Jump to content

Final result of the Marcel Dareus trade for Buffalo:


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bob in STL said:

Getting rid of that contract was huge.  Dump it when you can. 
 

Dareus helped them for one year, and then he went back to being the typically unreliable Dareus.  Getting rid of that salary help us to rebuild.   


He believes that if the Bills held onto him and traded him after the season, they’d get HOF’er value.  
 

I believe It’s foolish to assume that if the Bills kept an underperforming Dareus on the team for another season it could have had an adverse effect.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2020 at 3:42 PM, warrior9 said:

We initially traded Dareus for a sixth round conditional pick that turned into a fifth.

 

The initial fifth round pick turned out to be Wyatt Teller. 

 

The Bills then traded Wyatt teller and a 7th for this year's 5th and 6th round draft picks. 

 

When all is said and done the Bills traded Marcel Dareus and recieve

 

Jake Fromm, Tyler Bass

Damn, Beane is playing 5D chess against these other GM's. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2020 at 12:28 AM, somnus00 said:

 

At the time, I hated the Dareus pick. I wanted Watt there (even at 3), or a trade down for Cameron Jordan. My 2 favorite D-line prospects in that draft. I saw Dareus as a 2 down DT. You don't spend the 3rd overall pick on a 2 down player in my opinion.

 

Dareus was a day one starter and incredible talent who played at a high level even as "lazy" as he was. He dealt with a massive train of tragedies in a short period of time and he just couldn't cope with it. Whaley and the Bills staff at the time knew what he was dealing with and they were doing their best to help him and encourage him. It was a solid draft choice that didn't go as planned for anyone. I give my best wishes to Marcel, that he can recover and lead a good life whether he plays football again or not.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Phil The Thrill said:


He believes that if the Bills held onto him and traded him after the season, they’d get HOF’er value.  
 

I believe It’s foolish to assume that if the Bills kept an underperforming Dareus on the team for another season it could have had an adverse effect.  


 

It wouldn’t have increased any return but it would have helped our dead cap situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Phil The Thrill said:


If you read my comments here you know I don’t pretend every move is the greatest.  But unlike some, I give this Bills administration a lot of credit for the job they’ve done.  It seems like everything you write is critical.

 

Im regards to trading Dareus being a “genius” move, I never said that.  But if you remember in the summer of 2017, many in the NFL said it would be nearly impossible to move a slumping and lazy  Dareus given this cap hit - if that’s why people are giving Beane props - that’s why.  
 

I said it was the right move which you again dismissed failing to take into account the reasons why keeping him was problematic.  Again, it’s about changing culture and it happens all of the time.  
 

Also you can stop pretending that Dareus deserves the lion-share of credit for the Bills 4-2 record (he was playing less than 50% of the defensive snaps) or Jacksonville’s run defense who had already had a tremendous defensive line.  To make either of these correlations is just using junk data for your confirmation bias  
 

Your anti-Beane bias shines loud and clear through threads like this.  

Oh please.  If anything, I’m the most honest and clear thinking poster on this board.  If a move is good, I will call it good.  If it sucks, I will say it sucks.  Defensively, I pretty much love every move they have made minus signing Star and Trent Murphy.  Offensively, they have struggled.  The qb situation has been very weak to bad.  They traded for scrubs like Benjamin and Matthews and passed them off as starters.  And they love paying veterans rbs who were washed up millions of dollars.  

10 hours ago, Phil The Thrill said:


He believes that if the Bills held onto him and traded him after the season, they’d get HOF’er value.  
 

I believe It’s foolish to assume that if the Bills kept an underperforming Dareus on the team for another season it could have had an adverse effect.  

Yeah, now you’re just making stuff up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Oh please.  If anything, I’m the most honest and clear thinking poster on this board.  If a move is good, I will call it good.  If it sucks, I will say it sucks.  Defensively, I pretty much love every move they have made minus signing Star and Trent Murphy.  Offensively, they have struggled.  The qb situation has been very weak to bad.  They traded for scrubs like Benjamin and Matthews and passed them off as starters.  And they love paying veterans rbs who were washed up millions of dollars.  

Yeah, now you’re just making stuff up.


How am I making stuff up?  You said they could have gotten more of a return by trading him the next season.  This is a very presumptuous, and likely, an inaccurate statement 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2020 at 4:48 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

And to think we could have had AJ Green or Julio Jones... wtf

Either would have been great to have along with all the other studs that were picked after him.  That said, he did have an all-pro season, so it wasn't the talent that was the issue.  Also, when he came out, people raved about his character and he was seen as the safest pick.  Goes to show you what money and bad influences can do to people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2020 at 8:42 AM, C.Biscuit97 said:

A lot of people died around him.  Sometimes that motivates people.  Other times, you go the opposite way.  

I’m going to call BS in the Watt stuff.  You were really calling for the Bills to draft a guy with 11.5 sacks in 3 years in college?  Really??? Over the guy who was the D player of game in a national championship? Really???

Yes, I was calling for him. It's not just about stats. Watching him play in college, you could see he was a monster. His game speed for a guy that big was just unreal.

 

I did not want Dareus. Again, just from watching him play. He dominated at times, but didn't seem to care at others.

 

I've been wrong plenty of times with regards to college players. I have no problem admitting that. I wasn't sold on Russell Wilson. Huge screw up there. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CheshireCT said:

 

Dareus was a day one starter and incredible talent who played at a high level even as "lazy" as he was. He dealt with a massive train of tragedies in a short period of time and he just couldn't cope with it. Whaley and the Bills staff at the time knew what he was dealing with and they were doing their best to help him and encourage him. It was a solid draft choice that didn't go as planned for anyone. I give my best wishes to Marcel, that he can recover and lead a good life whether he plays football again or not.

 

I agree with you that he was troubled. I too hope things get better for him. He suffered terrible losses as well.

 

But I feel that you could see this on the field at Alabama. Just went through the motions at times. Physical abilities were not the problem.

 

I know this is just a game we're talking about. He had more important things going on.

 

But respectfully, I don't think his career was solid for the #3 overall pick. You need a superstar at that pick. I appreciate your comments by the way. Our opinions aren't that far apart, I feel.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, somnus00 said:

Yes, I was calling for him. It's not just about stats. Watching him play in college, you could see he was a monster. His game speed for a guy that big was just unreal.

 

I did not want Dareus. Again, just from watching him play. He dominated at times, but didn't seem to care at others.

 

I've been wrong plenty of times with regards to college players. I have no problem admitting that. I wasn't sold on Russell Wilson. Huge screw up there. 

Dareus had unreal speed and quickness fir a man that size

 

It was basically getting hit by silverback gorilla. An animal. Marcell was a beast when he wanted to play football

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2020 at 4:48 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

And to think we could have had AJ Green or Julio Jones... wtf

Or JJ Watt or Patrick Peterson. Any one of those four would have been better. That first round in 2011 was loaded

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo03 said:

Or JJ Watt or Patrick Peterson. Any one of those four would have been better. That first round in 2011 was loaded

It was.   But at the same time it’s not like dareus at the time of his selection was a poor choice.   Many considered him the best player in the draft.  The issue with him is motivation not skill.  It is their job to evaluate a guys motivation and try to predict his behavior but it is always partly luck.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some guys get paid and don’t have the internal character to work at their craft. Dareus ended his career with Buffalo as 2nd all time in sacks per game (behind some guy named Bruce smith). He also racked up a ton of tackles. He could have been an all-time great, he now is unsigned. He wasn’t willing to work

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, somnus00 said:

 

I agree with you that he was troubled. I too hope things get better for him. He suffered terrible losses as well.

 

But I feel that you could see this on the field at Alabama. Just went through the motions at times. Physical abilities were not the problem.

 

I know this is just a game we're talking about. He had more important things going on.

 

But respectfully, I don't think his career was solid for the #3 overall pick. You need a superstar at that pick. I appreciate your comments by the way. Our opinions aren't that far apart, I feel.

Good post.  I definitely think his personal losses caught up with him.  He was a different dude when he came to Buffalo than when he left.  He had no one to hold him accountable in his family.  He was like a goofy dude but by the end, he was trying to buy a strip club in Buffalo (got shut down by the Bills).  Just a different person.  
 

same is he had a start similar to Warren Sapp.  He could have been a monster.  He just turned 30 too.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2020 at 12:53 PM, C.Biscuit97 said:

I think you are missing the point.  No one is arguing about trading Dareus.  The argument is when they traded him and acting like it was some genius move.  When they traded Dareus, they were 4-2.  They finished 5-6 after the trade.  Genius!  It clearly sent an inspiring message in the lockerroom!

 

It saved zero money when if happened; the Jags went from a terrible run defense to almost making the SB; and our run defense was awful after the trade.  If they keep Dareus for the season, he might help win a few more games and possibly the playoff game.  He also may have been traded for better value in the offseason.  
 

long term, they cleared cap room.  But short term, no, it wasn’t a good move.  You can still be a Bills fans and not pretend every move they make is genius.  

 

That's the proper criticism of the trade was why not do it in the 2018 off-season? The rush defense collapsed the rest of the season. As much as Dareus fell off as a interior disruptor he was still an elite level rush defender and it could have cost the team the 2017 playoffs by trading him a bit too early. BUT I understand that if someone is becoming such a huge problem in the locker room that it is looking like it will be toxic then maybe it was just too much of a risk to keep him around. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rico said:

I've said it before & I'll say it again, I think MD was a great pick at #3 who unfortunately went to the wrong team at the wrong time. It happens.

 

It is hard to say that AJ Green or Julio Jones wouldn't have been better picks at #3 but at the time Dareus was considered as sure fire high ceiling low floor type prospect as you could get at a position where the Bills needed a lot of help at. 

2 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Go back and check the tape, almost everyone on this board wanted the Bills to sign Dareus to an extension. 

Beane signed a guy that quit at halftime and gave millions to an injured PED cheat.

None of them are perfect judges of character 

 

Almost Everyone wanted the Bills to take him or Von Miller whomever was there at pick 3 and sign him to an extension. I am not sure if Mario being on the team and Rex showing up right when he got the extension made things worse? It was just such a drastic fall off form 2015-2017 from 2013-2014. In 2014 Dareus followed a Pro-Bowl caliber 2013 season by being one of the top 2-3 DT's in the league behind Suh and McCoy. He was 25 why wouldn't you want to keep that guy? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

 

It is hard to say that AJ Green or Julio Jones wouldn't have been better picks at #3 but at the time Dareus was considered as sure fire high ceiling low floor type prospect as you could get at a position where the Bills needed a lot of help at. 

Yeah, neither of them needed all the proper nurturing/developing and veteran support group that MD needed & that this trainwreck of an organization at the time just couldn't provide. By the time McBeane came along and started cleaning up the mess, it was too late, he was already damaged goods. Damn shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rico said:

Yeah, neither of them needed all the proper nurturing/developing and veteran support group that MD needed & that this trainwreck of an organization at the time just couldn't provide. By the time McBeane came along and started cleaning up the mess, it was too late, he was already damaged goods. Damn shame.

 

It was one of the worst situations for MD to be in. Mario was one of the worst influences, the organization early on was cheap and not able to develop him mentally, and then when Rex and new ownership took over he had a big contract, bad influences on and off the team, and an inflated head. It was just destined to be a train wreck long term despite his amazing ability. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, somnus00 said:

 

I agree with you that he was troubled. I too hope things get better for him. He suffered terrible losses as well.

 

But I feel that you could see this on the field at Alabama. Just went through the motions at times. Physical abilities were not the problem.

 

I know this is just a game we're talking about. He had more important things going on.

 

But respectfully, I don't think his career was solid for the #3 overall pick. You need a superstar at that pick. I appreciate your comments by the way. Our opinions aren't that far apart, I feel.

 

Thanks for that. I agree also, the result did not live up to #3.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 

It was one of the worst situations for MD to be in. Mario was one of the worst influences, the organization early on was cheap and not able to develop him mentally, and then when Rex and new ownership took over he had a big contract, bad influences on and off the team, and an inflated head. It was just destined to be a train wreck long term despite his amazing ability. 

Dareus had some hardships to overcome right from the start and some of it was not his own doing.   However, let's not forget that Dareus did not help himself either and he created a lot of problems with his off field behavior.  His work ethic was poor and he was easily distracted.  Definitely not a true professional and clearly someone who took his job and the team for granted.  You can blame Mario, Rex, the old regime but Marone took a gamble on him for the 2nd time and now his contract is expired and he is a free agent looking for work. 

 

So while Dareus is, or was, a top talent, he is the opposite of the kind of player that Beane and McD want here.   The current regime drafts players that already think "Team First" and that already are motivated to be the best they can be.  Trying to re-hab players is not something they want do to.  They  prefer to find players that are self motivated team players before they walk in the door. 

 

I would make the trade all over again.  Dumping his contract put us in a position to be successful for years to come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was highly critical of this move at the time and still think the timing was stupid.  I was similarly critical of the handling of Watkins contract and the eventual trade that looked like treading water.  I was supportive of the Kelvin Benjamin trade which may have been the biggest mistake of Beane's tenure.

 

Year's later my opinions have not changed that much.  My biggest takeaway is that the culture McD and Beane have established, the locker room, and the scouting department is strong enough to overcome some misses.  The foundation for sustained success appears to be in place.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

I was highly critical of this move at the time and still think the timing was stupid.  I was similarly critical of the handling of Watkins contract and the eventual trade that looked like treading water.  I was supportive of the Kelvin Benjamin trade which may have been the biggest mistake of Beane's tenure.

 

Year's later my opinions have not changed that much.  My biggest takeaway is that the culture McD and Beane have established, the locker room, and the scouting department is strong enough to overcome some misses.  The foundation for sustained success appears to be in place.

To this day, I will never understand the thought process of dealing his fifth year option then trading Sammy. Just really stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 

It is hard to say that AJ Green or Julio Jones wouldn't have been better picks at #3 but at the time Dareus was considered as sure fire high ceiling low floor type prospect as you could get at a position where the Bills needed a lot of help at. 

 

 

With 20/20 hindsight, the right move would have been to take the Falcons to the cleaners since they were desperately trying to trade up ahead of the Bengals to land AJ Green and keep Green in Georgia (before settling on trading up for Julio Jones). Bills trade back for a slew of picks and take Cam Jordan.

 

But correct, at the time, Dareus was the consensus #3 pick.

17 hours ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Go back and check the tape, almost everyone on this board wanted the Bills to sign Dareus to an extension. 

Beane signed a guy that quit at halftime and gave millions to an injured PED cheat.

None of them are perfect judges of character 

 

Of course, and the Bills/Whaley didnt really have a choice.

 

Even with the character issues being known, whats the other option? Letting the highest pick the Bills had in over a decade walk with no compensation? Not gonna happen. Had to take the risk.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

With 20/20 hindsight, the right move would have been to take the Falcons to the cleaners since they were desperately trying to trade up ahead of the Bengals to land AJ Green and keep Green in Georgia (before settling on trading up for Julio Jones). Bills trade back for a slew of picks and take Cam Jordan.

 

But correct, at the time, Dareus was the consensus #3 pick.

 

Of course, and the Bills/Whaley didnt really have a choice.

 

Even with the character issues being known, whats the other option? Letting the highest pick the Bills had in over a decade walk with no compensation? Not gonna happen. Had to take the risk.

According you and many others here, Dareus was the consensus #2 pick, over Von Miller ? good times 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2020 at 4:44 PM, aceman_16 said:

And saved a TON of money on a lazy slob.

 

I know they paid him his base salary the rest of 2017 and i think they restructured 2018/2019.  Either way, IIRC 2018 was a fully guaranteed base salary so i assume it was a lot.  

 

2 and a half years for about 40something million from buffalo.  Jags paid him about 23 for 2 and a half years.   Now hes a FA and no one wants him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

I was highly critical of this move at the time and still think the timing was stupid.  I was similarly critical of the handling of Watkins contract and the eventual trade that looked like treading water.  I was supportive of the Kelvin Benjamin trade which may have been the biggest mistake of Beane's tenure.

 

Year's later my opinions have not changed that much.  My biggest takeaway is that the culture McD and Beane have established, the locker room, and the scouting department is strong enough to overcome some misses.  The foundation for sustained success appears to be in place.

 

Yeah - Dareus was not without problems either.  The suspensions, drug arrest, drag racing... 

 

I don't think that Beane and McD like wrote him off either - I believe he was given every chance to play and contribute, and he just was not buying in.  Scheme fit doesn't really make sense as a complaint either, I think he should have been able to play a phillips like role as a 3T - but they had him at nose because he was way too heavy.  He didn't want to be here so... trading him for nothing allows you to accelerate cap penalty into 2017, and dump the guaranteed salary in 2018 and beyond.  Double win. 

 

With Watkins, I think a lot of it came down to availability from injury - and maximizing a previous investment.  They had no intention of re-signing him, and getting the pick they got was much better than forcing yourself to work the comp pick formula.  Ragland wasn't a scheme fit.  Darby wasn't either.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

Yeah - Dareus was not without problems either.  The suspensions, drug arrest, drag racing... 

 

I don't think that Beane and McD like wrote him off either - I believe he was given every chance to play and contribute, and he just was not buying in.  Scheme fit doesn't really make sense as a complaint either, I think he should have been able to play a phillips like role as a 3T - but they had him at nose because he was way too heavy.  He didn't want to be here so... trading him for nothing allows you to accelerate cap penalty into 2017, and dump the guaranteed salary in 2018 and beyond.  Double win. 

 

With Watkins, I think a lot of it came down to availability from injury - and maximizing a previous investment.  They had no intention of re-signing him, and getting the pick they got was much better than forcing yourself to work the comp pick formula.  Ragland wasn't a scheme fit.  Darby wasn't either.  

Dareus showing up late to the pre-season game vs. Baltimore sealed his fate.   From that point on his days in Buffalo were numbered.  Most of us knew that unless he found Jesus then he wasn't in the team's long-term plans.  As @C.Biscuit97 pointed out, the timing made no sense to many of us.  I believe McD and Beane had no real intention of competing that season and did expect us to be winning games at that point.

 

The Watkins handling was a debacle.  Partly because there was no GM in place when the decision was up on Watkins 5th year option.  McDermott made the call on not extending as it was before Beane was hired.  I think they could have gotten a better package had they executed his 5th year and then traded him.  Can't fault Beane for dealing with the aftermath.

 

Ironically, the move everyone loved was the biggest whiff.  How were they so far off about Kelvin Benjamin?  

 

Given the way everything worked out, I can't say I care a whole lot.  I do wonder from time to time what this team looks like if we could have had our GM and head coach in place before the 2017 draft, but I have no complaints with where they're at right now.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2020 at 10:48 AM, C.Biscuit97 said:

I still fail to see how the timing of the Dareus trade was a good move.  It literally makes no sense to do a salary dump in the middle of a season when you are competing for the playoffs.  Especially at a position that was a huge weakness.  
 

McBeane has done some really good things but I think people fall all over themselves to praise them.  The Jags almost went to the SB with Dareus.  The Bills lost to the Jags 10-3.  Maybe if they have Dareus and kept Sammy instead of scrubs like Jordan Matthews and fat Kelvin, they win that game and go on a playoff run. 

This thread is revisionist history at it’s finest.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

With 20/20 hindsight, the right move would have been to take the Falcons to the cleaners since they were desperately trying to trade up ahead of the Bengals to land AJ Green and keep Green in Georgia (before settling on trading up for Julio Jones). Bills trade back for a slew of picks and take Cam Jordan.

 

But correct, at the time, Dareus was the consensus #3 pick.

 

Of course, and the Bills/Whaley didnt really have a choice.

 

Even with the character issues being known, whats the other option? Letting the highest pick the Bills had in over a decade walk with no compensation? Not gonna happen. Had to take the risk.

That was my point. But read this thread. People act like it was stupid decision to sign Dareus to an extension. It wasn't at the time and almost everyone on here celebrated when he signed extension.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2020 at 6:16 PM, billsfan89 said:

 

It is hard to say that AJ Green or Julio Jones wouldn't have been better picks at #3 but at the time Dareus was considered as sure fire high ceiling low floor type prospect as you could get at a position where the Bills needed a lot of help at. 

 

Almost Everyone wanted the Bills to take him or Von Miller whomever was there at pick 3 and sign him to an extension. I am not sure if Mario being on the team and Rex showing up right when he got the extension made things worse? It was just such a drastic fall off form 2015-2017 from 2013-2014. In 2014 Dareus followed a Pro-Bowl caliber 2013 season by being one of the top 2-3 DT's in the league behind Suh and McCoy. He was 25 why wouldn't you want to keep that guy? 

Exaclty my point. Revisionist history to blame Whaley for signing him to extension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

They got a 5th for Dareus and dumped his salary to use it on Star. Meh. Not sure what's so impressive. 

 

My guess is Star would have trouble finding a team just like Dareus if he was released. 

 

Star would get a one year deal from some team that runs a similar scheme. Just because he has been overpaid the past 2 seasons doesn't mean he doesn't have value and the fact that he is by all accounts not an issue in the locker room makes him easier to sign. Dareus comes with a toxic reputation one that coaches don't want to bring into the locker room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

Dareus showing up late to the pre-season game vs. Baltimore sealed his fate.   From that point on his days in Buffalo were numbered.  Most of us knew that unless he found Jesus then he wasn't in the team's long-term plans.  As @C.Biscuit97 pointed out, the timing made no sense to many of us.  I believe McD and Beane had no real intention of competing that season and did expect us to be winning games at that point.

 

The Watkins handling was a debacle.  Partly because there was no GM in place when the decision was up on Watkins 5th year option.  McDermott made the call on not extending as it was before Beane was hired.  I think they could have gotten a better package had they executed his 5th year and then traded him.  Can't fault Beane for dealing with the aftermath.

 

Ironically, the move everyone loved was the biggest whiff.  How were they so far off about Kelvin Benjamin?  

 

Given the way everything worked out, I can't say I care a whole lot.  I do wonder from time to time what this team looks like if we could have had our GM and head coach in place before the 2017 draft, but I have no complaints with where they're at right now.

 

I think at the time - with Tyrod's refusal to throw 50/50 balls, maybe they thought KB could jumpstart the offense a bit?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

Dareus showing up late to the pre-season game vs. Baltimore sealed his fate.   From that point on his days in Buffalo were numbered.  Most of us knew that unless he found Jesus then he wasn't in the team's long-term plans.  As @C.Biscuit97 pointed out, the timing made no sense to many of us.  I believe McD and Beane had no real intention of competing that season and did expect us to be winning games at that point.

 

The Watkins handling was a debacle.  Partly because there was no GM in place when the decision was up on Watkins 5th year option.  McDermott made the call on not extending as it was before Beane was hired.  I think they could have gotten a better package had they executed his 5th year and then traded him.  Can't fault Beane for dealing with the aftermath.

 

Ironically, the move everyone loved was the biggest whiff.  How were they so far off about Kelvin Benjamin?  

 

Given the way everything worked out, I can't say I care a whole lot.  I do wonder from time to time what this team looks like if we could have had our GM and head coach in place before the 2017 draft, but I have no complaints with where they're at right now.

 

 

Ding Ding Ding!

 

Making the playoffs that year was the most Billsiest thing to happen, considering it was the one year the new GM was actually focused on next years draft and getting their QB.

 

The Dareus trade, Watkins trade, and deciding in November to start Peterman for 4 games all make that pretty clear.

 

The good news is, they made the playoffs and got the monkey off our back, AND still got their QB.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

 

Ding Ding Ding!

 

Making the playoffs that year was the most Billsiest thing to happen, considering it was the one year the new GM was actually focused on next years draft and getting their QB.

 

The Dareus trade, Watkins trade, and deciding in November to start Peterman for 4 games all make that pretty clear.

 

The good news is, they made the playoffs and got the monkey off our back, AND still got their QB.

 

Right?  Once we got Allen I think i truly understood the failure of Nix/Whaley.  You can get your QB in a variety of ways - they settled.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

Right?  Once we got Allen I think i truly understood the failure of Nix/Whaley.  You can get your QB in a variety of ways - they settled.  

 

In some fairness to them, I've gone back and looked at those 2011-2014 years and can't really find the QB they "should have" gotten.

 

Passing over Russell Wilson in the 3rd for TJ Graham is the only missed QB I could find. Other than him, there werent any options that were any better than EJ (and even with EJ, they traded down to 17 and still got him). I guess maybe Kirk Cousins too, but not sure how he would have worked out in Buffalo. That's about it. It was just a dark time for QB prospects.

 

Same goes for when the Bills were trying to replace Kelly. I recently went back and looked at the draft classes from 1995-1998. Holy BARF. Pretty much zero successful QBs came into the league during that window, up until Peyton in 1998.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...