Jump to content

Tyrod Taylor finally unleashed in a "competent offense with weapons."


BringBackOrton

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Lo and behold my children, the miracle of Tyrod Taylor.  Gone are the foolish OC's, your Greg Roman's, your Anthony Lynn's, your Rick Dennison's.  Yes, these men all had promising career's before Tyrod but he exposed them as the hacks they are!  Gone are the terrible weapons of Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, Clay, Benjamin, Shady.  I ask, were any of these players successful at any point in their careers without Tyrod manning the QB station? The results speak for themselves!

 

Behold what Tyrod has accomplished going to a competent organization chock full of first round picks and cap space.  An organization who needed a QB that was a pillar of stability.  Surround him with weapons, with WR's who have had career success or were highly drafted, with a HB group that can beat you several different ways, with a promising OL, and a defense filled to the brim with talent.  Look upon Tyrod's works, ye mighty, and despair!

image.thumb.png.541fd71fd76bb666cded3e8107788509.png

 

You thought the two time ninth AFC Pro Bowl alternate would fail?  Repent!

 

If i could read through the blurriness i might be impressed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

If he wins a playoff game I will still eat my shoe. I always felt that we should've suck with Fitz and drafted good talent around him while grooming a young QB behind him. The Weapons Taylor had are still producing solid to good numbers for other teams. The weapons Fitz had are working at UPS and Jewel now.

 

Absolutely agree on the Fitz thing.

 

We could and should have kept Fitz at his reasonable contract and we STILL could have drafted Manuel in the 1st.  And at that point at least Manuel wouldn't have been forced to play... unless that damn mat would have just hunted Fitz down somehow the way it did Kolb.

 

 

Speaking of which, that choice of Kolb was a really underwhelming vet to bring in, anyway... kinda like AJ McCarron this year  :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

A lot of his sacks are scrambles that go OOB behind the line of scrimmage. Still counts as a sack, doesn't mean he isn't still running.

I understand that, which is why I was curious as to the nature of his sacks.. So he’s still taking off and running a lot vs. staying in the pocket then? I haven’t seen him except on highlights, etc. But if he’s still bailing out too early, I can see his OC telling Hue that he’d rather have Baker in there. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Lo and behold my children, the miracle of Tyrod Taylor.  Gone are the foolish OC's, your Greg Roman's, your Anthony Lynn's, your Rick Dennison's.  Yes, these men all had promising career's before Tyrod but he exposed them as the hacks they are!  Gone are the terrible weapons of Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, Clay, Benjamin, Shady.  I ask, were any of these players successful at any point in their careers without Tyrod manning the QB station? The results speak for themselves!

 

Behold what Tyrod has accomplished going to a competent organization chock full of first round picks and cap space.  An organization who needed a QB that was a pillar of stability.  Surround him with weapons, with WR's who have had career success or were highly drafted, with a HB group that can beat you several different ways, with a promising OL, and a defense filled to the brim with talent.  Look upon Tyrod's works, ye mighty, and despair!

image.thumb.png.541fd71fd76bb666cded3e8107788509.png

 

You thought the two time ninth AFC Pro Bowl alternate would fail?  Repent!

 

And how many wins does he have?  He’s not 2-0.  He’s -0-1-1

Edited by NewEra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyrod is as Tyrod does. What he is and what he does has been apparent to me since the Cincy game in the middle of 2016. His limitations are laid bare and the league has seen them. 

 

I wasn't a big Allen guy coming out but sign me up for taking my lumps with someone like Josh who has a chance to be better than serviceable. 

 

Tyrod is a decent guy and a decent bridge Quarterback. There is no disgrace in that. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Absolutely agree on the Fitz thing.

 

We could and should have kept Fitz at his reasonable contract and we STILL could have drafted Manuel in the 1st.  And at that point at least Manuel wouldn't have been forced to play... unless that damn mat would have just hunted Fitz down somehow the way it did Kolb.

 

 

Speaking of which, that choice of Kolb was a really underwhelming vet to bring in, anyway... kinda like AJ McCarron this year  :doh:

 

I stopped reading when you said "still could have drafted Manuel in the 1st".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pop gun said:

He's been downright horrible in the first half of games even through the 3rd quarter. Been better in the 4th quarter when he hasn't had a choice but to throw the ball.

 

22 pass yards in the 1st quarter of 2 games, wow that's bad.

 

Split Value Cmp Att Inc Cmp% Yds TD 1D Int Rate Sk Yds Y/A AY/A Att Yds Y/A TD 1D
Quarter 1st Qtr 6 11 5 54.55 22 0 2 0 60.0 1   2.0 2.00 3 22 7.3 0 1
  2nd Qtr 9 11 2 81.82 94 0 4 0 102.3 3   8.5 8.55 3 11 3.7 0 1
  3rd Qtr 7 14 7 50.00 97 0 4 0 72.6 3   6.9 6.93 3 35 11.7 1 2
  4th Qtr 13 27 14 48.15 215 2 7 2 69.2 2   8.0 6.11 3 35 11.7 0 1
  OT 2 7 5 28.57 15 0 0 0 39.6 1   2.1 2.14 0 0   0 0
  1st Half 15 22 7 68.18 116 0 6 0 80.9 4   5.3 5.27 6 33 5.5 0 2
  2nd Half 20 41 21 48.78 312 2 11 2 70.4 5   7.6 6.39 6 70 11.7 1 3



OMG.

This entire thread is rich. You guys are pointing at a QB on another team and talking about a passing "attack". Perhaps you should all just sit in the corner and not worry about what another team has at QB. 

And yeah, he did enough to win two games against the Saints and the Steelers. That's about what the guy is and was - someone that gave you a chance. Good luck finding a chance in the next two years.

Edited by Hapless Bills Fan
inappropriate language
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, starrymessenger said:

 

I stopped reading when you said "still could have drafted Manuel in the 1st".

 

What I'm saying is that if their plan was to draft a QB in that draft, whoever their QB may have been, the choice to draft a QB or keep Fitz weren't mutually exclusive.

 

We could have done both.  There was no reason to let Fitz go.

 

Manuel probably never would have had it in him to be a viable NFL starting QB.  He's just too emotionally and mentally frail.  I agree with you there.  I think Trent Edwards had a better chance to be a Franchise QB than Manuel if he didn't get knocked the !@#$ out by Adrian Wilson in Arizona.  But those chances would have at least increased if he sat behind a smart, tough vet like Fitz and, at worst, we could have just kept playing Fitz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BringBackOrton said:

Lo and behold my children, the miracle of Tyrod Taylor.  Gone are the foolish OC's, your Greg Roman's, your Anthony Lynn's, your Rick Dennison's.  Yes, these men all had promising career's before Tyrod but he exposed them as the hacks they are!  Gone are the terrible weapons of Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, Clay, Benjamin, Shady.  I ask, were any of these players successful at any point in their careers without Tyrod manning the QB station? The results speak for themselves!

 

Behold what Tyrod has accomplished going to a competent organization chock full of first round picks and cap space.  An organization who needed a QB that was a pillar of stability.  Surround him with weapons, with WR's who have had career success or were highly drafted, with a HB group that can beat you several different ways, with a promising OL, and a defense filled to the brim with talent.  Look upon Tyrod's works, ye mighty, and despair!

image.thumb.png.541fd71fd76bb666cded3e8107788509.png

 

You thought the two time ninth AFC Pro Bowl alternate would fail?  Repent!

 

Between this and your user name makes me wonder if Facebook stalking ex girlfriends is a routine Saturday night.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not for a terrible kicker, Browns would be 2-0.  

 

Meanwhile, Bills have 2nd lowest points scored in the league and have also allowed the most points in the league.  We started the worst QB in NFL history week 1 and had a player retire at halftime week 2.  

 

Bills fans are literally the last people on Earth that should be mocking another team or player right now given what we have put on the field so far.

 

Second, who the hell cares, Tyrod is gone, some people need to let it go or seek therapy to help them cope with their PTSD (Post Tyrod Stress Disorder).

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

If not for a terrible kicker, Browns would be 2-0.  

 

Meanwhile, Bills have lowest points scored in the league and have also allowed the most points in the league.  We started the worst QB in NFL history week 1 and had a player retire at halftime week 2.  

 

Bills fans are literally the last people on Earth that should be mocking another team or player right now given what we have put on the field so far.

 

Second, who the hell cares, Tyrod is gone, some people need to let it go or seek therapy to help them cope with their PTSD (Post Tyrod Syndrome Disorder).

Syndrome Disorder? Back to drawing board, pal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

If not for a terrible kicker, Browns would be 2-0.  

 

Meanwhile, Bills have lowest points scored in the league and have also allowed the most points in the league.  We started the worst QB in NFL history week 1 and had a player retire at halftime week 2.  

 

Bills fans are literally the last people on Earth that should be mocking another team or player right now given what we have put on the field so far.

 

Second, who the hell cares, Tyrod is gone, some people need to let it go or seek therapy to help them cope with their PTSD (Post Tyrod Syndrome Disorder).

Cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Horrible!!!  it COULD NOT possibly get any worse than Tyrod Taylor 443 yds passing, his PIT tie and OT loss to saints.  

 

Thanks goodness these non running pocket passers are around to save the day... 

 

Player Att Comp Yds Comp % Yds/Att TD TD % INT INT % Long Sck Sack/Lost Rating
                           
Nathan Peterman 18 5 24 27.8 1.3 0 0.0 2 11.1 10 3 12 0.0
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad seasons and careers, or for that matter personnel decisions aren't or qualified after 2 games. 

 

The instant analysis crowd really struggles when there's a need to see things over the long haul. Tuh-rod spent 3 season in Buffalo with declining numbers, specifically YPA, yards passing per game, and of course, struggled to win games coming from behind.

 

Baker is their guy and he'll supplant TT at some point this season when the latter goes back to doing what he normally does: take few chances downfield.

 

 

Edited by BillsVet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall seeing posts last season claiming that the Browns were loaded with talent, yet they again had one of the worst offenses and defense in the league.

 

If the Browns HC was not Hue Jackson, there's no way, after 2 more winless weeks to start the season, TT would be QB in week 3........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Absolutely agree on the Fitz thing.

 

We could and should have kept Fitz at his reasonable contract and we STILL could have drafted Manuel in the 1st.  And at that point at least Manuel wouldn't have been forced to play... unless that damn mat would have just hunted Fitz down somehow the way it did Kolb.

 

 

Speaking of which, that choice of Kolb was a really underwhelming vet to bring in, anyway... kinda like AJ McCarron this year  :doh:

 

The thing that irks me on the whole Josh deal is we are pretty much doing EXACTLY the same with Josh as we did with EJ.  First we signed a PROJECT QB. Then we ran off the incumbent Vet starter that could have started some games and helped the new guy.  For EJ it was Fitz and for Josh of course Hotrod.  We even did it for the same reason.  "they make too much moeny."  (they didn't).  then we sign some off the shelf vet and they don't even make it out of pre season.  So we start the season with the new QB plus another inexperienced schmuck as backup.  EJ had Tuel Time.  Josh had Nasty Nate. Then we had to start him (before he's ready) because he's all we got.

 

Talk about dong the same thing and expecting different results.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

I recall seeing posts last season claiming that the Browns were loaded with talent, yet they again had one of the worst offenses and defense in the league.

 

If the Browns HC was not Hue Jackson, there's no way, after 2 more winless weeks to start the season, TT would be QB in week 3........

Dude, there were posts a month ago that hammering the Brown win total over was free money.

 

What a country.  Vegas is laughing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BringBackOrton said:

Lo and behold my children, the miracle of Tyrod Taylor.  (...)Behold what Tyrod has accomplished going to a competent organization chock full of first round picks and cap space.  (....) Look upon Tyrod's works, ye mighty, and despair!

 

Cleveland has a -3 point PF/PA differential

Bills are at -55, that's right, 55, fifty five, more points allowed than scored.

We never approached that, the 3 years TT was here.

 

Unless your point is that Tyrod and the Browns are doing better right now than the Bills are or simply to lose yourself in admiration of your rhapsodic bloviation, I'm not sure -

What IS Your Point?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Dude, there were posts a month ago that hammering the Brown win total over was free money.

 

What a country.  Vegas is laughing.

 

 

Was that in the thread that "vegas" was trying to convince us that all the smart money was on Cleveland to reach the SB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Cleveland has a -3 point PF/PA differential

Bills are at -55, that's right, 55, fifty five, more points allowed than scored.

We never approached that, the 3 years TT was here.

 

Unless your point is that Tyrod and the Browns are doing better right now than the Bills are or simply to lose yourself in admiration of your rhapsodic bloviation, I'm not sure -

What IS Your Point?

Unless you think Tyrod would've strapped on a helmet and played CB, I don't care about points allowed.

 

My point is that Tyrod still sucks in Cleveland, and even though there were whispers about how he was going to get them between 6-8 wins, he's already about to be benched for sucking and not being able to meet the lofty goal of winning a single game for the Browns.

 

The Steelers turned it over 6 times to the Browns and Tuh managed a tie.  Incredible stuff.

Edited by BringBackOrton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Cleveland has a -3 point PF/PA differential

Bills are at -55, that's right, 55, fifty five, more points allowed than scored.

We never approached that, the 3 years TT was here.

 

Unless your point is that Tyrod and the Browns are doing better right now than the Bills are or simply to lose yourself in admiration of your rhapsodic bloviation, I'm not sure -

What IS Your Point?

Cleveland is =24th right now in PPG offensively. Being that QB has relatively little to do with the defensive side of the ball, I'd say point diff is irrelevant to the discussion. Their defense is keeping them in games, and (as is characteristic of a Taylor led attack) their offense isn't doing enough to get the W.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

The thing that irks me on the whole Josh deal is we are pretty much doing EXACTLY the same with Josh as we did with EJ.  First we signed a PROJECT QB. Then we ran off the incumbent Vet starter that could have started some games and helped the new guy.  For EJ it was Fitz and for Josh of course Hotrod.  We even did it for the same reason.  "they make too much moeny."  (they didn't).  then we sign some off the shelf vet and they don't even make it out of pre season.  So we start the season with the new QB plus another inexperienced schmuck as backup.  EJ had Tuel Time.  Josh had Nasty Nate. Then we had to start him (before he's ready) because he's all we got.

 

Talk about dong the same thing and expecting different results.

 

Exactly.  Exactly. 

 

Right down to, with EJ, giving him NO QB coach his first season

With Allen, giving him a QB coach who last coached QB when dinosaurs roamed the earth and a gallon of gas cost less than a buck

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoBills808 said:

Cleveland is =24th right now in PPG offensively. Being that QB has relatively little to do with the defensive side of the ball, I'd say point diff is irrelevant to the discussion. Their defense is keeping them in games, and (as is characteristic of a Taylor led attack) their offense isn't doing enough to get the W.


They put the kicker into a place where the team should have won. Twice. 

It's what Tyrod does; he gives you a chance. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...