Jump to content

Our defense always seems to come up short in the playoffs


streetkings01

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

And I got plenty of pushbacks, eyerolls and vomit emojis anytime I questioned the defense and said anything about third & fourth down conversions.  Heck think I had a thread last week and was told how little I knew.

 

KC is a great offense, however the final 13 seconds was an epic fail (and OT), along with a couple of third down conversions.

 

One great play on third & one, where Reid tried to get too cute was pretty much all they did. 

I don't think you need game changing plays to defend during the last 13 seconds!!!!!!😡

Agreed, that was mind numbing incompetence and loss of simple situational coaching strategies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You play strong competition and it offers an opportunity to improve. It is on you if you don't learn or are accepting of sub par performance. I don't buy the narrative that Chiefs are so good that nothing could be done. Sorry that's a loser argument. If you believe that the Bills defense performed as well as could be expected I don't what to tell you other than I disagree.

Edited by D. L. Hot-Flamethrower
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 1/25/2022 at 8:25 AM, BuffaloRebound said:

Like Favre and Green Bay in the ‘90’s, this defense needs its Reggie White on the D Line.  Frazier does the most with what he has.  I’d go after Khalil Mack.  Bears are rebuilding.  They don’t have a 1st rounder this year. 

If Khalil Mack comes back from his foot injury without any lingering effects then he is a trade option that is really intriguing. Chicago needs to get weapons for their new young QB and the Ohio State WRs (Olave and Wilson) could be targets. Kind of like Cincinnati’s getting Chase Young to pair with their young QB. One of them could be there at pick 25. Trade down to pick 39 and include a 3rd next year and maybe Include AJ Epenesa. There will still be a good player at 39. Mack is 31 yo and for Chicago, he is very expensive. For the team acquiring his contract, is is reasonable and easy to get out of, if it didn’t work out. Maybe the third team is a charm, especially since is coming home to where he got his start at UB. Maybe he could fill a roll somewhat like Lorenzo’s rushing LB spot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 10:14 PM, LABILLBACKER said:

We've given up 80 points in our last 2 playoff games with KC. I love the comical term "we're built to stop KC".....what utter nonsense. 80 points= 0 pass rush!

The Bills pressured Mahomes on 40% of his dropbacks so the Chiefs just threw quick passes and got 275 YAC against our slow as balls secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2022 at 11:54 AM, streetkings01 said:

When we need them most. 
 

#1 - Jags game - allowing Bortles to scramble for 1st down after 1st down when we desperately needed stops. I know our offense was trash that year, but our defense had no answers for Bortles legs.

 

#2 - Texans game - dominant 1st half to letting Watson work his magic and kick our butts the 2nd half and then sending us home in OT. 
 

#3 - Chiefs game - defense didn’t even show up for this game.

 

#4 - Chiefs game#2 - defense gives up Hill TD, FG on a 13 second drive and walk off TD in OT

 

Frazier has been the DC for all of those games……McDermott needs to get a DC in here that can adjust and understand situational football. Frazier has proven that he comes up short in big moments.

 

 

Really? Seriously? Good lord, this is pretty dumb stuff.

 

#1 - It's the defense's problem, when the opponent scored 10 points and managed 230 total yards? That's pretty far out into Stupidville.

 

#2 - The defense wasn't great, but the offense was worse.

 

#3 and #4 - When Mahomes is playing like that, nobody can stop him. You can maybe slow him down a bit and you can outscore him. He had an awful game against Cincy, lucky for them. If he'd played that bad against us, we would have made it a laugher. The offense was sensational this year but just not good enough last year. 

 

And leaving out all the games that don't support your point is just pure bush league.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 9:54 PM, streetkings01 said:

When we need them most. 
 

#1 - Jags game - allowing Bortles to scramble for 1st down after 1st down when we desperately needed stops. I know our offense was trash that year, but our defense had no answers for Bortles legs.

 

#2 - Texans game - dominant 1st half to letting Watson work his magic and kick our butts the 2nd half and then sending us home in OT. 
 

#3 - Chiefs game - defense didn’t even show up for this game.

 

#4 - Chiefs game#2 - defense gives up Hill TD, FG on a 13 second drive and walk off TD in OT

 

Frazier has been the DC for all of those games……McDermott needs to get a DC in here that can adjust and understand situational football. Frazier has proven that he comes up short in big moments.

I generally agree with this.  Look, it's all anecdotal evidence, so it's hard to say your examples really prove anything.   The defense has been good to excellent and gotten some big stops.   In fact, in the Texans game they got a great stop to get the ball back for Allen and the offense to tie the game and send it to overtime. 

 

But in general, I agree.  It's a bend-don't-break defensive philosophy, and that's a philosophy that's built on the idea that if your AVERAGES are good, then over the long run you'll be well served by the defense.   Well, that's nice and all that, but when it gets down to crunch time in the playoffs, no one cares about the long run - we care about right now.  

 

I keep remembering how the Rams-49ers playoff game ended - Jimmy G threw a desperation stupid pass that was intercepted.  Why?  Because Aaron Donald was in his face.  If your system is built on eight defensive linemen putting up good averages over the season, you probably don't have an Aaron Donald who can make a play for you. 

 

I think the defensive philosophy has to change.  I think they have to take more risks.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Really? Seriously? Good lord, this is pretty dumb stuff.

 

#1 - It's the defense's problem, when the opponent scored 10 points and managed 230 total yards? That's pretty far out into Stupidville.

 

#2 - The defense wasn't great, but the offense was worse.

 

#3 and #4 - When Mahomes is playing like that, nobody can stop him. You can maybe slow him down a bit and you can outscore him. He had an awful game against Cincy, lucky for them. If he'd played that bad against us, we would have made it a laugher. The offense was sensational this year but just not good enough last year. 

 

And leaving out all the games that don't support your point is just pure bush league.

#1 - Bortles ran all over us in the 2nd half whether it was 3rd and 12 or 3rd and 5……we did nothing in the 2nd half to adjust to that……falls on Frazier!

 

#2 - Proves my point that when we need the defense the most in big spots they seem to fall on their face…..falls on Frazier!

 

#3 - Our defense didn’t show up against a hobbled Mahomes behind a banged up oline, but the Bucs sure did. That falls on Frazier for a weak gameplan!

 

#4 - It was 13 seconds with the Chiefs at the 25 yard line……nothing else to say but, that falls on Frazier!

 

Save all the “dumb” “bush league” comments out of the responses, if you disagree you disagree all that extra stuff is unnecessary and ignorant.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“always”, child? Did they come up short vs Rivers and the Colts? MVP L. Jackson?? NE’s prodigy Mac Jones??? In days of yore, did Elway, Marino, Schroeder, Montana & Rote/Hadle fare well against us?

 

No? 

 

We surrendered 10 points to the Jags, yet only scored 3. We were thoroughly beaten in the title game game a year ago, but beat KC convincingly in the regular season then lost in OT in the greatest offensive showing in playoff history. I’d remind you who the #1 Defense in the League was during the longest season in history, but facts obviously don’t interest you. 🤦‍♂️
 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 10:14 PM, LABILLBACKER said:

We've given up 80 points in our last 2 playoff games with KC. I love the comical term "we're built to stop KC".....what utter nonsense. 80 points= 0 pass rush!

 

On 1/24/2022 at 10:18 PM, streetkings01 said:

I never subscribed to that. Without a true pass rushing stud how are we built to stop KC? 

I think when the term " built to beat KC" is referenced its pertaining to the offense and being able to score with them. 

 

Not too many defenses can stop KC when they're in rythum and Mahomes is killing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s more the eye test than anything for me.  Oliver was our only D-Linemen who looked like he could chase down Mahomes.  Even if our other D-Linemen technically got a pressure on Mahomes, Mahomes easily juked them and never looked uncomfortable.  i guess that’s what it comes down to for me.  Can our defense make a Mahomes uncomfortable when it counts?  We might have a better D on paper than Cincy, but they had multiple guys upfront who could chase Mahomes down and make him uncomfortable.  And Apple was able to run with Hill and make a couple plays.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, streetkings01 said:

#1 - Bortles ran all over us in the 2nd half whether it was 3rd and 12 or 3rd and 5……we did nothing in the 2nd half to adjust to that……falls on Frazier!

 

#2 - Proves my point that when we need the defense the most in big spots they seem to fall on their face…..falls on Frazier!

 

#3 - Our defense didn’t show up against a hobbled Mahomes behind a banged up oline, but the Bucs sure did. That falls on Frazier for a weak gameplan!

 

#4 - It was 13 seconds with the Chiefs at the 25 yard line……nothing else to say but, that falls on Frazier!

 

Save all the “dumb” “bush league” comments out of the responses, if you disagree you disagree all that extra stuff is unnecessary and ignorant.

To me it's been players mostly not making tackles. Definitely in the Houston game. 

 

Even in the division game vs the Chiefs Mahomes was running all over the place. They made him move from his pocket a lot of the game but couldn't make a play upfront.

 

I honestly don't remember the Jags game in detail but they didn't give up much.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 10:14 PM, LABILLBACKER said:

We've given up 80 points in our last 2 playoff games with KC. I love the comical term "we're built to stop KC".....what utter nonsense. 80 points= 0 pass rush!

Yes, and people are advocating that we need more weapons for Allen. 

8 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

 

I think when the term " built to beat KC" is referenced its pertaining to the offense and being able to score with them. 

 

Not too many defenses can stop KC when they're in rythum and Mahomes is killing it.


The term “built to beat KC” came from Beane’s observations of what Tampa did to them in the ensuing Superbowl. The Tampa defense was able to contain the speed of the KC offense with a relentless pass rush. Then the next draft, we go DE for our first 2 picks. This was telegraphed by Beane. It was never about being able to outshoot the KC offense. We tried that this year and it failed. That’s a very dangerous game to play. The Bangles shut down his passing lanes and his running. That worked. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2022 at 8:25 AM, BuffaloRebound said:

Like Favre and Green Bay in the ‘90’s, this defense needs its Reggie White on the D Line.  Frazier does the most with what he has.  I’d go after Khalil Mack.  Bears are rebuilding.  They don’t have a 1st rounder this year. 

Reggie White was important, but he’s not the guy that took that D into overdrive. That season was the first where Gilbert Brown (NT) was healthy, they added a Eugene Robinson in FA, and Leroy Butler started wearing contacts (seriously). 
 

What’s equally notable is what they did on offense….. adding Andre Rison, Desmond Howard, and drafting three starting Olinemen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Junction said:

Reggie White was important, but he’s not the guy that took that D into overdrive. That season was the first where Gilbert Brown (NT) was healthy, they added a Eugene Robinson in FA, and Leroy Butler started wearing contacts (seriously). 
 

What’s equally notable is what they did on offense….. adding Andre Rison, Desmond Howard, and drafting three starting Olinemen. 

I think of Charles Woodson going to Green Bay also when Aaron Rodgers won it.

 

There's a free agent that won't get a lot of love around here but DT/DE Calais Campbell would be a great signing for toughness and veteran leadership on the DL. He's very close with Rousseau. We have a young DL with talent. A lot of high picks. Some guidance from a player like Campbell could be a big boost.

 

Patrick Peterson in the secondary would also be a good move.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Saint Doug said:

Yes, and people are advocating that we need more weapons for Allen. 


The term “built to beat KC” came from Beane’s observations of what Tampa did to them in the ensuing Superbowl. The Tampa defense was able to contain the speed of the KC offense with a relentless pass rush. Then the next draft, we go DE for our first 2 picks. This was telegraphed by Beane. It was never about being able to outshoot the KC offense. We tried that this year and it failed. That’s a very dangerous game to play. The Bangles shut down his passing lanes and his running. That worked. 

 

The Bengals had a far worse defense than the BIlls (and every other playoff team) this year. That second half against KC was as much about the KC offense imploding as much as it was about anything the Bengals did defensively. 

 

And last year, that same Tampa defense got scorched by KC to the tune of 550+ yards just a month or so earlier.

 

The fact is, a kickoff in the field of play with 13 seconds left and that game is probably over. Regardless, at the end of regulation the Bills and KC were pretty even in every meaningful offensive metric you want to look at - including the score. So, yes, the Bills absolutely can go toe to toe with KC offensively. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

defense Greatly benefits from the offense scoring early and putting pressure on the opponents Rookie/Back Up QB to start throwing.

 

When Buffalo wins…it is usually always the same flow to each game.

 

It’s very rare Buffalo “comes back” to win.  Or they just don’t play enough GOOD QBs who actually punch back.  When those teams do actually punch back…Buffalo also falters.

 

Buffalo is a front running, bully team.  The bell rings and buffalo likes to explode out of the gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our D-line has been light in the pants and has gotten pushed around vs KC and Indy the last 2 yes. You can’t expect better results if either personnel is upgraded (edge rusher, and another tackle alongside Oliver), or Sean to change his bend don't break, prevent defense strategy. We need pressure packages that get results, not sitting back and admiring Hill and Kelce running freely downfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

defense Greatly benefits from the offense scoring early and putting pressure on the opponents Rookie/Back Up QB to start throwing.

 

When Buffalo wins…it is usually always the same flow to each game.

 

It’s very rare Buffalo “comes back” to win.  Or they just don’t play enough GOOD QBs who actually punch back.  When those teams do actually punch back…Buffalo also falters.

 

Buffalo is a front running, bully team.  The bell rings and buffalo likes to explode out of the gate.

 

Actually, last year they came back to win in a number of games. This year, they came back again in a number of games. Allen led them down the field in almost every close game they lost this year, putting them in a position of winning or tying the game. The difference is that they failed to finish this year every time, which, was a statistical anomaly. In his 1st 3 years, Allen averaged almost 3 4th qtr comebacks per year and almost 4 game winning drives per year - compared to zero this year. He was one of only 3 QBs in the entire league that had no come from behind wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 6:54 PM, streetkings01 said:

When we need them most. 
 

#1 - Jags game - allowing Bortles to scramble for 1st down after 1st down when we desperately needed stops. I know our offense was trash that year, but our defense had no answers for Bortles legs.

 

#2 - Texans game - dominant 1st half to letting Watson work his magic and kick our butts the 2nd half and then sending us home in OT. 
 

#3 - Chiefs game - defense didn’t even show up for this game.

 

#4 - Chiefs game#2 - defense gives up Hill TD, FG on a 13 second drive and walk off TD in OT

 

Frazier has been the DC for all of those games……McDermott needs to get a DC in here that can adjust and understand situational football. Frazier has proven that he comes up short in big moments.

McDermott was the Head Coach for all those games.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

The Bengals had a far worse defense than the BIlls (and every other playoff team) this year. That second half against KC was as much about the KC offense imploding as much as it was about anything the Bengals did defensively. 

 

And last year, that same Tampa defense got scorched by KC to the tune of 550+ yards just a month or so earlier.

 

The fact is, a kickoff in the field of play with 13 seconds left and that game is probably over. Regardless, at the end of regulation the Bills and KC were pretty even in every meaningful offensive metric you want to look at - including the score. So, yes, the Bills absolutely can go toe to toe with KC offensively. 

I never said the Bills can’t go toe to toe with the Chiefs. They’ve proved this. It’s just a harder line to walk and one that is less likely to result in a win. Our defense could’ve won that game, but they failed. The Bangles saw this and had 8 players drop back in coverage during the 4th quarter. They had a plan based on what they were seeing on the field. I give them credit, rather than say Mahomes imploded. He didn’t. They were neck and neck at the end of the game, but the Bangles D prevailed. Ours folded. 
 

As for Tampa comment, it just proves my point. You can have the greatest QB of all time slinging the ball for you, but at the end of the day, you need to shut Mahomes down. Somehow. And they obviously changed their game plan for their next match up. 

Edited by Saint Doug
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like our no.1 D stats don't tell the whole story because of some of the competition we played, our sack stats are kind of the same thing, Yes we were top half in sacks.   However a closer looks shows 24 of our 42 sacks happened in 4 games, in 13 other games we had 18 sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a little too early in the window for "always" kinds of pronouncements.

 

It's really just the past 2 seasons.  Last year was just rough because our O was banged up and couldn't keep up.  This year, the D got some key stops in the 2nd half, but it really came down to a coin flip.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saint Doug said:

I never said the Bills can’t go toe to toe with the Chiefs. They’ve proved this. It’s just a harder line to walk and one that is less likely to result in a win. Our defense could’ve won that game, but they failed. The Bangles saw this and had 8 players drop back in coverage during the 4th quarter. They had a plan based on what they were seeing on the field. I give them credit, rather than say Mahomes imploded. He didn’t. They were neck and neck at the end of the game, but the Bangles D prevailed. Ours folded. 
 

As for Tampa comment, it just proves my point. You can have the greatest QB of all time slinging the ball for you, but at the end of the day, you need to shut Mahomes down. Somehow. And they obviously changed their game plan for their next match up. 

 

I'm not saying they can't improve their defense; however, the path to any championship for Buffalo is going through Allen and the offense. Period. Just as the path for KC has gone, and will continue to go, through Mahomes and their offense.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Steptide said:

It's that ######ed prevent defense they're always playing when they have a lead. Throw the Cardinals game in there too. They're trying to stop the big play, but they leave 80% of the field wide open and allow teams to drive right down the field in 13 seconds 

Lol our 3 best defensive players were at the point of the catch vs the Cardinals. You couldn't have the defense in better position.

 

No one wants to talk about the Hill TD. Poyer, Hyde, and Milano were lost. Again, our 3 best players on the field. Come on guys. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 9:54 PM, streetkings01 said:

When we need them most. 
 

#1 - Jags game - allowing Bortles to scramble for 1st down after 1st down when we desperately needed stops. I know our offense was trash that year, but our defense had no answers for Bortles legs.

 

#2 - Texans game - dominant 1st half to letting Watson work his magic and kick our butts the 2nd half and then sending us home in OT. 
 

#3 - Chiefs game - defense didn’t even show up for this game.

 

#4 - Chiefs game#2 - defense gives up Hill TD, FG on a 13 second drive and walk off TD in OT

 

Frazier has been the DC for all of those games……McDermott needs to get a DC in here that can adjust and understand situational football. Frazier has proven that he comes up short in big moments.

 

Hey this goes all the way back to SB XXV.  Giants held the ball forever in 2nd half,  converting long 3rd down.

 

Cincinnati has shown us you don’t need to be a great defense.  You do need to come up with some creative schemes to throw teams off for a half or whatever it be.  Playoff games are one and done.  Don’t need to do the same ‘ol thing that got you there.  The opponents are good and have studied your same ‘ol thing.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 78thealltimegreat said:

There’s another thread on this Leslie and Sean are good against mediocre QB play ..when they face a decent offense they can’t stop a cold 

That's true accross the league. But there are analytic sites that break down and grade based on competition. Bills defense still grades well when compared to the league. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense is built to prevent the big play over the top, but it's extremely predictable. I understand that we aren't a blitzing team, but we need to be more deceptive on defense to confuse the opposing quarterback.

 

We may only send 4 players to rush the qb, but keep them guessing which 4 we are sending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I think of Charles Woodson going to Green Bay also when Aaron Rodgers won it.

 

There's a free agent that won't get a lot of love around here but DT/DE Calais Campbell would be a great signing for toughness and veteran leadership on the DL. He's very close with Rousseau. We have a young DL with talent. A lot of high picks. Some guidance from a player like Campbell could be a big boost.

 

Patrick Peterson in the secondary would also be a good move.

 

 

I’m not opposed to Campbell or Peterson. I’m actually intrigued by what happens in GB this year too. They may end up letting some really good players go, so a trade for Za’Darius Smith (saves GB 10+ mil in space) or something might not be out of the question. Particularly after Rashan Gary stepped up in his absence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Lol our 3 best defensive players were at the point of the catch vs the Cardinals. You couldn't have the defense in better position.

 

No one wants to talk about the Hill TD. Poyer, Hyde, and Milano were lost. Again, our 3 best players on the field. Come on guys. 

 

 

I'll give you the Cardinals game, but the rest was just utter failure at its worst 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

“always”, child? Did they come up short vs Rivers and the Colts? MVP L. Jackson?? NE’s prodigy Mac Jones??? In days of yore, did Elway, Marino, Schroeder, Montana & Rote/Hadle fare well against us?

 

No? 

 

We surrendered 10 points to the Jags, yet only scored 3. We were thoroughly beaten in the title game game a year ago, but beat KC convincingly in the regular season then lost in OT in the greatest offensive showing in playoff history. I’d remind you who the #1 Defense in the League was during the longest season in history, but facts obviously don’t interest you. 🤦‍♂️
 

 

Rivers ate our defense up…..it was Allen and that offense that saved the day. Did you even watch that game?

 

Rivers 27-46 309yds 2TD. Defense gave up 472 total yards of offense to the Colts, 167 rushing yards and 0 sacks.

Edited by streetkings01
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2022 at 10:12 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Give credit to the opposition. Mahomes and Watson were superman.

 

We don't have a player on defense that dominates games.

Whose responsible for that fact?  Isn’t a dc with continuity supposed to be developing those talented players?  Whar about being the best version of yourself by buying in to the process?  Mahomes  and Watson were developed didn’t just get great in a vacuum,thier talent was developed and schemes were used to enhance their abilities. Why are we so devoid of defensive upper echelon players after devoting so many resources to that side if the ball?  They are not supermen, they have been beaten by other teams and Cincy proved how Mahomes was very human twice this year, whereas our d got ran over 2 out of three games by that same QB. At some point the coaching and lack of success deserves attention, especially when the O has left the field with leads, out scoring those “ supermen” , and then the D repeats the most epic mistakes and breakdowns I have ever seen in Bills history.
 

Its not about giving credit to guys who have been beaten by teams like the Bengals , proving they are not bulletproof; it’s about our D failing where others have found a way to neutralize their talent.  When you waste perhaps the best offensive qb production in playoff history by giving up 42 points, allowing a tie with 13 sec left, can’t make a stop in OT with your season ending either a walk off TD , that is a pattern of defensive futility and add the 0-4 in road playoff games, 0-7 in one posession games ( yep , one posession means you had 7 defensive attempts to make one game saving stop and ALWAYS CAME  UP SHORT), proving some of those failures weren’t against “ supermen” you want to give credit too.  
 

All the op is pointing out is the D failures are repetitive, have happened at such critical times they ended our seasons, and despite some amazing offensive production we couldn’t protect leads!  It’s disconcerting  that our O has to play perfect games to win , because the D to this point has not carried us to any playoff wins. We have won when our o blows teams out and the D is along for the ride in those wins ; let us know when they come up with the game winning stand , like stopping a tying Fg with only 13 seconds to defend a win!  I’m not trying to be harsh , or call you out in any way.  I just think that cliche about the other team gets paid too, or the belief that Watson & Mahomes are unstoppable is a cop out for facing the fact that this defense under Frazier continues to come up small against talented teams. Losses to the Titans, Bucs, Chiefs, colts , and then throw in something like hail Murray previously and this coordinator has been at the helm for faliures that really should have been preventable in the vast majority of the time. No lead , no amount of time left on the clock is safe with this scheme , this coordinaror, unless the competition is against teams with below average QB talent. I would love to see how this organization would do with a different DC, however it’s probably not coincidental  that our O coordinator got a HC job while Frazier went unhired with 9 opportunities passing despite his “#1 defense “ laurels. ! 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...