RalphWilson'sNewWar Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) All this talk of McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenum Foles, Bradford...doesn’t really interest me. Frankly I don’t want to have a QB who is costly or overly capable. its the Over capability potential of one of those guys that would keep the team in the playoff hunt but the Rookie off the field. but with Matt Moore...lots of potential. 1.) Moore and Beane go way back. 3 seasons together in Carolina. Solid trust? 2.) Moore is a UCLA alum...Rosen would be a UCLA alum. Makes for a happy QB room. 3.) Moore isn’t very expensive. Where as the others are and Foles is both financially and draft capital expensive. 4.) Moore isn’t overly good im looking for a QB who can slowly lead the team to a mid season / 3 quRter of the season win/loss record where then it will be First Round QB pick time. Matt Moore’s skill set, veteran leadership, and past relationships make him a perfect candidate for this bridge QB position. Edited March 10, 2018 by RalphWilson'sNewWar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 LMAO 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I could get behind this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Don't you want Moore than this? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Overly capable QB's are such a pain. Why can't they all suck as much as Matt Moore? Why!? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Moore would have had a great chance to shine this year if he held any promise. Gase brought Jay Cutler out of retirement instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 F***********ck no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, KelsaysLunchbox said: Moore would have had a great chance to shine this year if he held any promise. Gase brought Jay Cutler out of retirement instead. Shoes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 14 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: All this talk of McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenum Foles, Bradford...doesn’t really interest me. Frankly I don’t want to have a QB who is costly or overly capable. its the Over capability potential of one of those guys that would keep the team in the playoff hunt but the Rookie off the field. but with Matt Moore...lots of potential. Matt Moore’s skill set, veteran leadership, and past relationships make him a perfect candidate for this bridge QB position. Then why wouldn't you just start Nate Peterman. He is now experienced in this system for a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, ganesh said: Then why wouldn't you just start Nate Peterman. He is now experienced in this system for a season. Brian Daboll says what??? It's Erhardt-Perkins, not Erhardt-Pickins Edited March 10, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RalphWilson'sNewWar Posted March 10, 2018 Author Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Real McCoy said: Don't you want Moore than this? Lol. sure. The 1st Round QB being groomed. but with the absences of Eric Wood, Tyrod Taylor and now I’m thinking K. Williams...the lack of leadership on this team along with a new OC im not expecting much from 2018 team in the way of wins/loses. if anything 2018 will be a better statistical team with the Rookie QB showing flashes and finishing strong but the record probably 5-11 or 6-10 2 minutes ago, ganesh said: Then why wouldn't you just start Nate Peterman. He is now experienced in this system for a season. Need a vet. Look at the Browns. They tried for Alex Smith and now secured Taylor for their Rookie to sit under. No Rookie should have to only lean on Nate Peterman. Edited March 10, 2018 by RalphWilson'sNewWar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 21 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: All this talk of McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenum Foles, Bradford...doesn’t really interest me. Frankly I don’t want to have a QB who is costly or overly capable. its the Over capability potential of one of those guys that would keep the team in the playoff hunt but the Rookie off the field. but with Matt Moore...lots of potential. 1.) Moore and Beane go way back. 3 seasons together in Carolina. Solid trust? 2.) Moore is a UCLA alum...Rosen would be a UCLA alum. Makes for a happy QB room. 3.) Moore isn’t very expensive. Where as the others are and Foles is both financially and draft capital expensive. 4.) Moore isn’t overly good im looking for a QB who can slowly lead the team to a mid season / 3 quRter of the season win/loss record where then it will be First Round QB pick time. Matt Moore’s skill set, veteran leadership, and past relationships make him a perfect candidate for this bridge QB position. Just to add, Moore also played for Brian Daboll during his time in Miami as the OC. He's a perfectly capable backup who could start the first 4 games or so of the season. Bottom line is that McBeane is going to sign a cheap veteran like this to be in the quarterback room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RalphWilson'sNewWar Posted March 10, 2018 Author Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, MrEpsYtown said: Just to add, Moore also played for Brian Daboll during his time in Miami as the OC. He's a perfectly capable backup who could start the first 4 games or so of the season. Bottom line is that McBeane is going to sign a cheap veteran like this to be in the quarterback room. Whoa. Didn’t know the Daboll connections. That even bumps it up. Your exactly right. We inly need a guy for 4-6 games I feel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: Lol. sure. The 1st Round QB being groomed. but with the absences of Eric Wood, Tyrod Taylor and now I’m thinking K. Williams...the lack of leadership on this team along with a new OC im not expecting much from 2018 team in the way of wins/loses. if anything 2018 will be a better statistical team with the Rookie QB showing flashes and finishing strong but the record probably 5-11 or 6-10 Need a vet. Look at the Browns. They tried for Alex Smith and now secured Taylor for their Rookie to sit under. No Rookie should have to only lean on Nate Peterman. If we are trading up high for Rosen or Mayfield I would personally much rather bring in McCown to help groom our shiny new toy. Can prob sign him on a 7-10mill contract max and I feel he would be a great mentor with his 15 years experience around the league. IDK, I still want a competitive team next year and think we still can be with him. Let him take a pounding for a year while the rookie tries to learn the timing and speed of the NFL. We don't want to break the new guy. Edited March 10, 2018 by Real McCoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk71 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Wow, Matt Moore, on a day like this. What a buzzwrecker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 23 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: All this talk of McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenum Foles, Bradford...doesn’t really interest me. Frankly I don’t want to have a QB who is costly or overly capable. its the Over capability potential of one of those guys that would keep the team in the playoff hunt but the Rookie off the field. but with Matt Moore...lots of potential. 1.) Moore and Beane go way back. 3 seasons together in Carolina. Solid trust? 2.) Moore is a UCLA alum...Rosen would be a UCLA alum. Makes for a happy QB room. 3.) Moore isn’t very expensive. Where as the others are and Foles is both financially and draft capital expensive. 4.) Moore isn’t overly good im looking for a QB who can slowly lead the team to a mid season / 3 quRter of the season win/loss record where then it will be First Round QB pick time. Matt Moore’s skill set, veteran leadership, and past relationships make him a perfect candidate for this bridge QB position. I think the foundational flaw in that plan might just be that I don't think Moore WANTS to play..........he has had opportunities to leave and likely play more elsewhere but it just seems like he wants to just collect a paycheck......live somewhere sweet.......and only play if he has to. Gase passed over him so fast when Tannehill went down it was actually pretty surprising/telling IMO. I think he knew Moore was absolutely not down with playing a lot of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 32 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: All this talk of McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenum Foles, Bradford...doesn’t really interest me. Frankly I don’t want to have a QB who is costly or overly capable. its the Over capability potential of one of those guys that would keep the team in the playoff hunt but the Rookie off the field. but with Matt Moore...lots of potential. 1.) Moore and Beane go way back. 3 seasons together in Carolina. Solid trust? 2.) Moore is a UCLA alum...Rosen would be a UCLA alum. Makes for a happy QB room. 3.) Moore isn’t very expensive. Where as the others are and Foles is both financially and draft capital expensive. 4.) Moore isn’t overly good im looking for a QB who can slowly lead the team to a mid season / 3 quRter of the season win/loss record where then it will be First Round QB pick time. Matt Moore’s skill set, veteran leadership, and past relationships make him a perfect candidate for this bridge QB position. How about we try to get a QB that will help win a lot of games so we can make the playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baskingridgebillsfan Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 9 minutes ago, Turk71 said: Wow, Matt Moore, on a day like this. What a buzzwrecker. Matt moors has had games the last Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk71 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, baskingridgebillsfan said: Matt moors has had games the last Whatever you say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Matt Moore to backup Peterman while Mayfield sits and learns the ropes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRush Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Matt Moore is not that bad of a QB. Actually he’s pretty decent and you can argue he might have more success than Cutler did with Miami. Id be ok with Moore as starter while a rookie sits next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, PeterGriffin said: Matt Moore to backup Peterman while Mayfield sits and learns the ropes. As a GM If your first rounder is sitting inactive behind Moore and peterman you might want to start working on a resume ————— now I will say I don’t think we are chasing a costly vet to pair with a rookie. Tyrod was that option. So someone like Moore is the alternative that now makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, NoSaint said: As a GM If your first rounder is sitting inactive behind Moore and peterman you might want to start working on a resume ————— now I will say I don’t think we are chasing a costly vet to pair with a rookie. Tyrod was that option. So someone like Moore is the alternative that now makes sense. No kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, BuffaloRush said: Matt Moore is not that bad of a QB. Actually he’s pretty decent and you can argue he might have more success than Cutler did with Miami. Id be ok with Moore as starter while a rookie sits next season A first rounder is starting for us day 1 almost 100% no matter the rest of the depth chart If we sign Moore and don’t take a guy in the first.... again, I’ll suggest Beane start contemplating his own future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 hour ago, H2o said: F***********ck no .....wouldn't let him start the bus let alone a football game............. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing Bong Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Why do you want a bridge QB so bad. Recently either quarterbacks make it their rookie year or they don't. Bridging deshaun Watson was moronic. If a quarterback can't start in the NFL right away or gets discouraged at early failure than he never had IT to begin with. Sink or swim. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Now Moment Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Biggest question mark guy for me is Sam Bradford. He has been so close to breaking through to the next level of QB play but injuries have cost him. I think he could be an interesting signing with an opt out clause included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Shoes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 What have you been watching from Matt Moore over the past 3 years that suggests he would be good at this? He looks great coming in a game for an injured QB, not so much when teams game plan for him as the starter...actually he kind of sucks when that happens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr8billsfan Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) Moore for dirt cheap would make sense. What’s Peterman future if we get Moore and draft Rosen? Edited March 10, 2018 by gr8billsfan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: Whoa. Didn’t know the Daboll connections. That even bumps it up. Your exactly right. We inly need a guy for 4-6 games I feel. What a waste of 4-6 games. I don't even understand that thinking at all. It's like you are planning on your starter to be so bad that you have to throw a rookie in there. Either sit him the whole year barring injury, or play him right away. Don't do what they did with Peterman last year. 5 minutes ago, gr8billsfan said: Moore for dirt cheap would make sense. What’s Peterman future if we get Moore and draft Rosen? Who gives a !@#$... His future is what it is now... Their isn't one, just like their wasn't one for Hamdan, Levi, or Tuel. These guys don't work out. Add Peterman to the list. Edited March 10, 2018 by Ol Dirty B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RalphWilson'sNewWar Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 Looking better with each passing tweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 can we stop saying bridge QB? We need a starting QB On 3/9/2018 at 10:49 PM, klos63 said: How about we try to get a QB that will help win a lot of games so we can make the playoffs? No, we need a bridge QB...bridge...bridge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 BRIDGE......under troubled water? Moore god no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Stop it. Bridgewater (if knee is okay), McCarron, McCown. In that order. Gtfo of here with Matt Moore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/9/2018 at 7:33 PM, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: im not expecting much from 2018 team in the way of wins/loses. Sounds like 2017 all over again. LOL. Let me guess 4 wins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptnCoke11 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/9/2018 at 10:32 PM, 26CornerBlitz said: Brian Daboll says what??? It's Erhardt-Perkins, not Erhardt-Pickins Who cares what it’s called. It’s ridiculous to read posts on here acting like they know everything about this offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greeneblitz Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Moore would be fine with me, but I hope that there is no bridge QB, we start our guy on day one of training camp, give him all the reps and most of preseason and ride him out through year one, our fans are terrible with being patient though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Moore is fine if we are drafting Rosen. Small correction but he is an Oregon State alum transfered from UCLA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts