MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, BUFFALOBART said: "Lucky". Indeed. I had a conversation with Warren Moon on a flight to Buffalo once. I mentioned a game that the Oiler's recently lost(The exact situation escapes me) He was nearly livid in stating that 'you make your own luck' in the NFL, in response to my 'they got lucky' comment... Nice to hear an opinion from the Andromeda Galaxy.... Once TT was pulled for a game that really meant the playoffs this regime put thier chips in. You go back now it just shows they have zero direction or plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: His running made a difference... He also gave up a defensive TD in the same manner Peterman did. Neither QB gave me hope for the offense. I won't say that Taylor is the next coming of John Elway, but we were down by a lot at the time and they could pretty much come after him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Joe Webb! FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maine-iac Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, PastaJoe said: If DiMarco catches that first pass we may have had a completely different game. That may have rattled Peterman, and then the next 2 Ints were in the OL. Might be the funniest thing I've seen/read all day. Surely he was going to go on to throw for 300 yards and 4 TD's ............ but that one damn pick set it all into motion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Foxx said: Joe Webb! FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why the hell not. He is a Former Panther so there is that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Peterman the decision was made the minute TT was benched. If TT comes back in just shows there is NO plan from this regime Taylor already came back in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Should be Tyrod starting if we want a chance to win. This defense is bad thk. So meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Wow?!? Really?!? If they play Peterman I'd be so shocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 40 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Should be Taylor. Peterman's not ready. yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclepete Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said: Let Peterman finish out the season and draft a qb. We aren't bringing Tyrod back so why bother playing him. No need to. That was a laughably bad performance. The national media and fans of other teams view us as a joke. The fact that we sent him out there after the 3rd interception was ridiculous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Wow?!? Really?!? If they play Peterman I'd be so shocked How to make a team trust the process and lose that trust in 10 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 12 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Peterman the decision was made the minute TT was benched. If TT comes back in just shows there is NO plan from this regime well whats the option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Once TT was pulled for a game that really meant the playoffs this regime put thier chips in. You go back now it just shows they have zero direction or plan One could argue going to Peterman, with the things being said about how he practiced, shows they have zero direction. It is way way to late in the season to start tanking. The move to Peterman should have been because he was better than Tyrod, or they believe that not to "see what he's got". If the plan was to "see what he's got" you do that after they've been eliminated from the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 TT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 That line of thinking just baffles me. Why not keep Taylor until we have something better? This mentality is why we've been spinning our wheels so long and haven't made the playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 28 minutes ago, horned dogs said: If he's not already ruined. If he's ruined by one bad half of football the guy will be a schitty QB anyway. That stuff is so overblown, you'll either be good or you won't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Sack Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 White privilege would be throwing 5 first half picks and getting rewarded with a start next week at KC. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: Taylor already came back in. So they names him starter next week?? Coming in in garbage time means nada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: One could argue going to Peterman, with the things being said about how he practiced, shows they have zero direction. It is way way to late in the season to start tanking. The move to Peterman should have been because he was better than Tyrod, or they believe that not to "see what he's got". If the plan was to "see what he's got" you do that after they've been eliminated from the playoffs. Or take a game when it still matters and test Peterman now. No harm done, may have even help kicked start tyrod into performing like a real QB. Competition at the QB position is a good thing in my humble opinion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Or take a game when it still matters and test Peterman now. No harm done, may have even help kicked start tyrod into performing like a real QB. Competition at the QB position is a good thing in my humble opinion... Did you really just say no harm done? The Bills had the #6 playoff seed and are in a playoff race. They have now lost it. They got completely spanked and look like fools for making the switch. The rookie QB embarassed himself. But yea, no harm done. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: So they names him starter next week?? Coming in in garbage time means nada They aren't going to just keep putting Tyrod on the bench and then ask him to come in to save Nates embarrassment. I don't think there is any chance Peterman starts again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Taylor. Holy effen Jesus Taylor. I was willing to give the Peterman experiment a try, doubtful as I was. But I think that answers what we need to know about for this season at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said: Did you really just say no harm done? The Bills had the #6 playoff seed and are in a playoff race. They have now lost it. They got completely spanked and look like fools for making the switch. The rookie QB embarassed himself. But yea, no harm done. Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. The Bills accomplished something today, Petermans not the answer. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Edited November 20, 2017 by Figster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I am so far past caring that the light from caring will take fifty thousand years to reach me. Doesn't matter who starts. The team isn't just broken, it's spectacularly broken, and has fallen apart with remarkable speed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Taylor played just fine against the Jets. It's not his fault everyone on the team sucked. He **** the bed against the Saints. Won't be the first QB to have a bad game and won't be the last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 41 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Sure he is. It was a horrible game by Nate. The announcers said maybe 2 INTs were on Nate. But sure OK You win. Taylor still is who he is. Garbage time points or not Serious colors starting to show here. If you watched that game and only thought 2 picks were his fault then you honestly are just so far gone. Just becuz a qb is getting pressured or hit when he throws doesn’t mean it wasn’t an absolutely AWFUL throw. You blasted Taylor for taking sacks in those situations but say the ints were up for debate with peterman. Pathetic dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Figster said: Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Ok? You said there was no harm in starting Peterman. There obviously was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
par73 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Taylor. I thought we'd see Peterman this year-- but not until after this rough stretch (SD, KC on the road, NE). Very strange timing, imo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Stank_Nasty said: Serious colors starting to show here. If you watched that game and only thought 2 picks were his fault then you honestly are just so far gone. Just becuz a qb is getting pressured or hit when he throws doesn’t mean it wasn’t an absolutely AWFUL throw. You blasted Taylor for taking sacks in those situations but say the ints were up for debate with peterman. Pathetic dude. Did you know that taking a sack and going 3 and out is the same as an INT? I learned that today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsfan1972 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I feel bad for Peterman and no way can you start him again until the season is officially over (eliminated from the plaoffs). The locker room is lost if Nate starts..... Heck all of a sudden Rob Ryan looks like a defensive genius too..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceman_16 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 10 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said: White privilege would be throwing 5 first half picks and getting rewarded with a start next week at KC. LOL nice.... I see who you are rooting for (hint: it is NOT the Bills). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Georgia Bill Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 If Peterman starts it will be a fiasco. If McD has not already lost the team he surely will if he starts Peterman after that abysmal performance in the 1st half. It will be interesting to see how McDermott deals with all the "what were you thinking" nasty press he's going to get this week. Sometimes (too many times if you're a Bills fan) coaches double down on stupidity - because the upside is the chance to show the dumb decision wasn't so dumb. Let's hope he doesn't go there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: Ok? You said there was no harm in starting Peterman. There obviously was. Do you think any part of the team played well enough to win? because i don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Scott7975 said: Did you know that taking a sack and going 3 and out is the same as an INT? I learned that today. Haha. Right. Nevermind the field position issues and the fact that some of his picks happened before the team could even have a chance at 3rd down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Do you think any part of the team played well enough to win? because i don't We will never know how the game would have gone if Peterman didn't play... so there's that. And yea, Hauschka looked like he was playing to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 6-14 for 66 yards 0 TDs with 5 INTs. Cannot start Peterman. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: 6-14 for 66 yards 0 TDs with 5 INTs. Cannot start Peterman. What’s that Quarterback Rating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: We will never know how the game would have gone if Peterman didn't play... so there's that. And yea, Hauschka looked like he was playing to win. Peterman is only responsible for 1 game of a 3 game losing streak. Who takes responsibility for one of the leagues worst passing O's going on 3 seasons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, mannc said: What’s that Quarterback Rating? I'm afraid to look. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts