Jump to content

Tyler Dunne story on McDermott - 3 parts, 25 interviews, one damning conclusion


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

Maybe.  The 2014 Marrone-led Bills went to 9-7 on the strength of a #4 overall defense.  They had a fading FredEx as their leading rusher, and Watkins (best season as a pro), and not much else as weapons. 

 

I'd say definitely a playoff team with Allen.  The Bills also had Robert Woods and Goodwin.  Woods is a suberbowl winning WR and very good.  Goodwin is a speedster that Allen probably would have lit up.  Goodwin wasn't all thaaat good and made of glass but I still think with Allens cannon and his speed it would have been a pretty good connection.  Also Chandler at TE who isn't great but a 500 yard guy. Not terrible.  Pretty decent lineup if you ask me.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I'd say definitely a playoff team with Allen.  The Bills also had Robert Woods and Goodwin.  Woods is a suberbowl winning WR and very good.  Goodwin is a speedster that Allen probably would have lit up.  Goodwin wasn't all thaaat good and made of glass but I still think with Allens cannon and his speed it would have been a pretty good connection.  Also Chandler at TE who isn't great but a 500 yard guy. Not terrible.  Pretty decent lineup if you ask me.

Goodwin and Bobby Woods still in the league…not sure about Sammy

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

Not the same thing. What you're referring to as not winning anything is a Super Bowl. They have won plenty together in the regular season and in the playoffs. Herbert/Staley has been together for 3 years and had one playoff game and a huge collapse in that one game. You wanna talk about losing one score games, Staley is the king

Because McDermott is better than any of those guys. I would take McDermott without Allen than any of those other coaches with what they had. 

Thank you for your OPINION  Duly noted.🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

That's my point. They did that well only based on their top Defense. Throw in a real QB, let alone a dual threat like Allen, and we have at least 2 more wins (Denver and Raiders) which puts us in the playoffs. And away we go.

 

Of course it's speculation, and pointless. But it has as much creedance as any statement saying none of the other coaches would do better with Allen on their team. We all lived the drought. We all should know/remember our biggest issue was not being able to find a QB.

 

My point is that there wasn't a lot of talent on that offense, and that the OC in  name/HC do not have a track record of getting the best out of their QB - and rookie Allen was a very raw talent who needed his energy and competitiveness to be channeled and developed.  Specifically, there are cases where you have a situation where a QB's performance drops markedly under one coach, then revives markedly under another, and in the case of Russ Wilson and Hackett you see that.  I guess you could also argue that perhaps he got the most out of Blake Bortles in '16-'18.

 

And just for the record, the bolded is nothing I've said or that should reasonably be inferred from what I've said.

 

4 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

actually there are some named sources.  I'd have to go re-read the article but there were some players named.

 

I think it would fall within "fair use"  to share that and what they said.

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Where on earth do you get that from anything I've written on this board at any time?

Because you went on about how admirably the defense has played.  They have given up late leads (<2 minutes) in 3 games the Bills lost, didn't make that one stop needed at the end to give Bills a chance when down a score (and ST lost game 1).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, buffalostu2 said:

Didn't Ken Dorsey fail this season?  I think that quote is ridiculous.   Also he starts with a quote, inserts his opinion, and ends with a quote like the entire narrative was from a reliable source.   His writing style is deceptive IMO.  I was hoping for a more fact based article where I could form my own opinion

The key to the role Dorsey played in this season's struggles revolves around whether or not Dorsey was free to create the strategic & tactical approach the Bills offense took.  By this I mean:

 

*  Was Dorsey the one who suggested that they needed to change Allen's playing style?

 

*  Was Dorsey the one that lobbied to slow the offense down to better compliment the defensive effort?

 

If these are all on Dorsey then he failed on his own.  But if Dorsey was following the orders of McD here then all Dorsey failed at was in the execution of where McD wanted to take Allen and the offense.  And that is very different from "Dorsey failed this season".

 

I don't have the answer to these questions but this article along with other tidbits from McD over the last few months - his interview with the NFL Network is revealing - suggest that McD is the author of the strategy that failed to work for Allen and the offense.  And this IMO, not the 9/11 foot in mouth quote, is the real problem with McD as the Bills head coach. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

My point is that there wasn't a lot of talent on that offense, and that the OC in  name/HC do not have a track record of getting the best out of their QB - and rookie Allen was a very raw talent who needed his energy and competitiveness to be channeled and developed.  Specifically, there are cases where you have a situation where a QB's performance drops markedly under one coach, then revives markedly under another, and in the case of Russ Wilson and Hackett you see that.  I guess you could also argue that perhaps he got the most out of Blake Bortles in '16-'18.

 

And just for the record, the bolded is nothing I've said or that should reasonably be inferred from what I've said.

 

 

I think it would fall within "fair use"  to share that and what they said.

“Me and Sean got along great,” Smith said. “No one wants the Buffalo Bills to be better. No one wants to do it right more than Sean McDermott. He’s not that guy that’s going to be meeting a player for a beer after practice or after the game. He’s a worker, man. He’s a worker. He’s the boss. He’s obsessed with growing and being great at the boulders and not the pebbles.

“The only thing that matters is being consistent, being genuine, and having a damn good locker room.”

Added DiMarco: “He didn’t serve in the military, but he has that wrestler’s mindset of just: ‘You’re part of a team, look like the rest of everybody, go out, play your ass off and celebrate and do whatever you want after the game, after we get the job done. But until the job’s done, enough with the cute *****. Go succeed.’ Which you can’t argue with.”

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm late to the party and I haven't read through this thread but I just want to point out how incredibly bizarre and wild this story is.  

 

Even if you want to give McDermott the full benefit of the doubt, this is a gaffe that's just beyond what'd you think is believable.  It's like a sitcom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

My point is that there wasn't a lot of talent on that offense

 

There was.  Maybe you missed my post

 

Watkins, Robert Woods, Goodwin, Chandler, Jackson.  Hell Spiller was on that team lol.  Not a great back I know but Gailey got a lot out of him.  Thats probably a better group than some of the crap Allen has had here.  Even the oline was decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

The key to the role Dorsey played in this season's struggles revolves around whether or not Dorsey was free to create the strategic & tactical approach the Bills offense took.  By this I mean:

 

*  Was Dorsey the one who suggested that they needed to change Allen's playing style?

 

*  Was Dorsey the one that lobbied to slow the offense down to better compliment the defensive effort?

 

If these are all on Dorsey then he failed on his own.  But if Dorsey was following the orders of McD here then all Dorsey failed at was in the execution of where McD wanted to take Allen and the offense.  And that is very different from "Dorsey failed this season".

 

I don't have the answer to these questions but this article along with other tidbits from McD over the last few months - his interview with the NFL Network is revealing - suggest that McD is the author of the strategy that failed to work for Allen and the offense.  And this IMO, not the 9/11 foot in mouth quote, is the real problem with McD as the Bills head coach. 

 

 

Yeah I too would lean that a lot of dorseys failings were driven by McDermott

 

Dorsey was here when Josh Allen was scrambling and doing his thing with daboll as the offensive coordinator

 

It would take a special kind of dumb to go away from something that is close to making you a head coach somewhere in the next year or two 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billsfan1972 said:

Because you went on about how admirably the defense has played.  They have given up late leads (<2 minutes) in 3 games the Bills lost, didn't make that one stop needed at the end to give Bills a chance when down a score (and ST lost game 1).

 

"ST lost game 1".  You mean the season opener Jets game where Allen threw 3 INTs and fumbled?  Any idea what the W-L stats are when a team has twice as many turnovers as their opponent? 

 

OK, I'm outta here.  Not doing this with someone who comes to that conclusion about that game.

 

Just for the record, I have never said the defense played well against Jacksonville ("what a wonderous game the Bills D played allowing Jax 500+ yards?"); it is logically consistent to feel the the defense has overall played well and kept us in games while the offense wasn't scoring this season overall, while not extolling defensive performance in one specific game.

In the Jax game, there was an almost 2:1 edge in TOP for Jax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

If you think rookie/ 2nd year Allen is the same player as Allen now, you lack any objectivity. 

I didn't say that.  Obviously the 2018 & 2019 Allen was a work in progress and far from the elite QB he is today.  What I was responding to was your continued parroting of the false narrative that McD did a good job "developing" Allen.  IMO the evidence from those two years, particularly 2018, was that Allen was thrown to the wolves.

 

The fact is that McD had a "plan" for Allen's development that was poorly designed and executed (sound familiar).  The plan involved bringing AJ McCarron in as the "vet" QB Allen could learn from.  The problem was that no one told McCarron before he signed that was going to be his role and he wanted no part of it.  Then the plan was to let Allen sit and learn while Peterman was named the starting QB.  And how long did that last?  It lasted until Peterman had set a new NFL record for consecutive offensive possessions without getting a 1st down in game 1. In what alternate universe are we going to call this a good plan?

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Maybe.  The 2014 Marrone-led Bills went to 9-7 on the strength of a #4 overall defense.  They had a fading FredEx as their leading rusher, and Watkins (best season as a pro), and not much else as weapons. 

The OC was nominally Nathaniel Hackett, whom Aaron Rodgers likes a lot and who got a chance to flame out as the Denver HC based on that liking.  He hasn't done a lot otherwise, which one could attribute to having Blake Bortles as his QB in Jacksonville and Zach Wilson with the Jets. 

 

Or one could look at it as, Hackett has yet to demonstrate that he can develop a QB nor work with a QB who showed success elsewhere (Wilson).

 

I personally think this kind of revisionist speculation is pointless, and certainly debatable, but with the huge growth in Sports Betting it wouldn't shock me if you could actually make such a bet.

By the way, a number of lines of evidence point to Marrone having a pretty giant ego, at least while he was with the Bills.  Remember "Saint Doug"?  And there was a reporter who wrote about a wierd private interview session he had with Marrone after publishing some info that made Marrone look bad, that had shades of the "Godfather" about it.  I seem to recall several articles at the time.

 

 

 

Marrone washed out of the league pretty quickly after Buffalo. 

Terry Pegula tried to keep him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don’t care what anyone says about him as long as we win (which we arent and that’s why this is all being written about now). The stories about belchick as he was winning SB after SB were probably no better: most HCs are obnoxious control freaks. When they win it’s fine when they don’t it’s not. So again I don’t care either way he could be the chillest guy ever like McDaniel and lose too. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

There was.  Maybe you missed my post

 

Watkins, Robert Woods, Goodwin, Chandler, Jackson.  Hell Spiller was on that team lol.  Not a great back I know but Gailey got a lot out of him.  Thats probably a better group than some of the crap Allen has had here.  Even the oline was decent.

 

I'll grant you Bobby Trees.  He had a good year, and I loved him as a player.

 

Goodwin had 1 catch on 9 targets that year, so I don't think he supports your argument; I don't remember the story with Spiller, if he was injured or what, but also not contributing much that year.

 

Chandler for me falls squarely into what Beane said once about "we never got to a point where opponents said we got to stop their TE from going off"
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

I really don’t care what anyone says about him as long as we win (which we arent and that’s why this is all being written about now). The stories about belchick as he was winning SB after SB were probably no better: most HCs are obnoxious control freaks. When they win it’s fine when they don’t it’s not. So again I don’t care either way he could be the chillest guy ever like McDaniel and lose too. 

Hell the narrative about Belichick now is that without Brady there putting up with it and them winning his ridiculous hardass schtick would wear pretty thin and they wouldn't be such a FA destination anymore. It was pretty hilarious watching that player basically twitter-GM calling all these players to come to the team and none of them did.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Marrone washed out of the league pretty quickly after Buffalo. 

Terry Pegula tried to keep him.

 

Um.....Doug Marrone spent 5 years as the HC of the Jacksonville Jaguars after Buffalo, and after a 1 year gap, got employed as the OL coach of the NO saints.

 

I 'get it' that people have different values of "washed out quickly", but by NFL standards, 5 years as the HC of another team ain't quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

"ST lost game 1".  You mean the season opener Jets game where Allen threw 3 INTs and fumbled?  Any idea what the W-L stats are when a team has twice as many turnovers as their opponent? 

 

OK, I'm outta here.  Not doing this with someone who comes to that conclusion about that game.

 

Just for the record, I have never said the defense played well against Jacksonville ("what a wonderous game the Bills D played allowing Jax 500+ yards?"); it is logically consistent to feel the the defense has overall played well and kept us in games while the offense wasn't scoring this season overall, while not extolling defensive performance in one specific game.

In the Jax game, there was an almost 2:1 edge in TOP for Jax. 

Yes Allen was awful vs. The Jets, but the winning points came in OT courtesy of the ST, which was the point. 

 

When you leave the field with the lead <2 mins, the expectation is that the Defense will do it's job.  

 

Another thread where this has been debated over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

I know you have a background as a journalist, but I would have guessed it was sourced over more like a year.  I would guess that as Dunne talks to people, he collects notes and quotes on what they say on several topics and of further sources to follow-up with, and collects them in literal or figurative "folders" which he reviews periodically in view of likely current topical interest.

 

But are you saying that Dunne timed the release deliberately to damage the Bills season and to maximize the possibility that McDermott gets fired?  Because journalists who know him have spoken out that Dunne is not a guy with an "axe to grind", but timing an article's release to maximize damage to his home town team's season and its head coach, kind of would sound like an ax.  If I'm misinterpreting you, please do clarify and correct.

 

Yea I meant 2-3 months minimum. Sorry was on a bus when I wrote it. It could well have been an ongoing - i.e. something you keep coming back to and bring together over the course of 6, 9, 12 months.

 

On timing I think it sort of makes sense in terms of where we are in the season and if I were being generous I might say just that. But personally I suspect timed to do maximum damage, yes. I think he does have axes to grind... or (I should say) is very close to people who do - Doug W and Russ B. That isn't the same as me doubting the authenticity of the sources btw. I think it is substantially an accurate piece. But I sense just a touch of vengence in the timing.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I really don’t care what anyone says about him as long as we win (which we arent and that’s why this is all being written about now). The stories about belchick as he was winning SB after SB were probably no better: most HCs are obnoxious control freaks. When they win it’s fine when they don’t it’s not. So again I don’t care either way he could be the chillest guy ever like McDaniel and lose too. 

 

From what I know, that's 100% correct.  HC in the NFL are highly competitive and driven and have strong egos.  That translates to "control freak" for many. 

 

But being a HC these days is also about motivating people, which requires being able to relate to them successfully.  If McDermott's people-skills are as bizarrely bad and he's as actually lacking in personal accountability as the impression people are giving from Dunne's article, it's very difficult to imagine him having a 7 year record of 109-68 in the regular season as the Bills HC and 5 years of playoffs while being so out of touch and unable to relate.

Caveat that I AM one of those who have not read the entire article.

 

And I will also add that being a solid HC, and having the ultimate ability to be a SB winning HC, are different things - but we have seen examples where someone spent a long time as the former before becoming the latter.  My jury is out on whether McDermott has, or can develop as, that ultimate warrior SB winning HC, but there's a lot of room between that POV and the feeling that he's a bizarre out of touch coach who can't relate appropriately to players.

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

 

“Me and Sean got along great,” Smith said. “No one wants the Buffalo Bills to be better. No one wants to do it right more than Sean McDermott. He’s not that guy that’s going to be meeting a player for a beer after practice or after the game. He’s a worker, man. He’s a worker. He’s the boss. He’s obsessed with growing and being great at the boulders and not the pebbles.

“The only thing that matters is being consistent, being genuine, and having a damn good locker room.”

Added DiMarco: “He didn’t serve in the military, but he has that wrestler’s mindset of just: ‘You’re part of a team, look like the rest of everybody, go out, play your ass off and celebrate and do whatever you want after the game, after we get the job done. But until the job’s done, enough with the cute *****. Go succeed.’ Which you can’t argue with.”

Thank you.  Appreciate this.  

So the only 2 willing to be named spoke positively about mcdermott.  Wonder how they feel about their quotes being used in a story that concludes McDermott doesn’t have what it takes.  

Edited by BuffaloRebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea I meant 2-3 months minimum. Sorry was on a bus when I wrote it. It could well have been an ongoing - i.e. something you keep coming back to and bring together over the course of 6, 9, 12 months.

 

On timing I think it sort of makes sense in terms of where we are in the season and if I were being generous I might say just that. But personally I suspect timed to do maximum damage, yes. I think he does have axes to grind... or (I should say) is very close to people who do - Doug W and Russ B. That isn't the same as me doubting the authenticity of the sources btw. I think it is substantially an accurate piece. But I sense just a touch of vengence in the timing.

 

OK, thanks for answering, fair enough.  People who know Dunne do say "no", but your point about him being very close to people with well-honed axes is germaine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Thank you.  Appreciate this.  

So the only 2 willing to be named spoke positively about mcdermott.  Wonder how they feel about their quotes being used in a story that concludes McDermott doesn’t have what it takes.  

Thank you.  Appreciate this.  

So the only 2 willing to be named spoke positively about mcdermott.  Wonder how they feel about their quotes being used in a story that concludes McDermott doesn’t have what it takes.  

Why would they feel one way or another about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

None of those coaches had a player like Josh Allen as their quarterback.

 

Pieces like this are what happens when a head coach is not getting the job done and an article comes out saying there's no chance he gets fired after the season.

 

If falling short on the field isn't going to result in changes then we have to go a different route.

 

Bingo

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

posted it in the game thread but there's a lot of relevance for this thread too.

People can complain about Sean McDermott as a coach if they want. There are plenty of examples of times he has screwed up on the football field.

 

But attacking his character? Attacking him as a human being? It is disgraceful. It has always been clear that he is a good person, a good leader, with a thoughtful, methodical approach to how he leads the team. As he said himself, he is not perfect and I'm sure he has made mistakes over the past years as a coach.

 

For those who want to believe all the garbage spewed by unnamed sources and biased crusaders, you are disgraceful.

 

I support Sean McDermott and I hope he proves all the ankle biting haters wrong.

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After processing this for a day, I've come to these conclusions.

 

First, I'm truly shocked. McDermott is now a trending meme for using the perpetuators of one of the nation's greatest tragedies to make some clumsy point about leadership. People are dunking on McDermott the person, not the anti-clutch HC. Nobody saw that coming. 

 

This entire episode sort of shatters the façade of an in control, serious leader, which is really McDermott's greatest strength. Turns out players are trying not to laugh at him while he makes his incredibly dumb speeches, and now he and the Bills are a national laughingstock. 

 

All that said, none of this matters, because we have Josh Allen and he will lead the team to enough wins to keep McDermott employed. We are basically the Norv Turner/ Phillip Rivers Chargers teams. Great QB who has to play with an anchor at HC. That's my prediction for Allen's career. I have zero hope that ownership figures it out and gets Allen an offensive minded HC while he is still in his prime. 

 

We're just going to have to overcome McDermott to win. He's apparently an insecure, Michael Scott type who means well but makes speeches that make him look like a clown, freezes in big moments, has to get all of the credit and none of the blame, and wants to hamstring Josh Allen's game. 

 

But he's not getting fired. The owner loves him and he has had enough success here W/L wise, and will continue to as long as Allen is here. 

 

And he will never live this down. It's been 20+ years, but a lot of people still have raw emotions about 9/11. This is the only team that actually plays in NY State, and I would expect a less than warm welcome for Sean the next time the Bills play at Met Life. 

 

I do expect the team to make the playoffs, which will of course be used as a reason to keep McDermott. Eventually the issues with Diggs only end one way: him off the team. Then we have to fill the WR spot in rounds 5-7, because we'll draft a DB or LB in rounds 1-3 who McDermott won't play next season because he's not a veteran player. 

 

Rinse and repeat. 

 

 

 

Edited by TheFunPolice
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I really don’t care what anyone says about him as long as we win (which we arent and that’s why this is all being written about now). The stories about belchick as he was winning SB after SB were probably no better: most HCs are obnoxious control freaks. When they win it’s fine when they don’t it’s not. So again I don’t care either way he could be the chillest guy ever like McDaniel and lose too. 

 

Ehh, maybe. But most of what I see about Belichick from former players is how funny he actually is. Almost the opposite of McD who has a nice, friendly public demeanor but can't relate to his players. Belichick has a gruff reputation, but behind the scenes players think he's one of the funniest guys of all time.

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/patriots/news/new-england-patriots-bill-belichick-humor-funny-ezekiel-elliott-juju-smith-schuster

Quote

Belichick, who has led New England to six Super Bowl victories, has gained a reputation for showing very little emotion publicly. It's not that he has no feelings, but rather him just choosing to remain more stoic than other coaches. With the success he has had over the years, it's hard to argue with his persona.

Behind closed doors, though, Belichick apparently is a different, more outgoing person with ... a great sense of humor? Running back Ezekiel Elliott, who signed with the Patriots two weeks ago, revealed that he was surprised by how funny Belichick actually is.

 

https://www.irishstar.com/sport/other-sports/bill-belichicks-funniest-moments-new-30364964

Quote

Despite his reputation as a no-nonsense coach, Belichick has shown a playful side when interacting with his players. He has been known to engage in lighthearted banter and practical jokes, creating a more relaxed atmosphere within the team.

 

One famous incident involved quarterback Tom Brady. During a practice session, Belichick sneakily replaced Brady's helmet with a noticeably larger one, leaving the entire team in stitches. This prank not only lightened the mood but also fostered a sense of camaraderie within the team, reminding everyone that even the most serious of coaches can have fun.

 

https://theathletic.com/2889665/2021/10/29/its-fun-at-gunpoint-the-comedy-stylings-of-bill-belichick/

Quote

Bill Belichick has been called many things during his 22 seasons as the Patriots coach: a genius, a grouch, the GOAT. But funny? Just wait until you read the stories from 15 of his former players …

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Ehh, maybe. But most of what I see about Belichick from former players is how funny he actually is. Almost the opposite of McD who has a nice, friendly public demeanor but can't relate to his players. Belichick has a gruff reputation, but behind the scenes players think he's one of the funniest guys of all time.

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/patriots/news/new-england-patriots-bill-belichick-humor-funny-ezekiel-elliott-juju-smith-schuster

 

https://www.irishstar.com/sport/other-sports/bill-belichicks-funniest-moments-new-30364964

 

https://theathletic.com/2889665/2021/10/29/its-fun-at-gunpoint-the-comedy-stylings-of-bill-belichick/

 

I've heard Edelman say similar things on podcasts recently fwiw

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Um.....Doug Marrone spent 5 years as the HC of the Jacksonville Jaguars after Buffalo, and after a 1 year gap, got employed as the OL coach of the NO saints.

 

I 'get it' that people have different values of "washed out quickly", but by NFL standards, 5 years as the HC of another team ain't quick.

 

He went walked away from HC of the Bills to become the OL coach of the Jags, who at the time were terrible. Had an opportunity as interim, to which they kept him and he had 1 "good" season, where he finished 10-6 carried by the defense. Marrone ultimately finished his time in Jacksonville with a .348 record. Had he been with a franchise with a real owner he would have lost his job much sooner than he did. 

Afterwards he has strictly been an OL coach. 

Marrone 100% flamed out of the NFL HC circle. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea I meant 2-3 months minimum. Sorry was on a bus when I wrote it. It could well have been an ongoing - i.e. something you keep coming back to and bring together over the course of 6, 9, 12 months.

 

On timing I think it sort of makes sense in terms of where we are in the season and if I were being generous I might say just that. But personally I suspect timed to do maximum damage, yes. I think he does have axes to grind... or (I should say) is very close to people who do - Doug W and Russ B. That isn't the same as me doubting the authenticity of the sources btw. I think it is substantially an accurate piece. But I sense just a touch of vengence in the timing.

I think at least one of the quotes and the things he wrote around it were something he hung on to for a while. The part around the whole 13 seconds thing he's quoting someone and says that they're currently happy on another team and the way the whole thing looks it's probably either Levi Wallace or Jerry Hughes but neither of them are even starting anymore. So it's like he wrote it a while ago and didn't think that things might not be going so great for them anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...