Bakin Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. In exchange for Bills #9 Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 If the the Raiders beg, maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 No. Beane and I want to see impact players from the top of the draft. I would not move down lower than 16. (don't ask why 16). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 No. Stay put and take BPA. Trade up to the 2nd and 3rd we have plenty of picks this year. Load up elite players. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 Yes. #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9. The 2020 pick is gravy. Then package something to get back into the top half of round one. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 37 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said: No. Beane and I want to see impact players from the top of the draft. I would not move down lower than 16. (don't ask why 16). That's kind of where I'm at right now. We need impact players, especially on the DLine. We have enough picks to add quality later. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 (edited) I'd rather make this trade with the Raiders: Bills #1 & #2 to Raiders for pick #4. Then Beane will have a shot at at least one of the 3 that is left among Bosa, Williams, Allen. Why would we want the Raiders 1st round garbage when we can get the Raiders 1st round treasure? Edited April 20, 2019 by Albany,n.y. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobills1212 Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Bakin said: Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. In exchange for Bills #9 Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 1 minute ago, gobills1212 said: Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks... We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALLEN1QB Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgotBILLStopay Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Bakin said: Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. In exchange for Bills #9 Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. No. I'd make it if it was a 2020 first rounder and I dont mind giving a 4th rounder back from this year. Also a function of who is left at #9. I still would not do it if Ed Oliver (or Q,) were to be available. Edited April 20, 2019 by IgotBILLStopay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 in two seconds, but Gruden is not that dumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ManRaid Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 If Oliver is not there at 9, sure. Then take that 2020 2nd and our day 3 picks to trade up our 2nd and 3rd rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan in Cleveland Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 No. That is too far. Drop no further than 15 and make sure at least one of the following guys will be there at 15 Hockenson Fant Sweat Oliver Taylor Metcalf Another top OT If more than 1 of the above is gone by 8 and the team swapping picks doesn't want a QB then sit tight at 9 and take Oliver, Hock, or Fant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobills1212 Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 4 hours ago, Virgil said: We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3 Youd hope, but this dream senerio certainly didnt seem to get that far.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrags Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Not for 24 and their 2nd rounder. But I’d do it for their 2 late round firsts. 24 and 27. I’d take a 3rd this year instead of a 2nd next year. And I would run up to the podium to announce the trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 NO. We need players. We've kicked the can down the road as far as we can. Time to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlonce Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 (edited) No. Don’t care about point value being close. The difference in players from 9 to 24 in this draft is great. If marginal you make that trade. Its not marginal and not a good trade. Edited April 21, 2019 by dlonce 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BakersBills Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 10 hours ago, Lurker said: Yes. #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9. The 2020 pick is gravy. Then package something to get back into the top half of round one. Worth it for the future but not for the present imo i want the picks for this draft. It’s very deep in areas of need imo. we need to come out of the first/2nd rounds with a TE WR and DT ideally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 They got FA TE and WR. TE can be played by committee, which seems to be the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 1 hour ago, maryland-bills-fan said: They got FA TE and WR. TE can be played by committee, which seems to be the plan. ....at some point, we need to have a top flight TE on this roster.......it's been years and the opposition has torched us with the position... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 21 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ....at some point, we need to have a top flight TE on this roster.......it's been years and the opposition has torched us with the position... Yes, but there are real impact DT, LB and OT available in the first round, and there are some good TE's availble in the 2nd and 3rd. If you really are worried about getting torched by the few impact TE's in the league, then another way is for us to get good cover LB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said: Yes, but there are real impact DT, LB and OT available in the first round, and there are some good TE's availble in the 2nd and 3rd. If you really are worried about getting torched by the few impact TE's in the league, then another way is for us to get good cover LB's. ...sorry for confusion....I could see 2nd or 3rd as more reasonable versus McBeane using a 1st...with FA emphasis on OL so far, think you're dead on with DL/LB/Edge in the 1st....could see McBeane trading down to grab an extra 2nd as well......... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Formation Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 I would counter with: Bills receive: 2019 : 1st and 3rd 2020: 1st Raiders receive: 2019: #9 2020: 5th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Says Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 18 hours ago, maryland-bills-fan said: No. Beane and I want to see impact players from the top of the draft. I would not move down lower than 16. (don't ask why 16). Seems to be 15 impact players...so..I fantasize about trying to get two of them 17 hours ago, Virgil said: We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3 Those 7 picks in rounds 4 to 7 ,combined,equal perhaps ONE mid -second round pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan17 Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 19 hours ago, Lurker said: Yes. #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9. The 2020 pick is gravy. Then package something to get back into the top half of round one. No its not. Draft chart really doesnt really apply when the fall off in talent is evident after the top 15 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 39 minutes ago, Georgie said: Seems to be 15 impact players...so..I fantasize about trying to get two of them Those 7 picks in rounds 4 to 7 ,combined,equal perhaps ONE mid -second round pick Plus the picks acquired in this hypothetical trade with the raiders. Keep up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 40 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said: No its not. Draft chart really doesnt really apply when the fall off in talent is evident after the top 15 or so. ...isn't the chart more of a guide versus gospel as you said?.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Rather trade up with them for Bosa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epstein's Mother Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 I'd stay put. If you have confidence in what this regime is doing then you have to assume this would be the last chance to draft in the top 10 for a long time (without trading up). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 (edited) On 4/20/2019 at 11:42 AM, Bakin said: Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. In exchange for Bills #9 Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. Unfortunately the Raiders have traded their 2020 2nd to the Bears. As much as I would like to see Gruden do something stupid I think he stays with his top 3 picks this year. Edited April 21, 2019 by ColoradoBills 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 On 4/20/2019 at 1:47 PM, Lurker said: Yes. #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9. The 2020 pick is gravy. Then package something to get back into the top half of round one. With number of picks Bills signed the Bills should be looking for extra picks next year so yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts