Jump to content

Cole Beasley announces he will not be following Covid protocols, willing to retire


Process

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, HalftimeAdjustment said:

 

Either you win the lottery or you don't.

 

Either you win at roulette or you don't.

 

Those two things do not have the same odds... but in both cases, you don't know in advance. In both cases, if you play more times, the chance of a win is increased.

 

Same principle applies here. The vaccine should lower my odds of getting serious COVID. Still... I would prefer to be exposed fewer times. The less cases that are in the population, the less likely I will be exposed.

 

We may see serious cases continue to decline which is good for everyone, juat based on immunity levels so far (both natural and vaccine induced). However, if more people chose to get vaccinated, it is more likely that serious cases will continue to decline faster.

 

Unfortunately we are at the point where vaccination levels will plateau. It is what it is.

So the rest of your life, even though you have a vaccine that works… you are going to be a worry-wort and make ppl that aren’t scared relinquish their right to the pursuit of happiness because of your obsessive compulsive approach to a disease that’s survival rate is in the 98th percentile.

 

Sounds like a waste of energy and a surplus of stress.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

The mRNA vaccines have the RNA, some salts, and some fat molecules to help keep the RNA soluble.  Once the mRNA is read for resulting synthesis of the spike protein it is degraded.  What in there do you think will cause long term effects?

 

An historical analysis of vaccine complications shows they are extraordinarily rare with any serious complications seen within weeks.  

I'll wait for the historical analysis to come in before declaring I have all the answers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

68 pages of most people missing the point here.  This has NOTHING to do with vaccinations.  its his right to get one or not, and not everyone needs to get one for a team to be compliant.  So nothing wrong with him opting to not get one.  

 

This is 100% about the stupid stance he took about NOT following the required protocols to better insure he doesn't expose others.  Regardless if he gets COVID or not, just him breaking protocols alone will be enough for him to get quarantined along with anyone else he was around, especially those unvaccinated.  

 

And based on what was out there prior, I am not sure Josh Allen is going to get vaccinated.  To have a player blatantly posting on social media that not only is he not going to get vaccinated, but he's flat out not abiding by the protocols the NFL has put in place is a massive problem.  

 

The fact he doesn't see how stupid is public comments are at this point is crazy to me.  NO ONE, literally NO ONE is forcing him to get a vaccine.  They are requiring to be considerate of the safety to his teammates and staff not only in protecting them from getting COVID, but contributing to them remaining OUT of COVID quaratine/protocols.  We saw a lot of people miss games last year because someone else on their team had been around them after either breaking protocols or testing positive.  Denver played a game with not a single QB dressed.  

 

For him to be this stupid is shocking.  Given how much he has loved his teammates and playing in Buffalo.  If he doesn't publicly back track this part of his comments, I don't know how Beane keeps him on the team.  And I love Cole on this team, so I really hope he backs off the narcissistic stuff about being rich enough to do what he wants.

 

I would have never thought for 1 second that Cole would not be on this team in 2021...but if I am Beane, I cant see how I can keep a player who is willfully and boastfully going to break the safety protocols for his own selfish desires and basically say that his teammates, this team, our staff, our pursuit of a Super Bowl, etc don't matter.  The best "ability" is "availability"...and if you have a loose canon jeopardizing not only his availability, but the rest of your rosters, especially Diggs and Allen, then your job is in jeopardy in my book.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 3
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

You do realize, of course, that it’s his job.  He’s the one that actually plays the game of football and has to live the punitive NFL Covid protocols.

 

 

 

Oh boo hoo. Forgive me if I don't shed a tear for a man that's made over $30+M playing football but can't be bothered to wear a mask. At this point it's just ignorance wrapped up under the guise of personal liberty.

 

Edited by QCity
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

You do realize, of course, that it’s his job.  He’s the one that actually plays the game of football and has to live the punitive NFL Covid protocols.

 

Yes.

 

Quote

So he’s speaking out about something he disagrees that effects his day to day… he’s confronting his Union representation and the NFL in a public way.  Again - that is his Union, his employer, his day-to-day.  If he wants to call them out for their helicopter mom protocols then he can and should.  That’s what good and honest ppl, that care about the truth, do.

 

Really?  Honest people who disagree with their employer's protocols call them out on social media?  I call "Baloney".  I don't think it has to do with "good" or "honest".  Note: I'm not saying Cole Beasley isn't a good and honest man, I'm just saying that calling someone out on social media has nothing to do with "good: or "honest"

 

Me, when I want to change something at my job or in my neighborhood, I've kinda found it more effective to go and talk to people man-to-man as it were, try to gain an understanding of where they're coming from, hear their concerns, lay out my concerns, and see if we can find some common ground.  Sometimes it takes several discussions over time and a ***** ton of patience.   But I usually get there.  Sometimes I don't.

 

I find that if I call people out publicly, they tend to get defensive and hunker down. 

 

Maybe that's just me, and you've had success with Cole's strategy?  Tell us about it....I'm listening!

 

Quote

And exactly who are the church-dance-level  restrictions protecting?

 

Fair question.  Straight up: as long as the NFL and NFLPA take the position that players who test positive for covid-19 can't play, they're protecting The Shield.  The goal is to protect player availability to the team, and preserve the quality of the game while avoiding reschedules.

 

 

Quote

Teammates and coaches and organizational staff that haven’t been vaccinated have chosen not to be vaccinated.

 

Correct.   But if they get infected with covid-19 and test positive or develop symptoms, they become unavailable to the team.  If they infect other players, those players become unavailable to the team.  Thus close contacts who are ~7x more susceptible to infection (Unvaccinated) are required to quarantine to prevent spread, and quarantined players become unavailable to the team.

 

The Team is paying players to be available, not to be on Sick Call or cause a team outbreak.

 

The same "church dance level" restrictions were in place last year for unvaccinated players, ie, Everyone.  What's different now?

 

Quote

If. your. medicine. works. then. it. works.

 

How can I help you understand that 80-88% is less than 100%?  Good Gracious, I'm Very Tenacious, but at this point I think you're just not trying. so.....

 

Quote

I implore you to let go!

 

......Why do you care what I do? :nana:

 

Edit: TIL if you don't put a space between s*** and ton, the bad word filter don't twinge.  Shhh.  Don't tell @SDS

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

So the rest of your life, even though you have a vaccine that works… you are going to be a worry-wort and make ppl that aren’t scared relinquish their right to the pursuit of happiness because of your obsessive compulsive approach to a disease that’s survival rate is in the 98th percentile.

 

Sounds like a waste of energy and a surplus of stress.

 

No, I am living my life, and I am not advocating for government-compelled vaccination of non healthcare workers nor am I suggesting that government restrictions should remain in place at current levels.

 

Nevertheless, it isn't as simple as "works or it doesn't" except in retrospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CorkScrewHill said:

As stated below I am pro-vaccine (my daughter is in the medical field)… but I very much worry when the government mandates pretty much anything. It is a slippery slope. Not everyone gets any vaccine.. religious reasons, etc

 

There are several states that require compulsory vaccinations without exemption unless it's a genuine medical reason.  And it is entirely within their power to do so.

 

The states that allow non-medical exemptions do so because they have chosen to, not because they lack the power to do so.  If they changed their laws to compel vaccination, it would be entirely Constitutional.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

But when you flip flop about the necessity to not go swimming in lake Erie in January via July it's a good and reasonable thing. 

Umm, what? Are you having an adverse reaction to the vaccine? So you equate the babble above as a proof point for whatever point you're trying to make? Sorry, this makes no sense. BTW, towards the end, I wouldn't trust Fauci to make a call on Lake Erie swimming.

1 minute ago, Capco said:

 

There are several states that require compulsory vaccinations without exemption unless it's a genuine medical reason.  And it is entirely within their power to do so.

 

The states that allow non-medical exemptions do so because they have chosen to, not because they lack the power to do so.  If they changed their laws to compel vaccination, it would be entirely Constitutional.  

Which states? I call BS. That wouldn't stand in court. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

68 pages of most people missing the point here.  This has NOTHING to do with vaccinations.  its his right to get one or not, and not everyone needs to get one for a team to be compliant.  So nothing wrong with him opting to not get one.  

 

This is 100% about the stupid stance he took to follow the required protocols to better insure he doesnt expose others.  Regardless if he gets COVID or not, just him breaking protocols alone will be enough for him to get quarantined along with anyone else he was around, especially those unvaccinated.  

 

And based on what was out there prior, I am not sure Josh Allen is going to get vaccinated.  To have a player blatantly posting on social media that not only is he not going to get vaccinated, but he's flat out not abiding by the protocols the NFL has put in place is a massive problem.  

 

The fact he doesn't see how stupid is public comments are at this point is crazy to me.  NO ONE, literally NO ONE is forcing him to get a vaccine.  They are requiring to be considerate of the safety to his teammates and staff not only in protecting them from getting COVID, but contributing to them remaining OUT of COVID quaratine/protocols.  We saw a lot of people miss games last year because someone else on their team had been around them after either breaking protocols or testing positive.  Denver played a game with not a single QB dressed.  

 

For him to be this stupid is shocking.  Given how much he has loved his teammates and playing in Buffalo.  If he doesn't publicly back track this part of his comments, I don't know how Beane keeps him on the team.  And I love Cole on this team, so I really hope he backs off the narcissistic stuff about being rich enough to do what he wants.

 

I would have never thought for 1 second that Cole would not be on this team in 2021...but if I am Beane, I cant see how I can keep a player who is willfully and boastfully going to break the safety protocols for his own selfish desires and basically say that his teammates, this team, our staff, our pursuit of a Super Bowl, etc don't matter.  The best "ability" is "availability"...and if you have a loose canon jeopardizing not only his availability, but the rest of your rosters, especially Diggs and Allen, then your job is in jeopardy in my book.  

I was trying to say that but you said it better than me

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:

Which states? I call BS. That wouldn't stand in court. 

 

Oh ho ho, I've been waiting for this one.  First, let me point you to these two posts:  

 

3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

There is no State or local mandate at present to take a Covid-19 vaccine, nor is his employer requiring it.  Therefore, this isn't a Constitutional issue at present.

 

Second, if there were a State or local mandate, the 10th amendment to the constitution has been held to apply:

 “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  The constitution does not generally delegate public health authority to the Federal gov't, therefore it is held to lie with State and local governments.

 

Third, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of State and local vaccine requirements multiple times.  This highlights some key cases.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/where-does-the-governments-right-to-require-vaccinations-come-from/

 

3 hours ago, Capco said:

 

There is currently no state-mandated compulsory vaccination for COVID, but if there were then he, nor anyone else, has any Constitutional right to refuse absent a genuine medical reason to do so.  American jurisprudence on this topic is over 100 years old and fairly settled. 

 

Individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.  Per Justice Harlan:  

 

"[I]n every well ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand"

 

and...

 

"Real liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own [liberty], whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others."

 

and finally...

 

"[In] extreme cases [for certain individuals] in a particular condition of . . . health, [the requirement of vaccination would be] cruel and inhuman[e], [in which case, courts would be empowered to interfere in order to] prevent wrong and oppression."

 

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).

 

Finally, the states that do not allow religious exemptions are:   California, Maine, Mississippi, New York, West Virginia, and Connecticut.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination_policy_in_the_United_States

Edited by Capco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

Ppl that don’t want the vaccine don’t have to get it.

 

Their choice doesn’t make your medicine work.  If what you injected in your body works then you’re good.

 

Okay, so you're just openly ignoring what people are saying? Cool.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffAlone said:

Lmfao at this thread. and the same overlords preaching the same crap. despite new, and ever changing, research. Think Freely folks. To each their own. Don't be turning in your neighbors. I support Cole's decision as a free thinking man. Same as I do the other side of the equasion. Think for yourselves.And feel free to discuss it openly. If JA doesn't get the vax, is he any less deserving of a new contract? On to the SuperBowl!

 

Yeah, No. Josh said they decided as a team to keep their decisions about the vaccine in house and that they wouldn't be talking about it publicly. I didn't hear Josh call the players union names and threaten to retire after saying he refused to follow NFL policy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:

Umm, what? Are you having an adverse reaction to the vaccine? So you equate the babble above as a proof point for whatever point you're trying to make? Sorry, this makes no sense. BTW, towards the end, I wouldn't trust Fauci to make a call on Lake Erie swimming.

Which states? I call BS. That wouldn't stand in court. 

Sorry you got confused. As the circumstances change so do the guidelines. IE when it is freezing swimming will kill you but it is safe to swim in the same water when it’s 80 degrees. That sort of flip flop and back tracking is reasonable and wise.   
 

NY requires vaccines for public school attendance. As an example of mandatory vaccines. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

Sorry you got confused. As the circumstances change so do the guidelines. IE when it is freezing swimming will kill you but it is safe to swim in the same water when it’s 80 degrees. That sort of flip flop and back tracking is reasonable and wise.   
 

NY requires vaccines for public school attendance. As an example of mandatory vaccines. 

Yes but it's already been went over That 43 out of 50 states allow philosophical or religious exemptions which aren't that hard to get

 

Now I'm not sitting here saying don't get your kids the polio vaccine, I'm not a nutter

 

I'm just playing devil's advocate that shows a lot of states allow exemptions

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

My assumption (based in common sense) is that most ppl who haven’t been vaccinated (in our magnificent USA) probably aren’t going to get it.  Ever.

 

So, I’m saying, either pin ‘em down and jab em.

 

Or quit projecting your (not you in particular)….. but the overly-emotional-vaccine-fanboys  need to quit projecting their fears onto others and live and let live.

Either your medics works for you or it doesn’t.

 

I appreciate the respectful discourse. Based on how you see it, would you prefer for the NFL/NFLPA to get rid of the option of allowing players to not get vaccinated, but in turn avoid certain activities vaccinated players are privy to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

Oh ho ho, I've been waiting for this one.  First, let me point you to these two posts:  

 

 

 

Finally, the states that do not allow religious exemptions are:   California, Maine, Mississippi, New York, West Virginia, and Connecticut.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination_policy_in_the_United_States

Oh ho ho, forced vaccine not happening and never will. They can mandate masks and protocols in lieu of that. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reader said:

 

I appreciate the respectful discourse. Based on how you see it, would you prefer for the NFL/NFLPA to get rid of the option of allowing players to not get vaccinated, but in turn avoid certain activities vaccinated players are privy to?

I would prefer that players can get vaccinated or not get vaccinated.

 

And I would prefer that no player’s activities were impinged whatsoever.

 

Ppl who want the vaccine have it.  People who don’t, don’t.  That’s it.  Ball game over.  Fat Lady is singing.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

So the rest of your life, even though you have a vaccine that works… you are going to be a worry-wort

 

I can not be a worry-wort, and STILL understand people who won't get vaxxed affect the odds of me and mine getting ill (because Math, 85-88% is less than 100%).  Those things can co-exist.

 

 I can not want to impose mandatory covid-19 vaccination, yet still believe that people who choose not to get vaxxed are Shirkers who aren't doing their part.  Those viewpoints can also co-exist.

 

Quote

and make ppl that aren’t scared relinquish their right to the pursuit of happiness

 

LOLOLOLOL how is Cole Beasley relinquishing his damned right to the "pursuit of happiness" if he has to follow some NFL protocols for 1/3 of a year so he can play the game he loves and go home to the wife and kids that he loves?   NFL player after NFL player (including Cole) has talked about how busy they are during the season and how little free time they have. 

 

It's not as though following the protocols is going to keep him from exercising his in-season right for a midweek jaunt to Cabo or Punta AmIRite?

 

Quote

because of your obsessive compulsive approach to a disease that’s survival rate is in the 98th percentile.

 

OOOOH, Math!  Survival rate of 98%

Check me here:

 

US population: 332 million

Covid infections: 33.3M (assume 55% unvaccinated to mirror population-level decisions)

Covid deaths: 0.6M

45% total population vaccinated: 149M. 

 

 

98% survival means 3.63 MILLION more Americans will die!  Nothing to see here, Move Along!

 

How many people died in 9/11 and yet it was a big deal? 3,000?

 

You have a right to not be vaccinated and to not be concerned about the impact of that decision on other humans

 

Add gratuitously name calling someone who is, frankly, I think that's a bad look.

 

In my day, we lined up and got injected with a vaccine for a disease with like 100% survival rate, all to save a mere 33,000 babies.  What fools!

 

  • Like (+1) 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KennyDavisEyes said:

I would prefer that players can get vaccinated or not get vaccinated.

 

And I would prefer that no player’s activities were impinged whatsoever.

 

Ppl who want the vaccine have it.  People who don’t, don’t.  That’s it.  Ball game over.  Fat Lady is singing.

That’s not gonna happen. Protocols will be in place. Just like Cole had to abide by in college. Remember in order to play college ball these players face mandatory vaccination. The NFL has picked vaccinations or protocols. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:

Oh ho ho, forced vaccine not happening and never will. They can mandate masks and protocols in lieu of that. 

 

I'm not attempting to predict the future.  All I'm saying is that if the states wanted to compel vaccination, they have the power to do so for every single person that does not have a genuine medical excuse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

That’s not gonna happen. Protocols will be in place. Just like Cole had to abide by in college. Remember in order to play college ball these players face mandatory vaccination. The NFL has picked vaccinations or protocols. 

 

Protocols will definitely be in place and it is very unlikely that vaccinated and unvaccinated players will be treated equally. Optimistically, if the overall case rate continues to decline, protocols can/will be relaxed due to lower relative risk. I also believe that player discontent with the announced preseason protocols may well cause some relaxation of the protocols for the regular season. Pessimistically, if there is a surge in cases in the fall, protocols could become more stringent for vaccinated players as well.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

I would prefer that players can get vaccinated or not get vaccinated.

 

And I would prefer that no player’s activities were impinged whatsoever.

 

Ppl who want the vaccine have it.  People who don’t, don’t.  That’s it.  Ball game over.  Fat Lady is singing.

You might prefer no Impingement of players’ activities, but the reality is that non-immunized players are at higher risk than immunized players, so the safety protocols need to be followed. 
 

And the ball game might indeed be over for non-immunized players who refuse to follow safety protocols getting infected or infecting other non-immunized players who then end up missing time and aren’t available to the team as a result. Is behavior that has the potential to weaken the team thus negatively impacting its chances of winning, the smart play? Really?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

That’s not gonna happen. Protocols will be in place. Just like Cole had to abide by in college. Remember in order to play college ball these players face mandatory vaccination. The NFL has picked vaccinations or protocols. 

It’s not apples to apples comparison.  
 

You’re talking about vaccines that have been around decades vs this rigged up thing.

 

Ppl aren’t going to follow the nanny state protocols whenever and wherever they can, so buckle up.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

I would prefer that players can get vaccinated or not get vaccinated.

 

And I would prefer that no player’s activities were impinged whatsoever.

 

Ppl who want the vaccine have it.  People who don’t, don’t.  That’s it.  Ball game over.  Fat Lady is singing.

How many people have to die from this virus for you to understand the concept of vaccinations?   Apparently over 600k in the US and millions worldwide aren’t enough.  Give us a number of deaths beyond which you’d get concerned.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, K-9 said:

You might prefer no Impingement of players’ activities, but the reality is that non-immunized players are at higher risk than immunized players, so the safety protocols need to be followed. 
 

And the ball game might indeed be over for non-immunized players who refuse to follow safety protocols getting infected or infecting other non-immunized players who then end up missing time and aren’t available to the team as a result. Is behavior that has the potential to weaken the team thus negatively impacting its chances of winning, the smart play? Really?

The reality is that non-immunized ppl don’t GAFF that they are “at higher risk.”

 

Quit making victims out of ppl that aren’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

It’s not apples to apples comparison.  
 

You’re talking about vaccines that have been around decades vs this rigged up thing.

 

Ppl aren’t going to follow the nanny state protocols whenever and wherever they can, so buckle up.

MRNA vaccines have been researched for years and the Phizer and Moderna have 95% effectiveness.  Your willful ignorance is  amazing.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KennyDavisEyes said:

The reality is that non-immunized ppl don’t GAFF that they are “at higher risk.”

 

Quit making victims out of ppl that aren’t.

 

It. Is. Not. About. Them.

 

It. Is. About. People. Who. Cannot. Get. Vaccinated.

 

It. Is. About. A. Rapid. And. Comprehensive. Response. NOW. That. Mitigates. Future. Outbreaks.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

The reality is that non-immunized ppl don’t GAFF that they are “at higher risk.”

 

Quit making victims out of ppl that aren’t.

Darwin may be the operative concept for such individuals.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

I would prefer that players can get vaccinated or not get vaccinated.

 

And I would prefer that no player’s activities were impinged whatsoever.

 

Ppl who want the vaccine have it.  People who don’t, don’t.  That’s it.  Ball game over.  Fat Lady is singing.

 

The Fat Lady went unheard by the NFLPA. Ball game NOT over. They protect ALL the players, not just one guy. Play by the rules, or you’re out. I don’t care one way or the other besides hoping the Bills can field the best team possible. 

 

EDIT: This is not a position on Covid or the vaccine. I don’t care much how you feel about it. (We are filly vaccinated, but you do you.) It’s more about what’s in black and white. This was negotiated, and a program was agreed upon. If Cole or anybody else doesn’t like it, going to social media just distracts your team. Go to your NFLPA representative. That is the ONLY way something gets changed. This situation is so fluid that the rules in place today may not be what we have to live with when the season starts. I hope it improves to the point that we get to loosen up a bit. 

Edited by Augie
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KennyDavisEyes said:

It’s not apples to apples comparison.  
 

You’re talking about vaccines that have been around decades vs this rigged up thing.

 

Ppl aren’t going to follow the nanny state protocols whenever and wherever they can, so buckle up.

 

[Looney Tunes theme plays in background]

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...