Jump to content

Washington Redskins: 15 women claim sexual harassment


SDS

Recommended Posts

IF even some of what’s been posted as likely substance is factual (thanks @DrDawkinstein for the leads), then how this doesn’t end up with Dan Snyder being forced out of ownership is beyond my pay grade to analyze. Consider that it’s common knowledge Snyder is one of the less likeable owners in the league to begin with (so prolly not many will rush to defend his management of the team) and as head of the ship would be a scalp (no pun intended) the NFL would probably not mind getting as a way to provide cover for the shield, if there’s even a hint that the league offices were made aware of any allegations along the way and failed to follow up independently? Lots of questions. 

 

Some of what’s alleged would make even Richardson blush, and he was forced out as well.

https://www.sbnation.com/2017/12/17/16788572/panthers-owner-jerry-richardson-selling-team

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

This is the best thread about what the story will most likely be about.

 

I'm only posting the main/first tweet because the rest gets vulgar, but follow the link to the whole story.

 

 

 

Called it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Snyder, Bwaha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Don Otreply said:

Dan Snyder, Bwaha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... 

If he learned anything from OJ,

he must DENY DENY DENY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

Last time someone hyped news 24hours+ in advance it turned out to be some idiotic, inconsequential thing. This had better live up to the hype with how many media folks are going nuts about it.

 

Couple of possible reasons behind the leaks (could have been from WaPo side to stay ahead of the name-change story, or from Skins side to get ahead of it themselves), and a couple of reasons for the delay (Skins lawyers are now involved so most likely delaying the drop).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

The whole thread/story in one image:

 

NSFW

Thanks for helping to actually indicate what this thread is about.


God forbid the thread originator could have bothered to do likewise.

 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

IF even some of what’s been posted as likely substance is factual (thanks @DrDawkinstein for the leads), then how this doesn’t end up with Dan Snyder being forced out of ownership is beyond my pay grade to analyze. Consider that it’s common knowledge Snyder is one of the less likeable owners in the league to begin with (so prolly not many will rush to defend his management of the team) and as head of the ship would be a scalp (no pun intended) the NFL would probably not mind getting as a way to provide cover for the shield, if there’s even a hint that the league offices were made aware of any allegations along the way and failed to follow up independently? Lots of questions. 

 

Some of what’s alleged would make even Richardson blush, and he was forced out as well.

https://www.sbnation.com/2017/12/17/16788572/panthers-owner-jerry-richardson-selling-team

I feel bad for Ron Rivera. First Richardson now Snyder

27 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Can the NFL relegate the team to the ACC and promote Clemson into the league?

Dabo has his own issues 

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Thanks for helping to actually indicate what this thread is about.


God forbid the thread originator could have bothered to do likewise.

 

?


yeah. God forbid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

For reals?  That would potentially destroy the NFL.  Seriously.  

And validate everyone on here who’s griped along the way that refs aren’t always above reproach, let’s just say. 

Edited by NoHuddleKelly12
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

 

 

 

I have now been witness to one of the greatest things ever put on twitter. 

 

My day...is brighter now.  Thank you.

 

:thumbsup:

 

EDIT:

@Warcodered  The true crime in today's events, Warcodered, is that after three pages I was the fist one to up vote your post.  

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Couple of possible reasons behind the leaks (could have been from WaPo side to stay ahead of the name-change story, or from Skins side to get ahead of it themselves), and a couple of reasons for the delay (Skins lawyers are now involved so most likely delaying the drop).

 

 

How?

 

Why would a newspaper delay publishing a story because a team hired a lawyer to do an internal policy review?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

And validate everyone on here who’s griped along the way that refs aren’t always above reproach, let’s just say. 

To be fair, assuming Snyder wouldn't pay them to rig it for Washington to lose, it seems like the refs might not have actually taken him up on his offer lol

3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

How?

 

Why would a newspaper delay publishing a story because a team hired a lawyer to do an internal policy review?

 

I think the current belief at least is that the lawyers are trying to prevent WaPo from releasing the article in addition to the damage control that they leaked to Schefter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

To be fair, assuming Snyder wouldn't pay them to rig it for Washington to lose, it seems like the refs might not have actually taken him up on his offer lol

 

I think the current belief at least is that the lawyers are trying to prevent WaPo from releasing the article in addition to the damage control that they leaked to Schefter.

 

They have no ability to prevent it's publication.  If WaPo is confident it is well-sourced, they will publish it.  Lawyers can't stop publication 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

How?

 

Why would a newspaper delay publishing a story because a team hired a lawyer to do an internal policy review?

 

No idea, I'm not a lawyer, but I mean separate from the internal policy review.

 

It could be as simple as: The team was contacted last week with a chance to comment. Instead of commenting, they announced the name change as "cover", then waited until the last minute (last night) to tell the WaPo "this one part of your story is not true and if you print it we're suing", which causes WaPo to go back and re-vet their facts? Pretty simple stall tactic.

Just now, Mr. WEO said:

 

They have no ability to prevent it's publication.  If WaPo is confident it is well-sourced, they will publish it.  Lawyers can't stop publication 

 

Right, but if they were contacted last night or even this morning, they may want to take a couple hours to double-check, which could push it's release back a full day. No?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

To be fair, assuming Snyder wouldn't pay them to rig it for Washington to lose, it seems like the refs might not have actually taken him up on his offer lol

 

I think the current belief at least is that the lawyers are trying to prevent WaPo from releasing the article in addition to the damage control that they leaked to Schefter.

Ok, fair enough...but, then why wouldn’t that have been reported straight back to league offices, who presumably, if so, then did nothing about it? Other possibilities include the ‘skins were so bad, a few calls questionably going their way ended up not mattering? All conjecture at this point. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Ok, fair enough...but, then why wouldn’t that have been reported straight back to league offices, who presumably, if so, then did nothing about it? Other possibilities include the ‘skins were so bad, a few calls questionably going their way ended up not mattering? All conjecture at this point. 

I was mostly being sarcastic in my post; I think the bolded is probably true/it's possible Snyder didn't care so much about winning but simply wanted to hit on spread picks. I don't know.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

No idea, I'm not a lawyer, but I mean separate from the internal policy review.

 

It could be as simple as: The team was contacted last week with a chance to comment. Instead of commenting, they announced the name change as "cover", then waited until the last minute (last night) to tell the WaPo "this one part of your story is not true and if you print it we're suing", which causes WaPo to go back and re-vet their facts? Pretty simple stall tactic.

 

 

LOL...what??

 

That makes zero sense.  Because "one part" (name change?? lol) of an expose on serious cultural infractions and rot is wrong, then all of rest is libel?  That's very funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

LOL...what??

 

That makes zero sense.  Because "one part" (name change?? lol) of an expose on serious cultural infractions and rot is wrong, then all of rest is libel?  That's very funny.

 

Ok man, take it up with WaPo and the Skins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SDS said:


The topic was beaten like a dead horse and then it was being used for this news. There are no more silly names left to discuss. However, the other topic deserves it’s own space.

Mr SDS, do not ever underestimate silliness.... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Ok man, take it up with WaPo and the Skins.

 

Take up your legal theory with them?  Like, as a suggestion to the Skins or a warning to WaPo?  I'm not sure which would laugh harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...