Jump to content

My case for Trubisky to the Colts


Alphadawg7

Will Wentz be the week 1 Starter for the Colts in 2022?  

182 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Wentz be the week 1 Starter for the Colts in 2022?

    • Yes
      102
    • No
      80
  2. 2. Chances you think Colts sign Trubisky to start or compete to start?

    • For sure
      1
    • Good Chance
      40
    • Possibly, but not likely
      115
    • None
      26


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, zow2 said:

I think it's more likely that Daboll goes to Chicago to develop Fields and help him reach his potential.

 

Fields is terrible.  He lacks all the attributes that Josh Allen has, that Daboll used to make Allen effective.  The only thing Fields does more or less as well as Josh, is run.  Daboll won't want to pin his HC opportunity on that hot mess.

33 minutes ago, gjv001 said:

Other than Trubisky's rookie season, I think this has to be the most enjoyable time he has spent in the NFL. And on top of that he got paid 2.5 million dollars. I think there is a very good chance Trubisky tells his agent he likes the Bills and wants to re-up for next season.

I think that if no good opportunity to start somewhere materializes, MT would be happy/smart to stay in Buffalo for another year.  But he really wants to be a starter somewhere and get himself one of those monster QB contracts.  2.5 million is very nice of course but 25 million per year is more of what he's thinking.  And his clock is ticking, so he might jump at any chance to start.  It could be a tough call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

If Daboll lands in Miami it's probably a no brainer that Trubisky ends up there to push Tua for the starting job and/or be waiting in the wings should Tua get hurt or have a short leash in 2022.

Tua's biggest problem is that he isn't the guy who was drafted right after him, Justin Herbert.

 

MT's biggest problem in Chicago was that they traded up for him and bypassed Deshaun Watson and Patrick Mahomes.

 

Both have to deal with buyer's remorse on the part of their teams and fans.  

 

Both Tua and MT have the potential to be solid, effective, professional game manager type QBs.  That's not what most teams want, but it's a lot more than a lot of teams have.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Utah John said:

Don't count out Ryan Fitzpatrick getting a call.  He's still the WFT's property and could play there, but Washington will likely move to a rookie next year.  If he doesn't play in DC, he'll be mildly attractive to a lot of teams desperate for solid play.

 

 

 

I dont know, he didn't look good in DC this year in his brief time before getting hurt.  With his age and stuff, I am not sure the market is going to be much for Fitz this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Love the thought process - I just don’t see it.

 

Wentz is costing them a 1st based upon what played this year - I don’t see them eating contract on top of the pick.

 

I think Frank would look to move on, but his (and Carson’s) faith and admiration for each other as a person - will lock the 2 together for another year.

 

It is the same issue with lesser given up in Carolina.  They gave up a pick and then the fifth year option for Darnold.  It is a double whammy when they move on, but for them the cost was so much less they can justify it.

 

The Colts it is hard to justify paying (+/or trading for) another QB when you still have to pay and gave up a 1st for the guy you have.

 

Bad job on the front in trading for him and not letting the Eagles move on and you getting him at a more reasonable price and compensation.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

Denver seems to be the best spot for Daboll. Draft or trade for a QB, decent cap room but a lot of difficult decisions. 

As if it's that easy.  The curse of Elway continues.  He can't find a good QB to come in and lead the team.  He did bring in a broken-down Peyton Manning who was able to succeed but only with Denver's powerful defense.  Before then and since then it's been a string of failures.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

Love the thought process - I just don’t see it.

 

Wentz is costing them a 1st based upon what played this year - I don’t see them eating contract on top of the pick.

 

I think Frank would look to move on, but his (and Carson’s) faith and admiration for each other as a person - will lock the 2 together for another year.

 

It is the same issue with lesser given up in Carolina.  They gave up a pick and then the fifth year option for Darnold.  It is a double whammy when they move on, but for them the cost was so much less they can justify it.

 

The Colts it is hard to justify paying (+/or trading for) another QB when you still have to pay and gave up a 1st for the guy you have.

 

Bad job on the front in trading for him and not letting the Eagles move on and you getting him at a more reasonable price and compensation.

 

 

 

I get what you are saying, and honestly, that first round pick they spent is why I asked if Wentz would be the starter instead of would Wentz be on the team.  

But, at the same time, the first round pick is gone...to just default Wentz as the starter over it, regardless if its not working out, would be unnecessarily foolish with a roster as good as theirs.  

 

So for me, what they paid to get Wentz makes someone like Trubisky is an ideal candidate for them because he can won't cost a lot to bring in to at least challenge Wentz for the job (and I think MT would win that battle personally).  

 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Let me be clear from the start, I have no evidence of any Trubisky interest by the Colts, this is just something I am personally speculating on as I think it makes a lot of sense personally for both the Colts and Trubisky.  Admittedly, I hope it does NOT happen, as I don't want to see the Colts get better lmao.  

 

Why it makes sense to me:  Trubisky isn't going to draw a lot of interest from rebuilding teams IMO unless its on a cheap deal to hold a seat warm for a rookie because those teams are likely turning to the draft for a QB.  There is also still Watson and of course possibly Rodgers that could be available too, not to mention the speculation that Wilson could be someone to keep an eye on.  With the Colts run game, they don't need to try and pursue cap choking big ticket QB's like those guys.  

 

Someone like Trubisky, who was able to get the Bears into the playoffs twice despite little offensive talent around him, a bad OL, and a terrible Coach and front office could come into Indy and help right the ship immediately.  And, it wouldn't likely need to be a big financial or cap risk either as the market for Trubisky isn't going to be expensive giving them flexibility to go in another direction quickly if its not working out.  

 

The case against Carson Wentz is pretty clear
 

Eagles:  

1.  Gets hurt, Eagles go on a run with Foles and win the SB.
2.  Eagles last year with Wentz…no playoffs.  This year without him…in the playoffs.

 

Colts:  

1.  Made playoffs without him last year.  
2. This year with him (and an 1800 rusher and MVP candidate in Taylor)…miss playoffs. 
 

And in a must win game to make the playoffs, his QBR was a pitiful (and Nathan Peterman like) 4.4 lmao...yes 4.4 out of 100.  Reich also apparently declined to commit to Wentz a day after the loss too.  Which is telling given they had history before this season that led to him wanting Wentz there in the first place. 

So what do you guys think...created poll asking if you thought Wentz would be the starter next year or not, and what you think the chances Trubisky ends up there to either start or at least compete with Wentz to start.  

 

 

 

I don’t think a brand new FO and HC are looking at players like Trubisky as their long term options.  On a short, reasonable deal while they draft their future, sure.  They would realize that there is a possibility of getting lucky with such a reclamation project, but they wouldn’t bank on it. 

Edited by BarleyNY
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Welp, guess that seals this threads fate to be no more than 1 to 3 pages max hahaha.  Threads are only active and long around here when they are full of nonsense and are off the rails.  Hahaha

Don't sell yourself short.  Debating that Trubisky is clearly a better option than Wentz could easily go 20 pages.  

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 947 said:

There's no guarantee that Trubisky would be any better than Wentz. The Bears did make the playoffs with Mitch, but not BECAUSE of him.

 

What Wentz did in 2017 blows away anything Trubisky has ever done, he would've been MVP if not for the injury. I know Wentz is not the same player anymore, but it least he once was that player. In Chicago, Trubisky was not a complete QB. He had issues reading coverages, and Nagy was using half-field reads at times to make it easier. I think Mitch will be better after his time with Daboll & Josh, but I can't see him going anywhere next year & being a top-15 QB. I think he's great as a backup, but I doubt any coach/GM is going to tie their job security solely to him.

Trubisky's 2018 season was good: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TrubMi00.htm. Make sure to look at the rushing stats too - 421 yards and 3 rushing TDs. 

3 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Don't sell yourself short.  Debating that Trubisky is clearly a better option than Wentz could easily go 20 pages.  

Agreed. See immediately above. I'm on it.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nextmanup said:

Not happening.  Frank Reich and Wentz are Jesus Brothers.

 

Frank will ride him until he can't ride him any further.

 

 

 

             ^^This right here.^^  Them Jesus peeps stick together thru hell and highwater.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Wentz will be the starter. He shouldn't be. He is terrible. But Frank Reich loves him and isn't moving off him for another placeholder type like Trubisky and they don't have a 1st round pick to draft a guy or trade for one.

 

The Wentz fascination could get Frank fired IMO.

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I think Wentz will be the starter. He shouldn't be. He is terrible. But Frank Reich loves him and isn't moving off him for another placeholder type like Trubisky and they don't have a 1st round pick to draft a guy or trade for one.

 

The Wentz fascination could get Frank fired IMO.

 

What in the world happened to him?  He was a leading MVP candidate in 2017 before getting hurt and has just fallen off a cliff since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I think Wentz will be the starter. He shouldn't be. He is terrible. But Frank Reich loves him and isn't moving off him for another placeholder type like Trubisky and they don't have a 1st round pick to draft a guy or trade for one.

 

The Wentz fascination could get Frank fired IMO.

 

It's just - if you're Reich, you're asking yourself ok, what else do I have to do next season to make Wentz more successful?  They've got the best running back in the NFL.  They have good enough receivers (probably could use 1-2 more real playmakers there).  They've got a great o-line.  Wentz was mostly healthy this year (other than his idiotic refusal to get vaxxed and the inevitable missed time as a result).  What conditions could make him more successful?  They don't have a first round pick, although they do have cap room.  How do they get over the hump with that guy at QB?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I think Wentz will be the starter. He shouldn't be. He is terrible. But Frank Reich loves him and isn't moving off him for another placeholder type like Trubisky and they don't have a 1st round pick to draft a guy or trade for one.

 

The Wentz fascination could get Frank fired IMO.

You were definitely right about Wentz. I thought he was moderately above average for most of the season, but these last two weeks ... ai yi yi. He was flat-out horrible vs. Jax.  I watched that game from start to finish, more or less, out of morbid fascination.

1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

It's just - if you're Reich, you're asking yourself ok, what else do I have to do next season to make Wentz more successful?  They've got the best running back in the NFL.  They have good enough receivers (probably could use 1-2 more real playmakers there).  They've got a great o-line.  Wentz was mostly healthy this year (other than his idiotic refusal to get vaxxed and the inevitable missed time as a result).  What conditions could make him more successful?  They don't have a first round pick, although they do have cap room.  How do they get over the hump with that guy at QB?  

he didn't actually miss any time. He started all 17 games.

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

You were definitely right about Wentz. I thought he was moderately above average for most of the season, but these last two weeks ... ai yi yi. He was flat-out horrible vs. Jax.  

he didn't actually miss any time. He started all 17 games.

 

He missed practice time leading up to the Raiders game right?  That was an excuse bandied about for that (or one of the other) loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dave mcbride said:

You were definitely right about Wentz. I thought he was moderately above average for most of the season, but these last two weeks ... ai yi yi. He was flat-out horrible vs. Jax.  

 

The Colts did a great job of hiding him. Reich is an excellent coach they have a couple of studs up front and Jonathan Taylor man I love that kid. I know the value of running backs is diminished so I am not talking value but pure pound for pound football playing ability.... Taylor is one of the most talented guys in the entire freaking league. 

 

But you can't hide Quarterbacks forever. And Carson Wentz is a wreck. 

3 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

It's just - if you're Reich, you're asking yourself ok, what else do I have to do next season to make Wentz more successful?  They've got the best running back in the NFL.  They have good enough receivers (probably could use 1-2 more real playmakers there).  They've got a great o-line.  Wentz was mostly healthy this year (other than his idiotic refusal to get vaxxed and the inevitable missed time as a result).  What conditions could make him more successful?  They don't have a first round pick, although they do have cap room.  How do they get over the hump with that guy at QB?  

 

Yea a couple more weapons to work alongside Pittman and Taylor, sure. But there isn't much else. I just don't know what the alternative is for them with no 1st round pick. They gave a first for what Wentz is giving them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The Colts did a great job of hiding him. Reich is an excellent coach they have a couple of studs up front and Jonathan Taylor man I love that kid. I know the value of running backs is diminished so I am not talking value but pure pound for pound football playing ability.... Taylor is one of the most talented guys in the entire freaking league. 

 

But you can't hide Quarterbacks forever. And Carson Wentz is a wreck. 

 

They got a historic season out of Taylor and couldn't even get baseline competence out of the QB.  How do they improve on it other than hoping Wentz miraculously gets better?

Edited by Coach Tuesday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

What in the world happened to him?  He was a leading MVP candidate in 2017 before getting hurt and has just fallen off a cliff since.

 

I don't know but his mechanics and his decision making are brutal. There were third downs on Sunday where the Colts had open guys beyond the sticks and Wentz was just trying to hurl it 60 yards. He nearly hit Campbell on one of them and everyone was like "wow almost such a great play." He had a guy open at the sticks for a 1st down.

1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

They got a historic season out of Taylor and couldn't even get baseline competence out of the QB.  How do they improve on it other than hoping Wentz miraculously gets better?

 

I honestly don't know. Spend the 2nd on the kid from Liberty? Or the kid from Nevada? And then pray that works out? Or spend that 2nd on another receiver? The Eason thing failed as a mid round shot to nothing. I have no idea. Jimmy G? If he shakes free? Trade a 2nd for him? 

 

I don't have a good solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FireChans said:

Wentz got a terrible team to the playoffs in 2019. Wentz also didn’t have the benefit of the best defense in the NFL.
 

I could see them signing Mitch and Mitch not beating out Wentz for the job. The dude was drafted 1 year after Wentz, he’s hardly close to his rookie year.

Wentz is playing nothing like he used to, though. I'm not totally sure what happened to him, but he isn't the same player anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I don't know but his mechanics and his decision making are brutal. There were third downs on Sunday where the Colts had open guys beyond the sticks and Wentz was just trying to hurl it 60 yards. He nearly hit Campbell on one of them and everyone was like "wow almost such a great play." He had a guy open at the sticks for a 1st down.

 

I honestly don't know. Spend the 2nd on the kid from Liberty? Or the kid from Nevada? And then pray that works out? Or spend that 2nd on another receiver? The Eason thing failed as a mid round shot to nothing. I have no idea. Jimmy G? If he shakes free? Trade a 2nd for him? 

 

I don't have a good solution.

The kid from Liberty won't make it out of the first. He will be a late riser in the draft process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I think Wentz will be the starter. He shouldn't be. He is terrible. But Frank Reich loves him and isn't moving off him for another placeholder type like Trubisky and they don't have a 1st round pick to draft a guy or trade for one.

 

The Wentz fascination could get Frank fired IMO.

 

But did you see where Reich declined to commit to Wentz the day after the loss?  I mean, if this is as strong and true as some suggest, he would have immediately squashed any possible speculation right then and there and gave Wentz a vote of confidence.  

 

That is telling to me, especially given Reichs history and bond with him.  Reich to me is too good of a coach to blindly hitch his horse to one wagon no matter what.  And its not only up to Reich either, the GM can still bring in competition regardless as well as they really have nothing behind Wentz anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Utah John said:

As if it's that easy.  The curse of Elway continues.  He can't find a good QB to come in and lead the team.  He did bring in a broken-down Peyton Manning who was able to succeed but only with Denver's powerful defense.  Before then and since then it's been a string of failures.  

 

Putting aside your axe to grind with Elway, in no way did I characterize Daboll to Denver as "easy." Denver has a path but that doesn't speak to chances for success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I don't know but his mechanics and his decision making are brutal. There were third downs on Sunday where the Colts had open guys beyond the sticks and Wentz was just trying to hurl it 60 yards. He nearly hit Campbell on one of them and everyone was like "wow almost such a great play." He had a guy open at the sticks for a 1st down.

 

I honestly don't know. Spend the 2nd on the kid from Liberty? Or the kid from Nevada? And then pray that works out? Or spend that 2nd on another receiver? The Eason thing failed as a mid round shot to nothing. I have no idea. Jimmy G? If he shakes free? Trade a 2nd for him? 

 

I don't have a good solution.

Garrapalo would do well in that offense. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

But did you see where Reich declined to commit to Wentz the day after the loss?  I mean, if this is as strong and true as some suggest, he would have immediately squashed any possible speculation right then and there and gave Wentz a vote of confidence.  

 

That is telling to me, especially given Reichs history and bond with him.  Reich to me is too good of a coach to blindly hitch his horse to one wagon no matter what.  And its not only up to Reich either, the GM can still bring in competition regardless as well as they really have nothing behind Wentz anyway.

 

I did. I just think when they sit down and look at their options it will be "Wentz or other failed former starters" and I very strongly believe Reich would be a better the devil he knows guy. Look at where he has gone post Luck - Rivers and Wentz. He likes guys he knows. Don't get me wrong if they could draft a stud QB or get a Russell Wilson (or even as I said above a Jimmy G) in a trade they'd do it. I don't see him moving off Wentz for someone of a similar profile. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 947 said:

There's no guarantee that Trubisky would be any better than Wentz. The Bears did make the playoffs with Mitch, but not BECAUSE of him.

 

What Wentz did in 2017 blows away anything Trubisky has ever done, he would've been MVP if not for the injury. I know Wentz is not the same player anymore, but it least he once was that player. In Chicago, Trubisky was not a complete QB. He had issues reading coverages, and Nagy was using half-field reads at times to make it easier. I think Mitch will be better after his time with Daboll & Josh, but I can't see him going anywhere next year & being a top-15 QB. I think he's great as a backup, but I doubt any coach/GM is going to tie their job security solely to him.

Have you seen the Rhule and Darnold show?

Never underestimate the outcome of desperation coupled with coaching ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

What in the world happened to him?  He was a leading MVP candidate in 2017 before getting hurt and has just fallen off a cliff since.

 

I can answer that question...2 things are at play:

  1. People tend to take a short stretch of a persons career, over exaggerated it and try and believe thats the real them while ignoring the vast majority of their career data.  
  2. His 2017 continues to be a thing of lore and over exaggeration.  Its not as special as people seem to want to believe.  Good season, yes...but wasn't that special.  It was more about him being a 2nd year QB doing that then it being some unmatched season.
    1. In 13 games, he had 33 TD's putting him on pace for 40.  He only had 7 INT's at that point, putting him on pace for about 10, BUT he had 9 more fumbles too, something he has been terrible at his whole career.  He was also only completing 60.2% of his passes that year and only had 3296 yards passing, putting him on pace to barely reach 4000 yards.
    2. Based on his averages up to that point...his final season would have been about 4100 yards, 40 total TD's, 10 INT's, 15 Fumbles (4 or 5 lost), with a comp percentage of 60.2%.  Not only would that NOT have even been contention the last 2 seasons for MVP, if Josh Allen had that same season it would have been labeled a down year and regression. 

It was literally one part of a season all the way back in 2017 and he is still living off that reputation despite his play not backing it up.  Its not about what happened, its more about he was playing above his mean (compared to his career) for part of a season and that stretch being remembered as more than it really was.  

 

I mean, honestly this has happened many times before, and not just for QB's, players at various positions having great success for a stretch of a season, a playoff run, even a full season but never duplicating that again.  Eagles alone have seen this...Foles had one crazy season as good or better than Wentz, went on to be the QB of the Rams and never was good again...except for one brief stretch again with the Eagles where he took over for Wentz and won them a SB where he out dueled a 500 yard Tom Brady in the SB...and then went right back to sucking again.  

 

Carr also had an MVP like season before getting hurt 2/3rds of the way, was never that good before and never that good again either.  

 

So for me, anytime anyone brings up that one stretch all the way back in 2017, I just kind of sigh because he has more time on the field both before and after that stretch suggesting that was more of an anomaly than than who he really is.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

(or even as I said above a Jimmy G) in a trade they'd do it. 

 

My fiance loves the 49ers...so I have seen a lot of Niners games, was even at the game Sunday when they beat the Rams.  Jimmy G, regardless of statistics, is not very good to me.  He makes a lot of terrible throws and decisions.  He is flat out soft too.  Most Niner fans, including her, can't wait for the Jimmy G era to end, although they still feel he gives the team the better chance to win today as Lance is not ready.  

 

He lacks mobility, his arm isn't very strong, and he can be delusional with an utter lack of accountability when he doesn't play well.  He also just seems to lack that drive to be great and isn't known to be a student of the game type guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJS said:

Wentz is playing nothing like he used to, though. I'm not totally sure what happened to him, but he isn't the same player anymore.

 

Wentz is the perfect of example of why you should never jump the gun to sign a young QB until they prove they are for real and deliver consistent results over multiple seasons.

 

He was great his first few years, particularly the season the Eagles won the SB and he was the clear cut league MVP favorite that year before being his season ending injury towards the end of the regular season.

 

Not saying this because I'm still very critical of Allen's deal and his own long term viability, but Wentz is a true cautionary tale among many other similar cases.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BuffaloBill said:

I hate the situation for Frank Reich …. As his team would be scary with an above average QB.

 

The suggested scenario is highly likely as Wentz is as good as gone. 

I feel like he deserves at least some of the criticism for his team feeling confident they could roll with Carson wentz in the offseason.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Let me be clear from the start, I have no evidence of any Trubisky interest by the Colts, this is just something I am personally speculating on as I think it makes a lot of sense personally for both the Colts and Trubisky.  Admittedly, I hope it does NOT happen, as I don't want to see the Colts get better lmao.  

 

Why it makes sense to me:  Trubisky isn't going to draw a lot of interest from rebuilding teams IMO unless its on a cheap deal to hold a seat warm for a rookie because those teams are likely turning to the draft for a QB.  There is also still Watson and of course possibly Rodgers that could be available too, not to mention the speculation that Wilson could be someone to keep an eye on.  With the Colts run game, they don't need to try and pursue cap choking big ticket QB's like those guys.  

 

Someone like Trubisky, who was able to get the Bears into the playoffs twice despite little offensive talent around him, a bad OL, and a terrible Coach and front office could come into Indy and help right the ship immediately.  And, it wouldn't likely need to be a big financial or cap risk either as the market for Trubisky isn't going to be expensive giving them flexibility to go in another direction quickly if its not working out.  

 

The case against Carson Wentz is pretty clear
 

Eagles:  

1.  Gets hurt, Eagles go on a run with Foles and win the SB.
2.  Eagles last year with Wentz…no playoffs.  This year without him…in the playoffs.

 

Colts:  

1.  Made playoffs without him last year.  
2. This year with him (and an 1800 rusher and MVP candidate in Taylor)…miss playoffs. 
 

And in a must win game to make the playoffs, his QBR was a pitiful (and Nathan Peterman like) 4.4 lmao...yes 4.4 out of 100.  Reich also apparently declined to commit to Wentz a day after the loss too.  Which is telling given they had history before this season that led to him wanting Wentz there in the first place. 

So what do you guys think...created poll asking if you thought Wentz would be the starter next year or not, and what you think the chances Trubisky ends up there to either start or at least compete with Wentz to start.  

 

 

 

 

Makes sense in certain ways if the Colts decide to give Wentz one more year.  You then aren't going to bring in a guy like Wilson, or Rodgers, but you want someone who some ability as the backup in case Wentz falters.  You don't want his backup to be a Matt Barkley type.  Based on what happened in Philly you also may not want to draft someone in the 1st round either as that  is rumored to be some of the issues with Wentz in Philly.  Plus Indy is drafting late enough and not a real strong QB class anyway.  If they decide to move on from Wentz, then think they may look for someone better than Trubisky.

 

I'm not so sure about the Trubisky and Daboll together rumors either.  Think is Daboll gets a HC job, wouldn't want to tie my fate to Trubisky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I feel like he deserves at least some of the criticism for his team feeling confident they could roll with Carson wentz in the offseason.    

 

There are rumors he still may be canned in the coming days but I think that would be a mistake despite failing to win just one game against the Raiders/Jags which would have clinched a playoff spot.

 

He's proven to be a good head coach and has essentially had a different starting QB every year since being there. Certainly he will probably be on a very hot seat in 2022 to get back to the postseason though.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...