Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bakin

Would you make this trade with the Raiders?

Recommended Posts

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the the Raiders  beg, maybe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Stay put and take BPA. Trade up to the 2nd and 3rd we have plenty of picks this year. Load up elite players.

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.  #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9.   The 2020 pick is gravy.

 

Then package something to get back into the top half of round one.

  • Like (+1) 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

No.  Beane and I want to see impact players from the top of the draft.  I would not move down lower than 16. (don't ask why 16).

That's kind of where I'm at right now.  We need impact players, especially on the DLine. We have enough picks to add quality later.

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I'd rather make this trade with the Raiders:  Bills #1 & #2 to Raiders for pick #4.  Then Beane will have a shot at at least one of the 3 that is left among Bosa, Williams, Allen.  

Why would we want the Raiders 1st round garbage when we can get the Raiders 1st round treasure?  

 

 

Edited by Albany,n.y.
  • Like (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bakin said:

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gobills1212 said:

Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks...

 

We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bakin said:

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

No. I'd make it if it was a 2020 first rounder and I dont mind giving a 4th rounder back from this year. Also a function of who is left at #9. I still would not do it if Ed Oliver (or Q,) were to be available.

Edited by IgotBILLStopay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in two seconds, but Gruden is not that dumb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Oliver is not there at 9, sure.  Then take that 2020 2nd and our day 3 picks to trade up our 2nd and 3rd rounders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. That is too far.

Drop no further than 15 and make sure at least one of the following guys will be there at 15

Hockenson

Fant

Sweat

Oliver

Taylor

Metcalf

Another top OT

 

If more than 1 of the above is gone by 8 and the team swapping picks doesn't want a QB then sit tight at 9 and take Oliver, Hock, or Fant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Virgil said:

 

We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3

Youd hope, but this dream senerio certainly didnt seem to get that far..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not for 24 and their 2nd rounder. But I’d do it for their 2 late round firsts. 24 and 27. I’d take a 3rd this year instead of a 2nd next year. And I would run up to the podium to announce the trade. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NO. We need players. We've kicked the can down the road as far as we can. Time to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

No. Don’t care about point value being close.

The difference in players from 9 to 24 in this draft is great. If marginal you make that trade.

Its not marginal and not a good trade.

Edited by dlonce
  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Lurker said:

Yes.  #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9.   The 2020 pick is gravy.

 

Then package something to get back into the top half of round one.

 

Worth it for the future but not for the present imo

 

i want the picks for this draft. It’s very deep in areas of need imo.

 

we need to come out of the first/2nd rounds with a TE WR and DT ideally.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

They got FA TE and WR.  TE can be played by committee, which seems to be the plan.

 

....at some point, we need to have a top flight TE on this roster.......it's been years and the opposition has torched us with the position...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

....at some point, we need to have a top flight TE on this roster.......it's been years and the opposition has torched us with the position...

Yes, but there are real impact DT, LB and OT available in the first round, and there are some good TE's availble in the 2nd and 3rd.  If you really are worried about getting torched by the few impact TE's in the league, then another way is for us to get good cover LB's.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

Yes, but there are real impact DT, LB and OT available in the first round, and there are some good TE's availble in the 2nd and 3rd.  If you really are worried about getting torched by the few impact TE's in the league, then another way is for us to get good cover LB's.

 

 

...sorry for confusion....I could see 2nd or 3rd as more reasonable versus McBeane using a 1st...with FA emphasis on OL so far, think you're dead on with DL/LB/Edge in the 1st....could see McBeane trading down to grab an extra 2nd as well.........

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would counter with:

Bills receive:

2019 : 1st and 3rd

2020: 1st

 

Raiders receive:

2019: #9

2020: 5th

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...