan, which could take place as soon as Week 7.

“I am told the coaches are discussing ways to work Cunningham into the game plan in a somewhat significant way, possibly as early as this week against Buffalo."Dan Graziano

While Cunningham is listed as a wide receiver/QB hybrid, it's obvious this potential move is hinting at a shakeup under center. New England's offense has been mostly lifeless under Jones, who's made opponents' jobs even easier through poor decision-making and turnovers.

The Pats have already started to put the wheels in motion for a Cunningham takeover. Not only was he promoted from the practice squad in Week 6, but the team gave him a three-year contract to join the the 53-man roster, which is an aggressive move. Even more, the Louisville product earned the QB2 role against the Las Vegas Raiders while Bailey Zappe was made inactive as the emergency third quarterback.

With his first snaps played in Week 6, too, it's clear the Patriots are interested in getting Cunningham on the field and seeing what happens. It sounds like he could have an even bigger opportunity to beat out Jones for the starting role in the coming days.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/patriots-preparing-shocking-quarterback-move-ahead-of-week-7/ar-AA1irSiC?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=910f735ccac947f3854e153d8505d746&ei=7

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beast said:


If the Bills are in trouble against the Patriots because Ed Oliver is out we might as well pack it in for the year.

 

However, I just don’t see the Bills being in trouble. Ed Oliver or no Ed Oliver.

I think, without Oliver, you see a dip in the overall performance of the defense. Ford, Settle, and Phillips do not demand double teams, which will have a negative impact on the DEs on passing downs and LBers on rushing downs. If the DEs are being hemmed up, that creates problems with our secondary which isn’t all that athletic.

 

That is the trouble I was talking about, there is a path that the Empire could take advantage of our DT depth.

 

Not saying we lose, we just won’t have the defensive performance we are all expecting potentially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RunTheBall said:

I expected Dorsey/Josh to dink and dunk more and run better just as an expansion of our offense and to get teams out of that 2 high shell which limits deep/intermediate passing. 

 

I figured when teams did that, we'd go back to our bread and butter with the deep crosses and overs plus seam shots to Kincaid 

 

Boy was I wrong. We don't have the consistent playmakers for a precision offense to be successful for 60 minutes. 

 

My solution:

Easy throws to several players early to get everyone in the game 

Test out run game under center early 

More pre snap motion 

A commitment to play action 

More Josh runs or the green light to scramble when it's there 

 

Force teams out of that 2 high then hit them intermediate/deep as soon as they do. Get the big plays back in this offense. 

 

Starts with letting Josh run more (not get hit more). It can done Mahomes does it to near perfection. Uses his legs when he needs to and at key moments. 

 

 

You know, this reminds me of when I was starting to fly all over the country as a private pilot, and I was a bit intimidated by the idea of a 1200, 1400, 2000 mile flight.  I asked an experienced mentor how to do it, and he kind of looked at me as though I had beets for brains: "you just plan it as a series of 500 mile flights"  There's more to it, of course - you're liable to cross more weather systems, and encounter more varied density altitudes.

 

But fundamentally, he was right.

 

What's my point? 

 

I dunno about a "precision offense", but the Bills absolutely do have enough offense to sustain scoring drives of 9-11 plays that go 75 yds or more.   And in fact, that's pretty much what they've done when they've scored successfully, so it's what they need to make up their mind to do right now.  Just take it one set of downs at a time.  The only way we're going to force teams to give us the intermediate and deep throws is if we commit to that and show patience. 

 

And in fact - most of the time when we've scored, that's exactly what we've done.  The Bills have scored 20 TD so far this season, and 9 of them have been long, methodical drives of 9-17 plays driving 75 yds or more.  One was 75 yard in 8 plays, one was 64 yds in 9 plays.  Of the others, only 2 have been quick strike length of the field in 4-5 plays drives; the others were off turnovers and some of those drives took a lot of plays to move the ball from from near midfield.

 

Just plan it as a series of 10 yard chunks.

 

As far as Josh "running more and not getting hit more", Josh isn't Mahomes.  When he runs, he gets lathered up and craves contact.  I think the Bills coaches got tired of saying to him "run but don't get hit, use your legs when you need to then slide or go OOB" .  They've been saying that to him for 5 years now and Josh has been hearing "run blahblahJosh use your legs blahblahJosh".  This season, he would maybe run out of bounds and slide a couple times, then start barreling into guys. 

 

So I think they finally said "listen, if you can't run nicely for a QB, don't run."  Of course, then we see him body-checking LB in the endzone after the play so...

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

Got this from the article you posted:

 

“Up to this point, there's no truth to the rumor that they're going to officially change their name to the New England "Patrits" because there's no "o" to speak of right now.”

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

I think, without Oliver, you see a dip in the overall performance of the defense. Ford, Settle, and Phillips do not demand double teams, which will have a negative impact on the DEs on passing downs and LBers on rushing downs. If the DEs are being hemmed up, that creates problems with our secondary which isn’t all that athletic.

 

That is the trouble I was talking about, there is a path that the Empire could take advantage of our DT depth.

 

Not saying we lose, we just won’t have the defensive performance we are all expecting potentially.

Ok first the Empire is in ruin and in. Need of a rebuild.. lol second the Pats O line if it isn’t the worst o line in the league it is definitely in the bottom 3 so your D will probably easily get pressure fast.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

You know, this reminds me of when I was starting to fly all over the country as a private pilot, and I was a bit intimidated by the idea of a 1200, 1400, 2000 mile flight.  I asked an experienced mentor how to do it, and he kind of looked at me as though I had beets for brains: "you just plan it as a series of 500 mile flights"  There's more to it, of course - you're liable to cross more weather systems, and encounter more varied density altitudes.

 

But fundamentally, he was right.

 

What's my point? 

 

I dunno about a "precision offense", but the Bills absolutely do have enough offense to sustain scoring drives of 9-11 plays that go 75 yds or more.   And in fact, that's pretty much what they've done when they've scored successfully, so it's what they need to make up their mind to do right now.  Just take it one set of downs at a time.  The only way we're going to force teams to give us the intermediate and deep throws is if we commit to that and show patience. 

 

And in fact - most of the time when we've scored, that's exactly what we've done.  The Bills have scored 20 TD so far this season, and 9 of them have been long, methodical drives of 9-17 plays driving 75 yds or more.  One was 75 yard in 8 plays, one was 64 yds in 9 plays.  Of the others, only 2 have been quick strike length of the field in 4-5 plays drives; the others were off turnovers and some of those drives took a lot of plays to move the ball from from near midfield.

 

Just plan it as a series of 10 yard chunks.

 

As far as Josh "running more and not getting hit more", Josh isn't Mahomes.  When he runs, he gets lathered up and craves contact.  I think the Bills coaches got tired of saying to him "run but don't get hit, use your legs when you need to then slide or go OOB" .  They've been saying that to him for 5 years now and Josh has been hearing "run blahblahJosh use your legs blahblahJosh".  This season, he would maybe run out of bounds and slide a couple times, then start barreling into guys. 

 

So I think they finally said "listen, if you can't run nicely for a QB, don't run."  Of course, then we see him body-checking LB in the endzone after the play so...

It's been said before, but Josh typically gets hurt from the pocket rather than on running plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

Two.

 

Patriots have been spanked in 2 games - Cowboys and Saints.  And yes, as you might expect, those games featured a lot of rush yards given up.

 

The Patriots other 4 games have been 1 TD games.  They gave up a lot of rush yards to the Dolphins though, as though they were saying "you're not gonna beat us slinging it".

 

 

This may not be what you mean, but it sounds as though you're saying the Bills absolutely shouldn't lose to the Pats

 

Again, 3 of the Pats losses have been one-score games, including Miami.

 

The Bills better have a sound DL in the middle, and with Da'Quan Jones out they're already thin.  They coped last week by playing Ed at 1TDT.


Again, the Bills should have no trouble at all with the Patriots…Ed Oliver or no Ed Oliver. The Bills will still have Settle, Phillips and Ford, plus whoever else they may activate. They will slide Rousseau inside on passing downs.

 

The Patriots have become a severely banged up team since those 1 score games you are referring to. 


The Bills will win this by at least 2 TD’s regardless of Oliver’s status.

Edited by Beast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

True but that is 1/3 of their games.  I don't expect to destroy the Pats the way we have been playing but we do have a significantly better team.  We should beat them but any given Sunday thing.

 

Found this article in my MSN feed...

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/patriots-preparing-shocking-quarterback-move-ahead-of-week-7/ar-AA1irSiC?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=910f735ccac947f3854e153d8505d746&ei=7

 

Yeah, I don't buy it.

 

First of all, if Belicheck were seriously going to switch QB to Malik Cunningham or give him a significant role, why would he advertise it in the press?  Keep it quiet and show it on the field.  "Surprise is the essence of attack"

 

Second, Cunningham had what, 2 snaps in the Raiders game?  On one of them he took a 5 yd sack. 

 

The Cover1 Disguised Coverage show has Patriots guy Taylor Kyles talking about this, starting at 12:27 if the link doesn't take you there.  Taylor (Pats guy) says "he's been primarily trained as a receiver, and getting packaged as a QB.  He showed promising flashes in preseason, but literally just end of game flashes.  If you think it's bad with Mac, imagine how it's going to look with Malik Cunningham who has no chemistry with the people on the field and is still learning the offense, out there for an entire game against NFL defenses.  He got two opportunities at QB last week, a zone read and an RPO...maybe he was not processing things quickly enough, there was a well timed blitz...Malik is very talented, but to expect him to play any significant snaps at QB no matter who the emergency QB is, it's just not going to happen because Mac is just far and away the best QB on this roster."

I think it's distraction, designed to send Bills defensive assistants scurrying for the Louisville tape and wasting their time there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr Info said:

Got this from the article you posted:

 

“Up to this point, there's no truth to the rumor that they're going to officially change their name to the New England "Patrits" because there's no "o" to speak of right now.”

New England Putrids has a nice ring to it too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Beast said:


Again, the Bills should have no trouble at all with the Patriots…Ed Oliver or no Ed Oliver. The Bills will still have Settle, Phillips and Ford, plus whoever else they may activate. They will slide Rousseau inside on passing downs.

 

The Patriots have become a severely banged up team since those 1 score games you are referring to. 


The Bills will win this by at least 2 TD’s regardless of Oliver’s status.

 

The Patriots have become a severely banged up time since those 1 score games...you mean like, last week's game against the Raiders which they lost by 4 points?  And one could say the same about the Bills ...they've become a severely banged up team since they had those strong wins earlier in the season.

 

The Bills should have had no trouble at all with the Giants, and yet.

 

Settle and Ford played 25% of the snaps each at 1T last week.  Why is that, if they can get'er done against a team that is literally last in the league in scoring, 28th in passing, and 19th for rush yards?

 

The Bills can and should beat the Patriots, but make no mistake...it's going to be a much harder slog if there isn't strong pressure and run defense up the middle.  Bill Belicheck is aware that we have two inexperienced linebackers, and he will be doing his best to fool them.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have to accept that we are going to face an AFC East opponent desperate to get out of the basement.

 

I can remember when that was our Bills and even those crappy Bills teams often made it a game vs the Pats.

 

Normally found ways to lose those, but the lesson is that you never take any opponent lightly.

 

I expect us to win, but I am not expecting a cake walk.

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WideNine said:

I think we have to accept that we are going to face an AFC East opponent desperate to get out of the basement.

 

I can remember when that was our Bills and even those crappy Bills teams often made it a game vs the Pats.

 

Normally found ways to lose those, but the lesson is that you never take any opponent lightly.

 

I expect us to win, but I am not expecting a cake walk.

 

 

Agreed. Can see a 24-17 type of game. Hopefully it's not that close

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Deadstroke said:

It's been said before, but Josh typically gets hurt from the pocket rather than on running plays.

 

It's been said before, but it's actually incorrect that Josh "typically gets hurt from the pocket".  He's had two injuries in the pocket that I can think of.

 

Outside the pocket, it's a split between injuries on running plays and trying to extend the play (and to be fair that can be a distinction without a difference, since he'll be looking to pass until he decides to take off) but he's had 3 or 4 injuries outside the pocket.

 

First of all, going back to college, Josh shattered his shoulder, requiring surgery and a lost season, on a running play.  He also broke his clavicle in HS on a run play.  I say that not to dredge up old history, but when a guy has multiple injuries in the same area it does become a concern.

 

2018 Josh missed 4 games with a UCL injury to his right elbow, sustained in the pocket.

2019 Josh sustained a concussion on a running play vs. the Pats. Way outside the pocket.

2020 Josh sustained a shoulder injury to his L shoulder Week 4, extending the play outside the pocket to the L.  He played 2 or 3 games in a linebacker brace before switching to tape for another couple of games.  By the 5th week, he was fine.

[2020 There was also concern when Josh was corkscrewed to the ground by Bosa vs. SF outside the pocket to the R while trying to break a tackle and run; looked like a knee injury, but "Josh Allen is Gumby", he escaped.]
2021 Josh sustained a turf toe injury while running out of bounds, way outside the pocket.  Injury report, but "Josh Allen is Gumby" saved him again.

2022 UCL tear again vs the Jets, in the pocket as I recall.  No time lost but Josh admitted after the season that it did affect his throwing motion.

 

Those are the ones we know about, of course there are bumps and bruises and contusions and strains and sprains that go unreported.

But I make that 2 injuries in the pocket, and 3 [or 4] outside.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Info said:

Got this from the article you posted:

 

“Up to this point, there's no truth to the rumor that they're going to officially change their name to the New England "Patrits" because there's no "o" to speak of right now.”

 

Any chance they try a wildcat with Cunningham?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, WideNine said:

I think we have to accept that we are going to face an AFC East opponent desperate to get out of the basement.

 

I can remember when that was our Bills and even those crappy Bills teams often made it a game vs the Pats.

 

Normally found ways to lose those, but the lesson is that you never take any opponent lightly.

 

I expect us to win, but I am not expecting a cake walk.

 

This.  Furthermore, Bill B hasn't entirely had a brain transplant.  He understands that we're depleted on defense and depending upon a rookie and a 1st year starter at LB, as well as relatively inexperienced CBs and lesser DTs.

 

He will be scheming to deceive and take advantage of these players.

 

4 minutes ago, dock581 said:

Any chance they try a wildcat with Cunningham?

 

There's a chance of anything, but I would expect it to be a few plays.  2 last week, one of which didn't go so well.  Maybe 4 or 6?

 

12 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

https://x.com/agetzenberg/status/1715036293829160991?s=20

 

No Ed, Morris or Harris on Thursday.

 

@HappyDaysany inside info on Eds toe injury/severity?

 

Likely Vickers gets called up, if Ed can't go. 

 

I wish we hadn't lost Ankou to the Falcons

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

I've been saying that all season.  People that want this dink and dunk/take what the defense gives you for 2 yards and 15 play drives are literally asking for this offense to play perfect ball. 

 

As opposed to the games where Josh ignores "what the defense gives him" in favor of an overthrown moon shot (because he's extending the play and off platform) resulting in a 3 and out, or tries to force a ball into Stef or Davis resulting in a turnover?  :flirt:

 

The thing is, the Bills have done those long drives on essentially half of our TDs to date.  And they've cut drives short on those impatient "must get chunk plays!" interceptions or off-target deep shots, more often than not.

 

Dink and dunk.  Make them stop us, don't stop ourselves.

 

14 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

Sounds like a game Dorsey will go run heavy game plan then.

 

I hope we go run heavy game plan, not because of some Sar Chasm but because we should take the load off Allen's shoulder and give it a chance to heal.

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...