Jump to content

The Great Squib Kickoff Controversy - Have reviewed the film like it was Zapruder


Billsfan1972

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Not kicking the low line drive was correct. 

 

Odds it gets downed immediately and probably already around the 30 are high.  

 

The high pop up inside the 10 had to be the call and the way Bass approached and followed thru that looked like what he was doing - but you can't temper your adrenaline like you're at a Friday walk thru

How? It was the exact same as every kick he did on Sunday.  The pop up is 3-4 yard approach.  Geez.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Old Coot said:

Squib kick is not a bad idea but there are risks: a good runback -- maybe one of those rugby-style plays with lateral passes.

 

A well-coached returner will immediately down the ball so maybe 1-2 secs runs off the clock.

 

By kicking deep Bills were showing faith in their D.

Yes they were, no doubt, but faith in a D that had played at best a mediocre game and has just let the Chiefs go 75 yards in a minute not long before that. The coaches then decided to make their tired defense's job even harder by calling the worst two defensive plays in Bill's playoff history.

Edited by Livinginthepast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Billsfan1972 said:

That's McD's responsibility to tell them to kick it short.  ST coach is to ensure that they play it right and tackle.

 

If I'm wrong as to their responsibility let me know.

 

 

Stay by the phone. I'm sure McDermott and Farwell will be getting back to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Yea, so what. These circumstances were worlds different than what Bruce DeHaven failed to do. And Tennessee had to have a td on that kickoff. Andy had 3 timeouts and 13 seconds.  We played right into his hands. And hopefully this thread continues if for no other reason than annoy you.

“So what” is the fact that you really don’t know what would have happened….but I’m not saying don’t squib kick it. I actually think they should have. I’m just saying I think I know why they didn’t. But…I have ZERO idea why they played defense the way they did for thirteen seconds that followed. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billsfan1972 said:

How? It was the exact same as every kick he did on Sunday.  The pop up is 3-4 yard approach.  Geez.

Sean was covering for himself,  this nonsense of not throwing anyone under the bus is BS.  He called out Mackenzie for his fumble against the Colts,  just admit he screwed up final 3 plays before FG attempt. One of worse meltdowns in team history because it was not just one play but 3 in row.  He should be called out by media and just glad Jerry did

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DapperCam said:

Special teams coach blew the call I bet and McDermott is pissed.

It was McD's decision to make the kick to the end zone.  He had all the time in the world to make the call, to make a popup kick short and force them to field it.  He choose not to.

Edited by Toyo321
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Toyo321 said:

It was McD's decision to make the kick to the end zone.  He had all the time in the world to make the call to make a pop kick short force them to field it.  He choose not to.

 

Joe Buscaglia just posted an article suggesting that McDermott's presser contains clues that he didn't want a kick to the EZ

Quote

McDermott fielded multiple questions about that exact premise and offered little in the way of a direct explanation. But he did serve up a pretty good hint that what occurred was not the planned option.

“Yeah, our execution, I wish was different,” McDermott said. “I’m still not going to get into the specifics on it. Again, it comes down to execution. We didn’t execute.”

What McDermott didn’t say is more important here. He did not say the team intended to kick through the end zone, instead used the vague term “execution.” The strong insinuation makes it appear wires were crossed. Given all of McDermott’s focus on improving the Bills’ special teams over the years, it makes sense that they’d want something different.

 

Quote

After all, this is a franchise under McDermott and general manager Brandon Beane that has kept, signed and drafted special-teams-specific players, putting far more resources into bettering that unit than most teams. They have routinely asked their kicker and kickoff coverage units to force an opponent to return a kick by kicking it just shy of the end zone. They’ve even done it in clutch moments of games through the season. They have one of the best kickers and kickoff coverage teams in the league. If they did so again Sunday, it would have forced the Chiefs into a much more dire situation to gain a bunch of yards on one play. That’s certainly more of a McDermott attention-to-detail play than just kicking it through the end zone. All of that logically points to McDermott wanting something different to happen.

 

Buy that?  Don't buy that?  Buscaglia does have a track record of speed-reading between the Bills lines and is sometimes wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Protocal69 said:

So Cover 1 just covered the fact that a Squib kick was called but Bass didnt get the call. Its shows on the kickoff that the Bills players were looking around like why was the ball kicked deep smh

 

Which Cover1 film room was this?  Or another of their shows

Was it this one?

 

 

 

Approx. timing appreciated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Protocal69 said:

Yes that is the episode: Time:About 5mins 30sec in

These might by the dumbest people on the internet.    "Yeah that was a good play on the D giving up a quick 20 yards, I can understand the call."   Yada Yada.   Miscommunication--- I love that.   In simple terms, somehow nobody told the guy kicking the ball not to kick it in the end zone.

Edited by billsfan714
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Steptide said:

I'd like to see the all 22 and see bass's reaction when it went into the endzone. That might tell us something. Either way though, I don't think it really matters. Starting at the 25 yard line with 13 seconds gives little to no chance of getting in fg range. This was an epic fail for the defense. 

 

Also squibbing the kick and giving up worse field position (Let's say starting at the 38 yard line) also makes it so that they can get into field goal position possibly in one play and thus slimming the advantage. You can arrange it anyway you want in your head. What the Bills did wasn't the right move because it didn't work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, billsfan714 said:

These might by the dumbest people on the internet.    "Yeah that was a good play on the D giving up a quick 20 yards, I can understand the call."   Yada Yada.   Miscommunication--- I love that.   In simple terms, somehow nobody told the guy kicking the ball not to kick it in the end zone.

Yeah I do not understand how everyone knew the call except for the person kicking the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Old Coot said:

Squib kick is not a bad idea but there are risks: a good runback -- maybe one of those rugby-style plays with lateral passes.

 

A well-coached returner will immediately down the ball so maybe 1-2 secs runs off the clock.

 

By kicking deep Bills were showing faith in their D.

 

showing faith in their D was a huge error after the D was letting KC do whatever and then proceeded to intentionally leave the middle of the field open in prevent to a team with 3 TO’s.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Protocal69 said:

So Cover 1 just covered the fact that a Squib kick was called but Bass didnt get the call. Its shows on the kickoff that the Bills players were looking around like why was the ball kicked deep smh

 

So how do these Cover1 guys know this for a fact when McDermott is Stonewalling better than Andrew Jackson?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Steptide said:

Yes it matters. But let's say they squib it, kc grabs the ball and runs to the 40 with 9 seconds left, then Mahomes throws to kelce and they get in fg range. The end result is the same. My point was starting at the 25 with 13 seconds is an almost near impossible task to get down field. It was and epic fail on the defense to allow it to happen. 

 

Yep. It’s water under the bridge. Whining and complaining won’t help. Learn from this, and continue our upward trajectory. 

 

PERIOD. 

 

.

Edited by Augie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’d expect this thread in any message board other than the Buffalo Bills. The kickoff was NOT the big mistake! Don’t ANY of you remember the Music City Miracle? The mistake was not holding the receivers when KC got the ball at the 25 yard line.

End thread! 

Our Special Teams unit that year was awful.  We've been flawless in covering kicks all year.  You kick it short of the goal line and trust with what got you here.  Horribly mind boggling bad decision to kick it through the end zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's worth pointing out that a non-touchback kick off was the preferred play by the Bills.  The touchback kickoff was the WRONG PLAY by the Bills.

 

HOWEVER--the touchback only increased KC's win probability from 3.4% to 4.1%, at least according to Brian Burke's model!

 

Still an OBJECTIVELY WRONG ERROR BY THE BILLS, but one with a very small impact on the game.  

 

The real talking point is how incorrectly we played defense on the ensuing plays.

 

We played as though our coaching staff thought we were ahead by more than 3 points and didn't really defend a FG attempt against an opponent with 3 timeouts.  It was baffling.  

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Nextmanup
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

 

It's worth pointing out that a non-touchback kick off was the preferred play by the Bills.  The touchback kickoff was the WRONG PLAY by the Bills.

 

HOWEVER--the touchback only increased KC's win probability from 3.4% to 4.1%, at least according to Brian Burke's model!

 

Still an OBJECTIVELY WRONG ERROR BY THE BILLS, but one with a very small impact on the game.  

 

The real talking point is how incorrectly we played defense on the ensuing plays.

 

We played as though our coaching staff thought we were ahead by more than 3 points and didn't really defend a FG attempt against an opponent with 3 timeouts.  It was baffling.  

 

 

 

 

 

Sick looking at that defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does a kicker not get a special teams play call? 

57 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

 

It's worth pointing out that a non-touchback kick off was the preferred play by the Bills.  The touchback kickoff was the WRONG PLAY by the Bills.

 

HOWEVER--the touchback only increased KC's win probability from 3.4% to 4.1%, at least according to Brian Burke's model!

 

Still an OBJECTIVELY WRONG ERROR BY THE BILLS, but one with a very small impact on the game.  

 

The real talking point is how incorrectly we played defense on the ensuing plays.

 

We played as though our coaching staff thought we were ahead by more than 3 points and didn't really defend a FG attempt against an opponent with 3 timeouts.  It was baffling.  

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not saying they did, but it honestly looks like the Bills coaching staff threw the game on purpose. Or at least some of the coaches did.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

How does a kicker not get a special teams play call? 

I'm not saying they did, but it honestly looks like the Bills coaching staff threw the game on purpose. Or at least some of the coaches did.

Then why even mention something so stupid?

 

Someone made the wrong call, and McD is not going to throw that person or persons under the bus.  Plain and simple. As for squibbing, Sal on WGR said the other day he was right next to Jay Feely on the sideline and asked him if they should squib kick.  And Feely said no because you can't predict what would happen on a return.  Felly said you put it in the end zone and have your D stop them for 13 seconds.   Others like Romo had different thoughts, which shows one thing.  THERE WERE NO ABSOLUTE CORRECT ANSWERS.  Let's say they squib or pooch kick to around the 10 yard line.  They run it back for maybe 10-15 yards in 3 seconds, fall down.  Then they have three time out with plays to move into FG position, with Mahomes.  What are the odds that he doesn't get that done?  No different than him having the ball like he did on the 25.  And the reason for that is because our defense played to not lose, instead of to win.  The answer to why we lost has nothing to do with the kick.  It has to do with the fact that the D could not, or more accurately would not, play aggressively enough to stop them from gaining 50 yards in 5 seconds.  The way the D played those last two plays, I have no doubt the Chiefs could have moved into FG position even starting from their own 10 yard line.

 

If I had to guess, McD told Farwell to go normal kick and Bass did what he was told.  And the person he does not want to throw under the bus is Frazier, because Frazier's calls cost us the game, and he doesn't want to throw him under the bus when he's getting HC consideration.

 

If Frazier doesn't get a HC gig, then McD either needs to make a change, or he and Frazier need to decide their defense is going to have a more aggressive mindset next yera.  You can't talk about being more aggressive on offense, and then play so passively on defense.  When you have a QB like Josh and as high powered an offense as the Bills do, you can afford to be more aggressive and take more chances on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Then why even mention something so stupid?

 

Someone made the wrong call, and McD is not going to throw that person or persons under the bus.  Plain and simple. As for squibbing, Sal on WGR said the other day he was right next to Jay Feely on the sideline and asked him if they should squib kick.  And Feely said no because you can't predict what would happen on a return.  Felly said you put it in the end zone and have your D stop them for 13 seconds.   Others like Romo had different thoughts, which shows one thing.  THERE WERE NO ABSOLUTE CORRECT ANSWERS.  Let's say they squib or pooch kick to around the 10 yard line.  They run it back for maybe 10-15 yards in 3 seconds, fall down.  Then they have three time out with plays to move into FG position, with Mahomes.  What are the odds that he doesn't get that done?  No different than him having the ball like he did on the 25.  And the reason for that is because our defense played to not lose, instead of to win.  The answer to why we lost has nothing to do with the kick.  It has to do with the fact that the D could not, or more accurately would not, play aggressively enough to stop them from gaining 50 yards in 5 seconds.  The way the D played those last two plays, I have no doubt the Chiefs could have moved into FG position even starting from their own 10 yard line.

 

If I had to guess, McD told Farwell to go normal kick and Bass did what he was told.  And the person he does not want to throw under the bus is Frazier, because Frazier's calls cost us the game, and he doesn't want to throw him under the bus when he's getting HC consideration.

 

If Frazier doesn't get a HC gig, then McD either needs to make a change, or he and Frazier need to decide their defense is going to have a more aggressive mindset next yera.  You can't talk about being more aggressive on offense, and then play so passively on defense.  When you have a QB like Josh and as high powered an offense as the Bills do, you can afford to be more aggressive and take more chances on defense.

Why? Because it's such a terrible call.

 

Listen, 1 of 2 things happened. Obada was supposed to jam Kelce and missed the call or the coaches threw the game.

 

There is just no other explanation. Add that to the kicker of all people missing a kickoff play call and it looks really bad.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Then why even mention something so stupid?

 

Someone made the wrong call, and McD is not going to throw that person or persons under the bus.  Plain and simple. As for squibbing, Sal on WGR said the other day he was right next to Jay Feely on the sideline and asked him if they should squib kick.  And Feely said no because you can't predict what would happen on a return.  Felly said you put it in the end zone and have your D stop them for 13 seconds.   Others like Romo had different thoughts, which shows one thing.  THERE WERE NO ABSOLUTE CORRECT ANSWERS.  Let's say they squib or pooch kick to around the 10 yard line.  They run it back for maybe 10-15 yards in 3 seconds, fall down.  Then they have three time out with plays to move into FG position, with Mahomes.  What are the odds that he doesn't get that done?  No different than him having the ball like he did on the 25.  And the reason for that is because our defense played to not lose, instead of to win.  The answer to why we lost has nothing to do with the kick.  It has to do with the fact that the D could not, or more accurately would not, play aggressively enough to stop them from gaining 50 yards in 5 seconds.  The way the D played those last two plays, I have no doubt the Chiefs could have moved into FG position even starting from their own 10 yard line.

 

If I had to guess, McD told Farwell to go normal kick and Bass did what he was told.  And the person he does not want to throw under the bus is Frazier, because Frazier's calls cost us the game, and he doesn't want to throw him under the bus when he's getting HC consideration.

 

If Frazier doesn't get a HC gig, then McD either needs to make a change, or he and Frazier need to decide their defense is going to have a more aggressive mindset next yera.  You can't talk about being more aggressive on offense, and then play so passively on defense.  When you have a QB like Josh and as high powered an offense as the Bills do, you can afford to be more aggressive and take more chances on defense.

I showed the math and stats that to me support that a kick to the 5-10 yard line was the best bet.  I know that was what I was shouting for them to do.  Bass was money all year doing it and the ST coverages were great.  Would have run a minimum 4-5 seconds not 3 imo & that would have given KC no time to run two plays to get to the 32 (which is where they ended up).  At best would have been a 60 yard attempt.

Edited by Billsfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way he would have overshot it that much if he was trying to kick it short of the goal line. Bass is an ace at those kicks. 

 

And it really doesn't matter if he did one or the other kick. Squib kick is risky with the returners KC has, also because it's a finesse kick that could go wrong. Kick out of the EZ is a guaranteed outcome. Neither is the perfect play. 

 

Bottom line - to my eyes, the 13 Seconds debacle is on Frazier for calling Prevent defense. I thought that was malpractice. 

Edited by skibum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

People get so locked in on trying prove their point. NOBODY is saying that the squib kick isn’t an option! The point is, if you’all want listen for a second, that the lack of a squib kick is NOT what lost that game. Sheeesh! 

My view is that it was....  There were a # of options to get through 13 seconds, which should have been simple.  Statistical odds already have proven/shown a squib/short kick was the best option.

 

This thread was pointing out that Bass planned to kick it out of the endzone for a touchback (whether someone forgot to tell him to do different is another debate, but he definitely wanted to get a touchback), and that every stat points to it being the better call and that the Bill defence on those short kicks was # 3 in the league.  Every second counted.

 

This isn't a random play during the game (& yes there were many questionable ones, and great plays too during the game)

 

It was 13 freaking seconds & the Bills Coaches royally screwed it up.😡 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the message on the kick did not get delivered, it’s a failure regardless of which was chosen.  It puts the minds on the sideline like WTF happened instead of on their job at had.  Everything is altered after because of doubt.  Human nature kicks in.  

 

Everything that happens influences events later.  Jones Penalty running out of bounds forcing a re-kick and big return puts you on your heels on all coverage teams later.   Hills TD forces deeper zone on last few plays of regulation because fear of short pass going to the house.  

 

Fear and doubt alter judgement.  

Edited by since79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Why? Because it's such a terrible call.

 

Listen, 1 of 2 things happened. Obada was supposed to jam Kelce and missed the call or the coaches threw the game.

 

There is just no other explanation. Add that to the kicker of all people missing a kickoff play call and it looks really bad.

Suggesting the staff looked like they threw the game is monumentally stupid.

1 hour ago, Billsfan1972 said:

I showed the math and stats that to me support that a kick to the 5-10 yard line was the best bet.  I know that was what I was shouting for them to do.  Bass was money all year doing it and the ST coverages were great.  Would have run a minimum 4-5 seconds not 3 imo & that would have given KC no time to run two plays to get to the 32 (which is where they ended up).  At best would have been a 60 yard attempt.

And a guy who actually kicked in the NFL disagrees with you.  I bet they would have called a fair catch and given Mahomes the ball.  And they would have marched down into FG position because of the prevent defense which prevented nothing.

 

When your defense gives up 50 yards in two plays when they have to get a stop, the blame is on the defense.  It is mind bogglingly simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Suggesting the staff looked like they threw the game is monumentally stupid.

And a guy who actually kicked in the NFL disagrees with you.  I bet they would have called a fair catch and given Mahomes the ball.  And they would have marched down into FG position because of the prevent defense which prevented nothing.

 

When your defense gives up 50 yards in two plays when they have to get a stop, the blame is on the defense.  It is mind bogglingly simple.

Is it? Did you see the plays called? Lol. They literally gave them field goal range. If I was going to throw the game i'de call those exact same plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Why? Because it's such a terrible call.

 

Listen, 1 of 2 things happened. Obada was supposed to jam Kelce and missed the call or the coaches threw the game.

 

There is just no other explanation. Add that to the kicker of all people missing a kickoff play call and it looks really bad.

 

Yeah, the Cover 1 guys said that Wallace's leverage on Kelce makes sense if Obada's assignment was to jam Kelce, re-route him to Wallace then drop into a shallow zone to spy Mahomes.

 

Except he didn't touch Kelce, Obada fires off the line to rush Mahomes. Kelce gets a free release down the hash with Wallace playing the wrong leverage in the wrong position.  Efe didn't do his job, or Efe was told to do the wrong job.  

 

McD is not going to throw anybody under bus, be they player or coach, whether it's Frazier, Farwell, Bass, Obada or anyone else.  But once they ***** up the squib kick call, everything went to ***** and the coaching staff started making very basic mistakes.  McD has a share of that blame, because the buck stops with him.  But I'm scratching my ***** head that someone with Frazier's experience completely went to pieces.  

 

I think Farwell *might* be a dead man walking...but if he isn't I get that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Is it? Did you see the plays called? Lol. They literally gave them field goal range. If I was going to throw the game i'de call those exact same plays.

To suggest that the Bills coaches threw the game is the most absurd thing written around here in a long time.  And I would imagine the vast majority would agree.  Quit being an idiot.

Edited by oldmanfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Suggesting the staff looked like they threw the game is monumentally stupid.

And a guy who actually kicked in the NFL disagrees with you.  I bet they would have called a fair catch and given Mahomes the ball.  And they would have marched down into FG position because of the prevent defense which prevented nothing.

 

When your defense gives up 50 yards in two plays when they have to get a stop, the blame is on the defense.  It is mind bogglingly simple.

A fair catch at the 5-10 yard line means an extra 5-20 yards.  That happens and only a hail mary wins them the game.  Think about it, there is no fair catch if kicked shallow.... Bass was proficient at kicks like that all season with his 3-4 step approach.

Edited by Billsfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

A fair catch at the 5-10 yard line means an extra 5-20 yards.  That happens and only a hail mary wins them the game.  Think about it, there is no fair catch if kicked shallow.... Bass was proficient at kicks like that all season with his 3-4 step approach.

Think about it.  They call a fair catch no matter where the ball comes down.  That gives them 13 seconds.  Say it's on the 10.  Because of the stupid defenses Frazier called they move right down the middle of the field, still get a FG try.  

 

You think you know it all and you don't.  No one knows what Reid would have had his team do or not do.  What we do know is our defense let them walk down the field 50 yards in 10 seconds.  It is hardly a stretch to think they could have made another 10-15 in that time, because our defense was determined to play passively.  

 

They lost the game because the defense could not hold them that last 13 seconds, and then they let them walk right down the field again in OT.  That is the reason.  There is no other reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...