Jump to content

The D isn't built to handle what hit them today


Big Blitz

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, artmalibu said:

 

They know the issue...  But I hope they have the horses to execute the fix.  

 

When teams can take you to the woodshed between the tackles it tough to  win...

Teams are 116-822-3 when giving up 200 yards or more on the ground since 1988. 

Edited by Dr.Sack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

These points are all entirely valid. The run defense has some pieces that simply haven't worked over the past two weeks and could be a problem going forward.

 

But what we're not talking about is what DIDN'T happen and continues to NOT happen. We're not seeing the kind of game changing plays or drive killing sacks that put the opposing offense in negative down and distance situations. The defense is most certainly lacking that elite edge rusher that must be accounted for and the sum of the parts just isn't enough. 

 

I've seen plenty of 3rd and long stops this season, but I haven't seen nearly enough of them end with the a Bill in the quarterbacks mug forcing a huge mistake. 

 

A premier edge rusher covers up a lot of deficiencies in other areas. 

I really can't figure out if this is shtick or if you're being serious in regards to the players you'd like to see the Bills target.

I love my certain players, I root for these guys before they are drafted and as always am very devestated when we pass on them or don't trade up for them time and again... So naturally I want to see them make their way to where they belong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr.Sack said:

I know the Bills coaches and players will figure it out. 

All of the evidence they needed was provided today. What they need to figure out is where they are going to get defensive players that they need. They were defeated convincingly by the Eagles. They were obviously out classed.

Edited by Rocket94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately we have no pass rush and Star gets pushed backwards, Hughes isn't putting up sack totals because he is the only guy they really have to worry about, we need another guy on the outside because Shaq Lawson and Trent Murphy aren't getting it done at all. Vic Beasley is supposed to be available by the Falcons, what about Carlos Dunlap of the Bengals? I'm hoping Star is gone next season, I just don't see him doing a good job out there, he gets pushed back quite a bit imo. I'm not down on Oliver whatsoever yet because he's a young guy trying to find his way and I think he'll eventually find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.  

 

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

Edmunds is probably not going to be a run stopping force in the middle.  He was drafted because of his athleticism.  Meaning, he can cover.   

 

And when it all hits the fan like it did today and those big linemen get in space on those screens, and the RBs are good like Philly's are, combined with a coach that knows how to call a game....you got what hit us today.   

 

The Cowboys, Steelers, and Ravens---those are physical and good olines we'll see the down the stretch.  I think they might have 3 of the best olines outside of Indy.  

 

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.   

 

I don't know what Denver did today to slow down Indy and their run game but if anyone on their front 7 is available call them.  The Redskins might be shopping Kerrigan to.  

 

That's 3 games left vs good running teams with great olines.  Still have New England to.  That could be 4 losses.  And that's a problem.

 

We have to address it by Tuesday imo.  

 

 

Not sure we can get what we need by the trade deadline but totally agree with your assessment and should have been obvious to the FO after getting dismantled by New England last year.

 

Edmunds has the size to be a run stuffer just going to take some training.

 

Didn't want Oliver due to his size and attitude which McDermott pointed out in the preseason about needing to work harder.  Wanted DT Dexter Lawrence who is having a good season for the Giants and is 6'4" 342 and athletic.

 

There are some solid run stopping LBs in the draft who are also not liabilities in coverage with Auburn's KJ Britt and Northwestern 's Paddy Fisher, hopefully we can someone like them and DTs like Jordan Phillips.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rico said:

Don't let Ted Washington leave town.

 

Loved that guy should be in the HOF for NTs. If we could get a guy like him we would be all set.

 

This will always be a passing league but the run is still important and is making a comeback due to teams not being able to stop the run. The defense should have two big guys in the middle who crush the run and push the pocket. Small Athletic DTs are fun but get worn down in the run game.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.  

 

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

Edmunds is probably not going to be a run stopping force in the middle.  He was drafted because of his athleticism.  Meaning, he can cover.   

 

And when it all hits the fan like it did today and those big linemen get in space on those screens, and the RBs are good like Philly's are, combined with a coach that knows how to call a game....you got what hit us today.   

 

The Cowboys, Steelers, and Ravens---those are physical and good olines we'll see the down the stretch.  I think they might have 3 of the best olines outside of Indy.  

 

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.   

 

I don't know what Denver did today to slow down Indy and their run game but if anyone on their front 7 is available call them.  The Redskins might be shopping Kerrigan to.  

 

That's 3 games left vs good running teams with great olines.  Still have New England to.  That could be 4 losses.  And that's a problem.

 

We have to address it by Tuesday imo.  

 

 

I was criticized for saying last week we should be concerned about Philly, Baltimore, Dallas, and of course the Pats.  I was very hopeful we would play better yesterday, but we were exposed.  That’s two weeks in a row we did not play well.  You never can count on all of the other games as well, but we looked so bad yesterday.

 

I truly hope I’m wrong and we correct our mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

I'd sure like to see Sean promote Vincent Taylor in leiu of Peko. I'd even reduce Star's snaps. We will need to be more stout up front in future games. I'm still not sure where Ed's proper position is?

 

I'm with you on this. He was effective in Miami, I suppose because he is new they have not rushed him in. But it's time to kick the tires, cannot be any worse than what we saw yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.  

 

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

Edmunds is probably not going to be a run stopping force in the middle.  He was drafted because of his athleticism.  Meaning, he can cover.   

 

And when it all hits the fan like it did today and those big linemen get in space on those screens, and the RBs are good like Philly's are, combined with a coach that knows how to call a game....you got what hit us today.   

 

The Cowboys, Steelers, and Ravens---those are physical and good olines we'll see the down the stretch.  I think they might have 3 of the best olines outside of Indy.  

 

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.   

 

I don't know what Denver did today to slow down Indy and their run game but if anyone on their front 7 is available call them.  The Redskins might be shopping Kerrigan to.  

 

That's 3 games left vs good running teams with great olines.  Still have New England to.  That could be 4 losses.  And that's a problem.

 

We have to address it by Tuesday imo.  

 

OK, even if we do lose all four of those games, that six losses. Which means ten wins. 

 

Would you have been OK with 10-6 at the start of training camp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

I keep saying it - Derek Wolfe is reportedly available - I’ve been high on him for years - that’s the player we should trade for - he’d fix a lot of problems and instantly become a fan favorite (IMO he’s a Kyle Williams clone).  Probably could get him for a fourth.

 

I'm down with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.  

 

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

Edmunds is probably not going to be a run stopping force in the middle.  He was drafted because of his athleticism.  Meaning, he can cover.   

 

And when it all hits the fan like it did today and those big linemen get in space on those screens, and the RBs are good like Philly's are, combined with a coach that knows how to call a game....you got what hit us today.   

 

The Cowboys, Steelers, and Ravens---those are physical and good olines we'll see the down the stretch.  I think they might have 3 of the best olines outside of Indy.  

 

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.   

 

I don't know what Denver did today to slow down Indy and their run game but if anyone on their front 7 is available call them.  The Redskins might be shopping Kerrigan to.  

 

That's 3 games left vs good running teams with great olines.  Still have New England to.  That could be 4 losses.  And that's a problem.

 

We have to address it by Tuesday imo.  

 


what is the 10M DT doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.  

 

You got a link to that article?  Be nice to have it?

 

11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

That simply begs the question "why aren't we?"

Because big physical olines are not going away.

 

11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.  

 

Just like to point out we traded a guy like that away (there may have been other legit reasons), and I think we thought that was what we were getting when we signed Lotuleilei.

 

But yes, I agree it would be nice to make a trade if someone legit is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Loved that guy should be in the HOF for NTs. If we could get a guy like him we would be all set.

 

This will always be a passing league but the run is still important and is making a comeback due to teams not being able to stop the run. The defense should have two big guys in the middle who crush the run and push the pocket. Small Athletic DTs are fun but get worn down in the run game.

 

 

The more things change the more they stay the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BringBackOrton said:

Not sure you watched the first half. How many points did the defense allow prior to Allen’s fumble? How many yards?

You mean how our offense stalled because the defense gave up a 100 yard td run? Because that is your logic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

You got a link to that article?  Be nice to have it?

 

 

That simply begs the question "why aren't we?"

Because big physical olines are not going away.

 

 

Just like to point out we traded a guy like that away (there may have been other legit reasons), and I think we thought that was what we were getting when we signed Lotuleilei.

 

But yes, I agree it would be nice to make a trade if someone legit is available.

 

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2019/10/25/20929585/beginners-guide-to-buffalo-bills-surprising-5-1-start

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Paulus said:

You mean how our offense stalled because the defense gave up a 100 yard td run? Because that is your logic.

 

Unfortunately, offensive production is not tied to defensive points allowed. But defensive points allowed is related to offensive turnovers.

 

The answer was 3 points btw. 3 points allowed in almost the entire first half. 

Edited by BringBackOrton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

So true.  Our supposedly top 5 defense not only can't stop the run, they're not getting to the QB or disrupting plays in the backfield...all due to not being able to penetrate the O-line.

Unfortunately, I do not see them getting a DE or DT before the trade deadline.  This means that a scheme change is necessary; there is no way McD and Frazier can keep doing things the way they've been and expect success.  Brian Flores and his tanking Miami Dolphins team exposed them.  If Adrian Peterson puts up 200 yards and we cannot harass Haskins or Keenum, our defensive masterminds didn't do their jobs.

Edmunds outside and trade for some "run of the mill" run stuffing MLB. Edmunds could pretty easily make the transition IMO. Could be a monster rushing the passer AND still provide solid coverage. With Milano and Edmunds in coverage, alot of the deficiencies said "run of the mill" MLB would likely have in that area. 

 

Pretty sure McD won't go that route, but that's the best short term solution I can come up with.

 

Average to above average run stuffing MLB's are easy as (blank) to find. They're everywhere.

19 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

I love my certain players, I root for these guys before they are drafted and as always am very devestated when we pass on them or don't trade up for them time and again... So naturally I want to see them make their way to where they belong!

You got a top 10 list of players you wish were on the Bills?

Edited by LSHMEAB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WideNine said:

 

I thought about this today.

 

There have been folks saying that his game is finally tailing off and we need a pass rushing end earlier this year, but I thought perhaps it was a slow start, but I cannot recall a year where his name was mentioned so infrequently.

 

He had that hustle fumble recovery play last week, but really has not been as much of a factor rushing the QB.

 

May be time to start developing a young DE or shopping for a proven commodity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time to shop. I give Beane credit for recognizing this prior to the season, but nothing materialized. I fully expect to see a big time proven commodity DE as the top FREE AGENT priority. For Buffalo, gotta go draft to get the skill position players.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Time to shop. I give Beane credit for recognizing this prior to the season, but nothing materialized. I fully expect to see a big time proven commodity DE as the top FREE AGENT priority. For Buffalo, gotta go draft to get the skill position players.

Yes...a DE, MLB, and a DT.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Edmunds outside and trade for some "run of the mill" run stuffing MLB. Edmunds could pretty easily make the transition IMO. Could be a monster rushing the passer AND still provide solid coverage. With Milano and Edmunds in coverage, alot of the deficiencies said "run of the mill" MLB would likely have in that area. 

 

Pretty sure McD won't go that route, but that's the best short term solution I can come up with.

 

Average to above average run stuffing MLB's are easy as (blank) to find. They're everywhere.

 

 

I don't see them moving Edmunds to an outside linebacker spot; it goes against how McDermott built this defense.  I think they'll keep Edmunds at MLB and be patient with him.

 

That leaves the DT spot; currently Kyle Peko is simply not good enough and needs to be replaced.  Who is available, I'm not sure.  Unfortunately, they'll also keep Star for at least the rest of this season and probably next, as well.  Jordan Phillips is playing well and hope they can get him signed to a longer contract.  Ed Oliver, not surprisingly, is struggling like a rookie will; I don't think he's big enough at this point.  Oliver probably needs to put 20+ lbs on his frame, which (coupled with experience) should make a difference next year.  I don't see them adding a DT right now, especially if none are available that helps this year and in the future.  Harrison Phillips, while i thought was ok, 

 

Of course DE is another problem, but not sure who is available at a reasonable price.  Kerrigan would be nice, but the Redskins won't give him away...probably looking for a 1st round pick.

 

I agree that your short term solution of moving Edmunds outside and getting a bigger, traditional thumper MLB would be the quickest way to fix the problem.  Unfortunately that won't happen.  That leaves McD and Frazier having to adjust their scheme.  They have to make some changes because they've been figured out.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BringBackOrton said:

Unfortunately, offensive production is not tied to defensive points allowed. But defensive points allowed is related to offensive turnovers.

 

The answer was 3 points btw. 3 points allowed in almost the entire first half. 

Lol, so when the defense is on the field the whole time, keeping the ball from the offense, the two are not tied... 

 

I really am afraid you believe your malarkey. 

 

Member when I said Wallace and our run defense looked like a liability and were exploited by the dolphins, and you disagreed? Member when I said other teams would take note? I member.... Keep blaming Allen, tho.

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2019 at 10:21 AM, Big Blitz said:

We built a D built to cover....Read the article in the Ringer this week on how we built a team for the 2020s.  Fast.  And must cover. And get after the QB.  I think we know this anyway.  That's why we have Oliver.    EDIT:  https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2019/10/25/20929585/beginners-guide-to-buffalo-bills-surprising-5-1-start

 

And no doubt we can cover and get to the QB especially against poor to above average lines. 

 

 

The bad news....

 

We are not built to beat big physical olines like the Eagles have. 

 

Edmunds is probably not going to be a run stopping force in the middle.  He was drafted because of his athleticism.  Meaning, he can cover.   

 

And when it all hits the fan like it did today and those big linemen get in space on those screens, and the RBs are good like Philly's are, combined with a coach that knows how to call a game....you got what hit us today.   

 

The Cowboys, Steelers, and Ravens---those are physical and good olines we'll see the down the stretch.  I think they might have 3 of the best olines outside of Indy.  

 

This is something that can and has to be addressed NOW.  Get a legit run stuffing DT like Detroit did last year with Snacks Harrison.  Completely fixed their run D.  If that guy is available get him asap.   

 

I don't know what Denver did today to slow down Indy and their run game but if anyone on their front 7 is available call them.  The Redskins might be shopping Kerrigan to.  

 

That's 3 games left vs good running teams with great olines.  Still have New England to.  That could be 4 losses.  And that's a problem.

 

We have to address it by Tuesday imo.  

 

 

 

Not really buying this. Or at least not yet.

 

We're still early in the Beane-McDermott era. And we played the Pats, a tough team that can run, very tough.

 

It certainly was a bad game this week. So far, that's all it was, one game.

 

And Edmunds has every chance of being a good run stopping force. He's 250 pounds and violent.

 

The last thing we need to do is hit the panic button as you suggest and change the plan. Instead, work the plan. This is a young team. They have a lot of developing still to do.

 

 

 

Man. People go nuts here with the wailing and gnashing of teeth after a bad loss.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TallskiWallski83 said:

Harrison Phillips injury along with Star Latoulelei's massive regression are why we are where we are. 

Star's massive regression started in his last years in Carolina well before the Bills signed him to that ridiculous 5 year contract. 

14 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

 

I was criticized for saying last week we should be concerned about Philly, Baltimore, Dallas, and of course the Pats.  I was very hopeful we would play better yesterday, but we were exposed.  That’s two weeks in a row we did not play well.  You never can count on all of the other games as well, but we looked so bad yesterday.

 

I truly hope I’m wrong and we correct our mistakes.

Poor play and extremely poor coaching, 12 handoffs and 34 passes in high winds is inexcusable stupidity.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Turk71 said:

Star's massive regression started in his last years in Carolina well before the Bills signed him to that ridiculous 5 year contract. 

Yeah. I think people want to believe he's been under the radar good because it would be some kind of indictment if Beane's big first signing was a bad one. It was a poor choice. It's not the end of the world. The worst thing a GM can do is double down on a bad decision, so I'd like to see them recognize the mistake and take actions to replace him. He's gonna be here this year, but I LIKE to think he'll be gone in 2020. We can eat that cap space.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

Edmunds outside and trade for some "run of the mill" run stuffing MLB. Edmunds could pretty easily make the transition IMO. Could be a monster rushing the passer AND still provide solid coverage. With Milano and Edmunds in coverage, alot of the deficiencies said "run of the mill" MLB would likely have in that area. 

 

Pretty sure McD won't go that route, but that's the best short term solution I can come up with.

 

Average to above average run stuffing MLB's are easy as (blank) to find. They're everywhere.

You got a top 10 list of players you wish were on the Bills?

Christian McCaffrey

Luke Kuechly

TJ Watt

JJ Watt

Cooper Kupp

Joey Bosa

Nick Bosa

Leighton Vander Esch

Harrison Smith

TJ Hockenson & George Kittle

Adam Thielen

 

Eric Weddle

Clay Matthews

 

All guys I'd love on the team, obviously Weddle and Matthews when they were younger especially. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

Christian McCaffrey

Luke Kuechly

TJ Watt

JJ Watt

Cooper Kupp

Joey Bosa

Nick Bosa

Leighton Vander Esch

Harrison Smith

TJ Hockenson & George Kittle

Adam Thielen

 

Eric Weddle

Clay Matthews

 

All guys I'd love on the team, obviously Weddle and Matthews when they were younger especially. 

 

 

 

Very good players. VERY interesting list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Very good players. VERY interesting list. 

Forgot to add in Ryan Kerrigan...

I'd run a 3-4 D with those guys.

TJ Watt and Nick Bosa as OLBs with Kerrigan, Joey, JJ versatile enough to move into those spots as well to confuse.

Kuechly and Vander Esch are the MLBs

Joey and Kerrigan at DE with JJ in the middle.

 

Would be the best D ever, possibly 0 points all season if all healthy.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

These points are all entirely valid. The run defense has some pieces that simply haven't worked over the past two weeks and could be a problem going forward.

 

But what we're not talking about is what DIDN'T happen and continues to NOT happen. We're not seeing the kind of game changing plays or drive killing sacks that put the opposing offense in negative down and distance situations. The defense is most certainly lacking that elite edge rusher that must be accounted for and the sum of the parts just isn't enough. 

 

I've seen plenty of 3rd and long stops this season, but I haven't seen nearly enough of them end with the a Bill in the quarterbacks mug forcing a huge mistake. 

 

 

 

While I certainly wouldn't mind getting a premier edge rusher, it's not an absolute necessity. 

 

Carolina was 2nd in the league in sacks in 2016, McDermott's last year there. Who was their big sack artist? Mario Addison led them with 9.5, and the next guy got 6.

 

In 2015 they were 6th in the league in sacks. Kawann Short had 11 and Addison was next with 6.

 

In 2013 they led the league with 60. They had Greg Hardy in his one truly great year with 15. And Charles Johnson did very well across from him with 11.0. Is Charles Johnson an "elite edge rusher." The year after that they had 40.

 

Again, I wouldn't mind a bit if we get a guy like that. But it looks a bit as if McDermott defenses manufacture sacks from scheme and lots of guys getting a few.

 

And while drive-killing sacks are nice, any way you kill the drive is pretty much as good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Turk71 said:

Star's massive regression started in his last years in Carolina well before the Bills signed him to that ridiculous 5 year contract. 

 

 

 

His "massive" regression? Puh-leeze. If he'd massively regressed, McDermott, I'm guessing, might possibly have noticed and, you know, not brought him to Buffalo.

 

What, pray tell, was his "massive regression"? Going from averaging 2.5 sacks his first four years to 1.5 sacks that final year? Woooooooooooow!!!!! Massive!!!

 

He's never been a big numbers guy. His sacks have mostly been of the I'll keep active and occasionally the edge guys will cause a QB to run into me type. 

 

He's a space eater. It's what he's always done and it's what they hired him to do here. And he did it just fine last year, but there are questions this year.

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ScottLaw said:

Well McDermott continues to force Edmunds at MLB when it's starting to become obvious it isn't his position... perhaps the guys a little stubborn and confident in his abilities as a coach.... Star is essentially useless. The defensive line overall is pretty damn mediocre with a good chunk of change invested in it. 

 

 

It's not "obvious it isn't his position," to any but a few annoying Bills kibitzers.

 

What's obvious is that despite a bad game the defense has quickly developed into an extremely good one, and that McDermott knows a ton more about D than you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

His "massive" regression? Puh-leeze. If he'd massively regressed, McDermott, I'm guessing, might possibly have noticed and, you know, not brought him to Buffalo.

 

What, pray tell, was his "massive regression"? Going from averaging 2.5 sacks his first four years to 1.5 sacks that final year? Woooooooooooow!!!!! Massive!!!

 

He's never been a big numbers guy. His sacks have mostly been of the I'll keep active and occasionally the edge guys will cause a QB to run into me type. 

 

He's a space eater. It's what he's always done and it's what they hired him to do here. And he did it just fine last year, but there are questions this year.

 

  His run stop % fell off a cliff his last 2 years in Carolina after being at a high level for two years, it has never recovered. Carolina had no interest in re-signing him.

   A lack of sacks has nothing to do with it, his job is to occupy blockers and stuff the run and unfortunately he is not that good at it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...